Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of General Psychiatry 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Primary research

Administering the MADRS by telephone or face-to-face: a validity study

Authors: Marleen LM Hermens, Herman J Adèr, Hein PJ van Hout, Berend Terluin, Richard van Dyck, Marten de Haan

Published in: Annals of General Psychiatry | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a frequently used observer-rated depression scale. In the present study, a telephonic rating was compared with a face-to-face rating in 66 primary care patients with minor or mild-major depression. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of the administration by telephone. Additional objective was to study the validity of the first item, 'apparent sadness', the only item purely based on observation.

Methods

The present study was a validity study. During an in-person interview at the patient's home a trained interviewer administered the MADRS. A few days later the MADRS was administered again, but now by telephone and by a different interviewer. The validity of the telephone rating was calculated through the appropriate intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Mean total score on the in-person administration was 24.0 (SD = 11.1), and on the telephone administration 23.5 (SD = 10.4). The ICC for the full scale was 0.65. Homogeneity analysis showed that the observation item 'apparent sadness' fitted well into the scale.

Conclusion

The full MADRS, including the observation item 'apparent sadness', can be administered reliably by telephone.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Demyttenaere K, De Fruyt J: Getting what you ask for: on the selectivity of depression rating scales. Psychother Psychosom. 2003, 72 (2): 61-70. 10.1159/000068690.CrossRefPubMed Demyttenaere K, De Fruyt J: Getting what you ask for: on the selectivity of depression rating scales. Psychother Psychosom. 2003, 72 (2): 61-70. 10.1159/000068690.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Svanborg P, Åsberg M: A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord. 2001, 64 (2–3): 203-216. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00242-1.CrossRefPubMed Svanborg P, Åsberg M: A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord. 2001, 64 (2–3): 203-216. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00242-1.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961, 4: 561-471.CrossRefPubMed Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961, 4: 561-471.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hartong EGThM, Goekoop JG: De Montgomery-Åsberg beoordelingsschaal voor depressie. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie. 1985, 27 (9): 657-668. Hartong EGThM, Goekoop JG: De Montgomery-Åsberg beoordelingsschaal voor depressie. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie. 1985, 27 (9): 657-668.
5.
go back to reference Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Clark VA, Yokopenic PA: Measuring depression in the community: a comparison of telephone and personal interviews. Public Opin Q. 1982, 46 (1): 110-121. 10.1086/268703.CrossRefPubMed Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Clark VA, Yokopenic PA: Measuring depression in the community: a comparison of telephone and personal interviews. Public Opin Q. 1982, 46 (1): 110-121. 10.1086/268703.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Simon RJ, Fleiss JL, Fisher B, Gurland BJ: Two methods of psychiatric interviewing: telephone and face-to-face. J Psychol. 1974, 88 (1st Half): 141-146.CrossRefPubMed Simon RJ, Fleiss JL, Fisher B, Gurland BJ: Two methods of psychiatric interviewing: telephone and face-to-face. J Psychol. 1974, 88 (1st Half): 141-146.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wells KB, Burnam MA, Leake B, Robins LN: Agreement between face-to-face and telephone-administered versions of the depression section of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule. J Psychiatr Res. 1988, 22 (3): 207-220. 10.1016/0022-3956(88)90006-4.CrossRefPubMed Wells KB, Burnam MA, Leake B, Robins LN: Agreement between face-to-face and telephone-administered versions of the depression section of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule. J Psychiatr Res. 1988, 22 (3): 207-220. 10.1016/0022-3956(88)90006-4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference APA: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1994, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association APA: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1994, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
10.
go back to reference World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002, 48 (3): 206-208. World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002, 48 (3): 206-208.
11.
go back to reference Van Marwijk HWJ, Grundmeijer HGLM, Brueren MM, Sigling HOHJ, Stolk J, Van Gelderen MG: NHG-Standaard Depressie. [Guidelines on Depression of the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. Huisarts Wet. 1994, 37: 482-490. Van Marwijk HWJ, Grundmeijer HGLM, Brueren MM, Sigling HOHJ, Stolk J, Van Gelderen MG: NHG-Standaard Depressie. [Guidelines on Depression of the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. Huisarts Wet. 1994, 37: 482-490.
12.
go back to reference Andrews G, Peters L: The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998, 33: 80-88. 10.1007/s001270050026.CrossRefPubMed Andrews G, Peters L: The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998, 33: 80-88. 10.1007/s001270050026.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A: Sample size requirements for the design of reliability studie: review and new results. Stat Meth Med Res. 2004, 13: 251-271. Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A: Sample size requirements for the design of reliability studie: review and new results. Stat Meth Med Res. 2004, 13: 251-271.
14.
go back to reference Montgomery SA, Åsberg M: A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979, 134: 382-389.CrossRefPubMed Montgomery SA, Åsberg M: A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979, 134: 382-389.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Taskforce for the handbook of psychiatric measures: Handbook of psychiatric measures. 2000, Washington DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association Taskforce for the handbook of psychiatric measures: Handbook of psychiatric measures. 2000, Washington DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association
16.
go back to reference Ashcraft MH: Cognition. 2002, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 3 Ashcraft MH: Cognition. 2002, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 3
17.
go back to reference Robins LN: Epidemiology: reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985, 42 (9): 918-924.CrossRefPubMed Robins LN: Epidemiology: reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985, 42 (9): 918-924.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shavelson RJ, Webb NM: Generalizibility Theory. 1991, Newbury Park London New Delhi: Sage Publication Shavelson RJ, Webb NM: Generalizibility Theory. 1991, Newbury Park London New Delhi: Sage Publication
19.
go back to reference De Vet H: Observer reliability and agreement. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Edited by: Armitage P, Colton Th. 1998, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd De Vet H: Observer reliability and agreement. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Edited by: Armitage P, Colton Th. 1998, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
20.
go back to reference McGraw KO, Wong SP: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psych Methods. 1996, 1 (1): 30-46. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30.CrossRef McGraw KO, Wong SP: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psych Methods. 1996, 1 (1): 30-46. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull. 1979, 86: 420-428. 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.CrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull. 1979, 86: 420-428. 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986, 1 (8476): 307-310.CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986, 1 (8476): 307-310.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rankin G, Stokes M: Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998, 12 (3): 187-199. 10.1191/026921598672178340.CrossRefPubMed Rankin G, Stokes M: Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998, 12 (3): 187-199. 10.1191/026921598672178340.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jöreskog KG: Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika. 1971, 36 (2): 109-133. 10.1007/BF02291393.CrossRef Jöreskog KG: Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika. 1971, 36 (2): 109-133. 10.1007/BF02291393.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gulliksen H: A statistical criterion for parallel tests. Theory of mental tests. Edited by: Gulliksen H. 1950, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 173-192.CrossRef Gulliksen H: A statistical criterion for parallel tests. Theory of mental tests. Edited by: Gulliksen H. 1950, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 173-192.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yonkers KA, Samson J: Mood disorders measures. Handbook of psychiatric measures. 2000, Washington DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association Yonkers KA, Samson J: Mood disorders measures. Handbook of psychiatric measures. 2000, Washington DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association
Metadata
Title
Administering the MADRS by telephone or face-to-face: a validity study
Authors
Marleen LM Hermens
Herman J Adèr
Hein PJ van Hout
Berend Terluin
Richard van Dyck
Marten de Haan
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1744-859X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-5-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Annals of General Psychiatry 1/2006 Go to the issue