Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Population Health Metrics 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys

Authors: Maya N Mascarenhas, Hoiwan Cheung, Colin D Mathers, Gretchen A Stevens

Published in: Population Health Metrics | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Infertility is a significant disability, yet there are no reliable estimates of its global prevalence. Studies on infertility prevalence define the condition inconsistently, rendering the comparison of studies or quantitative summaries of the literature difficult. This study analyzed key components of infertility to develop a definition that can be consistently applied to globally available household survey data.

Methods

We proposed a standard definition of infertility and used it to generate prevalence estimates using 53 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). The analysis was restricted to the subset of DHS that contained detailed fertility information collected through the reproductive health calendar. We performed sensitivity analyses for key components of the definition and used these to inform our recommendations for each element of the definition.

Results

Exposure type (couple status, contraceptive use, and intent), exposure time, and outcomes were key elements of the definition that we proposed. Our definition produced estimates that ranged from 0.6% to 3.4% for primary infertility and 8.7% to 32.6% for secondary infertility. Our sensitivity analyses showed that using an exposure measure of five years is less likely to misclassify fertile unions as infertile. Additionally, using a current, rather than continuous, measure of contraceptive use over five years resulted in a median relative error in secondary infertility of 20.7% (interquartile range of relative error [IQR]: 12.6%-26.9%), while not incorporating intent produced a corresponding error in secondary infertility of 58.2% (IQR: 44.3%-67.9%).

Conclusions

In order to estimate the global burden of infertility, prevalence estimates using a consistent definition need to be generated. Our analysis provided a recommended definition that could be applied to widely available global household data. We also summarized potential biases that should be considered when making estimates of infertility prevalence using household survey data.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP: Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 31: 101-110. 10.3109/0167482X.2010.481337CrossRefPubMed Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP: Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 31: 101-110. 10.3109/0167482X.2010.481337CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cui W: Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility. Bull World Health Organ 2010, 88: 881-882. 10.2471/BLT.10.011210CrossRefPubMed Cui W: Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility. Bull World Health Organ 2010, 88: 881-882. 10.2471/BLT.10.011210CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J: The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn 2010, 32: 140-162. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.xCrossRefPubMed Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J: The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn 2010, 32: 140-162. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.xCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S: Defining infertility–a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011, 17: 575-588. 10.1093/humupd/dmr015CrossRefPubMed Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S: Defining infertility–a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011, 17: 575-588. 10.1093/humupd/dmr015CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Larsen U, Menken J: Measuring sterility from incomplete birth histories. Demography 1989, 26: 185-201. 10.2307/2061519CrossRefPubMed Larsen U, Menken J: Measuring sterility from incomplete birth histories. Demography 1989, 26: 185-201. 10.2307/2061519CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Larsen U: Sterility in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Stud 1994, 48: 459-474. 10.1080/0032472031000147976CrossRef Larsen U: Sterility in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Stud 1994, 48: 459-474. 10.1080/0032472031000147976CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Larsen U: Research on infertility: which definition should we use? Fertil Steril 2005, 83: 846-852. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.033CrossRefPubMed Larsen U: Research on infertility: which definition should we use? Fertil Steril 2005, 83: 846-852. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.033CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference WHO Scientific Group on the Epidemiology of Infertility: The epidemiology of infertility. In Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1975. WHO Scientific Group on the Epidemiology of Infertility: The epidemiology of infertility. In Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1975.
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization: Reproductive health indicators for global monitoring: Report of the second interagency meeting, 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. World Health Organization: Reproductive health indicators for global monitoring: Report of the second interagency meeting, 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
10.
go back to reference United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division: Update for the MDG database: Contraceptive prevalence. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2011. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division: Update for the MDG database: Contraceptive prevalence. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2011.
11.
go back to reference Ahmad O, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez A, Murray C, Lozano R, Inoue M: Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Ahmad O, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez A, Murray C, Lozano R, Inoue M: Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
12.
go back to reference Wilcox AJ, Horney LF: Accuracy of spontaneous abortion recall. Am J Epidemiol 1984, 120: 727-733.PubMed Wilcox AJ, Horney LF: Accuracy of spontaneous abortion recall. Am J Epidemiol 1984, 120: 727-733.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB, Rubin GL, Wingo PA: Research on infertility: definition makes a difference. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Am J Epidemiol 1989, 130: 259-267.PubMed Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB, Rubin GL, Wingo PA: Research on infertility: definition makes a difference. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Am J Epidemiol 1989, 130: 259-267.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Saloman J, Murray C: A conceptual framework for understanding adaptation, coping and adjustment in health state valuations. In Summary Measures of Population Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Saloman J, Murray C: A conceptual framework for understanding adaptation, coping and adjustment in health state valuations. In Summary Measures of Population Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
15.
go back to reference Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, van der Poel S: The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 2009, 24: 2683-2687. 10.1093/humrep/dep343CrossRefPubMed Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, van der Poel S: The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 2009, 24: 2683-2687. 10.1093/humrep/dep343CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee: Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2008, 89: 1603.CrossRef American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee: Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2008, 89: 1603.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health: Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London: RCOG Press; 2004. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health: Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London: RCOG Press; 2004.
18.
go back to reference Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ: WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile couple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ: WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile couple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
19.
go back to reference Pressat R, Wilson C: The dictionary of demography. New York: Blackwell Science; 1985. Pressat R, Wilson C: The dictionary of demography. New York: Blackwell Science; 1985.
Metadata
Title
Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys
Authors
Maya N Mascarenhas
Hoiwan Cheung
Colin D Mathers
Gretchen A Stevens
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Population Health Metrics / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7954
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-17

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Population Health Metrics 1/2012 Go to the issue