Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Commentary

The EVIDEM framework and its usefulness for priority setting across a broad range of health interventions

Authors: Sitaporn Youngkong, Noor Tromp, Dereck Chitama

Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

This commentary responds to the article by Goetghebeur et al [1], which applies the EVIDEM (Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcision-Making) framework to evaluate growth hormone therapy for Turner syndrome patients. The EVIDEM framework is developed to assist decision-makers in healthcare decisions, and encompasses a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) matrix consisting of 15 quantifiable, and six qualitative components of decision. With this comprehensive set of criteria, relevant experts can assess the performance of health interventions, and results are input for informed and transparent healthcare decisions. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goetghebeur M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Grégoire JP, Deal C: Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decisionmaking framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2010, 8: 4. 10.1186/1478-7547-8-4PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goetghebeur M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Grégoire JP, Deal C: Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decisionmaking framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2010, 8: 4. 10.1186/1478-7547-8-4PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goetghebeur M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt R, Erickson L, Rindress D: Evidence and value: Impact on DEcisionMaking - the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Services Research 2008, 8: 270. 10.1186/1472-6963-8-270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goetghebeur M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt R, Erickson L, Rindress D: Evidence and value: Impact on DEcisionMaking - the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Services Research 2008, 8: 270. 10.1186/1472-6963-8-270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baltussen R, Asbroek AHAt, Koolman X, Shrestha N, Bhattarai P, Niessen L: Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal? Health Policy and Planning 2007, 22: 178–185. 10.1093/heapol/czm010PubMedCrossRef Baltussen R, Asbroek AHAt, Koolman X, Shrestha N, Bhattarai P, Niessen L: Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal? Health Policy and Planning 2007, 22: 178–185. 10.1093/heapol/czm010PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vargas V, Poblete S: Health prioritization: The case of Chile. Health Affairs 2008, 27: 782–792. 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.782PubMedCrossRef Vargas V, Poblete S: Health prioritization: The case of Chile. Health Affairs 2008, 27: 782–792. 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.782PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jehu-Appiah C, Baltussen R, Acquah C, Aikins M, Amah d'Almeida S, Bosu W, Koolman X, Lauer J, Osei D, Adjei S: Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: The use of multicriteria decision analysis. Value in Health 2008, 11: 1081–1087. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00392.xPubMedCrossRef Jehu-Appiah C, Baltussen R, Acquah C, Aikins M, Amah d'Almeida S, Bosu W, Koolman X, Lauer J, Osei D, Adjei S: Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: The use of multicriteria decision analysis. Value in Health 2008, 11: 1081–1087. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00392.xPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference The International Health Policy Program, Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program: Research for development of health benefit package under universal health care coverage scheme: Issue 1. Nonthaburi 2011. The International Health Policy Program, Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program: Research for development of health benefit package under universal health care coverage scheme: Issue 1. Nonthaburi 2011.
7.
go back to reference Daniels N: Accountability for reasonableness: Establishing a fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles. BMJ 2000, 321: 1300–1301. 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Daniels N: Accountability for reasonableness: Establishing a fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles. BMJ 2000, 321: 1300–1301. 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Daniels N: Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Daniels N: Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
9.
go back to reference Friedman A: Beyond accountability for reasonableness. Bioethics 2008, 22: 101–112. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.xPubMedCrossRef Friedman A: Beyond accountability for reasonableness. Bioethics 2008, 22: 101–112. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.xPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The EVIDEM framework and its usefulness for priority setting across a broad range of health interventions
Authors
Sitaporn Youngkong
Noor Tromp
Dereck Chitama
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7547
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2011 Go to the issue