Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Common characteristics of open source software development and applicability for drug discovery: a systematic review

Authors: Christine Årdal, Annette Alstadsæter, John-Arne Røttingen

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Innovation through an open source model has proven to be successful for software development. This success has led many to speculate if open source can be applied to other industries with similar success. We attempt to provide an understanding of open source software development characteristics for researchers, business leaders and government officials who may be interested in utilizing open source innovation in other contexts and with an emphasis on drug discovery.

Methods

A systematic review was performed by searching relevant, multidisciplinary databases to extract empirical research regarding the common characteristics and barriers of initiating and maintaining an open source software development project.

Results

Common characteristics to open source software development pertinent to open source drug discovery were extracted. The characteristics were then grouped into the areas of participant attraction, management of volunteers, control mechanisms, legal framework and physical constraints. Lastly, their applicability to drug discovery was examined.

Conclusions

We believe that the open source model is viable for drug discovery, although it is unlikely that it will exactly follow the form used in software development. Hybrids will likely develop that suit the unique characteristics of drug discovery. We suggest potential motivations for organizations to join an open source drug discovery project. We also examine specific differences between software and medicines, specifically how the need for laboratories and physical goods will impact the model as well as the effect of patents.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference King B: Apache enjoys dominance on the Internet. Financial Times. 2005 King B: Apache enjoys dominance on the Internet. Financial Times. 2005
2.
go back to reference Twentyman J: Linux tries not to be victim of its own success. Financial Times. 2008 Twentyman J: Linux tries not to be victim of its own success. Financial Times. 2008
3.
go back to reference Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB: Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997, 126: 376-380.CrossRefPubMed Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB: Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997, 126: 376-380.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chesbrough H: Open innovation - The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. 2006, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation Chesbrough H: Open innovation - The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. 2006, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation
8.
go back to reference Von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin M: Open source software: What we know (and do not know) about motivations to contribute. The DRUID Conference: 17. 2008, June ; Copenhagen, Denmark Von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin M: Open source software: What we know (and do not know) about motivations to contribute. The DRUID Conference: 17. 2008, June ; Copenhagen, Denmark
9.
go back to reference Maurer S, Scotchmer S: Open source software: The new intellectual property paradigm. Economics and Information Systems. Edited by: Whinston A. 2006, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1: 285-322. 1CrossRef Maurer S, Scotchmer S: Open source software: The new intellectual property paradigm. Economics and Information Systems. Edited by: Whinston A. 2006, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1: 285-322. 1CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Muller-Seitz G: The open source software phenomenon as a role model for networked innovations in biotechnology: An exploratory study. International Journal of Web Based Communities. 2009, 5: 212-237. 10.1504/IJWBC.2009.023966.CrossRef Muller-Seitz G: The open source software phenomenon as a role model for networked innovations in biotechnology: An exploratory study. International Journal of Web Based Communities. 2009, 5: 212-237. 10.1504/IJWBC.2009.023966.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Feller J, Fitzgerald B: Understanding open source software development. 2002, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA Feller J, Fitzgerald B: Understanding open source software development. 2002, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
17.
go back to reference Scacchi W, Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani K: Guest editorial: Understanding free/open source software development processes. Software Process: Improvement and Practice. 2006, 11: 95-105. 10.1002/spip.255.CrossRef Scacchi W, Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani K: Guest editorial: Understanding free/open source software development processes. Software Process: Improvement and Practice. 2006, 11: 95-105. 10.1002/spip.255.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baytiyeh H, Pfaffman J: Open source software: A community of altruists. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010, 26: 1345-1354. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.008.CrossRef Baytiyeh H, Pfaffman J: Open source software: A community of altruists. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010, 26: 1345-1354. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.008.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hauge Ø, Sørensen CF, Røsdal A: Surveying industrial roles in open source software development. Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation. 2007, 259-264.CrossRef Hauge Ø, Sørensen CF, Røsdal A: Surveying industrial roles in open source software development. Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation. 2007, 259-264.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fershtman C, Gandal N: Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing. International Economics and Economic Policy. 2007, 4: 209-225. 10.1007/s10368-007-0086-4.CrossRef Fershtman C, Gandal N: Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing. International Economics and Economic Policy. 2007, 4: 209-225. 10.1007/s10368-007-0086-4.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. 1988, Sage Publications, IncCrossRef Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. 1988, Sage Publications, IncCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ghosh RA: Understanding free software developers: Findings from the FLOSS study. Edited by: Feller J, et al. 2005, Cambridge: MIT Press, 23-45. Ghosh RA: Understanding free software developers: Findings from the FLOSS study. Edited by: Feller J, et al. 2005, Cambridge: MIT Press, 23-45.
23.
go back to reference Giuri P, Rullani F, Torrisi S: Explaining leadership in virtual teams: The case of open source software. Information Economics and Policy. 2008, 20: 305-315. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.002.CrossRef Giuri P, Rullani F, Torrisi S: Explaining leadership in virtual teams: The case of open source software. Information Economics and Policy. 2008, 20: 305-315. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.002.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Howison J: Alone together: A socio-technical theory of motivation, coordination and collaboration technologies in organizing for free and open source software development. Submitted to ICIS. 2009, Dissertation Competition Howison J: Alone together: A socio-technical theory of motivation, coordination and collaboration technologies in organizing for free and open source software development. Submitted to ICIS. 2009, Dissertation Competition
25.
go back to reference Belenzon S, Schankerman MA, Street H: Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. EDS Innovation Research Programme Discussion Paper Series. 2008 Belenzon S, Schankerman MA, Street H: Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. EDS Innovation Research Programme Discussion Paper Series. 2008
26.
go back to reference Capiluppi A, Lago P, Morisio M: Characteristics of open source projects. The Seventh European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. 2003, 317-327. Capiluppi A, Lago P, Morisio M: Characteristics of open source projects. The Seventh European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. 2003, 317-327.
27.
go back to reference David PA, Waterman A, Arora S: FLOSS-US: The free/libre/open source software survey for 2003. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. 2004, 20: David PA, Waterman A, Arora S: FLOSS-US: The free/libre/open source software survey for 2003. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. 2004, 20:
28.
go back to reference Koch S, Schneider G: Effort, co-operation and co-ordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Information Systems Journal. 2002, 12: 27-42. 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00110.x.CrossRef Koch S, Schneider G: Effort, co-operation and co-ordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Information Systems Journal. 2002, 12: 27-42. 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00110.x.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Capra E, Francalanci C, Merlo F, Lamastra CR: A survey on firms' participation in open source community projects. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. 2009, 225-236. Capra E, Francalanci C, Merlo F, Lamastra CR: A survey on firms' participation in open source community projects. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. 2009, 225-236.
30.
go back to reference Mendonca LT, Sutton R: Succeeding at open-source innovation: An interview with Mozilla's Mitchell Baker. The McKinsey Quarterly. 2008, 1-7. Mendonca LT, Sutton R: Succeeding at open-source innovation: An interview with Mozilla's Mitchell Baker. The McKinsey Quarterly. 2008, 1-7.
31.
go back to reference Hagen S: A comparison of motivation and openness in hybrid open source and open source software projects. Master Thesis. 2011, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer and Information Science Hagen S: A comparison of motivation and openness in hybrid open source and open source software projects. Master Thesis. 2011, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer and Information Science
32.
go back to reference Schweik CM, English R, Haire S: Factors leading to success or abandonment of open source commons: An empirical analysis of Sourceforge. net projects. The Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial Conference. 2008 Schweik CM, English R, Haire S: Factors leading to success or abandonment of open source commons: An empirical analysis of Sourceforge. net projects. The Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial Conference. 2008
33.
go back to reference Lakhani K, Wolf RG: Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspectives on free and open source software. Edited by: Feller J, et al. 2005, Cambridge: MIT Press, 3-22. Lakhani K, Wolf RG: Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspectives on free and open source software. Edited by: Feller J, et al. 2005, Cambridge: MIT Press, 3-22.
34.
go back to reference Lakhani KR, Von Hippel E: How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy. 2003, 32: 923-943. 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00095-1.CrossRef Lakhani KR, Von Hippel E: How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy. 2003, 32: 923-943. 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00095-1.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR: Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy. 2003, 32: 1217-1241. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00050-7.CrossRef Von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR: Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy. 2003, 32: 1217-1241. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00050-7.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hars A, Ou S: Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2002, 6: 25-39. Hars A, Ou S: Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2002, 6: 25-39.
37.
go back to reference Haruvy E, Wu F, Chakravarty S: Incentives for developers' contributions and product performance metrics in open source development: An empirical exploration. IIMA Working Papers. 2005 Haruvy E, Wu F, Chakravarty S: Incentives for developers' contributions and product performance metrics in open source development: An empirical exploration. IIMA Working Papers. 2005
38.
go back to reference Lerner J, Tirole J: Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 2002, 50: 197-234.CrossRef Lerner J, Tirole J: Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 2002, 50: 197-234.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Colazo J, Fang Y: Impact of license choice on open source software development activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009, 60: 997-1011. 10.1002/asi.21039.CrossRef Colazo J, Fang Y: Impact of license choice on open source software development activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009, 60: 997-1011. 10.1002/asi.21039.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Chengalur-Smith I, Sidorova A, Daniel S: Sustainability of free/libre open source projects: A longitudinal study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2010, 11: 5- Chengalur-Smith I, Sidorova A, Daniel S: Sustainability of free/libre open source projects: A longitudinal study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2010, 11: 5-
41.
go back to reference Crowston K, Scozzi B: Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IEE Proc.-Softw. 2002, 149 (1): 3-17. 10.1049/ip-sen:20020197.CrossRef Crowston K, Scozzi B: Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IEE Proc.-Softw. 2002, 149 (1): 3-17. 10.1049/ip-sen:20020197.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Shibuya B, Tamai T: Understanding the process of participating in open source communities. FLOSS'09: 18. 2009, May ; Vancouver, Canada Shibuya B, Tamai T: Understanding the process of participating in open source communities. FLOSS'09: 18. 2009, May ; Vancouver, Canada
43.
go back to reference David PA, Shapiro JS: Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?. Information Economics and Policy. 2008, 20: 364-398. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001.CrossRef David PA, Shapiro JS: Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?. Information Economics and Policy. 2008, 20: 364-398. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S: Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy. 2003, 32: 1159-1177. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7.CrossRef Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S: Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy. 2003, 32: 1159-1177. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Roberts JA, Hann IH, Slaughter SA: Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science. 2006, 52: 984-10.1287/mnsc.1060.0554.CrossRef Roberts JA, Hann IH, Slaughter SA: Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science. 2006, 52: 984-10.1287/mnsc.1060.0554.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Shah SK: Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science. 2006, 52: 1000-10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553.CrossRef Shah SK: Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science. 2006, 52: 1000-10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Wu CG, Gerlach JH, Young CE: An empirical analysis of open source software developers' motivations and continuance intentions. Information & Management. 2007, 44: 253-262. 10.1016/j.im.2006.12.006.CrossRef Wu CG, Gerlach JH, Young CE: An empirical analysis of open source software developers' motivations and continuance intentions. Information & Management. 2007, 44: 253-262. 10.1016/j.im.2006.12.006.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Xu B, Jones DR: Volunteers' participation in open source software development: A study from the social-relational perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database. 2010, 41: 69-84. 10.1145/1851175.1851180.CrossRef Xu B, Jones DR: Volunteers' participation in open source software development: A study from the social-relational perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database. 2010, 41: 69-84. 10.1145/1851175.1851180.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference West J, Gallagher S: Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management. 2006, 36: 319-331. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x.CrossRef West J, Gallagher S: Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management. 2006, 36: 319-331. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Fang Y, Neufeld D: Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009, 25: 9-50. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250401.CrossRef Fang Y, Neufeld D: Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009, 25: 9-50. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250401.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Spaeth S, Haefliger S, Von Krogh G, Renzl B: Communal resources in open source software development. Information Research. 2008, 13: 2- Spaeth S, Haefliger S, Von Krogh G, Renzl B: Communal resources in open source software development. Information Research. 2008, 13: 2-
53.
go back to reference Von Hippel E: Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2001, 42: 82- Von Hippel E: Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2001, 42: 82-
54.
go back to reference Stewart K, Gosain S: Impact of ideology in OSS development teams. MIS Quarterly. 2006, 30: 291-314. Stewart K, Gosain S: Impact of ideology in OSS development teams. MIS Quarterly. 2006, 30: 291-314.
55.
go back to reference Rullani F: Dragging developers towards the core. Working Paper, Università Commerciale "Luigi Bocconi", Milano, Italy. 2007 Rullani F: Dragging developers towards the core. Working Paper, Università Commerciale "Luigi Bocconi", Milano, Italy. 2007
56.
go back to reference Bonaccorsi A, Rossi C: Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement: From community to business. Knowledge, Technology & Policy. 2006, 18: 40-64. 10.1007/s12130-006-1003-9.CrossRef Bonaccorsi A, Rossi C: Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement: From community to business. Knowledge, Technology & Policy. 2006, 18: 40-64. 10.1007/s12130-006-1003-9.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Iansiti M, Richards G: The business of free software: Enterprise incentives, investment, and motivation in the open source community. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series. 2006, 07-028. Iansiti M, Richards G: The business of free software: Enterprise incentives, investment, and motivation in the open source community. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series. 2006, 07-028.
58.
go back to reference Heckman R, Crowston K, Eseryel UY, Howison J, Allen E, Li Q: Emergent decision-making practices in free/libre open source software (FLOSS) development teams. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. 2007, 234: 71-84.CrossRef Heckman R, Crowston K, Eseryel UY, Howison J, Allen E, Li Q: Emergent decision-making practices in free/libre open source software (FLOSS) development teams. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. 2007, 234: 71-84.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Jensen C, Scacchi W: Collaboration, leadership, control, and conflict negotiation in the Netbeans. org community. Software Process - Improvement and Practice. 2005, 10: 255-272. 10.1002/spip.228.CrossRef Jensen C, Scacchi W: Collaboration, leadership, control, and conflict negotiation in the Netbeans. org community. Software Process - Improvement and Practice. 2005, 10: 255-272. 10.1002/spip.228.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Sarma M, Clark E: Virtual innovation within a hacker community an empirical study of open source software development. Copenhagen Business School Summer Conference. 2009 Sarma M, Clark E: Virtual innovation within a hacker community an empirical study of open source software development. Copenhagen Business School Summer Conference. 2009
61.
go back to reference Yamauchi Y, Yokozawa M, Shinohara T, Ishida T: Collaboration with lean media: How open-source software succeeds. CSCW'00: 2-6. 2000, December ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Yamauchi Y, Yokozawa M, Shinohara T, Ishida T: Collaboration with lean media: How open-source software succeeds. CSCW'00: 2-6. 2000, December ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
62.
go back to reference Crowston K, Li Q, Wei KN, Eseryel UY, Howison J: Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development. Information and Software Technology. 2007, 49: 564-575. 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.004.CrossRef Crowston K, Li Q, Wei KN, Eseryel UY, Howison J: Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development. Information and Software Technology. 2007, 49: 564-575. 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.004.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JD: Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM). 2002, 11: 309-346. 10.1145/567793.567795.CrossRef Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JD: Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM). 2002, 11: 309-346. 10.1145/567793.567795.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Lee GK, Cole RE: From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science. 2003, 633-649. Lee GK, Cole RE: From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science. 2003, 633-649.
65.
go back to reference Spaeth S, Haefliger S, Von Krogh G, Renzl B: Communal resources in open source software development. Information Research. 2008, 13: 2- Spaeth S, Haefliger S, Von Krogh G, Renzl B: Communal resources in open source software development. Information Research. 2008, 13: 2-
66.
go back to reference Tuomi I: Internet, innovation, and open source: Actors in the network. First Monday. 2001, 6: 34-CrossRef Tuomi I: Internet, innovation, and open source: Actors in the network. First Monday. 2001, 6: 34-CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Monteiro E, Østerlie T, Rolland KH, Røyrvik E: Keeping it going: The everyday practices of open source software. Working paper, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 2004 Monteiro E, Østerlie T, Rolland KH, Røyrvik E: Keeping it going: The everyday practices of open source software. Working paper, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 2004
68.
go back to reference O'Mahony S: Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy. 2003 O'Mahony S: Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy. 2003
69.
go back to reference Vetter GR: "Infectious" open source software: Spreading incentives or promoting resistance?. Rutgers Law Journal. 2004, 36: 53-1609. Vetter GR: "Infectious" open source software: Spreading incentives or promoting resistance?. Rutgers Law Journal. 2004, 36: 53-1609.
70.
go back to reference Maurer SM, Rai A, Sali A: Finding cures for tropical diseases: Is open source an answer?. PLoS Medicine. 2004, 1: 56-10.1371/journal.pmed.0010056.CrossRef Maurer SM, Rai A, Sali A: Finding cures for tropical diseases: Is open source an answer?. PLoS Medicine. 2004, 1: 56-10.1371/journal.pmed.0010056.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Maurer SM: Open source drug discovery: Finding a niche (or maybe several). University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review. 2007, 76: 405-435. Maurer SM: Open source drug discovery: Finding a niche (or maybe several). University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review. 2007, 76: 405-435.
72.
go back to reference Munos B: Can open-source R&D reinvigorate drug research?. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2006, 5: 723-729. 10.1038/nrd2131.CrossRefPubMed Munos B: Can open-source R&D reinvigorate drug research?. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2006, 5: 723-729. 10.1038/nrd2131.CrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Hope J: Biobazaar: The open source revolution and biotechnology. 2008, Harvard University PressCrossRef Hope J: Biobazaar: The open source revolution and biotechnology. 2008, Harvard University PressCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Ekins S, Hupcey MAZ, Williams AJ: Collaborative computational technologies for biomedical research. 2011, Wiley-BlackwellCrossRef Ekins S, Hupcey MAZ, Williams AJ: Collaborative computational technologies for biomedical research. 2011, Wiley-BlackwellCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Masum H, Harris R: Open source for neglected diseases: Magic bullet or mirage?. Results for Development Institute. 2011 Masum H, Harris R: Open source for neglected diseases: Magic bullet or mirage?. Results for Development Institute. 2011
76.
go back to reference Barnes MR: Lowering industry firewalls: Pre-competitive informatics initiatives in drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2009, 8: 701-708. 10.1038/nrd2944.CrossRefPubMed Barnes MR: Lowering industry firewalls: Pre-competitive informatics initiatives in drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2009, 8: 701-708. 10.1038/nrd2944.CrossRefPubMed
77.
go back to reference Wells WA, Brooks A: Adoption of new health products in low and middle income settings: How product development partnerships can support country decision making. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2011, 9: 15-10.1186/1478-4505-9-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells WA, Brooks A: Adoption of new health products in low and middle income settings: How product development partnerships can support country decision making. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2011, 9: 15-10.1186/1478-4505-9-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
go back to reference Maurer SM: The right tool(s): Designing cost-effective strategies for neglected disease research. 2005, Commissioned by World Health Organization Maurer SM: The right tool(s): Designing cost-effective strategies for neglected disease research. 2005, Commissioned by World Health Organization
79.
go back to reference Rydzewski RM: Real world drug discovery: A chemist's guide to biotech and pharmaceutical research. 2008, Elsevier Science Rydzewski RM: Real world drug discovery: A chemist's guide to biotech and pharmaceutical research. 2008, Elsevier Science
80.
go back to reference Ekins S, Williams AJ: Reaching out to collaborators: Crowdsourcing for pharmaceutical research. Pharmaceutical Research. 2010, 27: 393-395. 10.1007/s11095-010-0059-0.CrossRefPubMed Ekins S, Williams AJ: Reaching out to collaborators: Crowdsourcing for pharmaceutical research. Pharmaceutical Research. 2010, 27: 393-395. 10.1007/s11095-010-0059-0.CrossRefPubMed
81.
go back to reference Jayaraman KS: India's tuberculosis genome project under fire. Nature News. 2010 Jayaraman KS: India's tuberculosis genome project under fire. Nature News. 2010
Metadata
Title
Common characteristics of open source software development and applicability for drug discovery: a systematic review
Authors
Christine Årdal
Annette Alstadsæter
John-Arne Røttingen
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-36

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2011 Go to the issue