Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012)

Authors: Sa’ed H Zyoud, Samah W Al-Jabi, Waleed M Sweileh, Rahmat Awang

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bibliometric studies are increasingly being used for research assessment by involving the application of statistical methods to scientific publications to obtain the bibliographics for each country. The main objective of this study was to analyse the research productivity originating from 13 Middle Eastern Arab (MEA) countries with articles published in toxicology journals.

Methods

Data from January 1, 2003 till December 31, 2012 were searched for documents with specific words in the toxicology field as a “source title” in any one of the 13 MEA countries. Research productivity was evaluated based on a methodology developed and used in other bibliometric studies. Research productivity was adjusted to the national population and nominal gross domestic product (GDP) per capita.

Results

Documents (n = 1,240) were retrieved from 73 international peer-reviewed toxicology journals. The h-index of the retrieved documents was 39. Of the 73 journal titles, 52 (69.9%) have their IF listed in the ISI Journal Citation Reports 2012; 198 documents (16.0%) were published in journals that had no official IF. After adjusting for economy and population power, Egypt (193.6), Palestine (18.1), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) (13.0), and Jordan (11.5) had the highest research productivity. Countries with large economies, such as the Kuwait, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Oman, tended to rank relatively low after adjustment of GDP. The total number of citations at the time of data analysis (August 4, 2013) was 10,991, with a median (interquartile range) of 4 (1–11). MEA collaborated more with countries in the MEA regions (16.7%), especially KSA, Egypt, and UAE, followed by Europe (14.4%), especially with the United Kingdom and Germany.

Conclusions

The present data show a promising rise and a good start for toxicology research activity in toxicology journals in the Arab world. Research output is low in some countries, which can be improved by investing in more international and national collaborative research projects in the field of toxicology.
Literature
1.
Wallin JA: Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005, 97 (5): 261-275. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Bissar-Tadmouri N, Tadmouri GO: Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (1988–2007). Saudi Med J. 2009, 30 (1): 130-139.PubMed
3.
Lin JY, Rosenblatt D: Shifting patterns of economic growth and rethinking development. J Econ Policy Reform. 2012, 15 (3): 171-194. 10.1080/17487870.2012.700565.CrossRef
4.
Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 22 (2): 338-342.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, Abu-Taha A, Hussein A, Al-Jabi SW: Medical and biomedical research productivity from Palestine, 2002–2011. BMC Res Notes. 2013, 6: 41-10.1186/1756-0500-6-41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Benamer HT, Bredan A, Bakoush O: Scientific publication productivity of Libyan medical schools: a bibliometric study of papers listed in PubMed, 1988–2007. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009, 22 (2): 310.
7.
Diab MM, Taftaf RM, Arabi M: Research productivity in Syria: quantitative and qualitative analysis of current status. Avicenna J Med. 2011, 1 (1): 4-7. 10.4103/2231-0770.83716.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Tadmouri GO, Tadmouri NB: Biomedical research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (1982–2000). Saudi Med J. 2002, 23 (1): 20-24.PubMed
9.
Afifi M: Egyptian biomedical publications in PubMed, 1996–2005. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2007, 82 (1–2): 91-104.PubMed
10.
Tadmouri GO, Bissar-Tadmouri N: Biomedical publications in an unstable region: the Arab world, 1988–2002. Lancet. 2003, 362 (9397): 1766-10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14868-4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Miro O, Montori E, Ramos X, Galicia M, Nogue S: Trends in research activity in toxicology and by toxicologists in seven European countries. Toxicol Lett. 2009, 189 (1): 1-4. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.029.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Biglu MH, Omidi Y: Scientific profile of pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics fields in Middle East countries: impacts of Iranian scientists. Inter J Adv Pharmaceut Sci. 2010, 1: 122-127.
13.
Delirrad M, Rashidi A, Karimi S: A bibliometric analysis of toxicology publications of Iran and Turkey in ISI web of science. Iranian J Toxicol. 2013, 6 (19): 735-745.
14.
Jones AW: Impact of JAT publications 1981–2003: the most prolific authors and the most highly cited articles. J Anal Toxicol. 2004, 28 (7): 541-545. 10.1093/jat/28.7.541.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R: A bibliometric analysis of research productivity of Malaysian publications in leading toxicology journals during a 10-year period (2003–2012). Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013, Article in Press
17.
De Battisti F, Salini S: Robust analysis of bibliometric data. Stat Methods Appl. 2013, 22 (2): 269-283. 10.1007/s10260-012-0217-0.CrossRef
18.
Milat AJ, Bauman AE, Redman S, Curac N: Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11: 934-10.1186/1471-2458-11-934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Tan J, Fu H-Z, Ho Y-S: A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in science citation index expanded. Scientometrics. 2013
20.
Tess BH, Furuie SS, Castro RC, BarretoMdo C, Nobre MR: Assessing the scientific research productivity of a Brazilian healthcare institution: a case study at the Heart Institute of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009, 64 (6): 571-576. 10.1590/S1807-59322009000600013.CrossRef
21.
Kira A, Glover M, Bullen C, Viehbeck S: Publications as an indicator of increased tobacco control research productivity (quantity and quality) in New Zealand. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011, 13 (6): 474-478. 10.1093/ntr/ntr029.CrossRefPubMed
22.
McDonald PW, Viehbeck S, Robinson SJ, Leatherdale ST, Nykiforuk CI, Jolin MA: Building research capacity for evidence-informed tobacco control in Canada: a case description. Tob Induc Dis. 2009, 5 (1): 12-10.1186/1617-9625-5-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
25.
26.
De Granda-Orive JI, Alonso-Arroyo A, Roig-Vazquez F: Which data base should we use for our literature analysis? Web of science versus SCOPUS. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011, 47 (4): 213-10.1016/j.arbres.2010.10.007.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Tadmouri GO, Bissar-Tadmouri N: A major pitfall in the search strategy on PubMed. Saudi Med J. 2004, 25 (1): 7-10.PubMed
28.
Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW: Comparisons of citations in web of science, scopus, and google scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009, 302 (10): 1092-1096. 10.1001/jama.2009.1307.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Benamer HT, Bakoush O: Arab nations lagging behind other Middle Eastern countries in biomedical research: a comparative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009, 9: 26-10.1186/1471-2288-9-26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Bredan A, Benamer H, Bakoush O: Visibility of Arab countries in the world biomedical literature. Libyan J Med. 2011, 6: 6325.CrossRef
31.
Shaban SF, Abu-Zidan FM: A quantitative analysis of medical publications from Arab countries. Saudi Med J. 2003, 24 (3): 294-296.PubMed
32.
Cheng T, Zhang G: Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013, 52 (9): 1630-1634. 10.1093/rheumatology/ket008.CrossRef
33.
Soteriades ES, Falagas ME: A bibliometric analysis in the fields of preventive medicine, occupational and environmental medicine, epidemiology, and public health. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 301-10.1186/1471-2458-6-301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
35.
Ioannidis JP: Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS One. 2006, 1: e5-10.1371/journal.pone.0000005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Callaham M, Weber E, Wears R: Citation characteristics of research published in emergency medicine versus other scientific journals. Ann Emerg Med. 2001, 38 (5): 513-517. 10.1067/mem.2001.114318.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Afshari R: What is the “Best Research” for low income countries?. Asia Pacific J Med Toxicol. 2013, 2 (1): 1.
39.
Afshari R: A new horizon to medical toxicology in Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific J Med Toxicol. 2012, 1 (1): 2.
40.
41.
Jones AW: Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean?. Forensic Sci Int. 2003, 133 (1–2): 1-8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Dawson AH: Comment on editorial; best research for low income countries. Asia Pacific J Med Toxicol. 2013, 2 (2): 76.
43.
Figg WD, Dunn L, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Thurman PW, Barrett JC, Birkinshaw J: Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles. Pharmacotherapy. 2006, 26 (6): 759-767. 10.1592/phco.26.6.759.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Lee S, Bozeman B: The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies Sci. 2005, 35 (5): 673-702. 10.1177/0306312705052359.CrossRef
45.
Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Di Costa F: Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?. High Educ. 2009, 57 (2): 155-171. 10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z.CrossRef
46.
Hoffman RJ: Knowledge, not funding is the most important research resource. Asia Pacific J Med Toxicol. 2013, 2 (2): 77.
Metadata
Title
A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012)
Authors
Sa’ed H Zyoud
Samah W Al-Jabi
Waleed M Sweileh
Rahmat Awang
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research

How can we establish more successful knowledge networks in developing countries? Lessons learnt from knowledge networks in Iran

Research

The making of nursing practice Law in Lebanon: a policy analysis case study

Research

Features of successful bids for funding of applied health research: a cohort study

Research

Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: advice seeking behavior among primary health care physicians in Pakistan

Research

Resurrecting social infrastructure as a determinant of urban tuberculosis control in Delhi, India

Research

Handling incidental findings in neuroimaging research in Japan: current state of research facilities and attitudes of investigators and the general population