Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Frameworks for evaluating health research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study

Authors: Alan Boyd, Donald C Cole, Dan-Bi Cho, Garry Aslanyan, Imelda Bates

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health research capacity strengthening (RCS) projects are often complex and hard to evaluate. In order to inform health RCS evaluation efforts, we aimed to describe and compare key characteristics of existing health RCS evaluation frameworks: their process of development, purpose, target users, structure, content and coverage of important evaluation issues. A secondary objective was to explore what use had been made of the ESSENCE framework, which attempts to address one such issue: harmonising the evaluation requirements of different funders.

Methods

We identified and analysed health RCS evaluation frameworks published by seven funding agencies between 2004 and 2012, using a mixed methods approach involving structured qualitative analyses of documents, a stakeholder survey and consultations with key contacts in health RCS funding agencies.

Results

The frameworks were intended for use predominantly by the organisations themselves, and most were oriented primarily towards funders’ internal organisational performance requirements. The frameworks made limited reference to theories that specifically concern RCS. Generic devices, such as logical frameworks, were typically used to document activities, outputs and outcomes, but with little emphasis on exploring underlying assumptions or contextual constraints. Usage of the ESSENCE framework appeared limited.

Conclusions

We believe that there is scope for improving frameworks through the incorporation of more accessible information about how to do evaluation in practice; greater involvement of stakeholders, following evaluation capacity building principles; greater emphasis on explaining underlying rationales of frameworks; and structuring frameworks so that they separate generic and project-specific aspects of health RCS evaluation. The third and fourth of these improvements might assist harmonisation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bennett S, Paina L, Kim C, Agyepong I, Chunharas S, McIntyre D, Nachuk S: What must be done to enhance capacity for Health Systems Research?. Background Papers Commissioned by the Symposium Secretariat for the First Global Symposium on Health Systems Research: 16–19 Nov 2010. 2010, Montreux, Switzerland: World Health Organization Bennett S, Paina L, Kim C, Agyepong I, Chunharas S, McIntyre D, Nachuk S: What must be done to enhance capacity for Health Systems Research?. Background Papers Commissioned by the Symposium Secretariat for the First Global Symposium on Health Systems Research: 16–19 Nov 2010. 2010, Montreux, Switzerland: World Health Organization
4.
go back to reference Sridharan S, Nakaima A: Ten steps to making evaluation matter. Eval Program Plann. 2011, 34 (2): 135-146. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.003.CrossRefPubMed Sridharan S, Nakaima A: Ten steps to making evaluation matter. Eval Program Plann. 2011, 34 (2): 135-146. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.003.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Preskill H, Boyle S: A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. Am J Eval. 2008, 29 (4): 443-459. 10.1177/1098214008324182.CrossRef Preskill H, Boyle S: A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. Am J Eval. 2008, 29 (4): 443-459. 10.1177/1098214008324182.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mahmood S, Hort K, Ahmed S, Salam M, Cravioto A: Strategies for capacity building for health research in Bangladesh: role of core funding and a common monitoring and evaluation framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011, 9: 31-10.1186/1478-4505-9-31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mahmood S, Hort K, Ahmed S, Salam M, Cravioto A: Strategies for capacity building for health research in Bangladesh: role of core funding and a common monitoring and evaluation framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011, 9: 31-10.1186/1478-4505-9-31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Bernard A, Armstrong T: Framework for Evaluating Capacity Development in IDRC. 2005, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre Bernard A, Armstrong T: Framework for Evaluating Capacity Development in IDRC. 2005, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre
20.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Analyzing Qualitative Data. Edited by: Bryman A, Burgess RG. 1994, London & New York: Routledge, 172-194. Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Analyzing Qualitative Data. Edited by: Bryman A, Burgess RG. 1994, London & New York: Routledge, 172-194.
21.
go back to reference Cole DC, Kakuma R, Fonn S, Izugbara C, Thorogood M, Bates I: Evaluations of health research capacity development: a review of the evidence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012, 87 (5Suppl1): 801- Cole DC, Kakuma R, Fonn S, Izugbara C, Thorogood M, Bates I: Evaluations of health research capacity development: a review of the evidence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012, 87 (5Suppl1): 801-
22.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2 Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2
25.
go back to reference Braveman P: Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006, 27: 167-194. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103.CrossRefPubMed Braveman P: Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006, 27: 167-194. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Campos L: Stakeholder involvement in evaluation: three decades of the American journal of evaluation. J MultiDisciplinary Eval. 2011, 8 (17): 57-79. Rodriguez-Campos L: Stakeholder involvement in evaluation: three decades of the American journal of evaluation. J MultiDisciplinary Eval. 2011, 8 (17): 57-79.
27.
go back to reference Baizerman M, Compton DW, Stockdill SH: New directions for ECB. N Dir Eval. 2002, 93: 109-120.CrossRef Baizerman M, Compton DW, Stockdill SH: New directions for ECB. N Dir Eval. 2002, 93: 109-120.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Huicho L, Dieleman M, Campbell J, Codjia L, Balabanova D, Dussault G, Dolea C: Increasing access to health workers in underserved areas: a conceptual framework for measuring results. B World Health Organ. 2010, 88 (5): 357-363. 10.2471/BLT.09.070920.CrossRef Huicho L, Dieleman M, Campbell J, Codjia L, Balabanova D, Dussault G, Dolea C: Increasing access to health workers in underserved areas: a conceptual framework for measuring results. B World Health Organ. 2010, 88 (5): 357-363. 10.2471/BLT.09.070920.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Judge K, Bauld L: Strong theory, flexible methods: evaluating complex community-based initiatives. Critical Public Health. 2001, 11: 19-38. 10.1080/09581590010028237.CrossRef Judge K, Bauld L: Strong theory, flexible methods: evaluating complex community-based initiatives. Critical Public Health. 2001, 11: 19-38. 10.1080/09581590010028237.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Frameworks for evaluating health research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study
Authors
Alan Boyd
Donald C Cole
Dan-Bi Cho
Garry Aslanyan
Imelda Bates
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-46

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2013 Go to the issue