Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Review

Needs Assessment for cancer patients and their families

Authors: Kuang-Yi Wen, David H Gustafson

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The assessment of needs for cancer care is a critical step in providing high quality care and achieving cancer patients' and families' satisfaction. Instruments can be used to assess needs and guide cancer care planning. This study discusses the importance of the needs assessment, relationships between needs, satisfaction and quality of life; and reviews the assessment instruments of needs experienced by cancer patients and their families.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE and CANCERLIT data bases. Instruments were evaluated based on their conceptual and measurement models as well as their demonstrated reliability and validity. The authors also sought information pertaining to instruments' burden of administration and responsiveness. Measures compromised by a lack of published psychometric description were not included.

Results

This search identified 17 patient needs assessment instruments and seven family needs assessment instruments. The development and psychometric proprieties of most of these instruments were well documented. However, data on their responsiveness and burden of administration were scarce.

Conclusions

Each selected instrument meets some but not all of our criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. It is questionable whether any instrument can be developed meeting all the requirements. However, there is still a need to continue researching and developing needs assessment instruments leading to effective intervention and improving quality of cancer care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Berwick D: The total customer relationship in health care: broadening the bandwidth. The Joint Commission Journal On Quality Improvement 1997, 23: 245–250.PubMed
2.
Ross C, Steward C, Sinacore JM: The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction. Medical Care 1993, 31: 1138–1149.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Medicine of Institute: Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life. (Edited by: Field M and Cassel C). Washington, D.C. 1997.
4.
Bretsher M, Rummons R, Sloan J, Kaur J,, Bartlett A, Borkenhagen L, Loprinzi C: Quality of life in hospice patients. Psychosomatics 1999, 40: 309–313.CrossRef
5.
Silveira M, EiPiero A, Gerrity M, Geudtner C: Patients knowledge of options at the end of life. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000, 284: 2483–2488. 10.1001/jama.284.19.2483PubMedCrossRef
6.
Investigators SUPPORT: A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). Journal of the American Medical Association 1995, 274: 1591–1598. 10.1001/jama.274.20.1591CrossRef
7.
Suchman AL, Markakis K, Beckman HB, Frankel R: A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997, 277: 678–682. 10.1001/jama.277.8.678PubMedCrossRef
8.
Guadagnoli E, Ward P: Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science and Medicine 1998, 47: 329–339. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-8PubMedCrossRef
9.
Frosch DL, Kaplan RM: Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1999, 17: 285–294. 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00097-5PubMedCrossRef
10.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T: Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine 1999, 49: 651–661. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00145-8PubMedCrossRef
11.
Maguire P: Improving communication with cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer 1999, 35: 1415–1422. 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00178-1PubMedCrossRef
12.
Cull A, Stewart M, Altman D: Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. British Journal of Cancer 1995, 72: 229–235.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Osoba D: Rationale for the timing of health-related quality-of-life-assessments in oncological palliative therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 1996, 22 Suppl A: 69–73.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ford S, Fallowfield L, Lewis S: Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Social Science and Medicine 1996, 42: 1511–1519. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00265-0PubMedCrossRef
15.
Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB: Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved? Journal of the American Medical Association 1999, 281: 283–287. 10.1001/jama.281.3.283PubMedCrossRef
16.
Holland JC, Almanza J: Giving bad news: is there a kinder, gentler way? Cancer 1999, 86: 738–740. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<738::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-LPubMedCrossRef
17.
Kim MK, Alvi A: Breaking the bad news of cancer: the patient's perspective. Laryngoscope 1999, 109: 1064–1067. 10.1097/00005537-199907000-00010PubMedCrossRef
18.
Sabo D: Men, death anxiety and denial. Clinical Sociological Perspectives of Illness and Loss (Edited by: Clark D, Fritz J and Rieder P). Philadelphia, Charles Press 1990, 71–84.
19.
Schulz R, Beach S: Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999, 282: 2215–2219. 10.1001/jama.282.23.2215PubMedCrossRef
20.
Cegala DJ: A study of doctors' and patients' communication during a primary care consultation: Implications for communication training. Journal of Health Communication 1997, 2: 169–194. 10.1080/108107397127743PubMedCrossRef
21.
Northouse L: Social support in patients and husbands adjustment to breast cancer. Nursing Research 1988, 37: 91–95.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Northouse P, Northouse L: Communication and cancer: Issues confronting patients, health professionals and caregivers. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1987, 5: 17–46.CrossRef
23.
Peters-Golden H: Varied perceptions of social support in the illness experience. Social Science Medicine 1982, 16: 463–491. 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90057-0CrossRef
24.
Northouse L, Peters-Golden H: Cancer and the family: Strategies to assist spouses. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 1993, 9: 74–82.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Vitaliano P: Psychological and physical concomitants of caregiving; introduction to special issue. Annals of behavioral medicine 1997, 19: 75–77.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Northouse L: A longitudinal study of the adjustment of patients and husbands to breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989, 16: 511–516.PubMed
27.
Ell K, Nishimoto R, Mantell J: Longitudinal analysis of psychological adaptation among family members of patients with cancer. Journal of psychosomatic research 1988, 32: 429–438. 10.1016/0022-3999(88)90026-8PubMedCrossRef
28.
Wilson S, Morse JM: Living with a wife undergoing chemotherapy. Image J Nurs Sch 1991, 23: 78–84.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Wilkerson S: Factors which influence how nurses communicate with cancer patients. Journal of Advance Nursing 1991, 16: 677–688.CrossRef
30.
Grobe ME, Ahmann DL, Ilstrup DM: Needs assessment for advance cancer patients and their families. Oncol Nurs Forum 1982, 9: 26–30.PubMed
31.
Longman AJ, Atwood JR, Sherman JB, Benedict J, Shang TC: Care needs of home-based cancer patients and their caregivers. Cancer Nursing 1992, 15: 182–190.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bruera E, Kehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care 1991, 7: 6–9.PubMed
33.
Davis SW, Quinn S, Fox L, MacElwee N, Engstrom PF: Satisfaction among cancer outpatients. Progress in clinical and biological research 1988, 278: 227–232.PubMed
34.
Thomas S, Glynne JR, Chait I: Is it worth the wait? A survey of patients' satisfaction with an oncology outpatient clinic. European journal of cancer care 1997, 6: 50–58.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA: Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations: An instrument for assessing cancer patients' rehabilitation needs. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1983, 1: 11–24.CrossRef
36.
Meyerowitz BE, Heinrich RL, Schag CC, Burish TG, Bradley L: Coping with chronic illness: research and applications. A competency-based approach to coping with cancer. New York, Academic Press 1983, 137–158.
37.
Ganz PA, Rofessart J, Polinsky ML, Schag CC, Heinrich RL: A comprehensive approach to the assessment of cancer patients' rehabilitation needs: the Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations and a companion interview. Journal of psychosocial Oncology 1986, 4: 27–42.CrossRef
38.
Ganz PA, Shag CC, Polinsky ML, Heinrich RL, Flack VF: Rehabilitation needs and breast cancer: the first month after primary therapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1987, 10: 243–253.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Schag CC, Ganz PA, Heinrich RL: Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form (CARES-SF). A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument. Cancer 1991, 15: 1406–1413.CrossRef
40.
Wingate AL, Lackey NR: A description of the needs of noninstitutionalized cancer patients and their primary care givers. Cancer Nursing 1989, 12: 216–225.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Gates MF, Lackey NR, White MR: Needs of Hospice and clinic patients with cancer. Cancer Practice 1995, 3: 226–232.PubMed
42.
Foot G, Sanson-Fisher R: Measuring the unmet needs of people living with cancer. Cancer Forum 1995, 19: 131–135.
43.
Girgis A, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Burrows S: Perceived needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: rural versus urban location. Australian and New Zealand journal of Public Health 2000, 24: 166–173.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Bonevski B,, Sanson-Fisher R,, Girgis A,, Burton L,, Cook P,, Boyes A: Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 2000, 88: 217–225. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<217::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO;2-YPubMedCrossRef
45.
McCusker J: Development of scales to measure satisfaction and preferences regarding long-term and terminal care. Medical Care 1984, 22: 476–493.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Tamburini M, Gangeri L, Brunelli C, Beltrami P, Boeri C, C. Borreanim, Fusco Karmann M, Greco G, Miccinesi L, Trimigno Murru & P.: Assessment of hospitalized cancer patients' needs by the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire. Annals of Oncology 2000, 11: 31–37. 10.1023/A:1008396930832PubMedCrossRef
47.
Coyle N, Goldstein L, Passik S, Fishman B, Portenoy R: Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians. Cancer Nursing 1996, 19: 81–92. 10.1097/00002820-199604000-00001PubMedCrossRef
48.
Derdiarian AK: Informational needs of recently diagnosed cancer patients. Nurs Res 1986, 35: 276–281.PubMed
49.
Mesters I, Borne van den B, Boer MD, Pruyn J: Measuring information needs among cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling 2001, 43: 253–262. 10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00166-XPubMedCrossRef
50.
Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Offord KP, Koch C, Wen K, Kreutz K, Salner A: Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 2003, 49: 233–242. 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00183-0PubMedCrossRef
51.
Thomas C, Morris SM, McIllmurray MB, Soothill K, Francis B, Harman JC: The psychosocial needs of cancer patients and their main carers. Lancaster University, Institute for Health Research 2001.
52.
Galloway S, Graydon J, Harrison D, Evans-Boyden B, Palmer-Wickham S, Burlein-Hall S, Rich-van der Bij L, West P, Blair A: Informational needs of women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer: development and initial testing of a tool. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997, 25: 1175–1183. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251175.xPubMedCrossRef
53.
Templeton H, Dphil CM: Adaptation of an instrument to measure the informational needs of men with prostate cancer. Journal of Advance Nursing 2001, 35: 357–364. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01883.xCrossRef
54.
Denger LF, Davison BJ, Sloan JA, Mueller B: Development of a scale to measure information needs in cancer care. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1998, 6: 137–153. 10.1046/j.1365-2834.1998.00060.x
55.
McCarthy M, Higginson I: Clinical audit by a palliative care team. Palliative Medicine 1991, 5: 215–221.CrossRef
56.
Higginson IL, Wade A, McCarthy M: A comparison of four outcome measures of terminal care. A safer death (Edited by: Gilmore A and Gilmore S). London, Plenum Press 1988, 205–211.CrossRef
57.
Higginson IJ, McCarthy M: Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 1993, 8: 219–228.CrossRef
58.
Higginson IJ, Wade AM, McCarthy M: Effectiveness of two palliative support teams. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1992, 14: 50–56.PubMed
59.
Ellershaw JE, Peat SJ, Boys LC: Assessing the effectiveness of a hospital palliative care team. Palliative Medicine 1995, 9: 145–152.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Emanuel LL, Alpert HR, Baldwin DC, Emanuel EJ: What terminally ill patients care about: toward a validated construct of patients' perspectives. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2000, 3: 419–431.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL: The promise of a good death. Lancet 1998, 351 Suppl 2: S21-S29.CrossRef
62.
Kristjanson LJ, Atwood J, L.F. Denger: Validity and Reliability of the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN): Measuring the Care Needs of Families of Advanced Cancer Patients. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1995, 3: 109–126.PubMed
63.
Kilpatrick MG, Kristjanson LJ, Tataryn D: Measuring the information needs of husbands of women with breast cancer: validity and reliability of the Family of Inventory of Needs--Husbands. Oncol Nurs Forum 1998, 25: 1347–1351.PubMed
64.
Kilpatrick MG, Kristjanson LJ, Tataryn DJ, Fraser VH: Information needs of husbands of women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 1998, 25: 1565–1601.
65.
Kristjanson LJ: Validity and reliability testing of the FAMCARE scale: Measure Family Satisfaction with Advance Cancer Care. Social Science Medicine 1993, 36: 693–701. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90066-DPubMedCrossRef
66.
Wingate AL, Lackey NR: A description of the needs of noninstitutionalized cancer patients and their primary caregivers. Cancer Nursing 1989, 12: 216–225.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Hileman JW, Lackey NR: Self-identified needs of patients with cancer at home and their home caregivers: a descriptive study. Oncology Nursing Forum 1990, 17: 907–913.PubMed
68.
Hileman JW, Lackey NR, Hassanein RS: Identifying the needs of home caregivers of patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1992, 19: 771–777.PubMed
69.
Harrington V, Lackey NR, Gates MF: Needs of caregivers of clinic and hospice cancer patients. Cancer Nursing 1996, 19: 118–125. 10.1097/00002820-199604000-00006PubMedCrossRef
70.
Dawson NJ: Need satisfaction in terminal care setting. Social Science Medicine 1991, 32: 83–87. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90131-UPubMedCrossRef
71.
Chalmers K, Thomson K: Coming to terms with the risk of breast cancer: perceptions of women with primary relatives with breast cancer. Qualitative Health Research 1996, 6: 256–282.CrossRef
72.
Chalmers KI, Luker KA, Leinster SJ, Elis I, Booth K: Information and support needs of women with primary relatives with breast cancer: development of the Information and Support Needs Questionnaire. Journal of Advance Nursing 2001, 35: 497–507. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01866.xCrossRef
73.
Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16: 297–333.CrossRef
74.
Evan NJ: Needs assessment methodology: a comparison of results. Journal of College Student Personnel 1985, 26: 107–114.
75.
Title CR, Hill RJ: Attitude measurement and prediction of behavioral: An evaluation of conditions and measurement techniques. Sociometry 1967, 30: 199–213.CrossRef
76.
Harris LE, Weinberger M, Tierney WM: Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences: a controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Medical Care 1997, 35: 70–76. 10.1097/00005650-199701000-00006PubMedCrossRef
77.
McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr: Comparison of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Medical Care 1994, 32: 551–567.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Degner LF, Davison BJ, Sloan JA, Mueller B: Development of a scale to measure information needs in cancer care. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1998, 6: 137–153. 10.1046/j.1365-2834.1998.00060.xPubMed
79.
Newell S, Sanson-Fisher RW, Stewart J: Are touchscreen computer surveys acceptable to medical oncology patients? Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1997, 15: 37–46.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Needs Assessment for cancer patients and their families
Authors
Kuang-Yi Wen
David H Gustafson
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-11

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2004 Go to the issue

Review

Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review

Research

Validity of the AusTOM scales: A comparison of the AusTOMs and EuroQol-5D

Research

Ability to perform activities of daily living is the main factor affecting quality of life in patients with dementia

Research

The ECOS-16 questionnaire for the evaluation of health related quality of life in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis

Research

Dimensions of oral health related quality of life measured by EQ-5D+ and OHIP-14

Review

Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift