Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

Relative efficiency and productivity: a preliminary exploration of public hospitals in Beijing, China

Authors: Hao Li, Siping Dong, Tingfang Liu

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Third-grade hospitals in Beijing have been rapidly developing in capacity and scale for many years. These hospitals receive a large number of patients, and ensuring their efficient operation is crucial in meeting people’s healthcare needs. In this context, a study of their relative efficiency and productivity would be helpful to identify the driving factors and further improve their performance.

Methods

After a review of literature, the current numbers of open beds and employees were selected as input variables. The number of outpatient and emergency visits and the number of discharged patients were selected as output variables. A total of 12 third-grade Class A general public hospitals in Beijing were selected for a preliminary study. The panel data from 2006–2009 were collected by the National Institute of Hospital Administration, Ministry of Health of P.R. China. Descriptive analysis and data envelopment analysis were used to analyze the data using Stata 10.0 and DEAP(V2.1) software.

Results

In the 2006–2009 period, descriptive results show that sample hospitals continuously expanded their capacity and scale, with growth rate of total revenue being the highest among all variables. The DEA results show that the average annual growth rate of productivity was 26.7%, and the rates were 47.3%, 21.3% and 13.8% respectively for two consecutive years. The average annual growth rate of technological change was 28.3%, and the rates were 49.4%, 21.5% and 16.4% respectively for two consecutive years. The average annual growth rate of technical efficiency change was -1.3%, and the rates were -1.4%, -0.02% and -2.2% respectively for two consecutive years.

Conclusions

The sample hospitals in Beijing experienced substantial productivity growth, but annual growth rates were declining. Substantial technological change was the main contributor to the growth. Although some hospitals exhibited improvements in technical efficiency, there was a slight decline in general. To improve overall efficiency and productivity, both government and hospitals need to further drive positive technological change, technical change, and allocative efficiency of public hospitals. More empirical studies are needed to include more hospitals of all three grades at a larger scale.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen H, Ding JT: Health investment structure, health improvement and economic growth. J Public Manage. 2010, 7: 54-62. Chen H, Ding JT: Health investment structure, health improvement and economic growth. J Public Manage. 2010, 7: 54-62.
2.
go back to reference Wang H, Xu T, Xu J: Factors contributing to high costs and inequality in China’s health care system. JAMA. 2007, 298: 1928-1930. 10.1001/jama.298.16.1928.CrossRefPubMed Wang H, Xu T, Xu J: Factors contributing to high costs and inequality in China’s health care system. JAMA. 2007, 298: 1928-1930. 10.1001/jama.298.16.1928.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liu TF: Institutional change and path selection of hospital accreditation in China. Chin Health Qual Manage. 2011, 18: 31-34. Liu TF: Institutional change and path selection of hospital accreditation in China. Chin Health Qual Manage. 2011, 18: 31-34.
5.
go back to reference Kuang L: The continuing scale expansion mechanism of Chinese public hospitals. Chin J Health Policy. 2011, 4: 28-37. Kuang L: The continuing scale expansion mechanism of Chinese public hospitals. Chin J Health Policy. 2011, 4: 28-37.
6.
go back to reference Pang HM, Wang XW: Evaluating efficiency of level III general hospitals in China based on DEA Malmquist index. Chin Hosp Manage. 2010, 30: 35-37. Pang HM, Wang XW: Evaluating efficiency of level III general hospitals in China based on DEA Malmquist index. Chin Hosp Manage. 2010, 30: 35-37.
7.
go back to reference Wang H, Ma Y, Li B, Li DN: Application of DEA in evaluating the efficiency of third-grade hospitals in Harbin. Chin J Hosp Stat. 2006, 13: 289-292. Wang H, Ma Y, Li B, Li DN: Application of DEA in evaluating the efficiency of third-grade hospitals in Harbin. Chin J Hosp Stat. 2006, 13: 289-292.
8.
go back to reference LU WJ, Yang Q, Feng ZC: Analysis of Malmquist index of the dynamic changes of hospital efficiency in Wuhan. Chin Hosp Manage. 2011, 31: 28-31. LU WJ, Yang Q, Feng ZC: Analysis of Malmquist index of the dynamic changes of hospital efficiency in Wuhan. Chin Hosp Manage. 2011, 31: 28-31.
9.
go back to reference Wang W, Chen SX, Peng XM, Zhai ZT, Chen SR, Tian YL: Efficiency analysis of public hospitals in Guangdong Province. Chin Hosp Manage. 2008, 28: 16-19. Wang W, Chen SX, Peng XM, Zhai ZT, Chen SR, Tian YL: Efficiency analysis of public hospitals in Guangdong Province. Chin Hosp Manage. 2008, 28: 16-19.
10.
go back to reference Liu J, He MQ: Research on the assessment of technical efficiency of comprehensive hospitals and determining factors. Sci Manage Res. 2010, 6: 69-71. Liu J, He MQ: Research on the assessment of technical efficiency of comprehensive hospitals and determining factors. Sci Manage Res. 2010, 6: 69-71.
11.
go back to reference Gai RY, Zhou CC, Xu LZ, Zhu M, Wang XZ, Li SX, Zheng WG, Song PP, Yang XL, Fang LY, Zheng YC, Tang W: Health resources allocation and productive efficiency of Chinese county hospitals: data from 1993 to 2005. BioScience Trends. 2010, 4: 218-224.PubMed Gai RY, Zhou CC, Xu LZ, Zhu M, Wang XZ, Li SX, Zheng WG, Song PP, Yang XL, Fang LY, Zheng YC, Tang W: Health resources allocation and productive efficiency of Chinese county hospitals: data from 1993 to 2005. BioScience Trends. 2010, 4: 218-224.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ng YC: The productive efficiency of Chinese hospitals. China Econ Rev. 2011, 22: 428-439. 10.1016/j.chieco.2011.06.001.CrossRef Ng YC: The productive efficiency of Chinese hospitals. China Econ Rev. 2011, 22: 428-439. 10.1016/j.chieco.2011.06.001.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Worthington AC: Frontier efficiency measurement in health care: a review of empirical techniques and selected applications. Med Care Res Rev. 2004, 61: 135-170. 10.1177/1077558704263796.CrossRefPubMed Worthington AC: Frontier efficiency measurement in health care: a review of empirical techniques and selected applications. Med Care Res Rev. 2004, 61: 135-170. 10.1177/1077558704263796.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hollingsworth B: The measurement of efficiency and productivity of healthcare delivery. Health Econ. 2008, 17: 1107-1128. 10.1002/hec.1391.CrossRefPubMed Hollingsworth B: The measurement of efficiency and productivity of healthcare delivery. Health Econ. 2008, 17: 1107-1128. 10.1002/hec.1391.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Daraio C, Simar L: Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Methodology and Applications. 2007, New York: Springer Daraio C, Simar L: Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Methodology and Applications. 2007, New York: Springer
16.
go back to reference Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978, 3: 429-444.CrossRef Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978, 3: 429-444.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper W: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984, 9: 1078-1092.CrossRef Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper W: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984, 9: 1078-1092.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wheelock DC, Wilson PW: Technical progress, inefficiency, and productivity change in U.S. banking, 1984–1993. J Money Credit Bank. 1999, 31: 212-234. 10.2307/2601230.CrossRef Wheelock DC, Wilson PW: Technical progress, inefficiency, and productivity change in U.S. banking, 1984–1993. J Money Credit Bank. 1999, 31: 212-234. 10.2307/2601230.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Malmquist S: Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica. 1953, 4: 209-242. 10.1007/BF03006863.CrossRef Malmquist S: Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica. 1953, 4: 209-242. 10.1007/BF03006863.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE: Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. Econ J. 1982, 92: 73-86. 10.2307/2232257.CrossRef Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE: Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. Econ J. 1982, 92: 73-86. 10.2307/2232257.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lovell CAK: The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. J Prod Anal. 2003, 20: 437-458. 10.1023/A:1027312102834.CrossRef Lovell CAK: The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. J Prod Anal. 2003, 20: 437-458. 10.1023/A:1027312102834.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang ZY: Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev. 1994, 84: 66-83. Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang ZY: Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev. 1994, 84: 66-83.
23.
go back to reference Moffat BD, Valadkhani A, Harvie C: Malmquist indices of productivity change in Botswana’s financial institutions. Glob Bus Econ Rev. 2009, 11: 28-43. 10.1504/GBER.2009.025380.CrossRef Moffat BD, Valadkhani A, Harvie C: Malmquist indices of productivity change in Botswana’s financial institutions. Glob Bus Econ Rev. 2009, 11: 28-43. 10.1504/GBER.2009.025380.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Coelli T: A guide to DEAP(V2.1): A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. 1996, Armidale: University of New England Coelli T: A guide to DEAP(V2.1): A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. 1996, Armidale: University of New England
25.
go back to reference Simar L, Wilson PW: Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci. 1998, 44: 49-61. 10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49.CrossRef Simar L, Wilson PW: Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci. 1998, 44: 49-61. 10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Nuti S, Daraio C, Speroni C, Vainieri M: Relationships between technical efficiency and the quality and costs of health care in Italy. Int J Qual Health C. 2011, 23: 324-330. 10.1093/intqhc/mzr005.CrossRef Nuti S, Daraio C, Speroni C, Vainieri M: Relationships between technical efficiency and the quality and costs of health care in Italy. Int J Qual Health C. 2011, 23: 324-330. 10.1093/intqhc/mzr005.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yip W, Hsiao W: China’s health care reform: a tentative assessment. China Econ Rev. 2009, 20: 613-619. 10.1016/j.chieco.2009.08.003.CrossRef Yip W, Hsiao W: China’s health care reform: a tentative assessment. China Econ Rev. 2009, 20: 613-619. 10.1016/j.chieco.2009.08.003.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference OECD: Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Report. 2011, Paris OECD: Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Report. 2011, Paris
29.
go back to reference Bloom N, Van Reenen J: Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?. J Econ Perspect. 2010, 24: 203-224. 10.1257/jep.24.1.203.CrossRef Bloom N, Van Reenen J: Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?. J Econ Perspect. 2010, 24: 203-224. 10.1257/jep.24.1.203.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Farrell MJ: The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc A Gen. 1957, 120: 253-290. 10.2307/2343100.CrossRef Farrell MJ: The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc A Gen. 1957, 120: 253-290. 10.2307/2343100.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference The NHS Confederation: Challenging bureaucracy. 2013, London: Report The NHS Confederation: Challenging bureaucracy. 2013, London: Report
32.
go back to reference Gao W: DRG pilot experiment in Beijing. Chin Hosp CEO. 2011, 24: 32-39. Gao W: DRG pilot experiment in Beijing. Chin Hosp CEO. 2011, 24: 32-39.
33.
go back to reference Hu B, Ji XM, Fei XL, Wei L, Wang RX: Analysis of the medical services and payment mode for patients with emergency in a Beijing Hospital from 2007 to 2008. Chin Hosp Manage. 2010, 30: 24-26. Hu B, Ji XM, Fei XL, Wei L, Wang RX: Analysis of the medical services and payment mode for patients with emergency in a Beijing Hospital from 2007 to 2008. Chin Hosp Manage. 2010, 30: 24-26.
34.
go back to reference Vasanthakumar NB: Institutional arrangements and efficiency of health care delivery systems. Eur J Health Econ. 2005, 6: 215-221. 10.1007/s10198-005-0294-1.CrossRef Vasanthakumar NB: Institutional arrangements and efficiency of health care delivery systems. Eur J Health Econ. 2005, 6: 215-221. 10.1007/s10198-005-0294-1.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Smith PC, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I, Leatherman S: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. 2009, Cambridge University Press Smith PC, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I, Leatherman S: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. 2009, Cambridge University Press
36.
go back to reference Nuti S, Vainieri M, Bonini A: Disinvestment for re-allocation: a process to identify priorities in healthcare. Health Policy. 2010, 95: 137-143. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.011.CrossRefPubMed Nuti S, Vainieri M, Bonini A: Disinvestment for re-allocation: a process to identify priorities in healthcare. Health Policy. 2010, 95: 137-143. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.011.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Nuti S, Seghieri C, Vainieri M: Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience. J Manage Gov. 2013, 17: 59-69. 10.1007/s10997-012-9218-5.CrossRef Nuti S, Seghieri C, Vainieri M: Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience. J Manage Gov. 2013, 17: 59-69. 10.1007/s10997-012-9218-5.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nuti S, Seghieri C, Vainieri M, Zett S: Assessment and improvement of the Italian healthcare system: first evidences from a pilot national performance evaluation system. J Healthc Manag. 2012, 57: 182-198.PubMed Nuti S, Seghieri C, Vainieri M, Zett S: Assessment and improvement of the Italian healthcare system: first evidences from a pilot national performance evaluation system. J Healthc Manag. 2012, 57: 182-198.PubMed
39.
go back to reference LI H, Barsanti S, Bonini A: Building China’s municipal healthcare performance evaluation system: a Tuscan perspective. Int J Qual Health C. 2012, 24: 403-410. 10.1093/intqhc/mzs032.CrossRef LI H, Barsanti S, Bonini A: Building China’s municipal healthcare performance evaluation system: a Tuscan perspective. Int J Qual Health C. 2012, 24: 403-410. 10.1093/intqhc/mzs032.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Coelli TJ, Rao DSP: CEPA Working Papers No. 4/2001. Implicit Value Shares in Malmquist TFP Index Numbers. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. University of New England Coelli TJ, Rao DSP: CEPA Working Papers No. 4/2001. Implicit Value Shares in Malmquist TFP Index Numbers. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. University of New England
Metadata
Title
Relative efficiency and productivity: a preliminary exploration of public hospitals in Beijing, China
Authors
Hao Li
Siping Dong
Tingfang Liu
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-158

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Health Services Research 1/2014 Go to the issue