Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH

Authors: Jonathan P DeShazo, Donna L LaVallie, Fredric M Wolf

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to identify publication output, and research areas, as well as descriptively and quantitatively characterize the field of medical informatics through publication trend analysis over a twenty year period (1987–2006).

Methods

A bibliometric analysis of medical informatics citations indexed in Medline was performed using publication trends, journal frequency, impact factors, MeSH term frequencies and characteristics of citations.

Results

There were 77,023 medical informatics articles published during this 20 year period in 4,644 unique journals. The average annual article publication growth rate was 12%. The 50 identified medical informatics MeSH terms are rarely assigned together to the same document and are almost exclusively paired with a non-medical informatics MeSH term, suggesting a strong interdisciplinary trend. Trends in citations, journals, and MeSH categories of medical informatics output for the 20-year period are summarized. Average impact factor scores and weighted average impact factor scores increased over the 20-year period with two notable growth periods.

Conclusion

There is a steadily growing presence and increasing visibility of medical informatics literature over the years. Patterns in research output that seem to characterize the historic trends and current components of the field of medical informatics suggest it may be a maturing discipline, and highlight specific journals in which the medical informatics literature appears most frequently, including general medical journals as well as informatics-specific journals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH: Medical informatics. An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. JAMA. 1990, 263 (8): 1114-1120. 10.1001/jama.263.8.1114.CrossRefPubMed Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH: Medical informatics. An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. JAMA. 1990, 263 (8): 1114-1120. 10.1001/jama.263.8.1114.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hersh W: Medical informatics: improving health care through information. JAMA. 2002, 288 (16): 1955-8. 10.1001/jama.288.16.1955.CrossRefPubMed Hersh W: Medical informatics: improving health care through information. JAMA. 2002, 288 (16): 1955-8. 10.1001/jama.288.16.1955.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bemmel JV: Medical informatics, art or science?. Methods Inf Med. 1996, 35 (3): 157-72.PubMed Bemmel JV: Medical informatics, art or science?. Methods Inf Med. 1996, 35 (3): 157-72.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Moehr J: Evaluation: salvation or nemesis of medical informatics?. Comput Biol Med. 2002, 32 (3): 113-25. 10.1016/S0010-4825(02)00009-4.CrossRefPubMed Moehr J: Evaluation: salvation or nemesis of medical informatics?. Comput Biol Med. 2002, 32 (3): 113-25. 10.1016/S0010-4825(02)00009-4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Clayton P: Do medical informaticists pursue legitimate research?. Methods Inf Med. 1996, 35 (3): 194-5.PubMed Clayton P: Do medical informaticists pursue legitimate research?. Methods Inf Med. 1996, 35 (3): 194-5.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Wyatt J: Medical informatics, artefacts or science?. Methods Inf Med. 1996, 35 (3): 197-200.PubMed Wyatt J: Medical informatics, artefacts or science?. Methods Inf Med. 1996, 35 (3): 197-200.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Friedman C, Abbas U: Is medical informatics a mature science? A review of measurement practice in outcome studies of clinical systems. Int J Med Inform. 2003, 69 (2–3): 261-72. 10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00109-0.CrossRefPubMed Friedman C, Abbas U: Is medical informatics a mature science? A review of measurement practice in outcome studies of clinical systems. Int J Med Inform. 2003, 69 (2–3): 261-72. 10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00109-0.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lutman M: Bibliometric analysis as a measure of scientific output. Br J Audiol. 1992, 26 (6): 323-4. 10.3109/03005369209076653.CrossRefPubMed Lutman M: Bibliometric analysis as a measure of scientific output. Br J Audiol. 1992, 26 (6): 323-4. 10.3109/03005369209076653.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Garfield E: New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation. 1963, 14: 195-201. 10.1002/asi.5090140304.CrossRef Garfield E: New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation. 1963, 14: 195-201. 10.1002/asi.5090140304.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Garfield E: The meaning of the impact factor. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2003, 3: 363-69. Garfield E: The meaning of the impact factor. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2003, 3: 363-69.
12.
go back to reference Garfield E: Citation indexing–its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. 1972, New York: John Wiley & Sons Garfield E: Citation indexing–its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. 1972, New York: John Wiley & Sons
13.
go back to reference Thompson Scientific: ISI Journal Citation Reports., in ISI Web of Knowledge. 2005 Thompson Scientific: ISI Journal Citation Reports., in ISI Web of Knowledge. 2005
14.
go back to reference Young H: Glossary of Library and Information Science. 1983, Chicago: American Library Association Young H: Glossary of Library and Information Science. 1983, Chicago: American Library Association
15.
go back to reference Lewison G, Devey M: Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999, 38 (1): 13-20. 10.1093/rheumatology/38.1.13.CrossRef Lewison G, Devey M: Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999, 38 (1): 13-20. 10.1093/rheumatology/38.1.13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Geisler E: The Metrics of Science and Technology. 2000, Westport CT: Quorum Books Geisler E: The Metrics of Science and Technology. 2000, Westport CT: Quorum Books
17.
18.
go back to reference Price D: Little science, big science. 1963, New York: Columbia University Press Price D: Little science, big science. 1963, New York: Columbia University Press
19.
go back to reference Garfield E: Science citation index: a new dimension in indexing. Science. 1964, 144: 649-54. 10.1126/science.144.3619.649.CrossRefPubMed Garfield E: Science citation index: a new dimension in indexing. Science. 1964, 144: 649-54. 10.1126/science.144.3619.649.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Moorman P, Lei Jvd: An inventory of publications on computerbased medical records: an update. Methods Inf Med. 2003, 42 (3): 199-202.PubMed Moorman P, Lei Jvd: An inventory of publications on computerbased medical records: an update. Methods Inf Med. 2003, 42 (3): 199-202.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S: Orthodontic literature: an overview of the last 2 decades. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003, 124 (1): 30-40. 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00199-9.CrossRefPubMed Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S: Orthodontic literature: an overview of the last 2 decades. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003, 124 (1): 30-40. 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00199-9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yang S, Needleman H, Niederman R: A bibliometric analysis of the pediatric dental literature in MEDLINE. Pediatr Dent. 2001, 23 (5): 415-8.PubMed Yang S, Needleman H, Niederman R: A bibliometric analysis of the pediatric dental literature in MEDLINE. Pediatr Dent. 2001, 23 (5): 415-8.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Wun S: Bibliometric Analysis of Decision Support Systems and Clinical Research. Medinfo. 2004 Wun S: Bibliometric Analysis of Decision Support Systems and Clinical Research. Medinfo. 2004
26.
go back to reference García-García P: Phytotherapy and psychiatry: Bibliometric study of the scientific literature from the last 20 years. Phytomedicine. 2008, 15 (8): 566-576. 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.04.014.CrossRefPubMed García-García P: Phytotherapy and psychiatry: Bibliometric study of the scientific literature from the last 20 years. Phytomedicine. 2008, 15 (8): 566-576. 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.04.014.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hasman A, Haux R: Modeling in Biomedical Informatics – An Exploratory Analysis (Part 1). Methods Inf Med. 2006, 45 (6): 638-642.PubMed Hasman A, Haux R: Modeling in Biomedical Informatics – An Exploratory Analysis (Part 1). Methods Inf Med. 2006, 45 (6): 638-642.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Moorman P, Lei Jvd: An inventory of publications on computer-based medical records: an update. Methods Inf Med. 2003, 42 (3): 199-202.PubMed Moorman P, Lei Jvd: An inventory of publications on computer-based medical records: an update. Methods Inf Med. 2003, 42 (3): 199-202.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Mendis K: Health informatics research in Australia: retrospective analysis using PubMed. Informatics in Primary Care. 2007, 15: 17-PubMed Mendis K: Health informatics research in Australia: retrospective analysis using PubMed. Informatics in Primary Care. 2007, 15: 17-PubMed
30.
go back to reference Otero P: Evolution of medical informatics in bibliographic databases. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004, 107 (Pt 1): 301-305.PubMed Otero P: Evolution of medical informatics in bibliographic databases. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004, 107 (Pt 1): 301-305.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Sittig D, Kaalaas-Sittig J: A citation analysis of medical informatics journals. Medinfo. 1995, 8 (Pt 2): 1452-6.PubMed Sittig D, Kaalaas-Sittig J: A citation analysis of medical informatics journals. Medinfo. 1995, 8 (Pt 2): 1452-6.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Vishwanatham R: Citation analysis in journal rankings: medical informatics in the library and information science literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998, 86 (4): 518-522.PubMedPubMedCentral Vishwanatham R: Citation analysis in journal rankings: medical informatics in the library and information science literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998, 86 (4): 518-522.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Synnestvedt MB, Chen C, Holmes JH: Visual Exploration of Landmarks and Trends In the Medical Informatics Literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005, 1129- Synnestvedt MB, Chen C, Holmes JH: Visual Exploration of Landmarks and Trends In the Medical Informatics Literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005, 1129-
36.
go back to reference Synnestvedt M, Chen C: Visualizing AMIA: A Medical Informatics Knowledge Domain Analysis. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003, 1024- Synnestvedt M, Chen C: Visualizing AMIA: A Medical Informatics Knowledge Domain Analysis. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003, 1024-
37.
go back to reference LaVallie DL, Wolf FM: Publication Trends and Impact Factors in the Medical Informatics Literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005, 1018- LaVallie DL, Wolf FM: Publication Trends and Impact Factors in the Medical Informatics Literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005, 1018-
38.
go back to reference Grefsheim SF, Rankin JA: Information needs and information seeking in a biomedical research setting: a study of scientists and science administrators. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007, 95 (4): 426-434. 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.426.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grefsheim SF, Rankin JA: Information needs and information seeking in a biomedical research setting: a study of scientists and science administrators. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007, 95 (4): 426-434. 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.426.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P: Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7 (2): 119-10.1038/nrg1768.CrossRefPubMed Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P: Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7 (2): 119-10.1038/nrg1768.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Oliver DE: Tools for loading Medline into a local relational database. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Oliver DE: Tools for loading Medline into a local relational database. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004
41.
go back to reference Bradford S: Documentation. 1950, Washington DC: Public Affairs Press Bradford S: Documentation. 1950, Washington DC: Public Affairs Press
43.
go back to reference Department of Health and Human Services: Heatlh Information Technology Leadership Panel Report. 2005 Department of Health and Human Services: Heatlh Information Technology Leadership Panel Report. 2005
44.
go back to reference Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N: An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982–2002. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004, 107 (Pt 2): 1289-1294.PubMed Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N: An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982–2002. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004, 107 (Pt 2): 1289-1294.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Morris T: Structural relationships within medical informatics. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000, 590-4. Morris T: Structural relationships within medical informatics. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000, 590-4.
Metadata
Title
Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH
Authors
Jonathan P DeShazo
Donna L LaVallie
Fredric M Wolf
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2009 Go to the issue