Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research article

Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of mortality in head trauma based on initial clinical data

Authors: Behzad Eftekhar, Kazem Mohammad, Hassan Eftekhar Ardebili, Mohammad Ghodsi, Ebrahim Ketabchi

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years, outcome prediction models using artificial neural network and multivariable logistic regression analysis have been developed in many areas of health care research. Both these methods have advantages and disadvantages. In this study we have compared the performance of artificial neural network and multivariable logistic regression models, in prediction of outcomes in head trauma and studied the reproducibility of the findings.

Methods

1000 Logistic regression and ANN models based on initial clinical data related to the GCS, tracheal intubation status, age, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate, injury severity score and the outcome of 1271 mainly head injured patients were compared in this study. For each of one thousand pairs of ANN and logistic models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) statistics and accuracy rate were calculated and compared using paired T-tests.

Results

ANN significantly outperformed logistic models in both fields of discrimination and calibration but under performed in accuracy. In 77.8% of cases the area under the ROC curves and in 56.4% of cases the HL statistics for the neural network model were superior to that for the logistic model. In 68% of cases the accuracy of the logistic model was superior to the neural network model.

Conclusions

ANN significantly outperformed the logistic models in both fields of discrimination and calibration but lagged behind in accuracy. This study clearly showed that any single comparison between these two models might not reliably represent the true end results. External validation of the designed models, using larger databases with different rates of outcomes is necessary to get an accurate measure of performance outside the development population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C, Cuff SN, Savino J: An Artificial Neural Network as a Model for Prediction of Survival in Trauma Patients: Validation for a Regional Trauma Area. J Trauma. 2000, 49: 212-223.CrossRefPubMed DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C, Cuff SN, Savino J: An Artificial Neural Network as a Model for Prediction of Survival in Trauma Patients: Validation for a Regional Trauma Area. J Trauma. 2000, 49: 212-223.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wyatt JC, Altman DG: Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten?. Brit M J. 1995, 311: 1539-1541. (comment)CrossRef Wyatt JC, Altman DG: Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten?. Brit M J. 1995, 311: 1539-1541. (comment)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Terrin N, Schmid CH, Griffith JL, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP: External validity of predictive models: A comparison of logistic regression, classification trees, and neural networks. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003, 56: 721-729. 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00120-3.CrossRefPubMed Terrin N, Schmid CH, Griffith JL, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP: External validity of predictive models: A comparison of logistic regression, classification trees, and neural networks. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003, 56: 721-729. 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00120-3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Patterson DW: Artificial Neural Networks: Theory and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. 1996 Patterson DW: Artificial Neural Networks: Theory and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. 1996
6.
go back to reference Leondes CT: Neural network systems, techniques, and applications. 1998, San Diego, Academic Press Leondes CT: Neural network systems, techniques, and applications. 1998, San Diego, Academic Press
7.
go back to reference Baxt WG: Use of an artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: the diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion. Neural Comput. 1990, 2: 480-9.CrossRef Baxt WG: Use of an artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: the diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion. Neural Comput. 1990, 2: 480-9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baxt WG: Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1990, 115: 843-8.CrossRef Baxt WG: Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1990, 115: 843-8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kemeny V, Droste DW, Hermes S, Nabavi DG, Schulte-Altedo-rneburg G, Siebler M, Ringelstein EB: Automatic embolus detection by a neural network. Stroke. 1999, 30: 807-10.CrossRefPubMed Kemeny V, Droste DW, Hermes S, Nabavi DG, Schulte-Altedo-rneburg G, Siebler M, Ringelstein EB: Automatic embolus detection by a neural network. Stroke. 1999, 30: 807-10.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Das A, Ben-Menachem T, Cooper GS, Chak A, Sivak MV, Gonet JA, Wong RC: Prediction of outcome in acute lower-gastrointestinal hemorrhage based on an artificial neural network: internal and external validation of a predictive model. Lancet. 2003, 362 (9392): 1261-6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14568-0.CrossRefPubMed Das A, Ben-Menachem T, Cooper GS, Chak A, Sivak MV, Gonet JA, Wong RC: Prediction of outcome in acute lower-gastrointestinal hemorrhage based on an artificial neural network: internal and external validation of a predictive model. Lancet. 2003, 362 (9392): 1261-6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14568-0.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vijaya G, Kumar V, Verma HK: ANN-based QRS-complex analysis of ECG. J Med Eng Technol. 1998, 22: 160-7.CrossRefPubMed Vijaya G, Kumar V, Verma HK: ANN-based QRS-complex analysis of ECG. J Med Eng Technol. 1998, 22: 160-7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kloppel B: Application of neural networks for EEG analysis. Consideration and first results. Neuropsychobiology. 1994, 29: 39-46.CrossRefPubMed Kloppel B: Application of neural networks for EEG analysis. Consideration and first results. Neuropsychobiology. 1994, 29: 39-46.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jando G, Siegel RM, Horvath Z, Buzsaki G: Pattern recognition of the electroencephalogram by artificial neural networks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuropsychol. 1993, 86: 100-9. 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90082-7.CrossRef Jando G, Siegel RM, Horvath Z, Buzsaki G: Pattern recognition of the electroencephalogram by artificial neural networks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuropsychol. 1993, 86: 100-9. 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90082-7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Penedo MG, Carreira MJ, Mosquera A, Cabello D: Computer-aided diagnosis: a neural-network-based approach to lung nodule detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998, 17: 872-80. 10.1109/42.746620.CrossRefPubMed Penedo MG, Carreira MJ, Mosquera A, Cabello D: Computer-aided diagnosis: a neural-network-based approach to lung nodule detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998, 17: 872-80. 10.1109/42.746620.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Izenberg SD, Williams MD, Luterman A: Prediction of trauma mortality using a neural network. Am Surg. 1997, 63: 275-81.PubMed Izenberg SD, Williams MD, Luterman A: Prediction of trauma mortality using a neural network. Am Surg. 1997, 63: 275-81.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Li YC, Liu L, Chiu WT, Jian WS: Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients. Int J Med Inf. 2000, 57 (1): 1-9. 10.1016/S1386-5056(99)00054-4.CrossRef Li YC, Liu L, Chiu WT, Jian WS: Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients. Int J Med Inf. 2000, 57 (1): 1-9. 10.1016/S1386-5056(99)00054-4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Grigsby J, Kooken R, Hershberger J: Simulated neural networks to predict outcomes, costs and length of stay among orthopedic rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994, 75: 1077-81. 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90081-7.CrossRefPubMed Grigsby J, Kooken R, Hershberger J: Simulated neural networks to predict outcomes, costs and length of stay among orthopedic rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994, 75: 1077-81. 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90081-7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tu JV, Guerriere MR: Use of a neural network as a predictive instrument for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. Comput Biomed Res. 1993, 26: 220-9. 10.1006/cbmr.1993.1015.CrossRefPubMed Tu JV, Guerriere MR: Use of a neural network as a predictive instrument for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. Comput Biomed Res. 1993, 26: 220-9. 10.1006/cbmr.1993.1015.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nguyen T, Malley R, Inkelis S, Kuppermann N: Comparison of prediction models for adverse outcome in pediatric meningococcal disease using artificial neural network and logistic regression analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002, 55: 687-695. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00394-3.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen T, Malley R, Inkelis S, Kuppermann N: Comparison of prediction models for adverse outcome in pediatric meningococcal disease using artificial neural network and logistic regression analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002, 55: 687-695. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00394-3.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Dorsey SG, Waltz CF, Brosch L, Connerney I, Schweitzer EJ, Barlett ST: A neural network model for predicting pancreas transplant graft outcome. Diabetes Care. 1997, 20: 1128-33.CrossRefPubMed Dorsey SG, Waltz CF, Brosch L, Connerney I, Schweitzer EJ, Barlett ST: A neural network model for predicting pancreas transplant graft outcome. Diabetes Care. 1997, 20: 1128-33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lang EW, Pitts LH, Damron SL, Rutledge R: Outcome after severe head injury: an analysis of prediction based upon comparison of neural network versus logistic regression analysis. Neurol Res. 1997, 19: 274-80.PubMed Lang EW, Pitts LH, Damron SL, Rutledge R: Outcome after severe head injury: an analysis of prediction based upon comparison of neural network versus logistic regression analysis. Neurol Res. 1997, 19: 274-80.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Zargar M, Modaghegh MHS, Rezaishiraz H: Urban Injuries in Tehran: Demography of trauma patients and evaluation of trauma care. Injury. 2001, 32 (8): 613-7. 10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00029-8.CrossRefPubMed Zargar M, Modaghegh MHS, Rezaishiraz H: Urban Injuries in Tehran: Demography of trauma patients and evaluation of trauma care. Injury. 2001, 32 (8): 613-7. 10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00029-8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Moini M, Rezaishiraz H, Zafarghandi MR: Characteristics and outcome of injured patients treated in urban trauma centers in Iran. J Trauma. 2000, 48 (3): 503-7.CrossRefPubMed Moini M, Rezaishiraz H, Zafarghandi MR: Characteristics and outcome of injured patients treated in urban trauma centers in Iran. J Trauma. 2000, 48 (3): 503-7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Des Plaines IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated Injury Scale: 1990 Revision. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 1990 Des Plaines IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated Injury Scale: 1990 Revision. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 1990
25.
go back to reference Tu JV: Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 1225-31. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00002-9.CrossRefPubMed Tu JV: Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 1225-31. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00002-9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Baxt WG: Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995, 346: 1135-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91804-3.CrossRefPubMed Baxt WG: Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995, 346: 1135-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91804-3.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ohno-Machado L, Rowland T: Neural network applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 1999, 78: 392-8. 10.1097/00002060-199907000-00022.CrossRef Ohno-Machado L, Rowland T: Neural network applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 1999, 78: 392-8. 10.1097/00002060-199907000-00022.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bishop C: Neural networks for pattern recognition. 1995, Oxford University Press Bishop C: Neural networks for pattern recognition. 1995, Oxford University Press
29.
go back to reference Sargent DJ: Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches. Cancer (Supplement). 2001, 91 (8): 1636-42. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1636::AID-CNCR1176>3.0.CO;2-D.CrossRef Sargent DJ: Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches. Cancer (Supplement). 2001, 91 (8): 1636-42. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1636::AID-CNCR1176>3.0.CO;2-D.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gaudart J: Comparison of the performance of multi-layer perceptron and linear regression for epidemiological data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 2004, 44 (4): 547-570. 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00257-8.CrossRef Gaudart J: Comparison of the performance of multi-layer perceptron and linear regression for epidemiological data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 2004, 44 (4): 547-570. 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00257-8.CrossRef
31.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of mortality in head trauma based on initial clinical data
Authors
Behzad Eftekhar
Kazem Mohammad
Hassan Eftekhar Ardebili
Mohammad Ghodsi
Ebrahim Ketabchi
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-5-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2005 Go to the issue