Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Development and initial evaluation of a treatment decision dashboard

Authors: James G Dolan, Peter J Veazie, Ann J Russ

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For many healthcare decisions, multiple alternatives are available with different combinations of advantages and disadvantages across several important dimensions. The complexity of current healthcare decisions thus presents a significant barrier to informed decision making, a key element of patient-centered care.
Interactive decision dashboards were developed to facilitate decision making in Management, a field marked by similarly complicated choices. These dashboards utilize data visualization techniques to reduce the cognitive effort needed to evaluate decision alternatives and a non-linear flow of information that enables users to review information in a self-directed fashion. Theoretically, both of these features should facilitate informed decision making by increasing user engagement with and understanding of the decision at hand. We sought to determine if the interactive decision dashboard format can be successfully adapted to create a clinically realistic prototype patient decision aid suitable for further evaluation and refinement.

Methods

We created a computerized, interactive clinical decision dashboard and performed a pilot test of its clinical feasibility and acceptability using a multi-method analysis. The dashboard summarized information about the effectiveness, risks of side effects and drug-drug interactions, out-of-pocket costs, and ease of use of nine analgesic treatment options for knee osteoarthritis. Outcome evaluations included observations of how study participants utilized the dashboard, questionnaires to assess usability, acceptability, and decisional conflict, and an open-ended qualitative analysis.

Results

The study sample consisted of 25 volunteers - 7 men and 18 women - with an average age of 51 years. The mean time spent interacting with the dashboard was 4.6 minutes. Mean evaluation scores on scales ranging from 1 (low) to 7 (high) were: mechanical ease of use 6.1, cognitive ease of use 6.2, emotional difficulty 2.7, decision-aiding effectiveness 5.9, clarification of values 6.5, reduction in decisional uncertainty 6.1, and provision of decision-related information 6.0. Qualitative findings were similarly positive.

Conclusions

Interactive decision dashboards can be adapted for clinical use and have the potential to foster informed decision making. Additional research is warranted to more rigorously test the effectiveness and efficiency of patient decision dashboards for supporting informed decision making and other aspects of patient-centered care, including shared decision making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Committee on quality of health care in America, Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 2001, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press Committee on quality of health care in America, Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 2001, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press
2.
go back to reference Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, CD001431-10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. 10 Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, CD001431-10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. 10
3.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, Sodano AG, King JS: Toward The “Tipping Point”: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 2007, 26: 716-725. 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.CrossRef O’Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, Sodano AG, King JS: Toward The “Tipping Point”: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 2007, 26: 716-725. 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB: Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff. 2004, Suppl Variation: VAR63-72 O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB: Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff. 2004, Suppl Variation: VAR63-72
5.
go back to reference Nelson WL, Han PKJ, Fagerlin A, Stefanek M, Ubel PA: Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27: 609-618. 10.1177/0272989X07306780.CrossRefPubMed Nelson WL, Han PKJ, Fagerlin A, Stefanek M, Ubel PA: Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27: 609-618. 10.1177/0272989X07306780.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 73: 526-535. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018.CrossRefPubMed Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 73: 526-535. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, Turcotte S: Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 5: Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, Turcotte S: Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 5:
8.
go back to reference Feldmanstewart D: Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient Educ Counseling. 2004, 54: 265-273. 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.007.CrossRef Feldmanstewart D: Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient Educ Counseling. 2004, 54: 265-273. 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.007.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Shafir E: Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA. 1995, 273: 302-5. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520280048038.CrossRefPubMed Redelmeier DA, Shafir E: Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA. 1995, 273: 302-5. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520280048038.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hastie R, Dawes RM: Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Second edition. 2009, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, Inc Hastie R, Dawes RM: Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Second edition. 2009, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, Inc
11.
go back to reference Few S: Now you see it. 2009, Oakland, CA: Analytics Press Few S: Now you see it. 2009, Oakland, CA: Analytics Press
12.
go back to reference Chen C: Information visualization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev: Computational Stat. 2010, 2: 387-403. 10.1002/wics.89.CrossRef Chen C: Information visualization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev: Computational Stat. 2010, 2: 387-403. 10.1002/wics.89.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Few S: Information dashboard design. 2005, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Few S: Information dashboard design. 2005, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media
14.
go back to reference Conway WA, Hawkins S, Jordan J, Voutt-Goos MJ: 2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. The Henry Ford Health System No Harm Campaign: a comprehensive model to reduce harm and save lives. innovation in patient safety and quality at the local level. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012, 38: 318-327.PubMed Conway WA, Hawkins S, Jordan J, Voutt-Goos MJ: 2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. The Henry Ford Health System No Harm Campaign: a comprehensive model to reduce harm and save lives. innovation in patient safety and quality at the local level. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012, 38: 318-327.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Donaldson N, Brown DS, Aydin CE, Bolton MLB, Rutledge DN: Leveraging nurse-related dashboard benchmarks to expedite performance improvement and document excellence. J Nurs Adm. 2005, 35: 163-172.CrossRefPubMed Donaldson N, Brown DS, Aydin CE, Bolton MLB, Rutledge DN: Leveraging nurse-related dashboard benchmarks to expedite performance improvement and document excellence. J Nurs Adm. 2005, 35: 163-172.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Koopman RJ, Kochendorfer KM, Moore JL, Mehr DR, Wakefield DS, Yadamsuren B, Coberly JS, Kruse RL, Wakefield BJ, Belden JL: A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed for high-quality diabetes care. Ann Family Med. 2011, 9: 398-405. 10.1370/afm.1286.CrossRef Koopman RJ, Kochendorfer KM, Moore JL, Mehr DR, Wakefield DS, Yadamsuren B, Coberly JS, Kruse RL, Wakefield BJ, Belden JL: A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed for high-quality diabetes care. Ann Family Med. 2011, 9: 398-405. 10.1370/afm.1286.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Olsha-Yehiav M, Einbinder JS, Jung E, Linder JA, Greim J, Li Q, Schnipper JL, Middleton B: Quality Dashboards: technical and architectural considerations of an actionable reporting tool for population management. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2006, 1052- Olsha-Yehiav M, Einbinder JS, Jung E, Linder JA, Greim J, Li Q, Schnipper JL, Middleton B: Quality Dashboards: technical and architectural considerations of an actionable reporting tool for population management. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2006, 1052-
18.
go back to reference Waitman LR, Phillips IE, McCoy AB, Danciu I, Halpenny RM, Nelsen CL, Johnson DC, Starmer JM, Peterson JF: Adopting real-time surveillance dashboards as a component of an enterprisewide medication safety strategy. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011, 37: 326-332.PubMed Waitman LR, Phillips IE, McCoy AB, Danciu I, Halpenny RM, Nelsen CL, Johnson DC, Starmer JM, Peterson JF: Adopting real-time surveillance dashboards as a component of an enterprisewide medication safety strategy. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011, 37: 326-332.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Egan M: Clinical dashboards: impact on workflow, care quality, and patient safety. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006, 29: 354-361.CrossRefPubMed Egan M: Clinical dashboards: impact on workflow, care quality, and patient safety. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006, 29: 354-361.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chorpita BF, Bernstein A, Daleiden EL: Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008, 35: 114-123. 10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x.CrossRefPubMed Chorpita BF, Bernstein A, Daleiden EL: Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008, 35: 114-123. 10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kailas A, Chong C-C, Watanabe F: From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010, 1: 57-63.CrossRefPubMed Kailas A, Chong C-C, Watanabe F: From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010, 1: 57-63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Peters E: Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003, 24: 413-33. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.141005.CrossRefPubMed Hibbard JH, Peters E: Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003, 24: 413-33. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.141005.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ware C: Information visualization. 2004, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 2 Ware C: Information visualization. 2004, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 2
24.
go back to reference Vessey I: Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decis Sci. 1991, 22: 219-240. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x.CrossRef Vessey I: Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decis Sci. 1991, 22: 219-240. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oppenheimer DM, Frank MC: A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition. 2008, 106: 1178-1194. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.010.CrossRefPubMed Oppenheimer DM, Frank MC: A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition. 2008, 106: 1178-1194. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.010.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Reber R, Schwarz N: Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Conscious Cogn. 1999, 8: 338-342. 10.1006/ccog.1999.0386.CrossRefPubMed Reber R, Schwarz N: Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Conscious Cogn. 1999, 8: 338-342. 10.1006/ccog.1999.0386.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM: Easy does it: the role of fluency in cue weighting. Judgment and Decision Making. 2007, 2: 371-379. KW Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM: Easy does it: the role of fluency in cue weighting. Judgment and Decision Making. 2007, 2: 371-379. KW
28.
go back to reference Hansen J, Dechêne A, Wänke M: Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008, 44: 687-691. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005.CrossRef Hansen J, Dechêne A, Wänke M: Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008, 44: 687-691. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005.CrossRef
29.
30.
31.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: a1655-a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: a1655-a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Wittink DR: Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004, 164: 1299-304. 10.1001/archinte.164.12.1299.CrossRefPubMed Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Wittink DR: Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004, 164: 1299-304. 10.1001/archinte.164.12.1299.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Carnes D, Anwer Y, Underwood M, Harding G, Parsons S, on behalf of the TOIB study team: Influences on older people’s decision making regarding choice of topical or oral NSAIDs for knee pain: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008, 336: 142-145. 10.1136/bmj.39401.699063.BE.CrossRefPubMed Carnes D, Anwer Y, Underwood M, Harding G, Parsons S, on behalf of the TOIB study team: Influences on older people’s decision making regarding choice of topical or oral NSAIDs for knee pain: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008, 336: 142-145. 10.1136/bmj.39401.699063.BE.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007, 15: 981-1000. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.014.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007, 15: 981-1000. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.014.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008, 16: 137-62. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008, 16: 137-62. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
go back to reference Xcelsius. Newtown Square, PA: SAP Corporation Xcelsius. Newtown Square, PA: SAP Corporation
42.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27: 425-478. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27: 425-478.
43.
go back to reference Loiacono E, Watson R, Goodhue D: WebQual: an instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. Int J Electron Commer. 2007, 11: 51-87. 10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302.CrossRef Loiacono E, Watson R, Goodhue D: WebQual: an instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. Int J Electron Commer. 2007, 11: 51-87. 10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference O’Connor AM: Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995, 15: 25-30. 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor AM: Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995, 15: 25-30. 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Family Medicine. 1993, 25: 391-PubMed Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Family Medicine. 1993, 25: 391-PubMed
46.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM: Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27: 672-680. 10.1177/0272989X07304449.CrossRefPubMed Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM: Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27: 672-680. 10.1177/0272989X07304449.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, Mockbee J, Hale FA: Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005, 3: 514-522. 10.1370/afm.405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, Mockbee J, Hale FA: Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005, 3: 514-522. 10.1370/afm.405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference MedCalc. Mariakerke, Belgium: MedCalc Software MedCalc. Mariakerke, Belgium: MedCalc Software
49.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Kocovski N, McConnell BA, Brundage MD, MacKillop WJ: Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Med Decis Making. 2000, 20: 228-38. 10.1177/0272989X0002000208.CrossRefPubMed Feldman-Stewart D, Kocovski N, McConnell BA, Brundage MD, MacKillop WJ: Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Med Decis Making. 2000, 20: 228-38. 10.1177/0272989X0002000208.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Zotov V: Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27: 34-43. 10.1177/0272989X06297101.CrossRefPubMed Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Zotov V: Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27: 34-43. 10.1177/0272989X06297101.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Waters EA, Weinstein ND, Colditz GA, Emmons K: Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions. J Health Commun. 2006, 11: 167-82. 10.1080/10810730500526695.CrossRefPubMed Waters EA, Weinstein ND, Colditz GA, Emmons K: Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions. J Health Commun. 2006, 11: 167-82. 10.1080/10810730500526695.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Wang C, Ubel PA: Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?. Med Decis Making. 2005, 25: 398-405. 10.1177/0272989X05278931.CrossRefPubMed Fagerlin A, Wang C, Ubel PA: Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?. Med Decis Making. 2005, 25: 398-405. 10.1177/0272989X05278931.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Fuller R, Dudley N, Blacktop J: Older people’s understanding of cumulative risks when provided with annual stroke risk information. Postgrad Med J. 2004, 80: 677-8. 10.1136/pgmj.2004.019489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fuller R, Dudley N, Blacktop J: Older people’s understanding of cumulative risks when provided with annual stroke risk information. Postgrad Med J. 2004, 80: 677-8. 10.1136/pgmj.2004.019489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
go back to reference Meyer J, Shamo MK, Gopher D: Information structure and the relative efficacy of tables and graphs. Human Factors. 1999, 41: 570-10.1518/001872099779656707.CrossRefPubMed Meyer J, Shamo MK, Gopher D: Information structure and the relative efficacy of tables and graphs. Human Factors. 1999, 41: 570-10.1518/001872099779656707.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Speier C: The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006, 64: 1115-1131. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.007.CrossRef Speier C: The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006, 64: 1115-1131. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.007.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Speier C, Morris MG: The influence of query interface design on decision-making performance. MIS Q. 2003, 397-423. Speier C, Morris MG: The influence of query interface design on decision-making performance. MIS Q. 2003, 397-423.
57.
go back to reference Whelan T, LeVine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D, Chambers S, O’Brien MA, Reid S, Dubois S: Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004, 292: 435-441. 10.1001/jama.292.4.435.CrossRefPubMed Whelan T, LeVine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D, Chambers S, O’Brien MA, Reid S, Dubois S: Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004, 292: 435-441. 10.1001/jama.292.4.435.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Whelan T, Sawka C, LeVine M, Gafni A, Reyno L, Willan A, Julian J, Dent S, Abu-Zahra H, Chouinard E, Tozer R, Pritchard K, Bodendorfer I: Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 95: 581-587. 10.1093/jnci/95.8.581.CrossRefPubMed Whelan T, Sawka C, LeVine M, Gafni A, Reyno L, Willan A, Julian J, Dent S, Abu-Zahra H, Chouinard E, Tozer R, Pritchard K, Bodendorfer I: Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 95: 581-587. 10.1093/jnci/95.8.581.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and initial evaluation of a treatment decision dashboard
Authors
James G Dolan
Peter J Veazie
Ann J Russ
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-51

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013 Go to the issue