Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Health communication in primary health care -A case study of ICT development for health promotion

Authors: Amina Jama Mahmud, Ewy Olander, Sara Eriksén, Bo JA Haglund

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Developing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) supported health communication in PHC could contribute to increased health literacy and empowerment, which are foundations for enabling people to increase control over their health, as a way to reduce increasing lifestyle related ill health. However, to increase the likelihood of success of implementing ICT supported health communication, it is essential to conduct a detailed analysis of the setting and context prior to the intervention. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of health communication for health promotion in PHC with emphasis on the implications for a planned ICT supported interactive health channel.

Methods

A qualitative case study, with a multi-methods approach was applied. Field notes, document study and focus groups were used for data collection. Data was then analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

Health communication is an integral part of health promotion practice in PHC in this case study. However, there was a lack of consensus among health professionals on what a health promotion approach was, causing discrepancy in approaches and practices of health communication. Two themes emerged from the data analysis: Communicating health and environment for health communication. The themes represented individual and organizational factors that affected health communication practice in PHC and thus need to be taken into consideration in the development of the planned health channel.

Conclusions

Health communication practiced in PHC is individual based, preventive and reactive in nature, as opposed to population based, promotive and proactive in line with a health promotion approach. The most significant challenge in developing an ICT supported health communication channel for health promotion identified in this study, is profiling a health promotion approach in PHC. Addressing health promotion values and principles in the design of ICT supported health communication channel could facilitate health communication for promoting health, i.e. ‘health promoting communication’.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frankish C, Moulton J, Rootman I, Cole C, Gray D: Setting a foundation: underlying values and structures of health promotion in primary health care settings. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2006, 7 (02): 172-182. 10.1191/1463423606pc279oa.CrossRef Frankish C, Moulton J, Rootman I, Cole C, Gray D: Setting a foundation: underlying values and structures of health promotion in primary health care settings. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2006, 7 (02): 172-182. 10.1191/1463423606pc279oa.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wise M, Nutbeam D: Enabling health systems transformation: what progress has been made in re-orienting health services?. Promot Educ. 2007, 14 (suppl 2): 23-27. Wise M, Nutbeam D: Enabling health systems transformation: what progress has been made in re-orienting health services?. Promot Educ. 2007, 14 (suppl 2): 23-27.
3.
go back to reference Watson M: Going for gold: the health promoting general practice. Qual Prim Care. 2008, 16 (3): 177-185.PubMed Watson M: Going for gold: the health promoting general practice. Qual Prim Care. 2008, 16 (3): 177-185.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ratzan SC: Health Communication: beyond recognition to impact. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2011, 16 (2): 111-CrossRef Ratzan SC: Health Communication: beyond recognition to impact. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2011, 16 (2): 111-CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kickbusch I, Ratzan S: Health Literacy: making a difference in the USA. J Health Commun. 2001, 6 (2): 87-88.CrossRefPubMed Kickbusch I, Ratzan S: Health Literacy: making a difference in the USA. J Health Commun. 2001, 6 (2): 87-88.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nutbeam D: Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000, 15 (3): 259-267. 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.CrossRef Nutbeam D: Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000, 15 (3): 259-267. 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Poland B, Krupa G, McCall D: Settings for Health Promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promot Pract. 2009, 10 (4): 505-516. 10.1177/1524839909341025.CrossRefPubMed Poland B, Krupa G, McCall D: Settings for Health Promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promot Pract. 2009, 10 (4): 505-516. 10.1177/1524839909341025.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kreps GL, Neuhauser L: New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns. 2010, 78 (3): 329-336. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013.CrossRefPubMed Kreps GL, Neuhauser L: New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns. 2010, 78 (3): 329-336. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008, 372 (9650): 1661-1669. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.CrossRefPubMed Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008, 372 (9650): 1661-1669. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Richard L, Potvin L, Mansi O: The ecological approach in health promotion programs: the views of health promotion workers in Canada. Health Educ J. 1998, 57 (2): 160-173. 10.1177/001789699805700208.CrossRef Richard L, Potvin L, Mansi O: The ecological approach in health promotion programs: the views of health promotion workers in Canada. Health Educ J. 1998, 57 (2): 160-173. 10.1177/001789699805700208.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith BJ, Tang KC, Nutbeam D: WHO Health Promotion Glossary: new terms. Health Promot Int. 2006, 21 (4): 340-345. 10.1093/heapro/dal033.CrossRefPubMed Smith BJ, Tang KC, Nutbeam D: WHO Health Promotion Glossary: new terms. Health Promot Int. 2006, 21 (4): 340-345. 10.1093/heapro/dal033.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tufte T, Hemer O: (Eds): Media and Glocal Change – Rethinking Communication for Development. 2005, Gothenburg: NORDICOM Tufte T, Hemer O: (Eds): Media and Glocal Change – Rethinking Communication for Development. 2005, Gothenburg: NORDICOM
13.
go back to reference Mantoura P, Potvin L: A realist-constructionist perspective on participatory research in health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2012, Sept.5 Mantoura P, Potvin L: A realist-constructionist perspective on participatory research in health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2012, Sept.5
14.
go back to reference Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant AF, Greer DS: Advancing health literacy: a framework for understanding and action. 2006, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant AF, Greer DS: Advancing health literacy: a framework for understanding and action. 2006, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
15.
go back to reference Nutbeam D: The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 12: 2072-2078.CrossRef Nutbeam D: The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 12: 2072-2078.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS: Elaborating a definition of health literacy: a commentary. J Health Commun. 2003, 8 (sup1): 119-120. 10.1080/713851982.CrossRefPubMed Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS: Elaborating a definition of health literacy: a commentary. J Health Commun. 2003, 8 (sup1): 119-120. 10.1080/713851982.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference World Health Organization, Ottawa Charter for health promotion: First International Conference on Health Promotion. 1986, Canada: Ottawa World Health Organization, Ottawa Charter for health promotion: First International Conference on Health Promotion. 1986, Canada: Ottawa
18.
go back to reference Socialdepartementet, 2007/08:110: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. The new public health policy. 2008, Stockholm: Government proposition in Swedish Socialdepartementet, 2007/08:110: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. The new public health policy. 2008, Stockholm: Government proposition in Swedish
19.
go back to reference Costa-Font J, Mossialos E, Rudisill C: When is the Internet a valued communication device for health information in Europe?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2009, 18 (5): 429-445. 10.1080/10438590802547159.CrossRef Costa-Font J, Mossialos E, Rudisill C: When is the Internet a valued communication device for health information in Europe?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2009, 18 (5): 429-445. 10.1080/10438590802547159.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Evers KE: eHealth promotion: the use of the Internet for health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 2006, 20 (4): 1-7.PubMed Evers KE: eHealth promotion: the use of the Internet for health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 2006, 20 (4): 1-7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Schiavo R: Health communication: from theory to practice. 2007, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Schiavo R: Health communication: from theory to practice. 2007, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
22.
go back to reference Ratzan SC: Moving from IEC to IHC— the time is now. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2010, 15 (7): 691-694.CrossRef Ratzan SC: Moving from IEC to IHC— the time is now. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2010, 15 (7): 691-694.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Neuhauser L, Kreps GL: The 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium. Participatory design and artificial intelligence: strategies to improve health communication for diverse Audiences. 2011, Stanford, California, USA: AAAI Neuhauser L, Kreps GL: The 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium. Participatory design and artificial intelligence: strategies to improve health communication for diverse Audiences. 2011, Stanford, California, USA: AAAI
24.
go back to reference Timpka T, Olvander C, Hallberg N: Information system needs in health promotion: a case study of the Safe Community program using requirements engineering methods. Health Informatics J. 2008, 14 (3): 183-193. 10.1177/1081180X08092829.CrossRefPubMed Timpka T, Olvander C, Hallberg N: Information system needs in health promotion: a case study of the Safe Community program using requirements engineering methods. Health Informatics J. 2008, 14 (3): 183-193. 10.1177/1081180X08092829.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Johannesson C, Winge M: Hälsa genom e-eHälsorapporten 2010, in VINNOVA Rapport VR 2011: 04. 2011, Swedish: Health through e- eHealth report Johannesson C, Winge M: Hälsa genom e-eHälsorapporten 2010, in VINNOVA Rapport VR 2011: 04. 2011, Swedish: Health through e- eHealth report
26.
go back to reference Hoyo Barbolla ED: PhD Thesis. E-health reference framework for personalized information provision to promote sound lifestyles. 2007, Technical University of Madrid: Department of Telecommunication Hoyo Barbolla ED: PhD Thesis. E-health reference framework for personalized information provision to promote sound lifestyles. 2007, Technical University of Madrid: Department of Telecommunication
27.
go back to reference Skinner HA, Maley O, Norman CD: Developing Internet-based eHealth promotion programs: the Spiral Technology Action Research (STAR) model. Health Promot Pract. 2006, 7 (4): 406-417. 10.1177/1524839905278889.CrossRefPubMed Skinner HA, Maley O, Norman CD: Developing Internet-based eHealth promotion programs: the Spiral Technology Action Research (STAR) model. Health Promot Pract. 2006, 7 (4): 406-417. 10.1177/1524839905278889.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mahmud A, Olander E, Wallenberg L, Haglund BA: Health promoting settings in primary health care - “halsotorg”: an implementation analysis. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (1): 707-10.1186/1471-2458-10-707.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mahmud A, Olander E, Wallenberg L, Haglund BA: Health promoting settings in primary health care - “halsotorg”: an implementation analysis. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (1): 707-10.1186/1471-2458-10-707.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Andersen P, Olander E: Evaluation of implementation of Health Square, focusing Health Squares development possibilities. 2008, Swedish: Local evaluation report Andersen P, Olander E: Evaluation of implementation of Health Square, focusing Health Squares development possibilities. 2008, Swedish: Local evaluation report
30.
go back to reference Waterston T: A new direction for primary health care: 30 yrs after Alma Ata?. J Trop Pediatr. 2008, 54 (6): 357-360. 10.1093/tropej/fmn104.CrossRefPubMed Waterston T: A new direction for primary health care: 30 yrs after Alma Ata?. J Trop Pediatr. 2008, 54 (6): 357-360. 10.1093/tropej/fmn104.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Whyte WF: Participatory action research. Sage focus editions, 99-0141286-2; 123. 1991, Newbury Park: Sage Whyte WF: Participatory action research. Sage focus editions, 99-0141286-2; 123. 1991, Newbury Park: Sage
32.
go back to reference Yin RK: Case study research: design and methods. 2009, INC, London: Sage publications Yin RK: Case study research: design and methods. 2009, INC, London: Sage publications
33.
go back to reference Reason P, Bradbury H: Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. 2001, London: Sage Reason P, Bradbury H: Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. 2001, London: Sage
34.
go back to reference Patton MQ: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002, London: Sage Patton MQ: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002, London: Sage
35.
go back to reference Denzin NK, Lincoln Y: The landscape of qualitative research- Theories and issues. 2007, Thousand Oaks CA 91320: SAGE Publications Denzin NK, Lincoln Y: The landscape of qualitative research- Theories and issues. 2007, Thousand Oaks CA 91320: SAGE Publications
36.
go back to reference Casey D: Using action research to change health-promoting practice. Nurs Health Sci. 2007, 9 (1): 5-13. 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00297.x.CrossRefPubMed Casey D: Using action research to change health-promoting practice. Nurs Health Sci. 2007, 9 (1): 5-13. 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00297.x.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Krueger RA, Casey MA: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2009, Thousand Oakes, California: Sage Publications, updated edition Krueger RA, Casey MA: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2009, Thousand Oakes, California: Sage Publications, updated edition
38.
go back to reference Bowling A: Research methods in health. 2002, Buckingham: Open University Press Bowling A: Research methods in health. 2002, Buckingham: Open University Press
39.
go back to reference Whyte W, Greenwood D, Lazes P: Participatory action research. 1991, Participatory Action Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA: Through practice to science in social science researchCrossRef Whyte W, Greenwood D, Lazes P: Participatory action research. 1991, Participatory Action Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA: Through practice to science in social science researchCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Smith L, Bratini L, Chambers DA, Jensen RV, Romero L: Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research. 2010, 8 (4): 407-425. 10.1177/1476750310366043.CrossRef Smith L, Bratini L, Chambers DA, Jensen RV, Romero L: Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research. 2010, 8 (4): 407-425. 10.1177/1476750310366043.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Corbin JH, Mittelmark MB: Partnership lessons from the Global Program for Health Promotion Effectiveness: a case study. Health Promot Int. 2008, 23 (4): 365-371. 10.1093/heapro/dan029.CrossRefPubMed Corbin JH, Mittelmark MB: Partnership lessons from the Global Program for Health Promotion Effectiveness: a case study. Health Promot Int. 2008, 23 (4): 365-371. 10.1093/heapro/dan029.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Johansson H, Weinehall L, Emmelin M: If we only got a chance. Barriers to and possibilities for a more health-promoting health service. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2010, 3: 1-9. Johansson H, Weinehall L, Emmelin M: If we only got a chance. Barriers to and possibilities for a more health-promoting health service. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2010, 3: 1-9.
43.
go back to reference Moulton G, Frankish J, Cole C, Gray D: Building on a foundation: strategies, processes and outcomes of health promotion in primary health care settings. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2006, 7 (03): 269-277. Moulton G, Frankish J, Cole C, Gray D: Building on a foundation: strategies, processes and outcomes of health promotion in primary health care settings. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2006, 7 (03): 269-277.
44.
go back to reference World Health Organization, The World Health Report: Primary Health Care: Now more than ever, in World Health Report, Lerberghe, WV (Ed). 2008. 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization, 148- World Health Organization, The World Health Report: Primary Health Care: Now more than ever, in World Health Report, Lerberghe, WV (Ed). 2008. 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization, 148-
45.
go back to reference Pilemalm S, Timpka T: Third generation participatory design in health informatics–Making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. J Biomed Inform. 2008, 41 (2): 327-339. 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.09.004.CrossRefPubMed Pilemalm S, Timpka T: Third generation participatory design in health informatics–Making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. J Biomed Inform. 2008, 41 (2): 327-339. 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.09.004.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Robinson M, Robertson S: Young men’s health promotion and new information communication technologies: illuminating the issues and research agendas. Health Promot Int. 2010, 25 (3): 363-370. 10.1093/heapro/daq022.CrossRefPubMed Robinson M, Robertson S: Young men’s health promotion and new information communication technologies: illuminating the issues and research agendas. Health Promot Int. 2010, 25 (3): 363-370. 10.1093/heapro/daq022.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Irvine F: Examining the correspondence of theoretical and real interpretations of health promotion. J Clin Nurs. 2007, 16 (3): 593-602. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01539.x.CrossRefPubMed Irvine F: Examining the correspondence of theoretical and real interpretations of health promotion. J Clin Nurs. 2007, 16 (3): 593-602. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01539.x.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Crystal A, Greenberg J: Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006, 57: 1368-82. 10.1002/asi.20436.CrossRef Crystal A, Greenberg J: Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006, 57: 1368-82. 10.1002/asi.20436.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Eysenbach G: Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. the Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Edited by: John D, Catherine T, Mac A. 2007, 123-154. Eysenbach G: Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. the Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Edited by: John D, Catherine T, Mac A. 2007, 123-154.
50.
go back to reference Gilmour JA, Scott SD, Huntington N: Nurses and Internet health information: a questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs. 2008, 61: 19-28.PubMed Gilmour JA, Scott SD, Huntington N: Nurses and Internet health information: a questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs. 2008, 61: 19-28.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Swedish Central Statistics Agency (SCB): Immigration after nationality, sex and year. 2012, Swedish: Central Statistics Agency Swedish Central Statistics Agency (SCB): Immigration after nationality, sex and year. 2012, Swedish: Central Statistics Agency
52.
go back to reference Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Judging interpretations: but is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2007, 2007 (114): 11-25. 10.1002/ev.223.CrossRef Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Judging interpretations: but is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2007, 2007 (114): 11-25. 10.1002/ev.223.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Gazmararian JA: The Development of a Health Literacy Assessment Tool for Health Plans. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2010, 15 (1 suppl. 2): 93-101.CrossRef Gazmararian JA: The Development of a Health Literacy Assessment Tool for Health Plans. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2010, 15 (1 suppl. 2): 93-101.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health communication in primary health care -A case study of ICT development for health promotion
Authors
Amina Jama Mahmud
Ewy Olander
Sara Eriksén
Bo JA Haglund
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-17

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013 Go to the issue