Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Study protocol

Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)

Authors: Daniel C Steinemann, Dimitri A Raptis, Georg Lurje, Christian E Oberkofler, Roland Wyss, Adrian Zehnder, Mickael Lesurtel, René Vonlanthen, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Stefan Breitenstein

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Emerging attempts have been made to reduce operative trauma and improve cosmetic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is a trend towards minimizing the number of incisions such as natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC). Many retrospective case series propose excellent cosmesis and reduced pain in SPLC. As the latter has been confirmed in a randomized controlled trial, patient's satisfaction on cosmesis is still controversially debated.

Methods/Design

The SPOCC trial is a prospective, multi-center, double blinded, randomized controlled study comparing SPLC with 4-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) in elective surgery. The hypothesis and primary objective is that patients undergoing SPLC will have a better outcome in cosmesis and body image 12 weeks after surgery. This primary endpoint is assessed using a validated 8-item multiple choice type questionnaire on cosmesis and body image. The secondary endpoint has three entities: the quality of life 12 weeks after surgery assessed by the validated Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire, postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale and the use of analgesics. Operative time, surgeon's experience with SPLC and 4PLC, use of additional ports, conversion to 4PLC or open cholecystectomy, length of stay, costs, time of work as well as intra- and postoperative complications are further aspects of the secondary endpoint. Patients are randomly assigned either to SPLC or to 4PLC. Patients as well as treating physicians, nurses and assessors are blinded until the 7th postoperative day. Sample size calculation performed by estimating a difference of cosmesis of 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.90, drop out rate of 10%) resulted in a number of 55 randomized patients per arm.

Discussion

The SPOCC-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study to assess cosmesis and body image after SPLC.

Trial registration

(clinicaltrial.gov): NCT 01278472
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Litynski GS: Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS. 1998, 2 (4): 341-346.PubMedPubMedCentral Litynski GS: Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS. 1998, 2 (4): 341-346.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Begos DG, Modlin IM: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994, 19 (4): 325-330. 10.1097/00004836-199412000-00015.CrossRefPubMed Begos DG, Modlin IM: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994, 19 (4): 325-330. 10.1097/00004836-199412000-00015.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA: Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc. 2007, 21 (12): 2308-2316. 10.1007/s00464-007-9498-z.CrossRefPubMed Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA: Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc. 2007, 21 (12): 2308-2316. 10.1007/s00464-007-9498-z.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pearl JP, Ponsky JL: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008, 12 (7): 1293-1300. 10.1007/s11605-007-0424-4.CrossRefPubMed Pearl JP, Ponsky JL: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008, 12 (7): 1293-1300. 10.1007/s11605-007-0424-4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A: The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB (Oxford). 2008, 10 (5): 336-340.CrossRef Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A: The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB (Oxford). 2008, 10 (5): 336-340.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schlager A, Khalaileh A, Shussman N, Elazary R, Keidar A, Pikarsky AJ, Ben-Shushan A, Shibolet O, Horgan S, Talamini M, Zamir G, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y: Providing more through less: current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24 (7): 1542-1546. 10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6.CrossRefPubMed Schlager A, Khalaileh A, Shussman N, Elazary R, Keidar A, Pikarsky AJ, Ben-Shushan A, Shibolet O, Horgan S, Talamini M, Zamir G, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y: Providing more through less: current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24 (7): 1542-1546. 10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011 Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011
8.
go back to reference Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A: Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 24 (8): 1842-1848. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A: Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 24 (8): 1842-1848.
9.
go back to reference Allemann P, Schafer M, Demartines N: Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2010, 97 (10): 1476-1480. 10.1002/bjs.7189.CrossRefPubMed Allemann P, Schafer M, Demartines N: Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2010, 97 (10): 1476-1480. 10.1002/bjs.7189.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011, 25 (2): 367-377. 10.1007/s00464-010-1217-5.CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011, 25 (2): 367-377. 10.1007/s00464-010-1217-5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krahenbuhl S, Krahenbuhl L: Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011, 98 (3): 391-396. 10.1002/bjs.7335.CrossRefPubMed Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krahenbuhl S, Krahenbuhl L: Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011, 98 (3): 391-396. 10.1002/bjs.7335.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc. 2009, 23 (4): 896-899. 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y.CrossRefPubMed Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc. 2009, 23 (4): 896-899. 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24 (3): 709-714. 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4.CrossRefPubMed Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24 (3): 709-714. 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bignell M, Hindmarsh A, Nageswaran H, Mothe B, Jenkinson A, Mahon D, Rhodes M: Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?. Surg Endosc. 2011 Bignell M, Hindmarsh A, Nageswaran H, Mothe B, Jenkinson A, Mahon D, Rhodes M: Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?. Surg Endosc. 2011
15.
go back to reference Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA: Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc. 1998, 12 (11): 1334-1340. 10.1007/s004649900851.CrossRefPubMed Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA: Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc. 1998, 12 (11): 1334-1340. 10.1007/s004649900851.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lind MY, Hop WC, Weimar W, JN IJ: Body image after laparoscopic or open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004, 18 (8): 1276-1279. 10.1007/s00464-003-9113-x.CrossRefPubMed Lind MY, Hop WC, Weimar W, JN IJ: Body image after laparoscopic or open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004, 18 (8): 1276-1279. 10.1007/s00464-003-9113-x.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30 (6): 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30 (6): 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004, 240 (2): 205-213. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004, 240 (2): 205-213. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Keus F, de Vries J, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ: Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: health status in a blind randomised trial. Surg Endosc. 2008, 22 (7): 1649-1659. 10.1007/s00464-007-9675-0.CrossRefPubMed Keus F, de Vries J, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ: Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: health status in a blind randomised trial. Surg Endosc. 2008, 22 (7): 1649-1659. 10.1007/s00464-007-9675-0.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lurie I, Levine SZ: Meta-analysis of dropout rates in SSRIs versus placebo in randomized clinical trials of PTSD. J Nerv Ment Dis. 198 (2): 116-124. Lurie I, Levine SZ: Meta-analysis of dropout rates in SSRIs versus placebo in randomized clinical trials of PTSD. J Nerv Ment Dis. 198 (2): 116-124.
21.
go back to reference Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Altman DG, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Campbell WB, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Maddern GJ, Marshall JC, McCulloch P, Nicholl J, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Grant A: Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009, 374 (9695): 1097-1104. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Altman DG, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Campbell WB, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Maddern GJ, Marshall JC, McCulloch P, Nicholl J, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Grant A: Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009, 374 (9695): 1097-1104. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Steinemann DC, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S: Single-Port cholecystectomy using internal retraction. swissknife. 2011, s1 Steinemann DC, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S: Single-Port cholecystectomy using internal retraction. swissknife. 2011, s1
25.
26.
go back to reference Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Hirokawa F, Miyamoto Y, Okuda J, Tanigawa N: Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg. 2011, 98 (7): 991-995. 10.1002/bjs.7486.CrossRefPubMed Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Hirokawa F, Miyamoto Y, Okuda J, Tanigawa N: Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg. 2011, 98 (7): 991-995. 10.1002/bjs.7486.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)
Authors
Daniel C Steinemann
Dimitri A Raptis
Georg Lurje
Christian E Oberkofler
Roland Wyss
Adrian Zehnder
Mickael Lesurtel
René Vonlanthen
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Stefan Breitenstein
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-24

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Surgery 1/2011 Go to the issue