Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Study protocol

Clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aesculap Activ-L™ artificial disc in the treatment of degenerative disc disease

Authors: James J Yue, Fred F Mo

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Activ-L Artificial Disc for treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine in patients who have been unresponsive to at least six months of prior conservative care. The hypothesis of the study is that the Activ-L Disc is non-inferior to the control (the Charité® Artificial Disc [DePuy Spine] or ProDisc-L® Total Disc Replacement [Synthes Spine]) with respect to the rate of individual subject success at 24 months. Individual subject success is a composite of effectiveness and safety.

Methods/Design

The study proposed is a prospective, randomized, single-masked, controlled, multi-center clinical trial consisting of an estimated 414 subjects with single-level DDD of the lumbar spine (L4/L5, or L5/S1) who have failed to improve with conservative treatment for at least six months prior to enrollment. After enrollment, subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either the Activ-L Disc (investigational device) or the control (Charité or ProDisc-L). Radiographic endpoints will be evaluated by an independent reviewer at an imaging core laboratory. Each subject will be followed for 5 years post-treatment.

Discussion

The safety and effectiveness of the Activ-L Artificial Disc for treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine will be equivalent to Charité® Artificial Disc [DePuy Spine] or ProDisc-L® Total Disc Replacement [Synthes Spine] at 24 months.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials NCT00589797.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goins ML, Wimberly DW, Yuan PS, Fitzhenry LN, Vaccaro AR: Nucleus pulposus replacement: an emerging technology. Spine J. 2005, 5: 317S-324S. 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.021.CrossRefPubMed Goins ML, Wimberly DW, Yuan PS, Fitzhenry LN, Vaccaro AR: Nucleus pulposus replacement: an emerging technology. Spine J. 2005, 5: 317S-324S. 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.021.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Christensen FB: Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004, 75 (313): 2-43.PubMed Christensen FB: Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004, 75 (313): 2-43.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bao QB, Yuan HA: Artificial disc technology. Neurosurg Focus. 2004, 9 (4): Article 14- Bao QB, Yuan HA: Artificial disc technology. Neurosurg Focus. 2004, 9 (4): Article 14-
4.
go back to reference Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y: More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Statistics in Medicine. 1990, 9: 811-118. 10.1002/sim.4780090710.CrossRefPubMed Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y: More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Statistics in Medicine. 1990, 9: 811-118. 10.1002/sim.4780090710.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Mamy T: Correlation between Range of Motion and Outcome after Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: 8.6-Year Follow-up. Spine J. 2005, 30 (12): 1407-1411. 10.1097/01.brs.0000166528.67425.0e.CrossRef Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Mamy T: Correlation between Range of Motion and Outcome after Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: 8.6-Year Follow-up. Spine J. 2005, 30 (12): 1407-1411. 10.1097/01.brs.0000166528.67425.0e.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Marnay T: Lumbar total disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88: 50-64. 10.2106/JBJS.E.01066.PubMed Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Marnay T: Lumbar total disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88: 50-64. 10.2106/JBJS.E.01066.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Blackwelder WC: "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1982, 3: 345-353. 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1.CrossRefPubMed Blackwelder WC: "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1982, 3: 345-353. 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Morikawa T, Yoshida M: A useful testing strategy in phase III trials: Combined test of superiority and test of equivalence. J Biopharm Stat. 1995, 5 (3): 297-306. 10.1080/10543409508835115.CrossRefPubMed Morikawa T, Yoshida M: A useful testing strategy in phase III trials: Combined test of superiority and test of equivalence. J Biopharm Stat. 1995, 5 (3): 297-306. 10.1080/10543409508835115.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Singh V, Derby R: Percutaneous lumbar disc decompression. Pain Physician. 2006, 9: 139-46.PubMed Singh V, Derby R: Percutaneous lumbar disc decompression. Pain Physician. 2006, 9: 139-46.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aesculap Activ-L™ artificial disc in the treatment of degenerative disc disease
Authors
James J Yue
Fred F Mo
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-14

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

BMC Surgery 1/2010 Go to the issue