Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Process and impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment

Authors: Kaaren R Mathias, Ben Harris-Roxas

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

despite health impact assessment (HIA) being increasingly widely used internationally, fundamental questions about its impact on decision-making, implementation and practices remain. In 2005 a collaboration between public health and local government authorities performed an HIA on the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Options paper in New Zealand. The findings of this were incorporated into the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy;

Methods

using multiple qualitative methodologies including key informant interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, this study performs process and impact evaluations of the Christchurch HIA including evaluation of costs and resource use;

Results

the evaluation found that the HIA had demonstrable direct impacts on planning and implementation of the final Urban Development Strategy as well as indirect impacts on understandings and ways of working within and between organisations. It also points out future directions and ways of working in this successful collaboration between public health and local government authorities. It summarises the modest resource use and discusses the important role HIA can play in urban planning with intersectoral collaboration and enhanced relationships as both catalysts and outcomes of the HIA process;

Conclusion

as one of the few evaluations of HIA that have been published to date, this paper makes a substantial contribution to the literature on the impact, utility and effectiveness of HIA.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Signal L, Durham G: Health Impact Assessment in the New Zealand policy context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2000, 15: 11-26. Signal L, Durham G: Health Impact Assessment in the New Zealand policy context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2000, 15: 11-26.
3.
go back to reference Mahoney M, Morgan RK: Health Impact Assessment in Australia and New Zealand: an exploration of methodological concerns. Promotion & Education. 2001, 8 (1): 8-11. 10.1177/102538230100800104.CrossRef Mahoney M, Morgan RK: Health Impact Assessment in Australia and New Zealand: an exploration of methodological concerns. Promotion & Education. 2001, 8 (1): 8-11. 10.1177/102538230100800104.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ministry of Health: Health Impact Assessment Guidelines. 1995, Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Health Ministry of Health: Health Impact Assessment Guidelines. 1995, Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Health
5.
go back to reference Public Health Advisory Committee: A guide to Health Impact Assessment: a policy tool for New Zealand. 2005, Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee Public Health Advisory Committee: A guide to Health Impact Assessment: a policy tool for New Zealand. 2005, Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee
6.
go back to reference Ministry of Health: The New Zealand Health Strategy. 2000, Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health Ministry of Health: The New Zealand Health Strategy. 2000, Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health
7.
go back to reference Duhl LJ, Sanchez AK: Healthy cities and the city planning process – a background document on links between health and urban planning. 1999, Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organisation – Regional Office for Europe Duhl LJ, Sanchez AK: Healthy cities and the city planning process – a background document on links between health and urban planning. 1999, Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organisation – Regional Office for Europe
8.
9.
go back to reference Turshen M: The politics of public health. 1989, London: Zed Books Turshen M: The politics of public health. 1989, London: Zed Books
10.
go back to reference Harris-Roxas B, Harris P: Learning by doing: the value of case studies of Health Impact Assessment. NSW Public Health Bulletin. 2007, 18 (9–10): 161-163.CrossRefPubMed Harris-Roxas B, Harris P: Learning by doing: the value of case studies of Health Impact Assessment. NSW Public Health Bulletin. 2007, 18 (9–10): 161-163.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Joffe M, Mindell J: A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2002, 56 (2): 132-138. 10.1136/jech.56.2.132.CrossRef Joffe M, Mindell J: A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2002, 56 (2): 132-138. 10.1136/jech.56.2.132.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Quigley RJ, Taylor LC: Evaluation as a key part of Health Impact Assessment: the English experience. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003, 81 (6): 415-419.PubMedPubMedCentral Quigley RJ, Taylor LC: Evaluation as a key part of Health Impact Assessment: the English experience. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003, 81 (6): 415-419.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Quigley RJ, Taylor LC: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. Public Health. 2004, 118 (8): 544-552. 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.012.CrossRefPubMed Quigley RJ, Taylor LC: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. Public Health. 2004, 118 (8): 544-552. 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.012.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Taylor L, Gowman N, Quigley R: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. 2003, London: Health Development Agency Taylor L, Gowman N, Quigley R: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. 2003, London: Health Development Agency
15.
go back to reference Taylor L, Quigley R: Health Impact Assessment – A review of reviews. 2002, London: Health Development Agency Taylor L, Quigley R: Health Impact Assessment – A review of reviews. 2002, London: Health Development Agency
16.
go back to reference Greater Christchurch Urban Development Forum: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy – So many options which will you choose?. 2004, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council Greater Christchurch Urban Development Forum: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy – So many options which will you choose?. 2004, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council
17.
go back to reference Joffe M: How do we make Health Impact Assessment fit for purpose?. Public Health. 2003, 117 (5): 301-304. 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00102-1.CrossRefPubMed Joffe M: How do we make Health Impact Assessment fit for purpose?. Public Health. 2003, 117 (5): 301-304. 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00102-1.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Milner S, Bailey C, Deans J: 'Fit for purpose' Health Impact Assessment: a realistic way forward. Public Health. 2003, 117 (5): 295-300. 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00127-6.CrossRefPubMed Milner S, Bailey C, Deans J: 'Fit for purpose' Health Impact Assessment: a realistic way forward. Public Health. 2003, 117 (5): 295-300. 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00127-6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: A Health Impact Assessment of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: A Health Impact Assessment of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board
20.
go back to reference Robson B, Harris R, (Eds): Hauora: Maori standards of health IV. A study of the years 2000 – 2005. 2007, Wellington, New Zealand: Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago Robson B, Harris R, (Eds): Hauora: Maori standards of health IV. A study of the years 2000 – 2005. 2007, Wellington, New Zealand: Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago
21.
go back to reference Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: Health Impact Assessment – Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Options. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: Health Impact Assessment – Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Options. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board
22.
go back to reference Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: Assessing the impacts on health of an urban development strategy: a case study of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2006, 146-163. 29 Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: Assessing the impacts on health of an urban development strategy: a case study of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2006, 146-163. 29
23.
go back to reference Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: Greater Christchurch Draft Urban Development Strategy 2005. NSW Public Health Bulletin. 2007, 18 (9–10): 182-184.CrossRefPubMed Stevenson A, Banwell K, Pink R: Greater Christchurch Draft Urban Development Strategy 2005. NSW Public Health Bulletin. 2007, 18 (9–10): 182-184.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference London Health Commission: Evaluation of the Health Impact Assessments on the draft mayoral strategies for London. 2003, London: London Health Commission London Health Commission: Evaluation of the Health Impact Assessments on the draft mayoral strategies for London. 2003, London: London Health Commission
25.
go back to reference Mathias K: Process evaluation of the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand: Community and Public Health, Canterbury District Health Board Mathias K: Process evaluation of the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand: Community and Public Health, Canterbury District Health Board
26.
go back to reference Mathias K: An Impact Evaluation of the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board Mathias K: An Impact Evaluation of the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board
27.
go back to reference Greater Christchurch Urban Development Forum: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy and Action Plan 2007. 2007, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council Greater Christchurch Urban Development Forum: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy and Action Plan 2007. 2007, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council
28.
go back to reference Pink R: The health impacts of urban development option of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. Urban Forum of Greater Christchurch. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand Pink R: The health impacts of urban development option of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. Urban Forum of Greater Christchurch. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand
29.
go back to reference Christchurch City Council: A summary of the Health Impact Assessment report of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council Christchurch City Council: A summary of the Health Impact Assessment report of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council
30.
go back to reference Environment Canterbury: Natural Resources Regional Plan (NRRP) – Groundwater Allocation and Policy Implementation – September 2007. 2007, Christchurch, New Zealand: Environment Canterbury Environment Canterbury: Natural Resources Regional Plan (NRRP) – Groundwater Allocation and Policy Implementation – September 2007. 2007, Christchurch, New Zealand: Environment Canterbury
31.
go back to reference Christchurch City Council: Healthy Christchurch – Christchurch City Health Development Plan Proposal (Internal Report). 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council Christchurch City Council: Healthy Christchurch – Christchurch City Health Development Plan Proposal (Internal Report). 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council
32.
go back to reference Billante V: Health Promotion and Sustainability Through Environmental Design: a Guide for Planning. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council Billante V: Health Promotion and Sustainability Through Environmental Design: a Guide for Planning. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council
33.
go back to reference Christchurch City Council: Urban Development Strategy Community Charter. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council Christchurch City Council: Urban Development Strategy Community Charter. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council
34.
go back to reference Canterbury District Health Board: Healthy Eating Active Living Action Plan 2005–2010. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board Canterbury District Health Board: Healthy Eating Active Living Action Plan 2005–2010. 2005, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board
35.
go back to reference Stevenson A: An HIA on the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. A presentation in Planning Health Into Melbourne Conference. Melbourne. 2005 Stevenson A: An HIA on the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. A presentation in Planning Health Into Melbourne Conference. Melbourne. 2005
36.
go back to reference Quigley RJ: Case study of the Christchurch UDS HIA. 2008, Wellington, New Zealand: Public Health Advisory Committee Quigley RJ: Case study of the Christchurch UDS HIA. 2008, Wellington, New Zealand: Public Health Advisory Committee
37.
go back to reference Harris-Roxas B: Health Impact Assessment: A training resource for HIA. 2008, Sydney: UNSW Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation (CHETRE) Harris-Roxas B: Health Impact Assessment: A training resource for HIA. 2008, Sydney: UNSW Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation (CHETRE)
38.
go back to reference Humphrey A: Health Impact Assessment on the Central Plains Water Scheme. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board Humphrey A: Health Impact Assessment on the Central Plains Water Scheme. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board
39.
go back to reference Storey S, Mathias K: Health Impact Assessment of the Christchurch Transport Interchange Project – Phase One. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board (Internal Report) – with Christchurch City Council Storey S, Mathias K: Health Impact Assessment of the Christchurch Transport Interchange Project – Phase One. 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury District Health Board (Internal Report) – with Christchurch City Council
40.
go back to reference Department of Internal Affairs: Local Government Act. 2002, Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Internal Affairs Department of Internal Affairs: Local Government Act. 2002, Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Internal Affairs
41.
go back to reference Christchurch City Council: Healthy Housing Index. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council – Internal Report Christchurch City Council: Healthy Housing Index. 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand: Christchurch City Council – Internal Report
42.
go back to reference Ministry for the Environment: Resource Management Act. 1991, Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for the Environment Ministry for the Environment: Resource Management Act. 1991, Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for the Environment
43.
go back to reference Atkinson P, Cooke A: Developing a framework to assess costs and benefits of Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25: 791-798. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.011.CrossRef Atkinson P, Cooke A: Developing a framework to assess costs and benefits of Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25: 791-798. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.011.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J: The effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment. Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. 2007, Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies and WHO Europe Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J: The effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment. Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. 2007, Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies and WHO Europe
46.
go back to reference Close N: Alconbury Airfield Development Health Impact Assessment evaluation: Report for Cambridgeshire Health Authority. 2001, Cambridge: Anglia Clinical Audit and Effectiveness Team Close N: Alconbury Airfield Development Health Impact Assessment evaluation: Report for Cambridgeshire Health Authority. 2001, Cambridge: Anglia Clinical Audit and Effectiveness Team
47.
go back to reference Abdel Aziz M, Radford J, McCabe J: The Finningley Airport HIA: a case study. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press Abdel Aziz M, Radford J, McCabe J: The Finningley Airport HIA: a case study. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press
49.
go back to reference Ardern K: HIA: a practitioner's guide. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press Ardern K: HIA: a practitioner's guide. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press
50.
go back to reference Bekker M, Putters K, Grinter van der T: Evaluating the impact of HIA on urban reconstruction decision-making. Who manages whose risks?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25 (7–8): 758-771. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.008.CrossRef Bekker M, Putters K, Grinter van der T: Evaluating the impact of HIA on urban reconstruction decision-making. Who manages whose risks?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25 (7–8): 758-771. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.008.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Davenport C, Mathers J, Parry J: Use of Health Impact Assessment in incorporating health considerations in decision making. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2006, 60: 196-201. 10.1136/jech.2005.040105.CrossRef Davenport C, Mathers J, Parry J: Use of Health Impact Assessment in incorporating health considerations in decision making. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2006, 60: 196-201. 10.1136/jech.2005.040105.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, Bassett M, Rehkopf DH, Miller C: Assessing Health Impact Assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2003, 57 (9): 659-662. 10.1136/jech.57.9.659.CrossRef Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, Bassett M, Rehkopf DH, Miller C: Assessing Health Impact Assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2003, 57 (9): 659-662. 10.1136/jech.57.9.659.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Morgan R: Institutionalising Health Impact Assessment: the New Zealand experience. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2008, 26 (1): 2-16. 10.3152/146155108X300547.CrossRef Morgan R: Institutionalising Health Impact Assessment: the New Zealand experience. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2008, 26 (1): 2-16. 10.3152/146155108X300547.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Public Health Advisory Committee: An idea whose time has come – new opportunities for Health Impact Assessment in New Zealand public policy and planning. 2007, Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee Public Health Advisory Committee: An idea whose time has come – new opportunities for Health Impact Assessment in New Zealand public policy and planning. 2007, Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee
55.
go back to reference Hay L, Kitcher C: An analysis of the benefits of a cross-sectoral approach to a prospective Health Impact Assessment of a container port development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2004, 24: 199-206. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.010.CrossRef Hay L, Kitcher C: An analysis of the benefits of a cross-sectoral approach to a prospective Health Impact Assessment of a container port development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2004, 24: 199-206. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.010.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Elliott E, Francis S: Making effective links to decision-making: key challenges for Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25: 747-757. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.007.CrossRef Elliott E, Francis S: Making effective links to decision-making: key challenges for Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25: 747-757. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.007.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Menzies T: Reflections on ways HIA can be made most useful to local government in NSW. 2007, Sydney: Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Menzies T: Reflections on ways HIA can be made most useful to local government in NSW. 2007, Sydney: Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales
58.
go back to reference Signal L, Langford B, Quigley RJ, Ward M: Strengthening health, wellbeing and equity: embedding policy-level HIA in New Zealand. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2006, 17-31. 29 Signal L, Langford B, Quigley RJ, Ward M: Strengthening health, wellbeing and equity: embedding policy-level HIA in New Zealand. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2006, 17-31. 29
59.
go back to reference Blau G, Mahoney M: The positioning of Health Impact Assessment in local government in Victoria. 2005, Melbourne: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Deakin University Blau G, Mahoney M: The positioning of Health Impact Assessment in local government in Victoria. 2005, Melbourne: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Deakin University
Metadata
Title
Process and impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment
Authors
Kaaren R Mathias
Ben Harris-Roxas
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-97

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Public Health 1/2009 Go to the issue