Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

A tool to analyze the transferability of health promotion interventions

Authors: Linda Cambon, Laetitia Minary, Valery Ridde, François Alla

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health promotion interventions are often complex and not easily transferable from one setting to another. The objective of this article is to present the development of a tool to analyze the transferability of these interventions and to support their development and adaptation to new settings.

Methods

The concept mapping (CM) method was used. CM is helpful for generating a list of ideas associated with a concept and grouping them statistically. Researchers and stakeholders in the health promotion field were mobilized to participate in CM and generated a first list of transferability criteria. Duplicates were eliminated, and the shortened list was returned to the experts, scored for relevance and grouped into categories. Concept maps were created, then the project team selected the definitive map. From the final list of criteria thus structured, a tool to analyze transferability was created. This tool was subsequently tested by 15 project leaders and nine experts.

Results

In all, 18 experts participated in CM. After testing, a tool, named ASTAIRE, contained 23 criteria structured into four categories: population, environment, implementation, and support for transfer. It consists of two tools—one for reporting data from primary interventions and one for analyzing interventions’ transferability and supporting their adaptation to new settings.

Conclusion

The tool is helpful for selecting the intervention to transfer into the setting being considered and for supporting its adaptation. It also facilitates new interventions to be produced with more explicit transferability criteria.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO: Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Edited by: Promotion FICoH. 1986, Geneva: World Health Organization WHO: Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Edited by: Promotion FICoH. 1986, Geneva: World Health Organization
2.
go back to reference Ridde V: Reducing social inequalities in health: public health, community health or health promotion?. Promot Educ. 2007, 14 (2): 63-67.CrossRefPubMed Ridde V: Reducing social inequalities in health: public health, community health or health promotion?. Promot Educ. 2007, 14 (2): 63-67.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference McQueen DV, Anderson L: Donnees probantes et evaluation des programmes en promotion de la sante. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en sante. 2000, 7 (1): 79-98. McQueen DV, Anderson L: Donnees probantes et evaluation des programmes en promotion de la sante. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en sante. 2000, 7 (1): 79-98.
4.
go back to reference Mac Queen DV: Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health promotion international. 2001, 16 (3): 261-268.CrossRef Mac Queen DV: Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health promotion international. 2001, 16 (3): 261-268.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference McQueen DV, Jones C: Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. Edited by: McQueen DV, Jones CM. 2007, New York: Springer, 3-11.CrossRef McQueen DV, Jones C: Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. Edited by: McQueen DV, Jones CM. 2007, New York: Springer, 3-11.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2008, 337: a1655- Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2008, 337: a1655-
7.
go back to reference MRC: Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. 2008, London: UK Medical Research Council, 39- MRC: Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. 2008, London: UK Medical Research Council, 39-
8.
go back to reference Wang S, Moss JR, Hiller JE: Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promot Int. 2006, 21 (1): 76-83.CrossRefPubMed Wang S, Moss JR, Hiller JE: Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promot Int. 2006, 21 (1): 76-83.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Festinger L, Riecken H,HW, Schachter S: When Prophecy Fails : A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World. 1956, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota PressCrossRef Festinger L, Riecken H,HW, Schachter S: When Prophecy Fails : A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World. 1956, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota PressCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Laws RA, Saint Georg AB, Rychetnik L, Bauman AE: Diabetes prevention research: a systematic review of external validity in lifestyle interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2012, 43 (2): 205-214.CrossRefPubMed Laws RA, Saint Georg AB, Rychetnik L, Bauman AE: Diabetes prevention research: a systematic review of external validity in lifestyle interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2012, 43 (2): 205-214.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A: Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002, 56 (2): 119-127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A: Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002, 56 (2): 119-127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE: A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008, 34 (4): 228-243.PubMed Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE: A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008, 34 (4): 228-243.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E: RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004, 28 (2): 75-80.CrossRefPubMed Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E: RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004, 28 (2): 75-80.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Buffett C, Ciliska D, Thomas H: Can I Use This Evidence in my Program Decision? Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence. 2007, Hamilton, ON L8S 1G5: National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, 22- Buffett C, Ciliska D, Thomas H: Can I Use This Evidence in my Program Decision? Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence. 2007, Hamilton, ON L8S 1G5: National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, 22-
17.
go back to reference Trochim WMKM: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989, 12 (1): 1-16.CrossRef Trochim WMKM: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989, 12 (1): 1-16.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Burke JG, O'Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WM: An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15 (10): 1392-1410.CrossRefPubMed Burke JG, O'Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WM: An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15 (10): 1392-1410.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ward JH: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963, 58: 236-244.CrossRef Ward JH: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963, 58: 236-244.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Claudot F, Fresson J, Coudane H, Guillemin F, Demoré B, Alla F: Recherche en épidémiologie clinique : quelles règles appliquer ?. Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique. 2008, 56 (1): 63-70.CrossRefPubMed Claudot F, Fresson J, Coudane H, Guillemin F, Demoré B, Alla F: Recherche en épidémiologie clinique : quelles règles appliquer ?. Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique. 2008, 56 (1): 63-70.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera M: The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med. 2003, 36 (4): 410-419.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera M: The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med. 2003, 36 (4): 410-419.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Green LW, Glasgow RE: Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006, 29 (1): 126-153.CrossRefPubMed Green LW, Glasgow RE: Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006, 29 (1): 126-153.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ferguson L: External validity, generalizability, and knowledge utilization. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004, 36 (1): 16-22.CrossRefPubMed Ferguson L: External validity, generalizability, and knowledge utilization. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004, 36 (1): 16-22.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Leviton L, Kettel Khan L, Rog D, Dawkins N, Cotton D: Evaluability assessment to improve Health Policies, Programs, and Practices. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010, 31: 213-233.CrossRefPubMed Leviton L, Kettel Khan L, Rog D, Dawkins N, Cotton D: Evaluability assessment to improve Health Policies, Programs, and Practices. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010, 31: 213-233.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M: The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012, 12 (1): 751-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M: The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012, 12 (1): 751-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Amara N, Ouimet M, Landry R: New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Science Communication. 2004, 26 (1): 75-106.CrossRef Amara N, Ouimet M, Landry R: New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Science Communication. 2004, 26 (1): 75-106.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kothari A, Birch S, Charles C: "Interaction" and research utilisation in health policies and programs: does it work?. Health Policy. 2005, 71 (1): 117-125.CrossRefPubMed Kothari A, Birch S, Charles C: "Interaction" and research utilisation in health policies and programs: does it work?. Health Policy. 2005, 71 (1): 117-125.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Harris JR, Cheadle A, Hannon PA, Forehand M, Lichiello P, Mahoney E, Snyder S, Yarrow J: A framework for disseminating evidence-based health promotion practices. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012, 9: 11_0081-CrossRef Harris JR, Cheadle A, Hannon PA, Forehand M, Lichiello P, Mahoney E, Snyder S, Yarrow J: A framework for disseminating evidence-based health promotion practices. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012, 9: 11_0081-CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A tool to analyze the transferability of health promotion interventions
Authors
Linda Cambon
Laetitia Minary
Valery Ridde
François Alla
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1184

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Public Health 1/2013 Go to the issue