Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children

Authors: Chantal Wood, Carl L von Baeyer, Sylvain Falinower, Dominique Moyse, Daniel Annequin, Valérie Legout

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Assessment of pain in children is an important aspect of pain management and can be performed by observational methods or by self-assessment. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report tool which has strong positive correlations with other well established self-report pain intensity measures. It has been recommended for measuring pain intensity in school-aged children (4 years and older). The objective of this study is to compare the concordance and the preference for two versions, electronic and paper, of the FPS-R, and to determine whether an electronic version of the FPS-R can be used by children aged 4 and older.

Methods

The study is an observational, multicenter, randomized, cross-over, controlled, open trial. Medical and surgical patients in two pediatric hospitals (N = 202, age 4-12 years, mean age 8.3 years, 58% male) provided self-reports of their present pain using the FPS-R on a personal digital assistant (PDA) and on a paper version. Paper and electronic versions of the FPS-R were administered by a nurse in a randomized order: half the patients were given the PDA version first and the other half the paper version first. The time between the administrations was planned to be less than 30 minutes but not simultaneous. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled; 35 were excluded from analysis because of misunderstanding of instructions or abnormal time between the two assessments.

Results

Final population for analysis comprised 202 children. The overall weighted Kappa was 0.846 (95%CI: 0.795; 0.896) and the Spearman correlation between scores on the two versions was rs = 0.911 (p < 0.0001). The mean difference of pain scores was less than 0.1 out of 10, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant; 83.2% of children chose the same face on both versions of the FPS-R. Preference was not modified by order, sex, age, hospitalization unit (medical or surgical units), or previous analgesics. The PDA was preferred by 87.4% of the children who expressed a preference.

Conclusion

The electronic version of the FPS-R can be recommended for use with children aged 4 to 12, either in clinical trials or in hospitals to monitor pain intensity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dale O, Hagen KB: Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60 (1): 8-17. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.005.CrossRefPubMed Dale O, Hagen KB: Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60 (1): 8-17. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.005.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I: A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006, 6: 23-10.1186/1472-6947-6-23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I: A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006, 6: 23-10.1186/1472-6947-6-23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
go back to reference Junker U, Freynhagen R, Langler K, Gockel U, Schmidt U, Tolle TR, Baron R, Kohlmann T: Paper versus electronic rating scales for pain assessment: a prospective, randomised, cross-over validation study with 200 chronic pain patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008, 24 (6): 1797-1806. 10.1185/03007990802121059.CrossRefPubMed Junker U, Freynhagen R, Langler K, Gockel U, Schmidt U, Tolle TR, Baron R, Kohlmann T: Paper versus electronic rating scales for pain assessment: a prospective, randomised, cross-over validation study with 200 chronic pain patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008, 24 (6): 1797-1806. 10.1185/03007990802121059.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Marceau LD, Link C, Jamison RN, Carolan S: Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence?. Pain Med. 2007, 8 (Suppl 3): S101-109.CrossRefPubMed Marceau LD, Link C, Jamison RN, Carolan S: Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence?. Pain Med. 2007, 8 (Suppl 3): S101-109.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Morren M, van Dulmen S, Ouwerkerk J, Bensing J: Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2009, 13 (4): 354-365. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.05.010.CrossRefPubMed Morren M, van Dulmen S, Ouwerkerk J, Bensing J: Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2009, 13 (4): 354-365. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.05.010.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Price DD, Patel R, Robinson ME, Staud R: Characteristics of electronic visual analogue and numerical scales for ratings of experimental pain in healthy subjects and fibromyalgia patients. Pain. 2008, 140 (1): 158-166. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.028.CrossRefPubMed Price DD, Patel R, Robinson ME, Staud R: Characteristics of electronic visual analogue and numerical scales for ratings of experimental pain in healthy subjects and fibromyalgia patients. Pain. 2008, 140 (1): 158-166. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.028.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Roelofs J, Peters ML, Patijn J, Schouten EG, Vlaeyen JW: Electronic diary assessment of pain-related fear, attention to pain, and pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients. Pain. 2004, 112 (3): 335-342. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.016.CrossRefPubMed Roelofs J, Peters ML, Patijn J, Schouten EG, Vlaeyen JW: Electronic diary assessment of pain-related fear, attention to pain, and pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients. Pain. 2004, 112 (3): 335-342. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.016.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Falinower S, Martret P, Lombart B, Reti E, Krause D, Annequin D: Auto-évaluation de la douleur aiguë chez l'enfant. Utilisation de l'"échelle des visages" en version électronique sur micro-ordinateur de poche (PDA) PalmOneTM [Self report of acute pain by children using an electronic version of the Faces Pain Scale - Revised on the PalmOne data assistant]. Douleurs. 2004, 5 (5): 249-257. Falinower S, Martret P, Lombart B, Reti E, Krause D, Annequin D: Auto-évaluation de la douleur aiguë chez l'enfant. Utilisation de l'"échelle des visages" en version électronique sur micro-ordinateur de poche (PDA) PalmOneTM [Self report of acute pain by children using an electronic version of the Faces Pain Scale - Revised on the PalmOne data assistant]. Douleurs. 2004, 5 (5): 249-257.
10.
go back to reference Fanciullo GJ, Cravero JP, Mudge BO, McHugo GJ, Baird JC: Development of a new computer method to assess children's pain. Pain Med. 2007, 8 (Suppl 3): S121-128.CrossRefPubMed Fanciullo GJ, Cravero JP, Mudge BO, McHugo GJ, Baird JC: Development of a new computer method to assess children's pain. Pain Med. 2007, 8 (Suppl 3): S121-128.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP: A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain. 2004, 107 (3): 213-219. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.005.CrossRefPubMed Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP: A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain. 2004, 107 (3): 213-219. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.005.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stinson JN, Petroz GC, Tait G, Feldman BM, Streiner D, McGrath PJ, Stevens BJ: e-Ouch: usability testing of an electronic chronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Clin J Pain. 2006, 22 (3): 295-305. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000173371.54579.31.CrossRefPubMed Stinson JN, Petroz GC, Tait G, Feldman BM, Streiner D, McGrath PJ, Stevens BJ: e-Ouch: usability testing of an electronic chronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Clin J Pain. 2006, 22 (3): 295-305. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000173371.54579.31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B: The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001, 93 (2): 173-183. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1.CrossRefPubMed Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B: The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001, 93 (2): 173-183. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Spagrud LJ, Piira T, Von Baeyer CL: Children's self-report of pain intensity. Am J Nurs. 2003, 103 (12): 62-64. 10.1097/00000446-200312000-00020.CrossRefPubMed Spagrud LJ, Piira T, Von Baeyer CL: Children's self-report of pain intensity. Am J Nurs. 2003, 103 (12): 62-64. 10.1097/00000446-200312000-00020.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Champion GD, Goodenough B, von Baeyer CL, Thomas W: Measurement of pain by self-report. Measurement of Pain in Infants and Children. Edited by: Finley GA, McGrath PJ. 1998, Seattle: IASP Press, 123-160. Champion GD, Goodenough B, von Baeyer CL, Thomas W: Measurement of pain by self-report. Measurement of Pain in Infants and Children. Edited by: Finley GA, McGrath PJ. 1998, Seattle: IASP Press, 123-160.
16.
go back to reference Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L: A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010, 126 (5): e1168-1198. 10.1542/peds.2010-1609.CrossRefPubMed Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L: A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010, 126 (5): e1168-1198. 10.1542/peds.2010-1609.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B: Systematic review of yhe psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006, 125 (1-2): 143-57. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006.CrossRefPubMed Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B: Systematic review of yhe psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006, 125 (1-2): 143-57. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, Eccleston C, Finley GA, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman G, Palermo T, Rappaport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott J, Sethna N, Svensson OK, Stinson J, von Baeyer CL, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE, Zajicek A, Zeltzer L: Core Outcome Domains and Measures for Pediatric Acute and Chronic/Recurrent Pain Clinical Trials: PedIMMPACT Recommendations. J Pain. 2008, 9 (9): 771-83. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007.CrossRefPubMed McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, Eccleston C, Finley GA, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman G, Palermo T, Rappaport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott J, Sethna N, Svensson OK, Stinson J, von Baeyer CL, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE, Zajicek A, Zeltzer L: Core Outcome Domains and Measures for Pediatric Acute and Chronic/Recurrent Pain Clinical Trials: PedIMMPACT Recommendations. J Pain. 2008, 9 (9): 771-83. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33 (1): 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33 (1): 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A: Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001, 37 (1): 28-31. 10.1067/mem.2001.111517.CrossRefPubMed Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A: Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001, 37 (1): 28-31. 10.1067/mem.2001.111517.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gulur P, Rodi SW, Washington TA, Cravero JP, Fanciullo GJ, McHugo GJ, Baird JC: Computer Face Scale for Measuring Pediatric Pain and Mood. J Pain. 2009, 10 (2): 173-9. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.08.005. Epub Nov 17, 2008CrossRefPubMed Gulur P, Rodi SW, Washington TA, Cravero JP, Fanciullo GJ, McHugo GJ, Baird JC: Computer Face Scale for Measuring Pediatric Pain and Mood. J Pain. 2009, 10 (2): 173-9. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.08.005. Epub Nov 17, 2008CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Stinson JN, Petroz GC, Stevens BJ, Feldman BM, Streiner D, McGrath PJ, Gill N: Working out the kinks: testing the feasibility of an electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Pain Res Manag. 2008, 13 (5): 375-382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stinson JN, Petroz GC, Stevens BJ, Feldman BM, Streiner D, McGrath PJ, Gill N: Working out the kinks: testing the feasibility of an electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Pain Res Manag. 2008, 13 (5): 375-382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Menachemi N, Ettel DL, Brooks RG, Simpson L: Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers. BMC Pediatr. 2006, 6: 21-10.1186/1471-2431-6-21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Menachemi N, Ettel DL, Brooks RG, Simpson L: Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers. BMC Pediatr. 2006, 6: 21-10.1186/1471-2431-6-21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Keogh E, Rosser BA, Eccleston C: e-Health and chronic pain management: current status and developments. Pain. 2010, 151: 8-21.CrossRef Keogh E, Rosser BA, Eccleston C: e-Health and chronic pain management: current status and developments. Pain. 2010, 151: 8-21.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stone AA, Broderick JE: Real-time data collection for pain: appraisal and current status. Pain Medecine. 2007, 8 (Suppl 3): S85-93.CrossRef Stone AA, Broderick JE: Real-time data collection for pain: appraisal and current status. Pain Medecine. 2007, 8 (Suppl 3): S85-93.CrossRef
27.
Metadata
Title
Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
Authors
Chantal Wood
Carl L von Baeyer
Sylvain Falinower
Dominique Moyse
Daniel Annequin
Valérie Legout
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-87

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Pediatrics 1/2011 Go to the issue