Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Study protocol

Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public: a community survey

Authors: Sue Wilson, Sheila Greenfield, Helen M Pattison, Angela Ryan, Richard J McManus, David Fitzmaurice, John Marriott, Cyril Chapman, Sue Clifford

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Self-tests are those where an individual can obtain a result without recourse to a health professional, by getting a result immediately or by sending a sample to a laboratory that returns the result directly. Self-tests can be diagnostic, for disease monitoring, or both. There are currently tests for more than 20 different conditions available to the UK public, and self-testing is marketed as a way of alerting people to serious health problems so they can seek medical help. Almost nothing is known about the extent to which people self-test for cancer or why they do this. Self-tests for cancer could alter perceptions of risk and health behaviour, cause psychological morbidity and have a significant impact on the demand for healthcare. This study aims to gain an understanding of the frequency of self-testing for cancer and characteristics of users.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey. Adults registered in participating general practices in the West Midlands Region, will be asked to complete a questionnaire that will collect socio-demographic information and basic data regarding previous and potential future use of self-test kits. The only exclusions will be people who the GP feels it would be inappropriate to send a questionnaire, for example because they are unable to give informed consent. Freepost envelopes will be included and non-responders will receive one reminder. Standardised prevalence rates will be estimated.

Discussion

Cancer related self-tests, currently available from pharmacies or over the Internet, include faecal occult blood tests (related to bowel cancer), prostate specific antigen tests (related to prostate cancer), breast cancer kits (self examination guide) and haematuria tests (related to urinary tract cancers). The effect of an increase in self-testing for cancer is unknown but may be considerable: it may affect the delivery of population based screening programmes; empower patients or cause unnecessary anxiety; reduce costs on existing healthcare services or increase demand to investigate patients with positive test results. It is important that more is known about the characteristics of those who are using self-tests if we are to determine the potential impact on health services and the public.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus RJ, Pattison HM: Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. Journal of Public Health. Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus RJ, Pattison HM: Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. Journal of Public Health.
2.
4.
go back to reference Purrill F: Don't try this at home. Health Which. 2002 Purrill F: Don't try this at home. Health Which. 2002
5.
go back to reference Petit-Zeman S: Testing times. The Guardian. November 4; 2003 Petit-Zeman S: Testing times. The Guardian. November 4; 2003
8.
go back to reference Mintel Self-Diagnostics – UK: Market Intelligence Essentials. 2003 Mintel Self-Diagnostics – UK: Market Intelligence Essentials. 2003
11.
go back to reference Human Genetics Commission: Genes Direct. Ensuring the effective oversight of genetic tests supplied directly to the public. A report by the Human Genetics Commission. London. 2003 Human Genetics Commission: Genes Direct. Ensuring the effective oversight of genetic tests supplied directly to the public. A report by the Human Genetics Commission. London. 2003
12.
15.
go back to reference Lupton D: Consumerism, reflexivity and medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 1997, 43 (3): 373-81. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00353-X.CrossRef Lupton D: Consumerism, reflexivity and medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 1997, 43 (3): 373-81. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00353-X.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hardey M: Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1999, 21: 820-835. 10.1111/1467-9566.00185.CrossRef Hardey M: Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1999, 21: 820-835. 10.1111/1467-9566.00185.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kent Pharmaceuticals: Health Check: The early warning system for life. Product Information Brochure. 1999, Kent Pharmaceuticals Kent Pharmaceuticals: Health Check: The early warning system for life. Product Information Brochure. 1999, Kent Pharmaceuticals
18.
go back to reference Harper DJ: The professional construction of 'paranoia' and the discursive use of diagnostic criteria. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1994, 67: 131-143.CrossRefPubMed Harper DJ: The professional construction of 'paranoia' and the discursive use of diagnostic criteria. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1994, 67: 131-143.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stevenson FA, Greenfield SM, Jones M, Nayak A, Bradley CP: GP's perceptions of patient influence on prescribing. Family Practice. 1999, 16: 255-61. 10.1093/fampra/16.3.255.CrossRefPubMed Stevenson FA, Greenfield SM, Jones M, Nayak A, Bradley CP: GP's perceptions of patient influence on prescribing. Family Practice. 1999, 16: 255-61. 10.1093/fampra/16.3.255.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Weiss MC, Fitzpatrick R, Scott DK, Goldacre MJ: Pressures on the general practitioner and decisions to prescribe. Family Practice. 1996, 13 (5): 432-438.CrossRefPubMed Weiss MC, Fitzpatrick R, Scott DK, Goldacre MJ: Pressures on the general practitioner and decisions to prescribe. Family Practice. 1996, 13 (5): 432-438.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wearn AM, Greenfield SM: Access to complementary medicine in general practice: survey in one UK health authority. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1998, 91: 465-470.PubMedPubMedCentral Wearn AM, Greenfield SM: Access to complementary medicine in general practice: survey in one UK health authority. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1998, 91: 465-470.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Social Survey Division: OPCS Omnibus Survey, September 1993 [computer file]. 1997, Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], SN: 3670 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Social Survey Division: OPCS Omnibus Survey, September 1993 [computer file]. 1997, Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], SN: 3670
24.
go back to reference British Medical Association Board of Science: Population screening and genetic testing. A briefing on current programmes and technologies. London. 2005 British Medical Association Board of Science: Population screening and genetic testing. A briefing on current programmes and technologies. London. 2005
25.
go back to reference YouGov Limited: Public attitudes to genetic testing. A quantitative study for the Human Genetics Commission. London. 2003 YouGov Limited: Public attitudes to genetic testing. A quantitative study for the Human Genetics Commission. London. 2003
26.
go back to reference Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S: Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 193-10.1186/1471-2458-6-193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S: Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 193-10.1186/1471-2458-6-193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, Wehbie JM, Rust P: Urinary tract cancers found by home screening with hematuria dipsticks in healthy men over 50. Cancer. 1989, 64: 2361-2367. 10.1002/1097-0142(19891201)64:11<2361::AID-CNCR2820641128>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMed Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, Wehbie JM, Rust P: Urinary tract cancers found by home screening with hematuria dipsticks in healthy men over 50. Cancer. 1989, 64: 2361-2367. 10.1002/1097-0142(19891201)64:11<2361::AID-CNCR2820641128>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hobbs FDR, Delaney BC, Fitzmaurice DA, Wilson S, Hyde CJ, Thorpe GH, Earl-Slater ASM, Jowett S, Tobias RS: A review of near patient testing in primary care. Health Technology Assessment. 1997, 1 (5, i–iv): 1-229. Hobbs FDR, Delaney BC, Fitzmaurice DA, Wilson S, Hyde CJ, Thorpe GH, Earl-Slater ASM, Jowett S, Tobias RS: A review of near patient testing in primary care. Health Technology Assessment. 1997, 1 (5, i–iv): 1-229.
29.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Coates TJ, Eversley RB, Catania JA: Who plans to be tested for HIV or would get tested if no one could find out the results. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1995, 11: 156-162.PubMed Phillips KA, Coates TJ, Eversley RB, Catania JA: Who plans to be tested for HIV or would get tested if no one could find out the results. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1995, 11: 156-162.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Kassler WJ: Advances in HIV testing technology and their potential impact on prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention. 1997, 9: 27-40.PubMed Kassler WJ: Advances in HIV testing technology and their potential impact on prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention. 1997, 9: 27-40.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Orbell S, Sheeran P: Health Psychology and uptake of preventive health-services – a review of 30 years research on cervical screening. Psychology and Health. 1993, 8: 417-33.CrossRef Orbell S, Sheeran P: Health Psychology and uptake of preventive health-services – a review of 30 years research on cervical screening. Psychology and Health. 1993, 8: 417-33.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brubaker RG, Wickersham D: Encouraging the practice of testicular self-examination: a field application of the theory of reasoned action. Health Psychology. 1990, 9: 154-63. 10.1037/0278-6133.9.2.154.CrossRefPubMed Brubaker RG, Wickersham D: Encouraging the practice of testicular self-examination: a field application of the theory of reasoned action. Health Psychology. 1990, 9: 154-63. 10.1037/0278-6133.9.2.154.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Bradley CP, Riaz A, Tobias R, Kenkre JE, Dassu DY: Patient attitudes to over-the-counter drugs and possible professional responses to self-medication. Family Practice. 1998, 15: 44-50. 10.1093/fampra/15.1.44.CrossRefPubMed Bradley CP, Riaz A, Tobias R, Kenkre JE, Dassu DY: Patient attitudes to over-the-counter drugs and possible professional responses to self-medication. Family Practice. 1998, 15: 44-50. 10.1093/fampra/15.1.44.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Alberts JF, Sanderman R, Gerstenbluth I, vandenHeuvel WJA: Sociocultural variations in help-seeking behaviour for everyday symptoms and chronic disorders. Health Policy. 1998, 44: 57-72. 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00015-3.CrossRefPubMed Alberts JF, Sanderman R, Gerstenbluth I, vandenHeuvel WJA: Sociocultural variations in help-seeking behaviour for everyday symptoms and chronic disorders. Health Policy. 1998, 44: 57-72. 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00015-3.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J: The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 2000. 2000, 4 (14, i–vii): 1-133. Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J: The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 2000. 2000, 4 (14, i–vii): 1-133.
42.
go back to reference Hull SC, Prasad K: Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing in the USA. Reprod Health Matters. 2001, 9 (18): 44-8. 10.1016/S0968-8080(01)90089-8.CrossRefPubMed Hull SC, Prasad K: Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing in the USA. Reprod Health Matters. 2001, 9 (18): 44-8. 10.1016/S0968-8080(01)90089-8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Mouchawar J, Hensley-Alford S, Laurion S, Ellis J, Kulchak-Rahm A, Finucane ML, Meenan R, Axell L, Pollack R, Ritzwoller D: Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: a naturally-occurring experiment. Genet Med. 2005, 7 (3): 191-7.CrossRefPubMed Mouchawar J, Hensley-Alford S, Laurion S, Ellis J, Kulchak-Rahm A, Finucane ML, Meenan R, Axell L, Pollack R, Ritzwoller D: Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: a naturally-occurring experiment. Genet Med. 2005, 7 (3): 191-7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing: Code of Practice and Guidance on Human Genetic Testing Services Supplied Direct to the Public. 1997, Health Departments of the United Kingdom Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing: Code of Practice and Guidance on Human Genetic Testing Services Supplied Direct to the Public. 1997, Health Departments of the United Kingdom
52.
go back to reference Roses AD: Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and delivery. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1358-61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02126-7.CrossRefPubMed Roses AD: Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and delivery. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1358-61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02126-7.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Wilson S, Lester H: Developing a quality cervical cancer screening programme. British Journal of General Practice. 2002, 52: 485-490.PubMedPubMedCentral Wilson S, Lester H: Developing a quality cervical cancer screening programme. British Journal of General Practice. 2002, 52: 485-490.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
go back to reference Dengler R: Organisation and management of postal surveys. Survey Methods Centre Newsletter. 1996, 16: 14-16. Dengler R: Organisation and management of postal surveys. Survey Methods Centre Newsletter. 1996, 16: 14-16.
55.
go back to reference Dixon WJ, Massey FJ: Introduction to Statistical Analysis. 1983, McGraw-Hill, 105-7. 4 Dixon WJ, Massey FJ: Introduction to Statistical Analysis. 1983, McGraw-Hill, 105-7. 4
56.
go back to reference Wilson S, Roberts L, Roalfe A, Bridge P, Singh S: Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome: a community survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 495-502.PubMedPubMedCentral Wilson S, Roberts L, Roalfe A, Bridge P, Singh S: Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome: a community survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 495-502.PubMedPubMedCentral
58.
go back to reference Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology: Postnote. Medical Self-test Kits. London. 2003 Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology: Postnote. Medical Self-test Kits. London. 2003
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public: a community survey
Authors
Sue Wilson
Sheila Greenfield
Helen M Pattison
Angela Ryan
Richard J McManus
David Fitzmaurice
John Marriott
Cyril Chapman
Sue Clifford
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-215

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

BMC Cancer 1/2006 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine