Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

New birth weight reference standards customised to birth order and sex of babies from South India

Authors: Velusamy Saravana Kumar, Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan, Tunny Sebastian, Annie Regi, Jiji Mathew, Ruby Jose

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The foetal growth standards for Indian children which are available today suffer due to methodological problems. These are, for example, not adhering to the WHO recommendation to base gestational age on the number of completed weeks and secondly, not excluding mothers with risk factors. This study has addressed both the above issues and in addition provides birthweight reference ranges with regard to sex of the baby and maternal parity.

Methods

Data from the labour room register from 1996 to 2010 was obtained. A rotational sampling scheme was used i.e. the 12 months of the year were divided into 4 quadrants. All deliveries in January were considered to represent the first quadrant. Similarly all deliveries in April, July and October were considered to represent 2nd, 3rd and 4th quadrants. In each successive year different months were included in each quadrant. Only those mothers aged 20–39 years and delivered between 24 to 42 weeks gestational age were considered. Those mothers with obstetric risk factors were excluded. The reference standards were fitted using the Generalized Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) method for Box – Cox t distribution with cubic spline smoothing.

Results

There were 41,055 deliveries considered. When women with risk factors were excluded 19,501 deliveries could be included in the final analysis. The male babies of term firstborn were found to be 45 g heavier than female babies. The mean birthweights were 2934 g and 2889.5 g respectively. Similarly, among the preterm babies, the first born male babies weighed 152 g more than the female babies. The mean birthweights were 1996 g and 1844 g respectively.
In the case of later born babies, the term male babies weighed 116grams more than the females. The mean birth weights were 3085 grams and 2969 grams respectively. When considering later born preterm babies, the males outweighed the female babies by 111 grams. The mean birthweights were 2089 grams and 1978 grams respectively. There was a substantial agreement range from k=.883, (p<.01) to k=.943, (p<.01) between adjusted and unadjusted percentile classification for the subgroups of male and female babies and first born and later born ones.
Birth weight charts were adjusted for maternal height using regression methods. The birth weight charts for the first born and later born babies were regrouped into 4 categories, including male and female sexes of the babies. Reference ranges were acquired both for term and preterm babies.
With economic reforms, one expects improvement in birthweights. The mean (sd) birthweights of the year 1996 was 2846 (562) as compared to year 2010 (15 years later) which was 2907 (571). There was only a difference of 61 grams in the mean birthweights over one and a half decade.

Conclusion

New standards are presented from a large number of deliveries over 15 years, customised to the maternal height, from a south Indian tertiary hospital. Reference ranges are made available separately for first born or later born babies, for male and female sexes and for term and preterm babies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mohan M, Prasad SR, Chellani HK, Kapani V: Intrauterine growth curves in north Indian babies: weight, length, head circumference and ponderal index. Indian Pediatr. 1990, 27: 43-51.PubMed Mohan M, Prasad SR, Chellani HK, Kapani V: Intrauterine growth curves in north Indian babies: weight, length, head circumference and ponderal index. Indian Pediatr. 1990, 27: 43-51.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mathai M, Jacob S, Karthikeyan NG: Birthweight standards for south Indian babies. Indian Pediatr. 1996, 33: 203-209.PubMed Mathai M, Jacob S, Karthikeyan NG: Birthweight standards for south Indian babies. Indian Pediatr. 1996, 33: 203-209.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH: The Validity of Gestational Age Estimation by Menstrual Dating in Term, Preterm, and Postterm Gestations. JAMA. 1988, 260: 3306-3308. 10.1001/jama.1988.03410220090034.CrossRefPubMed Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH: The Validity of Gestational Age Estimation by Menstrual Dating in Term, Preterm, and Postterm Gestations. JAMA. 1988, 260: 3306-3308. 10.1001/jama.1988.03410220090034.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rj D: Population-based intrauterine growth curves from computerized birth certificates. South Med J. 1983, 76: 1401-10.1097/00007611-198311000-00020.CrossRef Rj D: Population-based intrauterine growth curves from computerized birth certificates. South Med J. 1983, 76: 1401-10.1097/00007611-198311000-00020.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM: Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. 1992, 339: 283-287. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91342-6.CrossRefPubMed Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM: Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. 1992, 339: 283-287. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91342-6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhang J, Bowes J: Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 86: 200-208. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00142-E.CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Bowes J: Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 86: 200-208. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00142-E.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Arbuckle TE, Wilkins R, Sherman GJ: Birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Canada. Obstet Gynecol. 1993, 81: 39-48.PubMed Arbuckle TE, Wilkins R, Sherman GJ: Birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Canada. Obstet Gynecol. 1993, 81: 39-48.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Roberts C, Mueller L, Hadler J: Birth-weight percentiles by gestational age, Connecticut 1988–1993. Conn Med. 1996, 60: 131-PubMed Roberts C, Mueller L, Hadler J: Birth-weight percentiles by gestational age, Connecticut 1988–1993. Conn Med. 1996, 60: 131-PubMed
9.
go back to reference Eckler AR: Rotation sampling. Ann Math Stat. 1955, 26: 664-685. 10.1214/aoms/1177728427.CrossRef Eckler AR: Rotation sampling. Ann Math Stat. 1955, 26: 664-685. 10.1214/aoms/1177728427.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA: Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw. 2007, 23: 1-46.CrossRef Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA: Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw. 2007, 23: 1-46.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bhatia BD, Bhargava V, Chatterjee M, Kota VL, Singh LI, Jain NP: Studies on fetal growth patterns: intrauterine growth percentiles for singleton live born babies. Indian Pediatr. 1981, 18: 647-653.PubMed Bhatia BD, Bhargava V, Chatterjee M, Kota VL, Singh LI, Jain NP: Studies on fetal growth patterns: intrauterine growth percentiles for singleton live born babies. Indian Pediatr. 1981, 18: 647-653.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ghosh S, Bhargava SK, Madhavan S, Taskar AD, Bhargava V, Nigam SK: Intra-uterine growth of North Indian babies. Pediatrics. 1971, 47: 826-830.PubMed Ghosh S, Bhargava SK, Madhavan S, Taskar AD, Bhargava V, Nigam SK: Intra-uterine growth of North Indian babies. Pediatrics. 1971, 47: 826-830.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mittal SK, Singh PA, Gupta RC: Intrauterine growth and low birth weight criteria in Punjabi infants. Indian Pediatr. 1976, 13: 679-682.PubMed Mittal SK, Singh PA, Gupta RC: Intrauterine growth and low birth weight criteria in Punjabi infants. Indian Pediatr. 1976, 13: 679-682.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, Blondel B, Bréart G: A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001, 108: E35-10.1542/peds.108.2.e35.CrossRefPubMed Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, Blondel B, Bréart G: A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001, 108: E35-10.1542/peds.108.2.e35.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH, Kramer MS: Postterm infants: too big or too small?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991, 164: 619-624.CrossRefPubMed McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH, Kramer MS: Postterm infants: too big or too small?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991, 164: 619-624.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wilcox M, Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Ray C, Johnson I: Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. BMJ. 1993, 307: 588-591. 10.1136/bmj.307.6904.588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilcox M, Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Ray C, Johnson I: Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. BMJ. 1993, 307: 588-591. 10.1136/bmj.307.6904.588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Secher NJ, Kern Hansen P, Thomsen BL, Keiding N: Growth retardation in preterm infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987, 94: 115-120. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02336.x.CrossRefPubMed Secher NJ, Kern Hansen P, Thomsen BL, Keiding N: Growth retardation in preterm infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987, 94: 115-120. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02336.x.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Schall JI, Miller LW, Fischer RL: Fetal growth and the etiology of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 85: 175-182. 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00365-K.CrossRefPubMed Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Schall JI, Miller LW, Fischer RL: Fetal growth and the etiology of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 85: 175-182. 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00365-K.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
New birth weight reference standards customised to birth order and sex of babies from South India
Authors
Velusamy Saravana Kumar
Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan
Tunny Sebastian
Annie Regi
Jiji Mathew
Ruby Jose
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-38

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013 Go to the issue