Top

BMC Primary Care

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Patients’ expectations of acute low back pain management: implications for evidence uptake

Authors: Tammy C Hoffmann, Chris B Del Mar, Jenny Strong, Juliana Mai

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2013

Abstract

Background

In many countries, general practitioner (GP) care of acute low back pain often does not adhere to evidence-based clinical guidelines. There has been little exploration of this deviation from evidence-based care from the patients’ perspective, particularly in relation to patients’ care expectations. The aim of this study was to explore the care expectations in patients who present to their GP with acute low back pain, influences on expectation development, and congruence of these expectations with clinical guideline recommendations.

Methods

Qualitative study in an inner urban general practice in Brisbane, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients who presented to their GP with acute low back pain.

Results

Patients had a biomechanical understanding of back pain, how it should be tested and treated, and a poor understanding of its natural history. Most expected x-rays, believing they were necessary to identify the “cause of the pain” without belief of any downsides to x-rays. Patients’ expectations were primarily influenced by the experiences of family and friends, their own previous experiences of low back pain care, and comments from other health professionals they were consulting. The GP-patient relationship was important in influencing patient satisfaction of care provided. Most patient expectations, and some of the care that they reported receiving, were incongruent with guideline recommendations.

Conclusions

A biomechanical approach to management rather than an awareness of empirical evidence was evident in patients’ expectations. Communication and education by the GP that includes specifically enquiring about patients’ expectations, provides an opportunity to correct misperceptions, explain acute low back pain natural history, and the rationale for test and treatment recommendations.

Available only for authorised users

Britt H, Miller GC, Charles J, Henderson J, Bayram C, Harrison C, Valenti L, Fahridin S, Pan Y, O’Halloran J: General practice activity in Australia 2007–08. 2008, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare2008, Contract No.: Cat. no. GEP 22

National Health and Medical Research Council: Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. 2003, Canberra, Australia: Australian Academic Press Pty. Ltd

Waddell G, Feder G, McIntosh A, Lewis M, Hutchinson A: Low Back Pain Evidence Review. 1996, London, England: Royal College of General Practitioners

van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MTG, Hutchinson A, Koes B, Laerum E, Malmivaara A, COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care: European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006, 15: S169-S191. 10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Williams CM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, McLachlan AJ, Britt H, Fahridin S, Harrison C, Latimer J: Low back pain and best practice care: a survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2010, 170: 271-277. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.507.CrossRefPubMed

Dahan R, Borkan J, Brown J-B, Reis S, Hermoni D, Harris S: The challenge of using the low back pain guidelines: a qualitative research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007, 13: 616-620. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00855.x.CrossRefPubMed

Wilkinson E, Bosanquet A, Salisbury C, Hasler J, Bosanquet N: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based medicine in general practice: a qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract. 1999, 5: 66-70. 10.3109/13814789909094262.CrossRef

Chenot JF, Scherer M, Becker A, Donner-Banzhoff N, Baum E, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler H-D, Kochen MM: Acceptance and perceived barriers of implementing a guideline for managing low back in general practice. Implementation Sci. 2008, 3: 1-6. 10.1186/1748-5908-3-1.CrossRef

Schers H, Wensing M, Huijsmans Z, Van Tulder M, Grol R: Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain. Spine. 2001, 26: E348-E353. 10.1097/00007632-200108010-00013.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Patton M: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 3

11.

Speziale H, Carpenter D: Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. 2007, Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins

12.

Brisbane City Council: Indooroopilly: Weekly individual income 2006. 2006, [cited 2011 17 October]; Available from: http://profile.id.com.au/Default.aspx?id=327&pg=124&gid=780&type=enum

13.

Mason M: Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res [serial on the Internet]. 2010, Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027, 11

14.

Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006, 3: 77-101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRef

15.

Tarrant C, Stokes T, Baker R: Factors associated with patients’ trust in their general practitioner: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2003, 53: 798-800.PubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Epstein R, Alper B, Quill T: Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004, 291: 2359-2366. 10.1001/jama.291.19.2359.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M: Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1516-1520. 10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1516.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Buchbinder R, Jolley D: Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs: three year follow up population survey. BMJ. 2004, 328: 321-10.1136/bmj.328.7435.321.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/14/7/prepub

Title: Patients’ expectations of acute low back pain management: implications for evidence uptake
Authors: Tammy C Hoffmann
Chris B Del Mar
Jenny Strong
Juliana Mai
Publication date: 01-12-2013
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Patients’ expectations of acute low back pain management: implications for evidence uptake

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Primary care obesity management in Hungary: evaluation of the knowledge, practice and attitudes of family physicians

Patient-experienced effect of an active implementation of a disease management programme for COPD – a randomised trial

Parents’ information needs, self-efficacy and influences on consulting for childhood respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study

Australian general practitioners’ perspectives on their role in well-child health care

In-vivo-validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction tool: the arriba-pro study

The chlamydia knowledge, awareness and testing practices of Australian general practitioners and practice nurses: survey findings from the Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot (ACCEPt)