Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK – development and psychometric characteristics

Authors: John Campbell, Patten Smith, Sonja Nissen, Peter Bower, Marc Elliott, Martin Roland

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The UK National GP Patient Survey is one of the largest ever survey programmes of patients registered to receive primary health care, inviting five million respondents to report their experience of NHS primary healthcare. The third such annual survey (2008/9) involved the development of a new survey instrument. We describe the process of that development, and the findings of an extensive pilot survey in UK primary healthcare.

Methods

The survey was developed following recognised guidelines and involved expert and stakeholder advice, cognitive testing of early versions of the survey instrument, and piloting of the questionnaire in a cross sectional pilot survey of 1,500 randomly selected individuals from the UK electoral register with two reminders to non-respondents.

Results

The questionnaire comprises 66 items addressing a range of aspects of UK primary healthcare. A response rate of 590/1500 (39.3%) was obtained. Non response to individual items ranged from 0.8% to 15.3% (median 5.2%). Participants did not always follow internal branching instructions in the questionnaire although electronic controls allow for correction of this problem in analysis. There was marked skew in the distribution of responses to a number of items indicating an overall favourable impression of care. Principal components analysis of 23 items offering evaluation of various aspects of primary care identified three components (relating to doctor or nurse care, or addressing access to care) accounting for 68.3% of the variance in the sample.

Conclusion

The GP Patient Survey has been carefully developed and pilot-tested. Survey findings, aggregated at practice level, will be used to inform the distribution of £65 million ($107 million) of UK NHS resource in 2008/9 and this offers the opportunity for NHS service planners and providers to take account of users' experiences of health care in planning and delivering primary healthcare in the UK.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gelb Safran D, Kosinski M, Tarlov M, Rogers W, Taira D, Lieberman N, Ware J: The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998, 36: 728-739. 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00012.CrossRef Gelb Safran D, Kosinski M, Tarlov M, Rogers W, Taira D, Lieberman N, Ware J: The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998, 36: 728-739. 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00012.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Reis S, Ribacke M, Szecsenyi J, Grol R: General practice care and patients' priorities in Europe: an international comparison. Health Policy. 1998, 45: 175-186. 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00040-2.CrossRefPubMed Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Reis S, Ribacke M, Szecsenyi J, Grol R: General practice care and patients' priorities in Europe: an international comparison. Health Policy. 1998, 45: 175-186. 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00040-2.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Airey C, Brewster S, Erens B, Lilley S, Pickering K, Pitson L: National Surveys of NHS Patients. General Practice. 1998, London: NHS Executive Airey C, Brewster S, Erens B, Lilley S, Pickering K, Pitson L: National Surveys of NHS Patients. General Practice. 1998, London: NHS Executive
4.
go back to reference Department of Health: The New NHS: modern, dependable. 1997, London: Department of Health Department of Health: The New NHS: modern, dependable. 1997, London: Department of Health
6.
go back to reference Campbell S, Roland M, Buetow S: Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2000, 51: 1611-1625. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00395.x.CrossRefPubMed Campbell S, Roland M, Buetow S: Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2000, 51: 1611-1625. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00395.x.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Roland M: What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual 'map' of patient preferences. Health Expectations. 2006, 9: 275-284. 10.1370/afm.816.CrossRefPubMed Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Roland M: What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual 'map' of patient preferences. Health Expectations. 2006, 9: 275-284. 10.1370/afm.816.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chisholm A, Askham J: What do you think of your doctor? A review of questionnaires for gathering patients' feedback on their doctor. 2006, Oxford: Picker Institute Chisholm A, Askham J: What do you think of your doctor? A review of questionnaires for gathering patients' feedback on their doctor. 2006, Oxford: Picker Institute
9.
go back to reference Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole A, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Bower P, Roland M: What patients want from a primary care consultation. A discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008, 6 (2): 107-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole A, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Bower P, Roland M: What patients want from a primary care consultation. A discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008, 6 (2): 107-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Rubin G, Bate A, George A, Shackley P, Hall N: Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006, 56: 743-748. 10.1258/135581907781543021.PubMedPubMedCentral Rubin G, Bate A, George A, Shackley P, Hall N: Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006, 56: 743-748. 10.1258/135581907781543021.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Turner D, Tarrant C, Windridge K, Bryan S, Boulton M, Freeman G, Baker R: Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007, 12: 132-137. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007087.CrossRefPubMed Turner D, Tarrant C, Windridge K, Bryan S, Boulton M, Freeman G, Baker R: Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007, 12: 132-137. 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007087.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gerard K, Salisbury C, Street D, Pope C, Baxter H: Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 3-10. 10.1136/qshc.2006.020172.CrossRefPubMed Gerard K, Salisbury C, Street D, Pope C, Baxter H: Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 3-10. 10.1136/qshc.2006.020172.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Campbell J, Dickens A, Richards S, Pound P, Greco M, Bower P: Capturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the Out of hours Patient Questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007, 16: 462-468. 10.1136/qshc.2006.021501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell J, Dickens A, Richards S, Pound P, Greco M, Bower P: Capturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the Out of hours Patient Questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007, 16: 462-468. 10.1136/qshc.2006.021501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Richards S, Pound P, Dickens A, Greco M, Campbell J: Exploring users' experiences of accessing out-of-hours primary medical care services. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007, 16: 469-477. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00091-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richards S, Pound P, Dickens A, Greco M, Campbell J: Exploring users' experiences of accessing out-of-hours primary medical care services. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007, 16: 469-477. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00091-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Chapple A, Campbell S, Rogers A, Roland M: Users' understanding of medical knowledge in general practice. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (8): 1215-24. 10.1136/bmj.38874.499167.7C.CrossRefPubMed Chapple A, Campbell S, Rogers A, Roland M: Users' understanding of medical knowledge in general practice. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (8): 1215-24. 10.1136/bmj.38874.499167.7C.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rao M, Clarke A, Hammersley R: Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2006, 333: 19-22. 10.1186/1471-2296-9-13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rao M, Clarke A, Hammersley R: Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2006, 333: 19-22. 10.1186/1471-2296-9-13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Mead N, Bower P, Roland M: The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) – Development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Family Practice. 2008, 9: 13-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mead N, Bower P, Roland M: The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) – Development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Family Practice. 2008, 9: 13-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Greco M, Powell R, Sweeney K: The Improving Practice Questionnaire (IPQ): a practical tool for general practices seeking patient views. Education for Primary Care. 2003, 14: 440-448. Greco M, Powell R, Sweeney K: The Improving Practice Questionnaire (IPQ): a practical tool for general practices seeking patient views. Education for Primary Care. 2003, 14: 440-448.
19.
go back to reference Grol R, Wensing M: Patients evaluate general/family practice: the EUROPEP instrument. 2000, Nijmegen: Centre for Quality of Care Research Grol R, Wensing M: Patients evaluate general/family practice: the EUROPEP instrument. 2000, Nijmegen: Centre for Quality of Care Research
24.
go back to reference Office of National Statistics: Living in Britain. 2008, London: Office for National Statistics Office of National Statistics: Living in Britain. 2008, London: Office for National Statistics
25.
go back to reference Streiner D, Norman G: Health Measurement Scales – a practical guide to their development and use. 1989, Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications Streiner D, Norman G: Health Measurement Scales – a practical guide to their development and use. 1989, Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications
26.
go back to reference Howie J, Heaney D, Maxwell M, Walker J: A comparison of Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998, 15: 165-171.CrossRefPubMed Howie J, Heaney D, Maxwell M, Walker J: A comparison of Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998, 15: 165-171.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mercer S, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt G: The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004, 21: 699-705.CrossRefPubMed Mercer S, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt G: The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004, 21: 699-705.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bower P, Roland M, Campbell J, Mead N: Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. BMJ. 2003, 326: 258-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bower P, Roland M, Campbell J, Mead N: Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. BMJ. 2003, 326: 258-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Ritter P, Stewart A, Kaymaz H, Sobel D, Block D, Lorig K: Self-reports of health care utilisation compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54 (2): 136-41.CrossRefPubMed Ritter P, Stewart A, Kaymaz H, Sobel D, Block D, Lorig K: Self-reports of health care utilisation compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54 (2): 136-41.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Richards S, Coast J, Peters T: Patient reported use of health service resources compared with information from health providers. Health Soc Care Community. 2003, 11: 510-518.CrossRefPubMed Richards S, Coast J, Peters T: Patient reported use of health service resources compared with information from health providers. Health Soc Care Community. 2003, 11: 510-518.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ipsos MORI: GP patient surveys: your doctor, your experience, your say. 2007, London: Ipsos MORI Ipsos MORI: GP patient surveys: your doctor, your experience, your say. 2007, London: Ipsos MORI
33.
go back to reference Groves R: Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006, 70: 646-675.CrossRef Groves R: Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006, 70: 646-675.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Groves R, Peytcheva E: The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008, 72: 167-189.CrossRef Groves R, Peytcheva E: The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008, 72: 167-189.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Elliott M, Zaslavsky A, Goldstein E, Lehrman W, Hambarsoomians K, Beckett M, Giordano L: Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Serv Res. 2009, 44: 501-508.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliott M, Zaslavsky A, Goldstein E, Lehrman W, Hambarsoomians K, Beckett M, Giordano L: Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Serv Res. 2009, 44: 501-508.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Elliott M, Haviland A, Kanouse D, Hambarsoomians K, Hays R: Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency when rating health care: impact on disparity estimates. Health Serv Res. 2009, 44: 542-561.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliott M, Haviland A, Kanouse D, Hambarsoomians K, Hays R: Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency when rating health care: impact on disparity estimates. Health Serv Res. 2009, 44: 542-561.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK – development and psychometric characteristics
Authors
John Campbell
Patten Smith
Sonja Nissen
Peter Bower
Marc Elliott
Martin Roland
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-57

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Primary Care 1/2009 Go to the issue