Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice

Authors: Heidi Bøgelund Frederiksen, Jakob Kragstrup, Gitte Dehlholm-Lambertsen

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Continuity of care has traditionally been regarded as a core quality of general practice, but the long-term doctor-patient relationship has been put under pressure. In many places practices are expanding, with larger teams and more registered patients, thereby threatening the possibility of patients staying with their own general practitioner (GP). GPs often take it for granted that interpersonal continuity is valuable. However, little is known about how patient satisfaction is related to interpersonal continuity. The purpose of this study is to explore the creation of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the interpersonal relation with the GP, and in a comprehensive way to investigate how this is related to continuity of care.

Methods

Qualitative study based on 22 interviews with patients from two practices in Denmark. A total of 12 patients saw a regular doctor and 10 saw an unfamiliar doctor. The patients were selected after an observed consultation and sampled purposefully according to reason for encounter, age and sex. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to study how patients perceive meeting either a regular or an unfamiliar GP. The analysis explored the patients' perception of their interpersonal relationship with their GP, and interpreted the accounts by using social psychological theories.

Results

A long-term continuous relationship with the GP could be satisfactory, but it could also be the reverse. The same pattern was shown in case of an unfamiliar GP. Therefore, patient satisfaction and interpersonal continuity were not causally related. On the contrary, there was a general pattern of how the satisfactory and trustful doctor-patient relationship from the patients' point of view could be created, maintained or destroyed. A pattern where the process of recognition, by respecting and remembering, on the one hand created and maintained satisfaction while humiliation on the other hand destroyed satisfaction in the relationship.

Conclusion

It was not valuable to have a continuous relationship unless the GP recognized the patient. The social psychological concept of recognition had two different meanings and the GP had to do both, respect and remember the patient, in order to create and sustain the trustful relationship. The added value of interpersonal continuity had to be combined with recognition.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hjortdahl P: Continuity of care – going out of style?. Brit J Gen Pract. 2001, 51: 699-700. Hjortdahl P: Continuity of care – going out of style?. Brit J Gen Pract. 2001, 51: 699-700.
2.
go back to reference Boulton M, Tarrant C, Windridge K, Baker R, Freeman GK: How are different types of continuity achieved? A mixed methods longitudinal study. Brit J Gen Pract. 2006, 56: 749-755. Boulton M, Tarrant C, Windridge K, Baker R, Freeman GK: How are different types of continuity achieved? A mixed methods longitudinal study. Brit J Gen Pract. 2006, 56: 749-755.
3.
go back to reference Pandhi N, Saultz JW: Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006, 19: 390-397.CrossRefPubMed Pandhi N, Saultz JW: Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006, 19: 390-397.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schers H, Webster S, Hoogen van den H, Avery A, Grol R, Bosch van den W: Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views. Brit J Gen Pract. 2002, 52: 459-462. Schers H, Webster S, Hoogen van den H, Avery A, Grol R, Bosch van den W: Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views. Brit J Gen Pract. 2002, 52: 459-462.
6.
7.
go back to reference Windridge K, Tarrant C, Freeman GK, Baker R, Boulton M, Low J: Problems with a 'target' approach to access in primary care: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 364-366. Windridge K, Tarrant C, Freeman GK, Baker R, Boulton M, Low J: Problems with a 'target' approach to access in primary care: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 364-366.
8.
go back to reference Kearley KE, Freeman GK, Heath A: An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice. Brit J Gen Pract. 2001, 51: 712-718. Kearley KE, Freeman GK, Heath A: An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice. Brit J Gen Pract. 2001, 51: 712-718.
9.
go back to reference Guthrie B, Wyke S: Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract. 2006, 7: 11-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guthrie B, Wyke S: Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract. 2006, 7: 11-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference von Bultzingslowen I, Eliasson G, Sarvimaki A, Mattsson B, Hjortdahl P: Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations. Fam Pract. 2006, 23: 210-219.CrossRefPubMed von Bultzingslowen I, Eliasson G, Sarvimaki A, Mattsson B, Hjortdahl P: Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations. Fam Pract. 2006, 23: 210-219.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Buszewicz M, Pistrang N, Barker C, Cape J, Martin J: Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract. 2006, 56: 496-503. Buszewicz M, Pistrang N, Barker C, Cape J, Martin J: Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract. 2006, 56: 496-503.
13.
go back to reference Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P: Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?. Fam Pract. 2003, 20: 623-627.CrossRefPubMed Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P: Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?. Fam Pract. 2003, 20: 623-627.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Langdridge D: Phenomenological Psychology. Theory, research and method. 2007, Harlow: Pearson Education Langdridge D: Phenomenological Psychology. Theory, research and method. 2007, Harlow: Pearson Education
18.
go back to reference Honneth A: The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. 1995, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT press Honneth A: The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. 1995, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT press
19.
go back to reference Steihaug S, Malterud K: Recognition and reciprocity in encounters with women with chronic muscular pain. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002, 20: 151-156.CrossRefPubMed Steihaug S, Malterud K: Recognition and reciprocity in encounters with women with chronic muscular pain. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002, 20: 151-156.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Glynn LG, MacFarlane A, Murphy AW: The complexity of patients' satisfaction with out-of-hours care: a qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract. 2007, 13: 83-88.CrossRefPubMed Glynn LG, MacFarlane A, Murphy AW: The complexity of patients' satisfaction with out-of-hours care: a qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract. 2007, 13: 83-88.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL: Continuity of care matters. BMJ. 2008, 337: 548-549. Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL: Continuity of care matters. BMJ. 2008, 337: 548-549.
23.
go back to reference Baker R, Mainous AG, Gray DP, Love MM: Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003, 21: 27-32.CrossRefPubMed Baker R, Mainous AG, Gray DP, Love MM: Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003, 21: 27-32.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Freeman GK, Richards SC: Personal Continuity and the Care of Patients with Epilepsy in General-Practice. Brit J Gen Pract. 1994, 44: 395-399. Freeman GK, Richards SC: Personal Continuity and the Care of Patients with Epilepsy in General-Practice. Brit J Gen Pract. 1994, 44: 395-399.
25.
go back to reference Gore J, Ogden J: Developing, validating and consolidating the doctor-patient relationship: the patients' views of a dynamic process. Brit J Gen Pract. 1998, 48: 1391-1394. Gore J, Ogden J: Developing, validating and consolidating the doctor-patient relationship: the patients' views of a dynamic process. Brit J Gen Pract. 1998, 48: 1391-1394.
26.
go back to reference Arborelius E, Bremberg S: What does a Human Relationship with the doctor mean?. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992, 10: 163-169.CrossRefPubMed Arborelius E, Bremberg S: What does a Human Relationship with the doctor mean?. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992, 10: 163-169.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tarrant C, Windridge K, Boulton M, Baker R, Freeman G: "He treats you as a person not just like a number" – How important is personal care in general practice?. BMJ. 2003, 326: 1310-1312.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tarrant C, Windridge K, Boulton M, Baker R, Freeman G: "He treats you as a person not just like a number" – How important is personal care in general practice?. BMJ. 2003, 326: 1310-1312.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ: Empathy and quality of care. Brit J Gen Pract. 2002, 52: 9-12. Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ: Empathy and quality of care. Brit J Gen Pract. 2002, 52: 9-12.
29.
go back to reference Hantho A, Jensen L, Malterud K: Mutual understanding: a communication model for general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002, 20: 244-251.CrossRefPubMed Hantho A, Jensen L, Malterud K: Mutual understanding: a communication model for general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002, 20: 244-251.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Schibbye ALL: The Role of Recognition in the Resolution of A Specific Interpersonal Dilemma. J Phenomenol Psychol. 1993, 24: 175-189.CrossRef Schibbye ALL: The Role of Recognition in the Resolution of A Specific Interpersonal Dilemma. J Phenomenol Psychol. 1993, 24: 175-189.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mercer S, Cawston P, Bikker A: Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract. 2007, 8: 22-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mercer S, Cawston P, Bikker A: Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract. 2007, 8: 22-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Johnston O, Kumar S, Kendall K, Peveler R, Gabbay J, Kendrick T: Qualitative study of depression management in primary care: GP and patient goals, and the value of listening. Brit J Gen Pract. 2007, 57: 872-879.CrossRef Johnston O, Kumar S, Kendall K, Peveler R, Gabbay J, Kendrick T: Qualitative study of depression management in primary care: GP and patient goals, and the value of listening. Brit J Gen Pract. 2007, 57: 872-879.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Jabaaij L, Fassaert T, van Dulmen S, Timmermans A, van Essen GA, Schellevis F: Familiarity between patient and general practitioner does not influence the content of the consultation. BMC Fam Pract. 2008, 9: 51-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jabaaij L, Fassaert T, van Dulmen S, Timmermans A, van Essen GA, Schellevis F: Familiarity between patient and general practitioner does not influence the content of the consultation. BMC Fam Pract. 2008, 9: 51-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Baker R, Boulton M, Windridge K, Tarrant C, Bankart J, Freeman GK: Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences. Brit J Gen Pract. 2007, 57: 283-289. Baker R, Boulton M, Windridge K, Tarrant C, Bankart J, Freeman GK: Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences. Brit J Gen Pract. 2007, 57: 283-289.
Metadata
Title
It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice
Authors
Heidi Bøgelund Frederiksen
Jakob Kragstrup
Gitte Dehlholm-Lambertsen
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-47

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Primary Care 1/2009 Go to the issue