Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Debate

Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt

Authors: Salla Atkins, Simon Lewin, Helen Smith, Mark Engel, Atle Fretheim, Jimmy Volmink

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Qualitative synthesis has become more commonplace in recent years. Meta-ethnography is one of several methods for synthesising qualitative research and is being used increasingly within health care research. However, many aspects of the steps in the process remain ill-defined.

Discussion

We utilized the seven stages of the synthesis process to synthesise qualitative research on adherence to tuberculosis treatment. In this paper we discuss the methodological and practical challenges faced; of particular note are the methods used in our synthesis, the additional steps that we found useful in clarifying the process, and the key methodological challenges encountered in implementing the meta-ethnographic approach.
The challenges included shaping an appropriate question for the synthesis; identifying relevant studies; assessing the quality of the studies; and synthesising findings across a very large number of primary studies from different contexts and research traditions. We offer suggestions that may assist in undertaking meta-ethnographies in the future.

Summary

Meta-ethnography is a useful method for synthesising qualitative research and for developing models that interpret findings across multiple studies. Despite its growing use in health research, further research is needed to address the wide range of methodological and epistemological questions raised by the approach.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lloyd Jones M: Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004, 48 (3): 271-278. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03196.x.CrossRef Lloyd Jones M: Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004, 48 (3): 271-278. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03196.x.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mays N: Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mays N: Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference McEwan MJ: A systematic review of the contribution of qualitative research to the study of quality of life in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Seizure. 2004, 13: 3-14. 10.1016/S1059-1311(03)00081-5.CrossRefPubMed McEwan MJ: A systematic review of the contribution of qualitative research to the study of quality of life in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Seizure. 2004, 13: 3-14. 10.1016/S1059-1311(03)00081-5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7: 209-215. 10.1258/135581902320432732.CrossRefPubMed Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7: 209-215. 10.1258/135581902320432732.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C, Popay J: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 6-20. 10.1258/1355819054308576.CrossRefPubMed Mays N, Pope C, Popay J: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 6-20. 10.1258/1355819054308576.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Green J: Qualitative methods for health research. 2004, London , Sage Green J: Qualitative methods for health research. 2004, London , Sage
7.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Young B, Jones D, Sutton A: Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. 2004 Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Young B, Jones D, Sutton A: Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. 2004
8.
go back to reference Thomas J: Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2004, 328: 1010-1012. 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas J: Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2004, 328: 1010-1012. 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 794-800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 794-800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Barbour RS, Barbour M: Evaluating and synthesising qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003, 9 (2): 179-186. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00371.x.CrossRefPubMed Barbour RS, Barbour M: Evaluating and synthesising qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003, 9 (2): 179-186. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00371.x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001, 322 (7294): 1115-1117. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001, 322 (7294): 1115-1117. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Noblit GW: Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. 1988, Newbury Park, California , SageCrossRef Noblit GW: Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. 1988, Newbury Park, California , SageCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 671-684. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3.CrossRefPubMed Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 671-684. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G, Campbell R: Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 61: 133-155. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063.CrossRefPubMed Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G, Campbell R: Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 61: 133-155. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA: The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004, 13: 223-225. 10.1136/qshc.2003.008714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA: The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004, 13: 223-225. 10.1136/qshc.2003.008714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Volmink J, Garner P: Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, CD003343-4 Volmink J, Garner P: Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, CD003343-4
17.
go back to reference Munro S: Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Medicine. 2007, 4 (7): Munro S: Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Medicine. 2007, 4 (7):
18.
go back to reference Walsh D: Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005, 50 (2): 204-211. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x.CrossRefPubMed Walsh D: Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005, 50 (2): 204-211. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K: Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000, 7 (2): 125-133. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00257.x.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K: Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000, 7 (2): 125-133. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00257.x.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Evans D: Database searches for qualitative research. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2002, 90 (3): 290-293.PubMedPubMedCentral Evans D: Database searches for qualitative research. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2002, 90 (3): 290-293.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Barroso J: The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2003, 25: 153-178. 10.1177/0193945902250034.CrossRefPubMed Barroso J: The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2003, 25: 153-178. 10.1177/0193945902250034.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Booth A: Cochrane or cock-eyed? How should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research?. Qualitative Evidence-based conference: Taking a critical stance. 2001, Coventry University Booth A: Cochrane or cock-eyed? How should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research?. Qualitative Evidence-based conference: Taking a critical stance. 2001, Coventry University
23.
go back to reference Shaw RL: Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2004, 4 (5): Shaw RL: Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2004, 4 (5):
24.
go back to reference Spencer L: Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office Occasional Papers Series. 2003, London , Cabinet Office, 2: Spencer L: Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office Occasional Papers Series. 2003, London , Cabinet Office, 2:
25.
go back to reference Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rowan M: Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1997, 157 (10): 1442-1446.PubMedPubMedCentral Rowan M: Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1997, 157 (10): 1442-1446.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2002, 11: Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2002, 11:
29.
go back to reference Anfara Jnr V: Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational Researcher. 2002, 31: 28-38. 10.3102/0013189X031007028.CrossRef Anfara Jnr V: Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational Researcher. 2002, 31: 28-38. 10.3102/0013189X031007028.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schutz A: Collected Papers . 1971, The Hague , Martinus Nijhoff, 1: 361- Schutz A: Collected Papers . 1971, The Hague , Martinus Nijhoff, 1: 361-
31.
go back to reference Smith LK: Patient’s help seeking and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet. 2005, 366: 825-831. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67030-4.CrossRefPubMed Smith LK: Patient’s help seeking and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet. 2005, 366: 825-831. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67030-4.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ritchie J: Qualitative Health Research. 2003, London , Sage Ritchie J: Qualitative Health Research. 2003, London , Sage
33.
go back to reference Walter FM: Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Annals of Family Medicine. 2004, 2 (6): 583-594. 10.1370/afm.242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walter FM: Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Annals of Family Medicine. 2004, 2 (6): 583-594. 10.1370/afm.242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
35.
36.
go back to reference Noyes J: Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007, 57 (3): 227-243. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04092.x.CrossRefPubMed Noyes J: Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007, 57 (3): 227-243. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04092.x.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Baum F: Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social Science and Medicine. 1995, 40 (4): 459-468. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0103-Y.CrossRefPubMed Baum F: Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social Science and Medicine. 1995, 40 (4): 459-468. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0103-Y.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt
Authors
Salla Atkins
Simon Lewin
Helen Smith
Mark Engel
Atle Fretheim
Jimmy Volmink
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2008 Go to the issue