Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Research article

WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges

Authors: A Metin Gülmezoglu, Lale Say, Ana P Betrán, Jose Villar, Gilda Piaggio

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden of reproductive ill-health, we are conducting a systematic review of incidence and prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity.

Methods

We followed the standard methodology for systematic reviews. We prepared a protocol and a form for data extraction that identify key characteristics on study and reporting quality. An extensive search was conducted for the years 1997–2002 including electronic and hand searching.

Results

We screened the titles and abstracts of about 65,000 citations identified through 11 electronic databases as well as various other sources. Four thousand six hundred and twenty-six full-text reports were critically appraised and 2443 are included in the review so far. Approximately one third of the studies were conducted in Asia and Africa. The reporting quality was generally low with definitions for conditions and the diagnostic methods often not reported.

Conclusions

There are unique challenges and issues regarding the search, critical appraisal and summarizing epidemiological data in this systematic review of prevalence/incidence studies. More methodological studies and discussion to advance the field will be useful. Considerable efforts including leadership, consensus building and resources are required to improve the standards of monitoring burden of disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Revised 1990 estimates of maternal mortality. A new approach by WHO and UNICEF. 1996, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, WHO/FRH/MSM/96.11: Revised 1990 estimates of maternal mortality. A new approach by WHO and UNICEF. 1996, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, WHO/FRH/MSM/96.11:
2.
go back to reference Maternal mortality in 1995: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. 2001, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization Maternal mortality in 1995: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. 2001, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization
3.
go back to reference Hill K, AbouZahr C, Wardlaw T: Estimates of maternal mortality for 1995. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001, 79: 182-193.PubMedPubMedCentral Hill K, AbouZahr C, Wardlaw T: Estimates of maternal mortality for 1995. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001, 79: 182-193.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Hakkert R: Country estimates for maternal mortality: an alternative model. Statistics in medicine. 2001, 20: 3505-3524. 10.1002/sim.1075.CrossRefPubMed Hakkert R: Country estimates for maternal mortality: an alternative model. Statistics in medicine. 2001, 20: 3505-3524. 10.1002/sim.1075.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Villar J, Betrán AP, Gülmezoglu AM, Say L: WHO leads global effort on systematic reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003, 32: 164-165. 10.1093/ije/dyg119.CrossRefPubMed Villar J, Betrán AP, Gülmezoglu AM, Say L: WHO leads global effort on systematic reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003, 32: 164-165. 10.1093/ije/dyg119.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dickersin K: Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002, 31: 6-12. 10.1093/ije/31.1.6.CrossRefPubMed Dickersin K: Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002, 31: 6-12. 10.1093/ije/31.1.6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG: Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. 2001, London, BMJ Publishing GroupCrossRef Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG: Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. 2001, London, BMJ Publishing GroupCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000, 283: 2008-2012. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.CrossRefPubMed Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000, 283: 2008-2012. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference WHO systematic review on maternal morbidity and mortality 1997-2002. Study protocol. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2002 WHO systematic review on maternal morbidity and mortality 1997-2002. Study protocol. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2002
12.
go back to reference International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - 10th revision. 1992, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - 10th revision. 1992, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization
14.
go back to reference Machin D, Campbell MJ, Fayers P, Pinol A: Statistical Tables for the Design of Clinical Trials. 1997, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Table 11.1: 2nd edition Machin D, Campbell MJ, Fayers P, Pinol A: Statistical Tables for the Design of Clinical Trials. 1997, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Table 11.1: 2nd edition
15.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fernández E, García AM: Accuracy of referencing of Spanish names in Medline. Lancet. 2003, 361: 351-352. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12356-2.CrossRefPubMed Fernández E, García AM: Accuracy of referencing of Spanish names in Medline. Lancet. 2003, 361: 351-352. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12356-2.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Siebers R, Holt S: Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1445-CrossRefPubMed Siebers R, Holt S: Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1445-CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Higgins JR, de Swiet M: Blood-pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy. Lancet. 2001, 357: 131-135. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03552-2.CrossRefPubMed Higgins JR, de Swiet M: Blood-pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy. Lancet. 2001, 357: 131-135. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03552-2.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ronsmans C, Campbell O, Collumbien M: Effect of supplementation with vitamin A or beta carotene on mortality related to pregnancy. Slight modifications in definitions could alter interpretation of results. BMJ. 1999, 319: 1202-1203.PubMed Ronsmans C, Campbell O, Collumbien M: Effect of supplementation with vitamin A or beta carotene on mortality related to pregnancy. Slight modifications in definitions could alter interpretation of results. BMJ. 1999, 319: 1202-1203.PubMed
21.
go back to reference North RA, Taylor RS, Schellenberg JC: Evaluation of a definition of pre-eclampsia. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1999, 106: 767-773.CrossRef North RA, Taylor RS, Schellenberg JC: Evaluation of a definition of pre-eclampsia. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1999, 106: 767-773.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith R: Publishing research from developing countries. Statistics in medicine. 2002, 21: 2869-2877. 10.1002/sim.1291.CrossRefPubMed Smith R: Publishing research from developing countries. Statistics in medicine. 2002, 21: 2869-2877. 10.1002/sim.1291.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference United Nations: World Population Prospects. The 2000 revision. 2001, New York, United Nations United Nations: World Population Prospects. The 2000 revision. 2001, New York, United Nations
Metadata
Title
WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges
Authors
A Metin Gülmezoglu
Lale Say
Ana P Betrán
Jose Villar
Gilda Piaggio
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-16

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2004 Go to the issue