Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study

Authors: Karin PW Schoenmakers, Petra JC Heesterbeek, Nigel TM Jack, Rudolf Stienstra

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stimulating catheters offer the possibility of delivering an electrical charge via the tip of the catheter. This may be advantageous as it allows verifying if the catheter tip is in close proximity to the target nerve, thereby increasing catheter performance. This prospective blinded cohort study was designed to investigate whether there is a correlation between the minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter, and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block (PNB) catheter as determined by 24 h postoperative morphine consumption.

Methods

Forty adult patients with ASA physical health classification I-III scheduled for upper extremity surgery under combined continuous interscalene block and general anesthesia were studied. Six patients were excluded from analysis.
After inserting a stimulating catheter as if it were a non-stimulating catheter for 2–5 cm through the needle, the minimal electrical charge necessary to obtain an appropriate motor response was determined. A loading dose of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% ropivacaine was then administered, and postoperative analgesia was provided by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 8 mL.h-1 via the brachial plexus catheter, and an intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.
Main outcome measures include the minimal electrical charge (MEC) at the tip of the stimulating catheter necessary to elicit an appropriate motor response, and the efficacy of the PNB catheter as determined by 24 h postoperative PCA morphine consumption.

Results

Mean (SD) [range] MEC at the tip of the stimulating catheter was 589 (1414) [30 – 5000] nC. Mean (SD) [range] 24 h morphine consumption was 8.9 (9.9) [0–29] mg. The correlation between the MEC and 24 h postoperative morphine consumption was Spearman’s Rho rs = -0.26, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.09.

Conclusion

We conclude that there is no proportional relation between MEC at the tip of the blindly inserted stimulating catheter and 24 h postoperative morphine consumption.

Trial registration

Trialregister.nl identifier: NTR2328
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Magora F, Rozin R, Ben-Menachem Y, Magora A: Obturator nerve block: an evaluation of technique. Br J Anaesth. 1969, 41: 695-698. 10.1093/bja/41.8.695.CrossRefPubMed Magora F, Rozin R, Ben-Menachem Y, Magora A: Obturator nerve block: an evaluation of technique. Br J Anaesth. 1969, 41: 695-698. 10.1093/bja/41.8.695.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Raj PP, Rosenblatt R, Montgomery SJ: Use of the nerve stimulator for peripheral blocks. Reg Anesth. 1980, 5: 14-21. Raj PP, Rosenblatt R, Montgomery SJ: Use of the nerve stimulator for peripheral blocks. Reg Anesth. 1980, 5: 14-21.
3.
go back to reference Tsai T, Vuckovic I, Dilberovic F, Obhodzas M, Kapur E, Divanovic K, Hadzic A: Intensity of the stimulating current may not be a reliable indicator of intraneural needle placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008, 33: 207-210. 10.1097/00115550-200809001-00401.CrossRefPubMed Tsai T, Vuckovic I, Dilberovic F, Obhodzas M, Kapur E, Divanovic K, Hadzic A: Intensity of the stimulating current may not be a reliable indicator of intraneural needle placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008, 33: 207-210. 10.1097/00115550-200809001-00401.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Altermatt F, Corvetto M, Venegas C, Echevarría G, Bravo P, De La Cuadra J, Irribarra L: The sensitivity of motor responses for detecting catheter-nerve contact during ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks with stimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2011, 113: 1276-1278. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c9887.CrossRefPubMed Altermatt F, Corvetto M, Venegas C, Echevarría G, Bravo P, De La Cuadra J, Irribarra L: The sensitivity of motor responses for detecting catheter-nerve contact during ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks with stimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2011, 113: 1276-1278. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c9887.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fredrickson M: The sensitivity of motor response to needle nerve stimulation during ultrasound guided interscalene catheter placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008, 33: 291-296. 10.1097/00115550-200807000-00002.CrossRefPubMed Fredrickson M: The sensitivity of motor response to needle nerve stimulation during ultrasound guided interscalene catheter placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008, 33: 291-296. 10.1097/00115550-200807000-00002.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Perlas A, Niazi A, McCartney C, Chan V, Xu D, Abbas S: The sensitivity of motor response to nerve stimulation and paresthesia for nerve localization as evaluated by ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006, 31: 445-450. 10.1097/00115550-200609000-00009.CrossRefPubMed Perlas A, Niazi A, McCartney C, Chan V, Xu D, Abbas S: The sensitivity of motor response to nerve stimulation and paresthesia for nerve localization as evaluated by ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006, 31: 445-450. 10.1097/00115550-200609000-00009.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Robards C, Hadzic A, Somasundaram L, Iwata T, Gadsden J, Xu D, Sala-Blanch X: Intraneural injection with low-current stimulation during popliteal sciatic nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2009, 109: 673-677. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa2d73.CrossRefPubMed Robards C, Hadzic A, Somasundaram L, Iwata T, Gadsden J, Xu D, Sala-Blanch X: Intraneural injection with low-current stimulation during popliteal sciatic nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2009, 109: 673-677. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa2d73.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Casati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, Baciarello M, Ghisi D, Nobili F, Chelly J: Stimulating or conventional perineural catheters after hallux valgus repair: a double-blind, pharmaco-economic evaluation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006, 50: 1284-1289. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01101.x.CrossRefPubMed Casati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, Baciarello M, Ghisi D, Nobili F, Chelly J: Stimulating or conventional perineural catheters after hallux valgus repair: a double-blind, pharmaco-economic evaluation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006, 50: 1284-1289. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01101.x.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Casati A, Fanelli G, Koscielniak-Nielsen Z, Cappelleri G, Aldegheri G, Danelli G, Fuzier R, Singelyn F: Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2005, 101: 1192-1197. 10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd.CrossRefPubMed Casati A, Fanelli G, Koscielniak-Nielsen Z, Cappelleri G, Aldegheri G, Danelli G, Fuzier R, Singelyn F: Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2005, 101: 1192-1197. 10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morin A, Kranke P, Wulf H, Stienstra R, Eberhart LH: The effect of stimulating versus nonstimulating catheter techniques for continuous regional anesthesia: a semiquantitative systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010, 35: 194-199. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d259a4.CrossRefPubMed Morin A, Kranke P, Wulf H, Stienstra R, Eberhart LH: The effect of stimulating versus nonstimulating catheter techniques for continuous regional anesthesia: a semiquantitative systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010, 35: 194-199. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d259a4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dhir S, Ganapathy S: Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with stimulating catheter and traditional technique: a prospective-randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008, 52: 1158-1166. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01736.x.CrossRefPubMed Dhir S, Ganapathy S: Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with stimulating catheter and traditional technique: a prospective-randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008, 52: 1158-1166. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01736.x.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jack NT, Liem EB, Vonhögen LH: Use of a stimulating catheter for total knee replacement surgery: preliminary results. Br J Anaesth. 2005, 95: 250-254. 10.1093/bja/aei161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jack NT, Liem EB, Vonhögen LH: Use of a stimulating catheter for total knee replacement surgery: preliminary results. Br J Anaesth. 2005, 95: 250-254. 10.1093/bja/aei161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Stevens M, Werdehausen R, Golla E, Braun S, Hermanns H, Ilg A, Willers R, Lipfert P: Does interscalene catheter placement with stimulating catheters improve postoperative pain or functional outcome after shoulder surgery? A prospective, randomized and double-blinded trial. Anesth Analg. 2007, 104: 442-447. 10.1213/01.ane.0000253513.15336.25.CrossRefPubMed Stevens M, Werdehausen R, Golla E, Braun S, Hermanns H, Ilg A, Willers R, Lipfert P: Does interscalene catheter placement with stimulating catheters improve postoperative pain or functional outcome after shoulder surgery? A prospective, randomized and double-blinded trial. Anesth Analg. 2007, 104: 442-447. 10.1213/01.ane.0000253513.15336.25.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Perlas A, Chan VW, Simons M: Brachial plexus examination and localization using ultrasound and electrical stimulation: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2003, 99: 429-435. 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00025.CrossRefPubMed Perlas A, Chan VW, Simons M: Brachial plexus examination and localization using ultrasound and electrical stimulation: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2003, 99: 429-435. 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00025.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sinha S, Abrams J, Weller R: Ultrasound-guided interscalene needle placement produces successful anesthesia regardless of motor stimulation above or below 0.5 mA. Anesth Analg. 2007, 105: 848-852. 10.1213/01.ane.0000271912.84440.01.CrossRefPubMed Sinha S, Abrams J, Weller R: Ultrasound-guided interscalene needle placement produces successful anesthesia regardless of motor stimulation above or below 0.5 mA. Anesth Analg. 2007, 105: 848-852. 10.1213/01.ane.0000271912.84440.01.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study
Authors
Karin PW Schoenmakers
Petra JC Heesterbeek
Nigel TM Jack
Rudolf Stienstra
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-26

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2014 Go to the issue