Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

A six year retrospective review of occipital nerve stimulation practice - controversies and challenges of an emerging technique for treating refractory headache syndromes

Authors: Stefano Palmisani, Adnan Al-Kaisy, Roberto Arcioni, Tom Smith, Andrea Negro, Giorgio Lambru, Vijay Bandikatla, Eleanor Carson, Paolo Martelletti

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A retrospective review of patients treated with Occipital Nerve Stimulation (ONS) at two large tertiary referral centres has been audited in order to optimise future treatment pathways.

Methods

Patient’s medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and each patient was contacted by a trained headache expert to confirm clinical diagnosis and system efficacy. Results were compared to reported outcomes in current literature on ONS for primary headaches.

Results

Twenty-five patients underwent a trial of ONS between January 2007 and December 2012, and 23 patients went on to have permanent implantation of ONS. All 23 patients reached one-year follow/up, and 14 of them (61%) exceeded two years of follow-up. Seventeen of the 23 had refractory chronic migraine (rCM), and 3 refractory occipital neuralgia (ON). 11 of the 19 rCM patients had been referred with an incorrect headache diagnosis. Nine of the rCM patients (53%) reported 50% or more reduction in headache pain intensity and or frequency at long term follow-up (11–77 months). All 3 ON patients reported more than 50% reduction in pain intensity and/or frequency at 28–31 months. Ten (43%) subjects underwent surgical revision after an average of 11 ± 7 months from permanent implantation - in 90% of cases due to lead problems. Seven patients attended a specifically designed, multi-disciplinary, two-week pre-implant programme and showed improved scores across all measured psychological and functional parameters independent of response to subsequent ONS.

Conclusions

Our retrospective review: 1) confirms the long-term ONS success rate in refractory chronic headaches, consistent with previously published studies; 2) suggests that some headaches types may respond better to ONS than others (ON vs CM); 3) calls into question the role of trial stimulation in ONS; 4) confirms the high rate of complications related to the equipment not originally designed for ONS; 5) emphasises the need for specialist multidisciplinary care in these patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Katsarava Z, Kukava M, Mirvelashvili E, et al.: A pilot methodological validation study for a population-based survey of the prevalences of migraine, tension-type headache and chronic daily headache in the country of Georgia. J Headache Pain 2007, 8: 77–82. 10.1007/s10194-007-0367-xPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Katsarava Z, Kukava M, Mirvelashvili E, et al.: A pilot methodological validation study for a population-based survey of the prevalences of migraine, tension-type headache and chronic daily headache in the country of Georgia. J Headache Pain 2007, 8: 77–82. 10.1007/s10194-007-0367-xPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scher AI, Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Lipton RB: Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study. Pain 2003, 106: 81–89. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00293-8PubMedCrossRef Scher AI, Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Lipton RB: Factors associated with the onset and remission of chronic daily headache in a population-based study. Pain 2003, 106: 81–89. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00293-8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Olesen J, Bousser M-G, Headache Classification Committee, et al.: New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2006, 26: 742–746.PubMedCrossRef Olesen J, Bousser M-G, Headache Classification Committee, et al.: New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2006, 26: 742–746.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Buse DC, Manack AN, Fanning KM, et al.: Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors: results from the American migraine prevalence and prevention study. Headache 2012. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02223.x Buse DC, Manack AN, Fanning KM, et al.: Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors: results from the American migraine prevalence and prevention study. Headache 2012. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02223.x
7.
go back to reference Wang S-J, Wang P-J, Fuh J-L, et al.: Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: a clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia 2013, 33: 171–181. 10.1177/0333102412468668PubMedCrossRef Wang S-J, Wang P-J, Fuh J-L, et al.: Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: a clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia 2013, 33: 171–181. 10.1177/0333102412468668PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lionetto L, Negro A, Palmisani S, et al.: Emerging treatment for chronic migraine and refractory chronic migraine. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2012, 17: 393–406. 10.1517/14728214.2012.709846PubMedCrossRef Lionetto L, Negro A, Palmisani S, et al.: Emerging treatment for chronic migraine and refractory chronic migraine. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2012, 17: 393–406. 10.1517/14728214.2012.709846PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goadsby PJ, Schoenen J, Ferrari MD, et al.: Towards a definition of intractable headache for use in clinical practice and trials. Cephalalgia 2006, 26: 1168–1170. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01173.xPubMedCrossRef Goadsby PJ, Schoenen J, Ferrari MD, et al.: Towards a definition of intractable headache for use in clinical practice and trials. Cephalalgia 2006, 26: 1168–1170. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01173.xPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Magis D, Schoenen J: Advances and challenges in neurostimulation for headaches. Lancet Neurol 2012, 11: 708–719. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70139-4PubMedCrossRef Magis D, Schoenen J: Advances and challenges in neurostimulation for headaches. Lancet Neurol 2012, 11: 708–719. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70139-4PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lambru G, Matharu MS: SUNCT and SUNA: medical and surgical treatments. Neurol Sci 2013,34(Suppl 1):75–81.CrossRef Lambru G, Matharu MS: SUNCT and SUNA: medical and surgical treatments. Neurol Sci 2013,34(Suppl 1):75–81.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Saper JR, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, et al.: Occipital nerve stimulation for the treatment of intractable chronic migraine headache: ONSTIM feasibility study. Cephalalgia 2011, 31: 271–285. 10.1177/0333102410381142PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Saper JR, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, et al.: Occipital nerve stimulation for the treatment of intractable chronic migraine headache: ONSTIM feasibility study. Cephalalgia 2011, 31: 271–285. 10.1177/0333102410381142PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Saper J, et al.: Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia 2012, 32: 1165–1179. 10.1177/0333102412462642PubMedCrossRef Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Saper J, et al.: Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia 2012, 32: 1165–1179. 10.1177/0333102412462642PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society: The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004,24(Suppl 1):9–160. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society: The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004,24(Suppl 1):9–160.
15.
go back to reference Schulman EA, Lake AE, Goadsby PJ, et al.: Defining refractory migraine and refractory chronic migraine: proposed criteria from the refractory headache special interest section of the American headache society. Headache 2008, 48: 778–782. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01132.xPubMedCrossRef Schulman EA, Lake AE, Goadsby PJ, et al.: Defining refractory migraine and refractory chronic migraine: proposed criteria from the refractory headache special interest section of the American headache society. Headache 2008, 48: 778–782. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01132.xPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lipton R, Goadsby P, Cady R, et al.: P047 - PRISM study: occipital nerve stimulation for treatment-refractory migraine. Cephalalgia 2009,29(Suppl 1):1–166. Lipton R, Goadsby P, Cady R, et al.: P047 - PRISM study: occipital nerve stimulation for treatment-refractory migraine. Cephalalgia 2009,29(Suppl 1):1–166.
17.
go back to reference Linton SJ, Andersson T: Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain. Spine 2000, 25: 2825–2831. 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00017PubMedCrossRef Linton SJ, Andersson T: Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain. Spine 2000, 25: 2825–2831. 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00017PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M: Pain and behavioral medicine: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. New York: The Guilford Press; 1987. Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M: Pain and behavioral medicine: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. New York: The Guilford Press; 1987.
19.
go back to reference Turk DC, Okifuji A: Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002, 70: 678–690.PubMedCrossRef Turk DC, Okifuji A: Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002, 70: 678–690.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al.: Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005, 113: 9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012PubMedCrossRef Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al.: Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005, 113: 9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, et al.: The pain disability index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987, 68: 438–441.PubMed Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, et al.: The pain disability index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987, 68: 438–441.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W: Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess 1996, 67: 588–597. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13PubMedCrossRef Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W: Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess 1996, 67: 588–597. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nicholas MK: The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007, 11: 153–163. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008PubMedCrossRef Nicholas MK: The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007, 11: 153–163. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J: The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995, 7: 524–532.CrossRef Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J: The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995, 7: 524–532.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hudes K: The Tampa scale of kinesiophobia and neck pain, disability and range of motion: a narrative review of the literature. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2011, 55: 222–232.PubMedCentralPubMed Hudes K: The Tampa scale of kinesiophobia and neck pain, disability and range of motion: a narrative review of the literature. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2011, 55: 222–232.PubMedCentralPubMed
26.
go back to reference Paemeleire K, Van Buyten J-P, Van Buynder M, et al.: Phenotype of patients responsive to occipital nerve stimulation for refractory head pain. Cephalalgia 2010, 30: 662–673.PubMed Paemeleire K, Van Buyten J-P, Van Buynder M, et al.: Phenotype of patients responsive to occipital nerve stimulation for refractory head pain. Cephalalgia 2010, 30: 662–673.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al.: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010, 50: 921–936. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.xPubMedCrossRef Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al.: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010, 50: 921–936. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.xPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Peres MFP, Zukerman E, Young WB, Silberstein SD: Fatigue in chronic migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2002, 22: 720–724. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00426.xPubMedCrossRef Peres MFP, Zukerman E, Young WB, Silberstein SD: Fatigue in chronic migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2002, 22: 720–724. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00426.xPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pompili M, Serafini G, Di Cosimo D, Dominici G, Innamorati M, Lester D, Forte A, Girardi N, De Filippis S, Tatarelli R, Martelletti P: Psychiatric comorbidity and suicide risk in patients with chronic migraine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2010, 6: 81–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pompili M, Serafini G, Di Cosimo D, Dominici G, Innamorati M, Lester D, Forte A, Girardi N, De Filippis S, Tatarelli R, Martelletti P: Psychiatric comorbidity and suicide risk in patients with chronic migraine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2010, 6: 81–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Scherstén B: Impact of chronic pain on health care seeking, self care, and medication. Results from a population-based Swedish study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999, 53: 503–509. 10.1136/jech.53.8.503PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Scherstén B: Impact of chronic pain on health care seeking, self care, and medication. Results from a population-based Swedish study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999, 53: 503–509. 10.1136/jech.53.8.503PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Doleys DM: Psychological factors in spinal cord stimulation therapy: brief review and discussion. Neurosurg Focus 2006, 21: E1.PubMedCrossRef Doleys DM: Psychological factors in spinal cord stimulation therapy: brief review and discussion. Neurosurg Focus 2006, 21: E1.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tunks ER, Crook J, Weir R: Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry 2008, 53: 224–234.PubMed Tunks ER, Crook J, Weir R: Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry 2008, 53: 224–234.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Sparkes E, Raphael JH, Duarte RV, et al.: A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy. Pain 2010, 150: 284–289. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.001PubMedCrossRef Sparkes E, Raphael JH, Duarte RV, et al.: A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy. Pain 2010, 150: 284–289. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.001PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN: Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med 2009, 10: 639–653. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00632.xPubMedCrossRef Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN: Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med 2009, 10: 639–653. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00632.xPubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Barolat G, Ketcik B, He J: Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management. Neuromodulation 1998, 1: 19–29. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.1998.tb00027.xPubMedCrossRef Barolat G, Ketcik B, He J: Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management. Neuromodulation 1998, 1: 19–29. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.1998.tb00027.xPubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al.: Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 2007, 132: 179–188. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028PubMedCrossRef Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al.: Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 2007, 132: 179–188. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Brown FD, et al.: Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine 1996, 21: 2786–2794. 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00015PubMedCrossRef Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Brown FD, et al.: Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine 1996, 21: 2786–2794. 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00015PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al.: The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained. Neurosurgery 2008, 63: 762–770. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9PubMedCrossRef Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al.: The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained. Neurosurgery 2008, 63: 762–770. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Trentman TL, Zimmerman RS: Occipital nerve stimulation: technical and surgical aspects of implantation. Headache 2008, 48: 319–327. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.01023.xPubMedCrossRef Trentman TL, Zimmerman RS: Occipital nerve stimulation: technical and surgical aspects of implantation. Headache 2008, 48: 319–327. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.01023.xPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Brewer AC, Trentman TL, Ivancic MG, et al.: Long-term outcome in occipital nerve stimulation patients with medically intractable primary headache disorders. Neuromodulation 2012. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00490.x Brewer AC, Trentman TL, Ivancic MG, et al.: Long-term outcome in occipital nerve stimulation patients with medically intractable primary headache disorders. Neuromodulation 2012. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00490.x
41.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee members, et al.: Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 2012, 32: 6–38.PubMedCrossRef Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee members, et al.: Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 2012, 32: 6–38.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Reed KL: Peripheral neuromodulation and headaches: history, clinical approach, and considerations on underlying mechanisms. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013, 17: 305.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Reed KL: Peripheral neuromodulation and headaches: history, clinical approach, and considerations on underlying mechanisms. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013, 17: 305.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Reed K, Black S, Banta C II, Will K: Combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine headaches: initial experience. Cephalalgia 2009, 30: 260–271. Reed K, Black S, Banta C II, Will K: Combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine headaches: initial experience. Cephalalgia 2009, 30: 260–271.
45.
go back to reference Franzini A, Messina G, Leone M, Broggi G: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS). Surgical technique and prevention of late electrode migration. Acta Neurochir 2009, 151: 861–865. 10.1007/s00701-009-0372-8PubMedCrossRef Franzini A, Messina G, Leone M, Broggi G: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS). Surgical technique and prevention of late electrode migration. Acta Neurochir 2009, 151: 861–865. 10.1007/s00701-009-0372-8PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Trentman TL, Mueller JT, Shah DM, et al.: Occipital nerve stimulator lead pathway length changes with volunteer movement: an in vitro study. Pain Pract 2010, 10: 42–48. 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00328.xPubMedCrossRef Trentman TL, Mueller JT, Shah DM, et al.: Occipital nerve stimulator lead pathway length changes with volunteer movement: an in vitro study. Pain Pract 2010, 10: 42–48. 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00328.xPubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Hess DR: Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care 2004, 49: 1171–1174.PubMed Hess DR: Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care 2004, 49: 1171–1174.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A six year retrospective review of occipital nerve stimulation practice - controversies and challenges of an emerging technique for treating refractory headache syndromes
Authors
Stefano Palmisani
Adnan Al-Kaisy
Roberto Arcioni
Tom Smith
Andrea Negro
Giorgio Lambru
Vijay Bandikatla
Eleanor Carson
Paolo Martelletti
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-14-67

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2013 Go to the issue