Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Dentistry Reviewed 1/2018

01-11-2018 | Techniques

Prevention of external apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment

Author: Roberto Justus

Published in: Periodontal and Implant Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The issue of orthodontic-induced external apical root resorption (EARR) has attracted the interest of clinicians and investigators because of the alarming clinical and legal implications associated with its occurrence in a severe form. The January/February 2005 issue of the American Association of Orthodontist’s Bulletin reported that medical malpractice is a significant problem in the USA today and that patients are filing claims and lawsuits against medical and dental practitioners, including orthodontists, in record numbers. EARR is a common iatrogenic consequence of orthodontic treatment. Cross-sectional as well as longitudinal studies show that EARR is a small problem for the average orthodontic patient, with radiographic mean resorption of less than 2.5 mm. This magnitude of resorption has no adverse clinical consequences. However, 1–5% of orthodontic patients experience a severe form of EARR, defined as exceeding 4 mm or one-third of the original root length. Severe root resorption mainly occurs in maxillary incisors. It compromises crown–root ratios and can result in tooth mobility. The main etiologic risk factor for the severe form of EARR is genetic predisposition. Emphasis is thus given on the root-sparing treatment procedures to minimize the risk for development of the severe form of EARR. Orthodontists are highly trained dental caregivers obligated to abide by the Hippocratic Oath of doing no harm. It is the author’s hope that this article will create awareness among clinicians that there are orthodontic and orthopedic treatment regimes designed precisely to minimize or even avoid the development of EARR. Successful treatment should begin at a young age so that the clinician can take advantage of eruption guidance and of growth modification when a Class II skeletal problem exists. Suggested treatment regimes outlined in this paper minimize the distance that teeth/root apices need to be moved.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (2007) Contemporary Orthodontics, 4th edn. Mosby Inc., Saint Louis, pp 279–283 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (2007) Contemporary Orthodontics, 4th edn. Mosby Inc., Saint Louis, pp 279–283
3.
go back to reference Weltman BJ (2011) External root resorption and orthodontic treatment—assessment of the evidence. In: Huang GJ, Richmond S, Vig KWL (eds) Evidence-based orthodontics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 63–87 Weltman BJ (2011) External root resorption and orthodontic treatment—assessment of the evidence. In: Huang GJ, Richmond S, Vig KWL (eds) Evidence-based orthodontics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 63–87
4.
go back to reference Weltman B, Vig KWL, Fields HW et al (2010) Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:462–476CrossRefPubMed Weltman B, Vig KWL, Fields HW et al (2010) Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:462–476CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chan E, Darendeliler MA (2006) Physical properties of root cementum: part 7. Extent of root resorption under areas of compression and tension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:504–510CrossRefPubMed Chan E, Darendeliler MA (2006) Physical properties of root cementum: part 7. Extent of root resorption under areas of compression and tension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:504–510CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Levander E, Malmgren O, Eliasson S (1994) Evaluation of root resorption in relation to two orthodontic treatment regimes. A clinical experimental study. Eur J Orthod 16:223–228CrossRefPubMed Levander E, Malmgren O, Eliasson S (1994) Evaluation of root resorption in relation to two orthodontic treatment regimes. A clinical experimental study. Eur J Orthod 16:223–228CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Årtun J, Smale I, Behbehani F et al (2005) Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 75:919–926PubMed Årtun J, Smale I, Behbehani F et al (2005) Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 75:919–926PubMed
8.
go back to reference Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK Jr, Everett ET et al (2003) Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:242–252CrossRefPubMed Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK Jr, Everett ET et al (2003) Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:242–252CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Brin I, Tulloch JFC, Koroluk L et al (2003) External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1-versus 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:151–156CrossRefPubMed Brin I, Tulloch JFC, Koroluk L et al (2003) External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1-versus 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:151–156CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prevention of external apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment
Author
Roberto Justus
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Periodontal and Implant Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2453
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41894-018-0035-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Clinical Dentistry Reviewed 1/2018 Go to the issue