Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Oral Health Reports
Published in: Current Oral Health Reports 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan, Section Editor)

A Critical Evaluation of Fatigue Studies for Restorative Materials in Dentistry

Authors: Martin Rosentritt, Michael Behr, Verena Preis

Published in: Current Oral Health Reports | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Fatigue tests are state of the art in dental materials testing for estimating the lifetime performance of materials or restorations. A number of different loading situations are tested with varying parameters, which are based on statistical methods or clinical experience. Partly, inadequate information is provided for a sufficient description and evaluation of the applied methods and resulting data. Several in vitro studies with limited clinical relevance have been published. This review gives a critical overview of fatigue methods published in dental literature. A clear differentiation should be made between fatigue tests for fundamental materials research and component testing of dental restorations. For structural testing, a correlation between in vitro data and in vitro performance is required. Correlation should be based on detailed evaluation of the clinical situation.
Literature
1.
Beuth J. Load controlled fatigue testing—execution and evaluation of cyclic tests at constant load amplitudes on metallic specimens and components. Berlin: Beuth Verlag; 2015.
2.••
Roesler J, Harders H, Baeker M. Mechanical behaviour of engineering materials: metals, ceramics, polymers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.
3.
4.
Aboushelib MN. Fatigue and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns prepared with different finish line designs. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(1):22–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Amir Rad FA, Succaria FG, Morgano SM. Fracture resistance of porcelain veneered zirconia crowns with exposed lingual zirconia for anterior teeth after thermal cycling: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2015;27(2):63–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Silva NRFA, Bonfante E, Rafferty BT, Zavanelli RA, Martins LL, Rekow ED, et al. Conventional and modified veneered zirconia vs. metalloceramic: fatigue and finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(6):433–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Alqahtani F, Flinton R. Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):299–305.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Eroğlu Z, Gurbulak AG. Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(7):516–22.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Ghazy MH, Madina MM, Aboushelib MN. Influence of fabrication techniques and artificial aging on the fracture resistance of different cantilever zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(2):161–6.PubMed
10.
Jiang T, Chen C, Lv P. Selective infiltrated etching to surface treat zirconia using a modified glass agent. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(6):553–7.PubMed
11.
Perdigão J, Pinto AM, Monteiro RCC, Braz Fernandes FM, Laranjeira P, Veiga JP. Degradation of dental ZrO2-based materials after hydrothermal fatigue. Part I: XRD, XRF, and FESEM analyses. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(2):256–65.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. Chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD/CAM manufactured veneer. J Dent. 2012;40(2):154–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Seto KB, McLaren EA, Caputo AA, White SN. Fatigue behavior of the resinous cement to zirconia bond. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(7):523–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ayatollahi MR, Yahya MY, Karimzadeh A, Nikkhooyifar M, Ayob A. Effects of temperature change and beverage on mechanical and tribological properties of dental restorative composites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;54:69–75.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Bortolotto T, Bahillo J, Richoz O, Hafezi F, Krejci I. Failure analysis of adhesive restorations with SEM and OCT: from marginal gaps to restoration loss. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):1881–90.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hamano N, Chiang Y, Nyamaa I, Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hickel R, et al. Repair of silorane-based dental composites: influence of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2012;28(8):894–902.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hurley RK, Drummond JL, Viana GC, Galang MT. The effects of environment and cyclic fatigue on the mechanical properties of an indirect composite. J Dent. 2012;40(10):787–92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Kassem AS, Atta O, El-Mowafy O. Fatigue resistance and microleakage of CAD/CAM ceramic and composite molar crowns. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(1):28–32.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Scotti N, Rota R, Scansetti M, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Pasqualini D, et al. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(5):376–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Shibata S, Gondo R, Araújo É, Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de, Baratieri LN. Influence of surrounding wall thickness on the fatigue resistance of molars restored with ceramic inlay. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28.
21.
Slavcheva S, Krejci I, Bortolotto T. Luting of ceramic crowns with a self-adhesive cement: effect of contamination on marginal adaptation and fracture strength. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(5):e799–803.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Alhasanyah A, Vaidyanathan TK, Flinton RJ. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(5):383–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Amaral M, Cesar PF, Bottino MA, Lohbauer U, Valandro LF. Fatigue behavior of Y-TZP ceramic after surface treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;57:149–56.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Thermal-induced residual stresses affect the fractographic patterns of zirconia-veneer dental prostheses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;21:167–77.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Canullo L, Coelho PG, Bonfante EA. Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments. J Appl Oral Sci: Rev FOB. 2013;21(1):20–4.CrossRef
26.
Corazza PH, Feitosa SA, Borges ALS, Della Bona A. Influence of convergence angle of tooth preparation on the fracture resistance of Y-TZP-based all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):339–47.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Foong JKW, Judge RB, Palamara JE, Swain MV. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(5):304–12.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Fraga S, Pereira GKR, Freitas M, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF, May LG. Loading frequencies up to 20Hz as an alternative to accelerate fatigue strength tests in a Y-TZP ceramic. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;61:79–86.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Guess PC, Bonfante EA, Silva, Nelson RFA, Coelho PG, van Thompson P. Effect of core design and veneering technique on damage and reliability of Y-TZP-supported crowns. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):307–16.CrossRefPubMed
30.••
Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2006;22(2):176–82. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Behr M, Hindelang U, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of failure rates of adhesive-fixed partial dentures for in vivo and in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Harding AB, Norling BK, Teixeira EC. The effect of surface treatment of the interfacial surface on fatigue-related microtensile bond strength of milled zirconia to veneering porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(5):346–52.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Iijima T, Homma S, Sekine H, Sasaki H, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Influence of surface treatment of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal with hot isostatic pressing on cyclic fatigue strength. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):274–80.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Jiménez-Melendo M, Llena-Blasco O, Bruguera A, Llena-Blasco J, Yáñez-Vico R, García-Calderón M, et al. Mechanical behavior of single-layer ceramized zirconia abutments for dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(5):e485–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Mitsias ME, van Thompson P, Pines M, Silva, Nelson RFA. Reliability and failure modes of two Y-TZP abutment designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(1):75–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Nicolaisen MH, Bahrami G, Finlay S, Isidor F. Comparison of fatigue resistance and failure modes between metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns by cyclic loading in water. J Dent. 2014;42(12):1613–20.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Noqueira LB, Moura CD, Francischone CE, Valente VS, Alencar SM, Moura WL, et al. Fracture strength of implant-supported ceramic crowns with customized zirconia abutments: screw retained vs. cement retained. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(1):49–53.
38.
Nossair SA, Aboushelib MN, Morsi TS. Fracture and fatigue resistance of cemented versus fused CAD-on veneers over customized zirconia implant abutments. J Prosthodont. 2015.
39.
Nothdurft FP, Neumann K, Knauber AW. Fracture behavior of zirconia implant abutments is influenced by superstructure-geometry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(5):1467–72.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Oblak C, Verdenik I, Swain MV, Kosmac T. Survival-rate analysis of surface treated dental zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25(10):2255–64.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Oderich E, Boff LL, Cardoso AC, Magne P. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(12):1360–8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Pereira GKR, Silvestri T, Amaral M, Rippe MP, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF. Fatigue limit of polycrystalline zirconium oxide ceramics: effect of grinding and low-temperature aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;61:45–54.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Rueda AO, Anglada M, Jimenez-Pique E. Contact fatigue of veneer feldspathic porcelain on dental zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015;31(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Kano T, Sasaki K. Effect of fatigue loading on the screw joint stability of zirconium abutment. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(3):219–23.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Batalha-Silva S, de Andrada MA, Caldeira, Maia HP, Magne P. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: direct versus CAD/CAM inlays. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):324–31.CrossRefPubMed
46.•
Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Are linear elastic material properties relevant predictors of the cyclic fatigue resistance of dental resin composites? Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):381–91. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):424–32.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Mechanical properties, fracture resistance, and fatigue limits of short fiber reinforced dental composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):95–102.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Lorenzoni FC, Sena LA, Hirata R, Bonfante G, et al. Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):e168–77.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Giannini M, Magne P. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(4):310–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Agnol D, Cezarotto RJ, Ghiggi PC, Paranhos MPG, Borges GA, Burnett LH, et al. Influence of resin cements on cuspal deflection and fracture load of endodontically-treated teeth restored with composite inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(3-4):664–70.CrossRef
52.
Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014;42(2):199–209.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Koottathape N, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K. Texture of composite resins exposed to two- and three-body wear in vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15(2):232–41.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Wear of nanofilled dental composites at varying filler concentrations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103(2):424–9.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Magne P, Boff LL, Oderich E, Cardoso AC. Computer-aided-design/computer-assisted-manufactured adhesive restoration of molars with a compromised cusp: effect of fiber-reinforced immediate dentin sealing and cusp overlap on fatigue strength. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(2):135–46.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Majd B, Majd H, Porter JA, Romberg E, Arola D. Degradation in the fatigue strength of dentin by diamond bur preparations: importance of cutting direction. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016;104(1):39–49.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Martins LM, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA, Freitas AC, Silva, Nelson RFA, et al. Fatigue reliability of 3 single-unit implant-abutment designs. Implant Dent. 2012;21(1):67–71.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Mühlemann S, Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(1):74–81.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Mutluay MM, Yahyazadehfar M, Ryou H, Majd H, Do D, Arola D. Fatigue of the resin-dentin interface: a new approach for evaluating the durability of dentin bonds. Dent Mater. 2013;29(4):437–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Mutluay MM, Zhang K, Ryou H, Yahyazadehfar M, Majd H, Xu HHK, et al. On the fatigue behavior of resin-dentin bonds after degradation by biofilm. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;18:219–31.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F, Morrow BR, Jefferies SR. Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Clin Dent. 2015;26(1):23–7.PubMed
62.
Pérez MA. Life prediction of different commercial dental implants as influence by uncertainties in their fatigue material properties and loading conditions. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2012;108(3):1277–86.CrossRef
63.
Rack T, Rack T, Zabler S, Rack A, Riesemeier H, Nelson K. An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(1):44–50.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):545–54.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Rocca GT, Gregor L, Sandoval MJ, Krejci I, Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. “Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations”. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(5):1385–93.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(6):561–8.PubMed
67.
Shembish FA, Tong H, Kaizer M, Janal MN, van Thompson P, Opdam NJ et al. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2016.
68.
Shemtov-Yona K, Rittel D. On the mechanical integrity of retrieved dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;49:290–9.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Shemtov-Yona K, Rittel D, Dorogoy A. Mechanical assessment of grit blasting surface treatments of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;39:375–90.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Silva NR, Teixeira HS, Silveira LM, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, van Thompson P. Reliability and failure modes of a hybrid ceramic abutment prototype. J Prosthodont. 2016.
71.
Skouridou N, Pollington S, Rosentritt M, Tsitrou E. Fracture strength of minimally prepared all-ceramic CEREC crowns after simulating 5 years of service. Dent Mater. 2013;29(6):e70–7.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Stappert CFJ, Baldassarri M, Zhang Y, Hänssler F, Rekow ED, Van Thompson P. Reliability and fatigue failure modes of implant-supported aluminum-oxide fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1173–80.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth J, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2012;28(12):1215–20.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Stimmelmayr M, Sagerer S, Erdelt K, Beuer F. In vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(2):488–93.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Stona D, Burnett LH, Mota EG, Spohr AM. Fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns cemented on solid abutments. J Am Dent Assoc (1939). 2015;146(7):501–7.CrossRef
76.
Takano T, Tasaka A, Yoshinari M, Sakurai K. Fatigue strength of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite with different surfaces. J Dent Res. 2012;91(8):800–4.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Tiossi R, Gomes ÉA, Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, Ribeiro RF. Influence of cyclic fatigue in water on screw torque loss of long-span one-piece implant-supported zirconia frameworks. J Prosthodont. 2015.
78.
Wandscher VF, Bergoli CD, de Oliveira AF, Kaizer OB, Souto Borges AL, Limberguer IF, et al. Fatigue surviving, fracture resistance, shear stress and finite element analysis of glass fiber posts with different diameters. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;43:69–77.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Wang R, Tao J, Yu B, Dai L. Characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(4):318–26.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Wong TL, Botelho MG. The fatigue bond strength of fixed-fixed versus cantilever resin-bonded partial fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(2):136–41.CrossRefPubMed
81.
Xia D, Lin H, Yuan S, Bai W, Zheng G. Dynamic fatigue performance of implant-abutment assemblies with different tightening torque values. Bio-Med Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):2143–9.
82.
Yahyazadehfar M, Mutluay MM, Majd H, Ryou H, Arola D. Fatigue of the resin-enamel bonded interface and the mechanisms of failure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;21:121–32.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Yao K, Kao H, Cheng C, Fang H, Huang C, Hsu M. The potential risk of conical implant-abutment connections: the antirotational ability of Cowell implant system. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1208–16.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Zamboni SC, Nogueira L, Bottino MA, Sobrinho LC, Valandro LF. The effect of mechanical loading on the cusp defection of premolars restored with direct and indirect techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15(1):75–81.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Zhao K, Wei Y, Pan Y, Zhang X, Swain MV, Guess PC. Influence of veneer and cyclic loading on failure behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2014;30(2):164–71.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Zicari F, van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent. 2012;40(4):312–21.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Zicari F, van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent. 2013;41(3):207–15.CrossRefPubMed
88.••
Rosentritt M, Siavikis G, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Approach for valuating the significance of laboratory simulation. J Dent. 2008;36(12):1048–53. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
89.••
Rosentritt M, Behr M, van der Zel, Jef M, Feilzer AJ. Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation. Dent Mater. 2009;25(3):348–52. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Lin J, Sun M, Zheng Z, Shinya A, Han J, Lin H, et al. Effects of rotating fatigue on the mechanical properties of microhybrid and nanofiller-containing composites. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):476–83.CrossRefPubMed
91.
Ruben JL, Roeters FJM, Montagner AF, Huysmans MCDNJM. A multifunctional device to simulate oral ageing: the “Rub&Roll”. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;30:75–82.CrossRefPubMed
92.
ISO 14801:2007. Dentistry —implants—dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants. Berlin: Beuth Verlag; 2007.
93.•
Bonfante EA, Coelho PG. A critical perspective on mechanical testing of implants and prostheses. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(1):18–27. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
94.
de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res. 1986;65(5):654–8. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
95.••
Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glass ceramic material. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):39–44. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
96.
Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B, Hajtó J, Scherrer SS, Lohbauer U. Fracture rates and lifetime estimations of CAD/CAM all-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):67–73.CrossRefPubMed
97.••
Bayne SC. Correlation of clinical performance with ‘in vitro tests’ of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based matrices. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):52–71. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
98.
Sundarapandian V. New results on the parametric stability of nonlinear systems. Math Comput Model. 2005;2005(43):9–15.
99.•
Della Bona A, Wozniak WT, Watts DC. International dental standards—order out of chaos? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):619–21. Proving important basic knowledge on the topic.CrossRefPubMed
100.
Metadata
Title
A Critical Evaluation of Fatigue Studies for Restorative Materials in Dentistry
Authors
Martin Rosentritt
Michael Behr
Verena Preis
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Current Oral Health Reports / Issue 3/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2196-3002
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-016-0097-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Current Oral Health Reports 3/2016 Go to the issue

Dental Public Health (R Collins, section editor)

Dental Public Health: the Future of Oral Health Care Delivery

Systemic Diseases (M Bartold, Section Editor)

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Biological Mechanisms Relating Periodontitis and Diabetes

Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan, Section Editor)

The Role of Silane Coupling Agents and Universal Primers in Durable Adhesion to Dental Restorative Materials - a Review

Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan, Section editor)

Biodegradation of Resin-Dentin Bonds: a Clinical Problem?

Dental Public Health (R Collins, Section Editor)

SBIRT-Based Interventions to Improve Pediatric Oral Health Behaviors and Outcomes: Considerations for Future Behavioral SBIRT Interventions in Dentistry

Dental Public Health (R Collins, Section Editor)

The “New” Genetics and Its Impact on Oral Care Delivery