Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oncology and Therapy 2/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Multiple Myeloma | Original Research

A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ® as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany

Authors: Stefan Walzer, Sebastian Krenberger, Lutz Vollmer, Tony Hewitt, Benjamin Eckert

Published in: Oncology and Therapy | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ® can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, standardized MRD assessment with improved performance is increasingly important. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of MRD testing with clonoSEQ® compared to no MRD testing for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) on maintenance therapy in Germany.

Methods

The cost impact of clonoSEQ® was analyzed from the German statutory insurance perspective. Clinical data were derived from the literature and expert opinions. Cost input was utilized based on publicly available data and literature. Patients in the MRD arm were tested every 6 months. The deterministic Markov model consists of six health states, and every patient begins at the start of maintenance. Included therapies are lenalidomide for maintenance and carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapse.

Results

For a time horizon of 10 years, the deterministic cost impact analysis shows total cost of €279,483 for patients using clonoSEQ® in comparison to €356,623 for simulated patients without MRD testing. The main drivers of the cost differences are saved cost of drug holiday. The savings per patient in 1 year are €18,396. Savings after 3 years are €69,991 per patient. Savings after 10 years are €77,140 per patient.

Conclusions

Based on the underlying model, clonoSEQ® can support German health insurance funds to use high-cost drugs more efficiently in the treatment of myeloma.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Landgren O, Devlin S, Boulad M, Mailankody S. Role of MRD status in relation to clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(12):1565–8.CrossRef Landgren O, Devlin S, Boulad M, Mailankody S. Role of MRD status in relation to clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(12):1565–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1311–20.CrossRef Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1311–20.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roussel M, Lauwers-Cances V, Robillard N, Hulin C, Leleu X, Benboubker L, et al. Front-line transplantation program with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination as induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma: a phase II study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(25):2712–7.CrossRef Roussel M, Lauwers-Cances V, Robillard N, Hulin C, Leleu X, Benboubker L, et al. Front-line transplantation program with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination as induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma: a phase II study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(25):2712–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Davies FE. Is molecular remission the goal of multiple myeloma therapy? Hematology. 2017;2017:205–11.CrossRef Davies FE. Is molecular remission the goal of multiple myeloma therapy? Hematology. 2017;2017:205–11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;3(1):28–35.CrossRef Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;3(1):28–35.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Adaptive Biotechnologies. clonoSEQ® assay B-cell reagent set instructions for use PNL-10047-04. 2021. p. 63. Adaptive Biotechnologies. clonoSEQ® assay B-cell reagent set instructions for use PNL-10047-04. 2021. p. 63.
10.
go back to reference Robins HS, Carlson CS, Livingston RJ, Emerson RO, Sherwood AM, inventors; United States Patent No.: US 9,371,558 B2: Compositions and method for measuring and calibrating amplification basin multiplexed PCR reactions. US patent application. 2016. Robins HS, Carlson CS, Livingston RJ, Emerson RO, Sherwood AM, inventors; United States Patent No.: US 9,371,558 B2: Compositions and method for measuring and calibrating amplification basin multiplexed PCR reactions. US patent application. 2016.
11.
go back to reference Robins HS, Carlson CS, Livingston RJ, Emerson RO, Sherwood AM, inventors; United States Patent No.: US 9,150,905 B2: Compositions and method for measuring and calibrating amplification basin multiplexed Pcr reactions. US patent application. 2015. Robins HS, Carlson CS, Livingston RJ, Emerson RO, Sherwood AM, inventors; United States Patent No.: US 9,150,905 B2: Compositions and method for measuring and calibrating amplification basin multiplexed Pcr reactions. US patent application. 2015.
12.
go back to reference Zimmermann M, Kirsch I, Eckert B, Carlson J. Measurable residual disease testing in multiple myeloma using an improved testing technology: population impact. A clinical and budget impact analysis. Blood. 2017;130:4685. Zimmermann M, Kirsch I, Eckert B, Carlson J. Measurable residual disease testing in multiple myeloma using an improved testing technology: population impact. A clinical and budget impact analysis. Blood. 2017;130:4685.
14.
go back to reference Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:397–409.CrossRef Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:397–409.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Avet-Loiseau H, Ludwig H, Landgren O, Paiva B, Morris C, Yang H, et al. Minimal residual disease status as a surrogate endpoint for progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma studies: a meta-analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(1):e30–7.CrossRef Avet-Loiseau H, Ludwig H, Landgren O, Paiva B, Morris C, Yang H, et al. Minimal residual disease status as a surrogate endpoint for progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma studies: a meta-analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(1):e30–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Perrot A, Lauwers-Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(32):2456–64.CrossRef Perrot A, Lauwers-Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(32):2456–64.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–46.CrossRef Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–46.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Attema AE, Brouwer WBF, Claxton K. Discounting in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(7):745–58.CrossRef Attema AE, Brouwer WBF, Claxton K. Discounting in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(7):745–58.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Greiner W, Witte J, Gensorowsky D, Pauge S. AMNOG-Report 2020. In: Storm A, editor. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsökonomie und Versorgungsforschung (Band 32). Heidelberg: medhochzwei Verlag GmbH; 2020. Greiner W, Witte J, Gensorowsky D, Pauge S. AMNOG-Report 2020. In: Storm A, editor. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsökonomie und Versorgungsforschung (Band 32). Heidelberg: medhochzwei Verlag GmbH; 2020.
26.
go back to reference Hörster L, Neusser S, Trautner A, Pahmeier K, Lax H, Merkel-Jens A, et al. Kosten der Nachsorge von Patienten mit hämatologischen Neoplasien. Gesundheitsökonomie Qualitätsmanagement. 2021;26(04):207–14.CrossRef Hörster L, Neusser S, Trautner A, Pahmeier K, Lax H, Merkel-Jens A, et al. Kosten der Nachsorge von Patienten mit hämatologischen Neoplasien. Gesundheitsökonomie Qualitätsmanagement. 2021;26(04):207–14.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Basic E, Kappel M, Misra A, Sellner L, Ratsch BA, Ostwald DA. Budget impact analysis of the use of oral and intravenous therapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Germany. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(9):1351–61.CrossRef Basic E, Kappel M, Misra A, Sellner L, Ratsch BA, Ostwald DA. Budget impact analysis of the use of oral and intravenous therapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Germany. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(9):1351–61.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kunacheewa C, Lee H, Patel K, Thomas S, Amini B, Srour S, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity does not overcome poor prognosis in high-risk multiple myeloma: a single-center retrospective study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(5):e221–38.CrossRef Kunacheewa C, Lee H, Patel K, Thomas S, Amini B, Srour S, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity does not overcome poor prognosis in high-risk multiple myeloma: a single-center retrospective study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(5):e221–38.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ® as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
Authors
Stefan Walzer
Sebastian Krenberger
Lutz Vollmer
Tony Hewitt
Benjamin Eckert
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Oncology and Therapy / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-1070
Electronic ISSN: 2366-1089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Oncology and Therapy 2/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine