Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Sports Medicine 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Research Article

Do Long-time Team-mates Lead to Better Team Performance? A Social Network Analysis of Data from Major League Baseball

Author: Danielle Jarvie

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the effects of team-mate shared experience on overall team performance as well as to determine whether concentration of time together among subgroups of players and/or focal players enhances team performance.

Methods

Social network analysis (SNA) was used to model 30 active Major League Baseball teams from 2006 to 2015 with years of experience together connecting players resulting in 300 individual team networks. Social network metrics of network density, network centralization, and average weighted degree were computed and analyzed with team attributes by generalized least squares regression to predict wins, and team rank. Logistic regression was used to predict binary outcomes of world series and division wins.

Results

Network density was negatively associated with team rank (β = − 0.115, p = .05), while average weighted degree was positively associated with team rank (β = 0.147, p = .01). On average, each extra year of shared player time per team was associated with 14.86% higher probability of winning a division title (B = 2.69, exp(B) = 14.86, p = .05). Each extra shared year of infield membership among team-mates predicted 2.4% lower odds of winning the world series (B = −0.024, exp(B) = 0.976, p = .01), and each extra shared year between outfield players predicted 2.9% lower probability of winning a team’s division (B = −0.029. exp(B) = 0.972, p = .05).

Conclusions

Prolonged shared time between players is beneficial when it is spread evenly among all players of the team, whereas having few focal players who have been on a team together for many years is a disadvantage to overall performance.
Footnotes
1
In a network where links are undirected, in other words, links between players are reciprocal, there are a total of n possible number between n players. Network density is the sum of all k ties between players team (wk) divided by the potential number of ties between players, n.
\({\text{Density }} = \frac{{{\sum }w_{k} }}{n}.\)
 
2
Centralization is the sum of differences between the most central node and all other nodes divided by the sum of the maximum possible difference. For a network with n nodes, nodes v1,…, vn , maximum degree centrality cmax, and degree centrality of vertex vi given by c(vi), network centralization is given by
\(\frac{{{\sum }{\hbox{cmax} } - c(v_{i} )}}{{\hbox{max} {\sum }{\hbox{cmax} } - c(v_{i} )}}.\)
 
3
For a network with n nodes, sum of all weights of edges adjacent to node i, wi , Average weighted degree = \(\frac{{{\sum }_{i} w_{i} }}{n(n - 1)}.\)
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fiore SM, Salas E, Cuevas HM, Bowers CA. Distributed coordination space: toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2003;4:340–64.CrossRef Fiore SM, Salas E, Cuevas HM, Bowers CA. Distributed coordination space: toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2003;4:340–64.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eccles DW, Tenenbaum G. Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: a social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:542–60.CrossRef Eccles DW, Tenenbaum G. Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: a social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:542–60.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ramos J, Lopes RJ, Araújo D. What’s next in complex networks? Capturing the concept of attacking play in invasive team sports. Sports Med. 2018;48:17–28.CrossRefPubMed Ramos J, Lopes RJ, Araújo D. What’s next in complex networks? Capturing the concept of attacking play in invasive team sports. Sports Med. 2018;48:17–28.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ribeiro J, Silva P, Duarte R, Davids K, Garganta J. Team sports performance analysed through the lens of social network theory: implications for research and practice. Sports Med. 2017;47:1689–96.CrossRefPubMed Ribeiro J, Silva P, Duarte R, Davids K, Garganta J. Team sports performance analysed through the lens of social network theory: implications for research and practice. Sports Med. 2017;47:1689–96.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Silva P, Garganta J, Araújo D, Davids K, Aguiar P. Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Med. 2013;43:765–72.CrossRefPubMed Silva P, Garganta J, Araújo D, Davids K, Aguiar P. Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Med. 2013;43:765–72.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Passos P, Davids K, Araújo D, Paz N, Minguéns J, Mendes J. Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:170–6.CrossRefPubMed Passos P, Davids K, Araújo D, Paz N, Minguéns J, Mendes J. Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:170–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vilar L, Araujo D, Davids K, Button C. The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Med. 2012;42:1–10.CrossRefPubMed Vilar L, Araujo D, Davids K, Button C. The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Med. 2012;42:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grund TU. Network structure and team performance: the case of English Premier League soccer teams. Soc Netw. 2012;34:682–90.CrossRef Grund TU. Network structure and team performance: the case of English Premier League soccer teams. Soc Netw. 2012;34:682–90.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.CrossRef Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clemente FM, Manuel F, Martins L, Wong PD, Mendes RS, Clemente FM, et al. General network analysis of national soccer teams in FIFA World Cup 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sports. 2015;15:80–96.CrossRef Clemente FM, Manuel F, Martins L, Wong PD, Mendes RS, Clemente FM, et al. General network analysis of national soccer teams in FIFA World Cup 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sports. 2015;15:80–96.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pina TJ, Paulo A, Araújo D. Network characteristics of successful performance in association football. A study on the UEFA Champions League. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1–7.CrossRef Pina TJ, Paulo A, Araújo D. Network characteristics of successful performance in association football. A study on the UEFA Champions League. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1–7.CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Sparrowe R, Liden R, Wayne S, Kraimer M. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manag J. 2001;44:316–25. Sparrowe R, Liden R, Wayne S, Kraimer M. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manag J. 2001;44:316–25.
14.
go back to reference Reimer T, Park ES, Hinsz VB. Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: an information-processing perspective for team sports. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;4:376–400.CrossRef Reimer T, Park ES, Hinsz VB. Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: an information-processing perspective for team sports. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;4:376–400.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Araújo D, Davids K. Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–13.CrossRef Araújo D, Davids K. Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Baron RM. Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007;33:845–59.CrossRefPubMed Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Baron RM. Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007;33:845–59.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Berman SL, Down J, Hill CW. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad Manag J. 2002;45:13–31. Berman SL, Down J, Hill CW. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad Manag J. 2002;45:13–31.
18.
go back to reference Blickensderfer EL, Reynolds R, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. Shared expectations and implicit coordination in tennis doubles teams. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2010;22:486–99.CrossRef Blickensderfer EL, Reynolds R, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. Shared expectations and implicit coordination in tennis doubles teams. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2010;22:486–99.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Collins H. Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992. Collins H. Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992.
20.
go back to reference Shamsie J, Mannor MJ. Looking inside the dream team: probing into the contributions of tacit knowledge as an organizational resource. Organ Sci. 2013;24:513–29.CrossRef Shamsie J, Mannor MJ. Looking inside the dream team: probing into the contributions of tacit knowledge as an organizational resource. Organ Sci. 2013;24:513–29.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Freeman LC, Borgatti SP, White DR. Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow. Soc Netw. 1991;31:141–54.CrossRef Freeman LC, Borgatti SP, White DR. Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow. Soc Netw. 1991;31:141–54.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Borgatti S, Freeman L. Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies; 2002. Borgatti S, Freeman L. Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies; 2002.
24.
go back to reference Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media; 2009. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media; 2009.
25.
go back to reference Drukker DM. Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. STATA J. 2003;3:168–77. Drukker DM. Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. STATA J. 2003;3:168–77.
26.
go back to reference Wooldridge M Jr. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002. Wooldridge M Jr. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.
27.
go back to reference Cochrane D, Orcutt G. Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto-correlated error terms. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44:32–61. Cochrane D, Orcutt G. Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto-correlated error terms. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44:32–61.
28.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata: release 14 statistical software. College Station: StataCorp; 2015. StataCorp. Stata: release 14 statistical software. College Station: StataCorp; 2015.
29.
go back to reference Poizat G, Bourbousson J, Saury J, Sève C. Understanding team coordination in doubles table tennis: joint analysis of first- and third-person data. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13:630–9.CrossRef Poizat G, Bourbousson J, Saury J, Sève C. Understanding team coordination in doubles table tennis: joint analysis of first- and third-person data. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13:630–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bourbousson J, Poizat G, Saury J, Seve C. Team coordination in basketball: description of the cognitive connections among teammates. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2010;22:150–66.CrossRef Bourbousson J, Poizat G, Saury J, Seve C. Team coordination in basketball: description of the cognitive connections among teammates. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2010;22:150–66.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Esteves PT, de Oliveira RF, Araújo D. Posture-related affordances guide attacks in basketball. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12:639–44.CrossRef Esteves PT, de Oliveira RF, Araújo D. Posture-related affordances guide attacks in basketball. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12:639–44.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Esteves PT, Araujo D, Davids K, Vilar L, Travassos B, Esteves C. Interpersonal dynamics and relative positioning to scoring target of performers in 1 vs. 1 sub-phases of team sports. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:1285–93.CrossRefPubMed Esteves PT, Araujo D, Davids K, Vilar L, Travassos B, Esteves C. Interpersonal dynamics and relative positioning to scoring target of performers in 1 vs. 1 sub-phases of team sports. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:1285–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Do Long-time Team-mates Lead to Better Team Performance? A Social Network Analysis of Data from Major League Baseball
Author
Danielle Jarvie
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0970-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Sports Medicine 11/2018 Go to the issue