Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Sports Medicine
Published in: Sports Medicine 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Systematic Review

Assessment of Workload and its Effects on Performance and Injury in Elite Cricket Fast Bowlers

Authors: Dean J. McNamara, Tim J. Gabbett, Geraldine Naughton

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cricket is distinctly positioned in the world of elite sports because three different formats now exist, each with characteristically different workload requirements. Fast bowlers have greater match-play workload requirements and are at greater injury risk than other positions. An update on the current cricket literature regarding fast bowling match-play physiology, workload, and injury is required to demonstrate the extent to which workload is related to performance and injury in elite fast bowlers since the introduction of 20-over cricket in 2005.

Methods

The current review examined articles published in English with data collected from 2005 onwards pertaining to in situ cricket fast bowling physiology, match play, injury, and workload. Four databases were searched using the combinations of the following keywords: ‘cricket’ and ‘bowl’, inclusive of ‘pace’, ‘fast’, ‘medium’, or ‘seam’ bowling. Articles from 2005 onwards with male participants, high-performing or elite, and fast bowlers in the game of cricket were considered for inclusion. Only workload assessments captured in a field setting were included.

Results

A total of 751 articles were identified. Exclusions included 527 duplicates, papers pre-2005, review articles, and abstracts. A further 185 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts that were deemed to be outside the scope of research or population. The full texts of 39 articles were reviewed, with only 17 included in this systematic review. In five articles reviewed, fast bowlers had a greater workload than other player types. Bowling workload history was reviewed in seven articles and appeared to have a complex interaction with likelihood of injury and injury type.

Conclusion

Fast bowling workload has a well recognised relationship with injury and performance. Although monitoring acute and chronic workloads of fast bowlers remains the most ideal method for identifying preparedness and injury likelihood in fast bowlers, complexities exist that make the systematic prescription of bowling workloads difficult. Advances in technology to monitor workloads may provide further insight into the intensity and workloads of fast bowlers.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015032466
Literature
1.
2.
McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Naughton G, et al. Training and competition workloads and fatigue responses of elite junior cricket players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(5):517–26.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Dennis R, Farhart P, Goumas C, et al. Bowling workload and the risk of injury in elite cricket fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6(3):359–67.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Orchard JW, James T, Portus M, et al. Fast bowlers in cricket demonstrate up to 3- to 4-week delay between high workloads and increased risk of injury. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1186–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Orchard J, James T, Kountouris A, et al. Changes to injury profile (and recommended cricket injury definitions) based on the increased frequency of Twenty20 cricket matches. Open Access J Sports Med. 2010;1:63–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Hulin BT, Gabbett TJ, Blanch P, et al. Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(8):708–12.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Orchard JW, Kountouris A, Sims KJ, et al. Change to injury profile of elite male cricketers in the T20 era. N Z J Sports Med. 2015;42(1):13–7.
8.
Olivier B, Taljaard T, Burger E, et al. Which extrinsic and intrinsic factors are associated with non-contact injuries in adult cricket fast bowlers? Sports Med. 2016;46(1):79–101.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Brughelli M, Cronin J, Levin G, et al. Understanding change of direction ability in sport: a review of resistance training studies. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):1045–63.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(12):1235–41.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
13.
Orchard J, Farhart P, Kountouris A, et al. Pace bowlers in cricket with history of lumbar stress fracture have increased risk of lower limb muscle strains, particularly calf strains. Open Access J Sports Med. 2010;1:177–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Fast bowling match workloads over 5–26 days and risk of injury in the following month. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(1):26–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Ranson C, Hurley R, Rugless L, et al. International cricket injury surveillance: a report of five teams competing in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2011. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(10):637–43.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Cricket fast bowling workload patterns as risk factors for tendon, muscle, bone and joint injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(16):1064–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Duffield R, Carney M, Karppinen S. Physiological responses and bowling performance during repeated spells of medium-fast bowling. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(1):27–35.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Petersen CJ, Pyne D, Dawson B, et al. Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(1):45–52.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Petersen CJ, Pyne DB, Dawson BT, et al. Comparison of training and game demands of national level cricketers. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1306–11.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Petersen CJ, Pyne DB, Portus MR, et al. Comparison of player movement patterns between 1-day and test cricket. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1368–73.CrossRefPubMed
21.
McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Chapman P, et al. The validity of microsensors to automatically detect bowling events and counts in cricket fast bowlers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(1):71–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Pyne DB, Duthie GM, Saunders PU, et al. Anthropometric and strength correlates of fast bowling speed in junior and senior cricketers. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):620–6.PubMed
23.
Johnstone JA, Ford PA. Physiologic profile of professional cricketers. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(11):2900–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Lombard WP, Muir GA, McKune AJ. Minimal changes in indirect markers of muscle damage after an acute bout of indoor pre-season fast bowling. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ R. 2012;34(2):105–14.
25.
Phillips E, Portus M, Davids K, et al. Performance accuracy and functional variability in elite and developing fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(2):182–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Petersen C, Pyne DB, Portus MJ, et al. Analysis of Twenty/20 Cricket performance during the 2008 Indian Premier League. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2008;8(3):63–9.
27.
McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Naughton G, et al. How submarine and guided missile technology can help reduce injury and improve performance in cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports Med. 2016;. doi:10.​1136/​bjsports-2015-095935.
Metadata
Title
Assessment of Workload and its Effects on Performance and Injury in Elite Cricket Fast Bowlers
Authors
Dean J. McNamara
Tim J. Gabbett
Geraldine Naughton
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0588-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Sports Medicine 3/2017 Go to the issue

Systematic Review

Explosive Training and Heavy Weight Training are Effective for Improving Running Economy in Endurance Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Current Opinion

Ketone Bodies and Exercise Performance: The Next Magic Bullet or Merely Hype?

Review Article

Impact of Endurance Exercise Training in the Fasted State on Muscle Biochemistry and Metabolism in Healthy Subjects: Can These Effects be of Particular Clinical Benefit to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Insulin-Resistant Patients?

Original Research Article

Electrocardiograms of Children and Adolescents Practicing Non-competitive Sports: Normal Limits and Abnormal Findings in a Large European Cohort Evaluated by Telecardiology

Systematic Review

The Epidemiology of Injuries Across the Weight-Training Sports

Letter to the Editor

Advancing Leadership in Sport: Time to ‘Actually’ Take the Blinkers Off?