Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Sports Medicine
Published in: Sports Medicine 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Systematic Review

The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners

Authors: Joel T. Fuller, Clint R. Bellenger, Dominic Thewlis, Margarita D. Tsiros, Jonathan D. Buckley

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The effect of footwear on running economy has been investigated in numerous studies. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has synthesised the available literature and the effect of footwear on running performance is not known.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners, by reviewing controlled trials that compare different footwear conditions or compare footwear with barefoot.

Methods

The Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception up until April 2014. Included articles reported on controlled trials that examined the effects of footwear or footwear characteristics (including shoe mass, cushioning, motion control, longitudinal bending stiffness, midsole viscoelasticity, drop height and comfort) on running performance or running economy and were published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Results

Of the 1,044 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were identified that reported effects on running performance. Individual studies reported significant, but trivial, beneficial effects on running economy for comfortable and stiff-soled shoes [standardised mean difference (SMD) <0.12; P < 0.05), a significant small beneficial effect on running economy for cushioned shoes (SMD = 0.37; P < 0.05) and a significant moderate beneficial effect on running economy for training in minimalist shoes (SMD = 0.79; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis found significant small beneficial effects on running economy for light shoes and barefoot compared with heavy shoes (SMD < 0.34; P < 0.01) and for minimalist shoes compared with conventional shoes (SMD = 0.29; P < 0.01). A significant positive association between shoe mass and metabolic cost of running was identified (P < 0.01). Footwear with a combined shoe mass less than 440 g per pair had no detrimental effect on running economy.

Conclusions

Certain models of footwear and footwear characteristics can improve running economy. Future research in footwear performance should include measures of running performance.
Literature
1.
Hennig EM. Eighteen years of running shoe testing in Germany—a series of biomechanical studies. Footwear Sci. 2011;3(2):71–81.CrossRef
2.
Moore IS, Jones A, Dixon S. The pursuit of improved running performance: can changes in cushioning and somatosensory feedback influence running economy and injury risk? Footwear Sci. 2014;6(1):1–11.CrossRef
3.
Rothschild CE. Primitive running: a survey analysis of runners’ interest, participation, and implementation. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2021–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Richards CE, Magin PJ, Callister R. Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based? Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(3):159–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Perl DP, Daoud AI, Lieberman DE. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(7):1335–43.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Hanson NJ, Berg K, Deka P, et al. Oxygen cost of running barefoot vs. running shod. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(6):401–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, et al. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med. 2004;34(7):465–85.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Divert C, Mornieux G, Freychat P, et al. Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect? Int J Sports Med. 2008;29(6):512–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Luo G, Stergiou P, Worobets J, et al. Improved footwear comfort reduces oxygen consumption during running. Footwear Sci. 2009;1(1):25–9.CrossRef
11.
Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn DJ, Cole G, et al. The effect of material characteristics of shoe soles on muscle activation and energy aspects during running. J Biomech. 2003;36:569–75.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Roy JPR, Stefanyshyn DJ. Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(3):562–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Thomson RD, Birkbeck AE, Tan WL, et al. The modelling and performance of training shoe cushioning systems. Sports Eng. 1999;2(2):109–20.CrossRef
14.
Rubin DA, Butler RJ, Beckman B, et al. Footwear and running cardio-respiratory responses. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30:379–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Frederick EC, Howley ET, Powers SK. Lower oxygen demands of running in soft-soled shoes. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1986;57(2):174–7.CrossRef
16.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​d5928.
18.
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, et al. Meta-analysis involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(1):140–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Burkett LN, Kohrt WM, Buchbinder R. Effects of shoes and foot orthotics on VO2 and selected frontal plane knee kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17(1):158–63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Franz JR, Wierzbinski CM, Kram R. Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(8):1519–25.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Hamill J, Freedson PS, Boda W, et al. Effects of shoe type on cardiorespiratory responses and rearfoot motion during treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20(5):515–21.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Hardin EC, Van Den Bogert AJ, Hamill J. Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):838–44.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lussiana T, Fabre N, Hebert-Losier K, et al. Effect of slope and footwear on running economy and kinematics. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23:246–53.CrossRef
26.
Sinclair J, Taylor PJ, Edmundson CJ, et al. The influence of footwear kinetic, kinematic and electromyographical parameters on the energy requirements of steady state running. Mov Sport Sci. 2013;80:39–49.CrossRef
27.
Squadrone R, Gallozzi C. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2009;49(6):6–13.
28.
Tung KD, Franz JR, Kram R. A test of the metabolic cost of cushioning hypothesis during unshod and shod running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(2):324–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Bosco C, Rusko H. The effect of prolonged skeletal muscle stretch-shortening cycle on recoil of elastic energy and on expenditure. Acta Physiol Scand. 1983;119:314–8.CrossRef
30.
Buchheit M, Laursen PB, Leblond F, et al. Effect of dorsiflexion shoes on the energy cost of running. Sci Sports. 2010;25:81–7.CrossRef
31.
Faiss R, Terrier P, Praz M, et al. Influence of initial foot dorsal flexion on vertical jump and running performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(9):2352–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Jones BH, Knapik JJ, Daniels WL, et al. The energy cost of women walking and running in shoes and boots. Ergonomics. 1986;29(3):439–43.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Mercer JA, Branks DA, Wasserman SK, et al. Physiological cost of running while wearing spring-boots. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(2):314–8.PubMed
34.
Berg K, Sady S. Oxygen cost of running at submaximal speeds while wearing shoe inserts. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1985;56(1):86–9.CrossRef
35.
Jones BH, Toner MM, Daniels WL, et al. The energy cost and heart-rate response of trained and untrained subjects walking and running in shoes and boots. Ergonomics. 1984;27(8):895–902.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Morgan DW, Miller TA, Mitchell VA, et al. Aerobic demand of running shoes designed to exploit energy storage and return. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(1):102–5.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Brizuela G, Llana S, Ferrandis R, et al. The influence of basketball shoes with increased ankle support on shock attenuation and performance in running and jumping. J Sports Sci. 1997;15(5):505–15.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Ratamess NA, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, et al. The effects of ten weeks of resistance and combined plyometric/sprint training with the Meridian Elyte athletic shoe on muscular performance in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):882–7.PubMed
39.
Stefanyshyn D, Fusco C. Increased shoe bending stiffness increases sprint performance. Sports Biomech. 2004;3(1):55–66.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Killgore GL, Coste SC, O’Meara SE, et al. A comparison of the physiological exercise intensity differences between shod and barefoot submaximal deep-water running at the same cadence. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(12):3302–12.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Rife RK, Myrer JW, Vehrs P, et al. Water treadmill parameters needed to obtain land treadmill intensities in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(4):733–8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Williams KR, Cavanagh PR, Ziff JL. Biomechanical studies of elite female distance runners. Int J Sports Med. 1987;8:107–18.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Hanson NJ, Berg K. Response to the letter to the editor: is barefoot running more economical? [letter]. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33:250.CrossRef
44.
45.
Conley DL, Krahenbuhl GS. Running economy and distance running performance of highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12:357–60.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Svedenhag J, Sjodin B. Physiological characteristics of elite male runners in and off-season. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10(3):127–33.PubMed
47.
Foster C, Daniels JT, Yarbrough RA. Physiological and training correlates of marathon running performance. Aust J Sports Med. 1977;9:58–62.
48.
Williams KR, Cavanagh PR. Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy and running performance. J Appl Physiol. 1987;63(3):1236–45.PubMed
49.
Hopkins WG, Hawley JA, Burke LM. Design and analysis of research on sport performance enhancement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(3):472–85.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Paquette MR, Zhang S, Baumgartner LD. Acute effects of barefoot, minimal shoes and running shoes on lower limb mechanics in rear and forefoot strike runners. Footwear Sci. 2013;5(1):9–18.CrossRef
51.
Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Mitchell UH, et al. Foot bone marrow edema after a 10-wk transition to minimalist running shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(7):1363–8.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, et al. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(2):323–8.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Rooney BD, Derrick TR. Joint contact loading in forefoot and rearfoot strike patterns during running. J Biomech. 2013;46:2201–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners
Authors
Joel T. Fuller
Clint R. Bellenger
Dominic Thewlis
Margarita D. Tsiros
Jonathan D. Buckley
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0283-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Sports Medicine 3/2015 Go to the issue

Review Article

Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction: An Updated Evidence-Based Approach for Enhanced Muscular Development

Current Opinion

Improving Current Practice in Reviews of the Built Environment and Physical Activity

Letter to the Editor

A Philosophical Debate on the Morality of Doping is Interesting but Beyond the Scope of Our Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review

Predictors of Physical Activity Change Among Adults Using Observational Designs

Review Article

Amateur Boxing: Physical and Physiological Attributes

Review Article

Half-Time Strategies to Enhance Second-Half Performance in Team-Sports Players: A Review and Recommendations