Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2021

Open Access 01-05-2021 | Editorial

Considerations on the Calculation of the Human Equivalent Dose from Toxicology Studies for Biologic Anticancer Agents

Authors: Mohamed Elmeliegy, Chandrasekhar Udata, Ken Liao, Donghua Yin

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

First-in-human (FIH) clinical trials for investigational anticancer agents are often conducted in cancer patients who are resistant and/or refractory to standard therapy or have no other treatment options that would confer clinically relevant benefit. Selecting an appropriate starting dose for these studies is not only important to ensure patient safety but also to enable efficiency in reaching the therapeutically relevant dose range. Starting with a dose that is too low could lead to a lengthy dose escalation and subjecting many terminally ill cancer patients to subtherapeutic doses [1]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Medicines Agency. Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human and early clinical trials with investigational medicinal products. European Medicines Agency; 2017. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human and early clinical trials with investigational medicinal products. European Medicines Agency; 2017.
2.
go back to reference International Conference on Harmonization. Guidance for Industry: S9 Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals. International Conference on Harmonization; 2010. International Conference on Harmonization. Guidance for Industry: S9 Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals. International Conference on Harmonization; 2010.
3.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration. Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers. US Food and Drug Administration; 2005. US Food and Drug Administration. Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers. US Food and Drug Administration; 2005.
4.
go back to reference Muller PY, et al. The minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) for selection of first human dose in clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(6):722–9.CrossRef Muller PY, et al. The minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) for selection of first human dose in clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(6):722–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Saber H, et al. An FDA oncology analysis of immune activating products and first-in-human dose selection. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;81:448–56.CrossRef Saber H, et al. An FDA oncology analysis of immune activating products and first-in-human dose selection. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;81:448–56.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Saber H, et al. An FDA oncology analysis of CD3 bispecific constructs and first-in-human dose selection. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;90:144–52.CrossRef Saber H, et al. An FDA oncology analysis of CD3 bispecific constructs and first-in-human dose selection. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;90:144–52.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chapman K, et al. Preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies: considerations for the use of non-human primates. MAbs. 2009;1(5):505–16.CrossRef Chapman K, et al. Preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies: considerations for the use of non-human primates. MAbs. 2009;1(5):505–16.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Betts A, et al. Linear pharmacokinetic parameters for monoclonal antibodies are similar within a species and across different pharmacological targets: a comparison between human, cynomolgus monkey and hFcRn Tg32 transgenic mouse using a population-modeling approach. MAbs. 2018;10(5):751–64.CrossRef Betts A, et al. Linear pharmacokinetic parameters for monoclonal antibodies are similar within a species and across different pharmacological targets: a comparison between human, cynomolgus monkey and hFcRn Tg32 transgenic mouse using a population-modeling approach. MAbs. 2018;10(5):751–64.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Oitate M, et al. Prediction of human pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies from simple allometry of monkey data. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2011;26(4):423–30.CrossRef Oitate M, et al. Prediction of human pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies from simple allometry of monkey data. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2011;26(4):423–30.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ling J, et al. Interspecies scaling of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: initial look. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49(12):1382–402.CrossRef Ling J, et al. Interspecies scaling of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: initial look. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49(12):1382–402.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference North B, Kocher HM, Sasieni P. A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):632.CrossRef North B, Kocher HM, Sasieni P. A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):632.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Considerations on the Calculation of the Human Equivalent Dose from Toxicology Studies for Biologic Anticancer Agents
Authors
Mohamed Elmeliegy
Chandrasekhar Udata
Ken Liao
Donghua Yin
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-021-00987-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2021 Go to the issue