Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Systematic Review

Physicochemical Properties, Biotransformation, and Transport Pathways of Established and Newly Approved Medications: A Systematic Review of the Top 200 Most Prescribed Drugs vs. the FDA-Approved Drugs Between 2005 and 2016

Authors: Anitha Saravanakumar, Armin Sadighi, Rachel Ryu, Fatemeh Akhlaghi

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enzyme-mediated biotransformation of pharmacological agents is a crucial step in xenobiotic detoxification and drug disposition. Herein, we investigated the metabolism and physicochemical properties of the top 200 most prescribed drugs (established) as well as drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2005 and 2016 (newly approved).

Objective

Our objective was to capture the changing trends in the routes of administration, physicochemical properties, and prodrug medications, as well as the contributions of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters to drug clearance.

Methods

The University of Washington Drug Interaction Database (DIDB®) as well as other online resources (e.g., CenterWatch.com, Drugs.com, DrugBank.ca, and PubChem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to collect and stratify the dataset required for exploring the above-mentioned trends.

Results

Analyses revealed that ~ 90% of all drugs in the established and newly approved drug lists were administered systemically (oral or intravenous). Meanwhile, the portion of biologics (molecular weight > 1 kDa) was 15 times greater in the newly approved list than established drugs. Additionally, there was a 4.5-fold increase in the number of compounds with a high calculated partition coefficient (cLogP > 3) and a high total polar surface area (> 75 Å2) in the newly approved drug vs. the established category. Further, prodrugs in established or newly approved lists were found to be converted to active compounds via hydrolysis, demethylases, and kinases. The contribution of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, as the major biotransformation pathway, has increased from 40% in the established drug list to 64% in the newly approved drug list. Moreover, the role of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 were decreased as major metabolizing enzymes among the newly approved medications. Among non-CYP major metabolizers, the contribution of alcohol dehydrogenases/aldehyde dehydrogenases (ADH/ALDH) and sulfotransferases decreased in the newly approved drugs compared with the established list. Furthermore, the highest contribution among uptake and efflux transporters was found for Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), respectively.

Conclusions

The higher portion of biologics in the newly approved drugs compared with the established list confirmed the growing demands for protein- and antibody-based therapies. Moreover, the larger number of hydrophilic drugs found in the newly approved list suggests that the probability of toxicity is likely to decrease. With regard to CYP-mediated major metabolism, CYP3A5 showed an increased involvement owing to the identification of unique probe substrates to differentiate CYP3As. Furthermore, the contribution of OATP1B1 and P-gp did not show a significant shift in the newly approved drugs as compared to the established list because of their broad substrate specificity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oda S, Fukami T, Yokoi T, Nakajima M. A comprehensive review of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and esterases for drug development. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2015;30(1):30–51.PubMedCrossRef Oda S, Fukami T, Yokoi T, Nakajima M. A comprehensive review of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and esterases for drug development. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2015;30(1):30–51.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Iyanagi T. Molecular mechanism of phase I and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes: implications for detoxification. Int Rev Cytol. 2007;260:35–112.PubMedCrossRef Iyanagi T. Molecular mechanism of phase I and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes: implications for detoxification. Int Rev Cytol. 2007;260:35–112.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Williams JA, Hyland R, Jones BC, Smith DA, Hurst S, Goosen TC, et al. Drug-drug interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrates: a pharmacokinetic explanation for typically observed low exposure (AUCi/AUC) ratios. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(11):1201–8.PubMedCrossRef Williams JA, Hyland R, Jones BC, Smith DA, Hurst S, Goosen TC, et al. Drug-drug interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrates: a pharmacokinetic explanation for typically observed low exposure (AUCi/AUC) ratios. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(11):1201–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nelson DR, Zeldin DC, Hoffman SM, Maltais LJ, Wain HM, Nebert DW. Comparison of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes from the mouse and human genomes, including nomenclature recommendations for genes, pseudogenes and alternative-splice variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2004;14(1):1–18.PubMedCrossRef Nelson DR, Zeldin DC, Hoffman SM, Maltais LJ, Wain HM, Nebert DW. Comparison of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes from the mouse and human genomes, including nomenclature recommendations for genes, pseudogenes and alternative-splice variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2004;14(1):1–18.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nebert DW, Russell DW. Clinical importance of the cytochromes P450. Lancet. 2002;360(9340):1155–62.PubMedCrossRef Nebert DW, Russell DW. Clinical importance of the cytochromes P450. Lancet. 2002;360(9340):1155–62.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sim SC, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Update on allele nomenclature for human cytochromes P450 and the human cytochrome P450 allele (CYP-allele) nomenclature database. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;987:251–9.PubMedCrossRef Sim SC, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Update on allele nomenclature for human cytochromes P450 and the human cytochrome P450 allele (CYP-allele) nomenclature database. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;987:251–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Walsky RL, Obach RS. Validated assays for human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(6):647–60.PubMedCrossRef Walsky RL, Obach RS. Validated assays for human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(6):647–60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wienkers LC, Heath TG. Predicting in vivo drug interactions from in vitro drug discovery data. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(10):825–33.PubMedCrossRef Wienkers LC, Heath TG. Predicting in vivo drug interactions from in vitro drug discovery data. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(10):825–33.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Guengerich FP, Cheng Q. Orphans in the human cytochrome P450 superfamily: approaches to discovering functions and relevance in pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63(3):684–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guengerich FP, Cheng Q. Orphans in the human cytochrome P450 superfamily: approaches to discovering functions and relevance in pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63(3):684–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(8):711–5.PubMedCrossRef Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(8):711–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gan J, Ma S, Zhang D. Non-cytochrome P450-mediated bioactivation and its toxicological relevance. Drug Metab Rev. 2016;48(4):473–501.PubMedCrossRef Gan J, Ma S, Zhang D. Non-cytochrome P450-mediated bioactivation and its toxicological relevance. Drug Metab Rev. 2016;48(4):473–501.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Foti RS, Dalvie DK. Cytochrome P450 and non-cytochrome P450 oxidative metabolism: contributions to the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of xenobiotics. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(8):1229–45.PubMedCrossRef Foti RS, Dalvie DK. Cytochrome P450 and non-cytochrome P450 oxidative metabolism: contributions to the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of xenobiotics. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(8):1229–45.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cerny MA. Prevalence of non-cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism in food and drug administration-approved oral and intravenous drugs: 2006–2015. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(8):1246–52.PubMedCrossRef Cerny MA. Prevalence of non-cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism in food and drug administration-approved oral and intravenous drugs: 2006–2015. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(8):1246–52.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pryde DC, Dalvie D, Hu Q, Jones P, Obach RS, Tran TD. Aldehyde oxidase: an enzyme of emerging importance in drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2010;53(24):8441–60.PubMedCrossRef Pryde DC, Dalvie D, Hu Q, Jones P, Obach RS, Tran TD. Aldehyde oxidase: an enzyme of emerging importance in drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2010;53(24):8441–60.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leeson PD. Molecular inflation, attrition and the rule of five. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:22–33.PubMedCrossRef Leeson PD. Molecular inflation, attrition and the rule of five. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:22–33.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference DeGorter MK, Xia CQ, Yang JJ, Kim RB. Drug transporters in drug efficacy and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;52:249–73.PubMedCrossRef DeGorter MK, Xia CQ, Yang JJ, Kim RB. Drug transporters in drug efficacy and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;52:249–73.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini KM, Huang SM, Tweedie DJ, Benet LZ, Brouwer KL, et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(3):215–36. International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini KM, Huang SM, Tweedie DJ, Benet LZ, Brouwer KL, et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(3):215–36.
19.
go back to reference Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of transporter-mediated clearance in the liver and kidney. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24(1):37–52.PubMedCrossRef Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of transporter-mediated clearance in the liver and kidney. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24(1):37–52.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shitara Y, Horie T, Sugiyama Y. Transporters as a determinant of drug clearance and tissue distribution. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27(5):425–46.PubMedCrossRef Shitara Y, Horie T, Sugiyama Y. Transporters as a determinant of drug clearance and tissue distribution. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27(5):425–46.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Price DA, Blagg J, Jones L, Greene N, Wager T. Physicochemical drug properties associated with in vivo toxicological outcomes: a review. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009;5(8):921–31.PubMedCrossRef Price DA, Blagg J, Jones L, Greene N, Wager T. Physicochemical drug properties associated with in vivo toxicological outcomes: a review. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009;5(8):921–31.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hachad H, Ragueneau-Majlessi I, Levy RH. A useful tool for drug interaction evaluation: the University of Washington Metabolism and Transport Drug Interaction Database. Hum Genomics. 2010;5(1):61–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hachad H, Ragueneau-Majlessi I, Levy RH. A useful tool for drug interaction evaluation: the University of Washington Metabolism and Transport Drug Interaction Database. Hum Genomics. 2010;5(1):61–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yu J, Ritchie TK, Mulgaonkar A, Ragueneau-Majlessi I. Drug disposition and drug-drug interaction data in 2013 FDA new drug applications: a systematic review. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(12):1991–2001.PubMedCrossRef Yu J, Ritchie TK, Mulgaonkar A, Ragueneau-Majlessi I. Drug disposition and drug-drug interaction data in 2013 FDA new drug applications: a systematic review. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(12):1991–2001.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yu J, Ritchie TK, Zhou Z, Ragueneau-Majlessi I. Key findings from preclinical and clinical drug interaction studies presented in new drug and biological license applications approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2014. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(1):83–101.PubMedCrossRef Yu J, Ritchie TK, Zhou Z, Ragueneau-Majlessi I. Key findings from preclinical and clinical drug interaction studies presented in new drug and biological license applications approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2014. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(1):83–101.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Yu J, Zhou Z, Owens KH, Ritchie TK, Ragueneau-Majlessi I. What can be learned from recent new drug applications? A systematic review of drug interaction data for drugs approved by the US FDA in 2015. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017;45(1):86–108.PubMedCrossRef Yu J, Zhou Z, Owens KH, Ritchie TK, Ragueneau-Majlessi I. What can be learned from recent new drug applications? A systematic review of drug interaction data for drugs approved by the US FDA in 2015. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017;45(1):86–108.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tseng E, Walsky RL, Luzietti RA, Harris JJ, Kosa RE, Goosen TC, et al. Relative contributions of cytochrome CYP3A4 versus CYP3A5 for CYP3A-cleared drugs assessed in vitro using a CYP3A4-selective inactivator (CYP3cide). Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(7):1163–73.PubMedCrossRef Tseng E, Walsky RL, Luzietti RA, Harris JJ, Kosa RE, Goosen TC, et al. Relative contributions of cytochrome CYP3A4 versus CYP3A5 for CYP3A-cleared drugs assessed in vitro using a CYP3A4-selective inactivator (CYP3cide). Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(7):1163–73.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chen SY, Li JL, Meng FH, Wang XD, Liu T, Li J, et al. Individualization of tacrolimus dosage basing on cytochrome P450 3A5 polymorphism: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(3):E272–81.PubMedCrossRef Chen SY, Li JL, Meng FH, Wang XD, Liu T, Li J, et al. Individualization of tacrolimus dosage basing on cytochrome P450 3A5 polymorphism: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(3):E272–81.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Thervet E, Anglicheau D, King B, Schlageter MH, Cassinat B, Beaune P, et al. Impact of cytochrome P450 3A5 genetic polymorphism on tacrolimus doses and concentration-to-dose ratio in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003;76(8):1233–5.PubMedCrossRef Thervet E, Anglicheau D, King B, Schlageter MH, Cassinat B, Beaune P, et al. Impact of cytochrome P450 3A5 genetic polymorphism on tacrolimus doses and concentration-to-dose ratio in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003;76(8):1233–5.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference McEuen K, Borlak J, Tong W, Chen M. Associations of drug lipophilicity and extent of metabolism with drug-induced liver injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(7):1335.PubMedCentralCrossRef McEuen K, Borlak J, Tong W, Chen M. Associations of drug lipophilicity and extent of metabolism with drug-induced liver injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(7):1335.PubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Leeson PD, Davis AM. Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs. J Med Chem. 2004;47(25):6338–48.PubMedCrossRef Leeson PD, Davis AM. Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs. J Med Chem. 2004;47(25):6338–48.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Amidon GL, Lennernas H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995;12(3):413–20.PubMedCrossRef Amidon GL, Lennernas H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995;12(3):413–20.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Reichert JM. Trends in development and approval times for new therapeutics in the United States. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(9):695–702.PubMedCrossRef Reichert JM. Trends in development and approval times for new therapeutics in the United States. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(9):695–702.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Yang X, Gandhi YA, Duignan DB, Morris ME. Prediction of biliary excretion in rats and humans using molecular weight and quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships. AAPS J. 2009;11(3):511–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yang X, Gandhi YA, Duignan DB, Morris ME. Prediction of biliary excretion in rats and humans using molecular weight and quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships. AAPS J. 2009;11(3):511–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hosey CM, Broccatelli F, Benet LZ. Predicting when biliary excretion of parent drug is a major route of elimination in humans. AAPS J. 2014;16(5):1085–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hosey CM, Broccatelli F, Benet LZ. Predicting when biliary excretion of parent drug is a major route of elimination in humans. AAPS J. 2014;16(5):1085–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rendic S, Guengerich FP. Survey of human oxidoreductases and cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic and natural chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28(1):38–42.PubMedCrossRef Rendic S, Guengerich FP. Survey of human oxidoreductases and cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic and natural chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28(1):38–42.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Roth M, Obaidat A, Hagenbuch B. OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(5):1260–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Roth M, Obaidat A, Hagenbuch B. OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(5):1260–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Romaine S, Bailey K, Hall A, Balmforth A. The influence of SLCO1B1 (OATP1B1) gene polymorphisms on response to statin therapy. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10(1):1–11.PubMedCrossRef Romaine S, Bailey K, Hall A, Balmforth A. The influence of SLCO1B1 (OATP1B1) gene polymorphisms on response to statin therapy. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10(1):1–11.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Amin ML. P-glycoprotein inhibition for optimal drug delivery. Drug Target Insights. 2013;19(7):27–34. Amin ML. P-glycoprotein inhibition for optimal drug delivery. Drug Target Insights. 2013;19(7):27–34.
44.
go back to reference König J, Seithel A, Gradhand U, Fromm MF. Pharmacogenomics of human OATP transporters. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2006;372(6):432–43.PubMedCrossRef König J, Seithel A, Gradhand U, Fromm MF. Pharmacogenomics of human OATP transporters. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2006;372(6):432–43.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lin JH, Yamazaki M. Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(1):59–98.PubMedCrossRef Lin JH, Yamazaki M. Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(1):59–98.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR, et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1074–82.PubMedCentralCrossRef Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR, et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1074–82.PubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kim S, Thiessen PA, Bolton EE, Chen J, Fu G, Gindulyte A, et al. PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1202–13.PubMedCrossRef Kim S, Thiessen PA, Bolton EE, Chen J, Fu G, Gindulyte A, et al. PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1202–13.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physicochemical Properties, Biotransformation, and Transport Pathways of Established and Newly Approved Medications: A Systematic Review of the Top 200 Most Prescribed Drugs vs. the FDA-Approved Drugs Between 2005 and 2016
Authors
Anitha Saravanakumar
Armin Sadighi
Rachel Ryu
Fatemeh Akhlaghi
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00750-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 10/2019 Go to the issue