Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Research Article

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Afatinib with Rifampicin and Ritonavir

Authors: Sven Wind, Thomas Giessmann, Arvid Jungnik, Tobias Brand, Kristell Marzin, Julia Bertulis, Julia Hocke, Dietmar Gansser, Peter Stopfer

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objective

Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, ErbB family blocker in clinical development for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic head and neck cancer, and other solid tumours. As afatinib is a substrate for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) pump transporter the three studies presented here investigated the pharmacokinetics of afatinib in the presence of a potent inhibitor (ritonavir) or inducer [rifampicin (rifampin)] of P-gp.

Methods

We conducted phase I, open-label, single-centre studies in healthy male volunteers who received a single once-daily oral dose of afatinib (20 or 40 mg) together with either ritonavir or rifampicin; two studies had a randomised, two- and three-way crossover design and the third was a non-randomised, two-period sequential study.

Results

When afatinib 20 mg was administered 1 h after ritonavir, afatinib geometric mean (gMean) maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) increased by 38.5 and 47.6 %, respectively. Coadministration of ritonavir either simultaneously or 6 h later than afatinib 40 mg resulted in minimal increase in the afatinib gMean C max and AUC (4.1 and 18.6 % for simultaneous administration with AUC not completely within the bioequivalence limits; 5.1 and 10.8 % for timed administration within the bioequivalence limits). Administration of afatinib 40 mg in the presence of rifampicin led to reduction in C max and AUC by 21.6 and 33.8 %, respectively. In all studies, P-gp modulation mainly affected the extent of absorption of afatinib; there was no change in the terminal elimination half-life. The overall safety profile of afatinib was acceptable.

Conclusion

Coadministration of potent P-gp modulators had no clinically relevant effect on afatinib exposure. Effects of potent P-gp inhibitors were minimal at higher afatinib doses and can be readily managed by the timing of concomitant therapy. As afatinib is not a relevant modulator or substrate of cytochrome P450 enzymes, the drug–drug interaction potential is considered to be low.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, et al. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008;27:4702–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, et al. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008;27:4702–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Solca F, Dahl G, Zoephel A, et al. Target binding properties and cellular activity of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;343:342–50.PubMedCrossRef Solca F, Dahl G, Zoephel A, et al. Target binding properties and cellular activity of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;343:342–50.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, et al. Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3327–34.PubMedCrossRef Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, et al. Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3327–34.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, et al. LUX-Lung 6: a randomized, open-label, phase III study of afatinib (A) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) as first-line treatment for Asian patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR M+) advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(Suppl):abstract 8016. Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, et al. LUX-Lung 6: a randomized, open-label, phase III study of afatinib (A) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) as first-line treatment for Asian patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR M+) advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(Suppl):abstract 8016.
5.
go back to reference Cohen EEW, Fayette J, Cupissol D, et al. A randomized, open-label, phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992) versus cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: final data [abstract no. PP101]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:1374. Cohen EEW, Fayette J, Cupissol D, et al. A randomized, open-label, phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992) versus cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: final data [abstract no. PP101]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:1374.
6.
7.
go back to reference Wind S, Schmid M, Erhardt J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of afatinib, a selective irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52:1101–9.PubMedCrossRef Wind S, Schmid M, Erhardt J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of afatinib, a selective irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52:1101–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stopfer P, Marzin K, Narjes H, et al. Afatinib pharmacokinetics and metabolism after oral administration to healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:1051–61.PubMedCrossRef Stopfer P, Marzin K, Narjes H, et al. Afatinib pharmacokinetics and metabolism after oral administration to healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:1051–61.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lin JH, Yamazaki M. Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:59–98.PubMedCrossRef Lin JH, Yamazaki M. Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:59–98.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mizuno N, Niwa T, Yotsumoto Y, et al. Impact of drug transporter studies on drug discovery and development. Pharmacol Rev. 2003;55:425–61.PubMedCrossRef Mizuno N, Niwa T, Yotsumoto Y, et al. Impact of drug transporter studies on drug discovery and development. Pharmacol Rev. 2003;55:425–61.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marzolini C, Paus E, Buclin T, et al. Polymorphisms in human MDR1 (P-glycoprotein): recent advances and clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:13–33.PubMedCrossRef Marzolini C, Paus E, Buclin T, et al. Polymorphisms in human MDR1 (P-glycoprotein): recent advances and clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:13–33.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhang L, Strong JM, Qiu W, et al. Scientific perspectives on drug transporters and their role in drug interactions. Mol Pharm. 2006;3:62–9.PubMedCrossRef Zhang L, Strong JM, Qiu W, et al. Scientific perspectives on drug transporters and their role in drug interactions. Mol Pharm. 2006;3:62–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Backman JT, Olkkola KT, Ojala M, et al. Concentrations and effects of oral midazolam are greatly reduced in patients treated with carbamazepine or phenytoin. Epilepsia. 1996;37:253–7.PubMedCrossRef Backman JT, Olkkola KT, Ojala M, et al. Concentrations and effects of oral midazolam are greatly reduced in patients treated with carbamazepine or phenytoin. Epilepsia. 1996;37:253–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Backman JT, Kivisto KT, Olkkola KT, et al. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve for oral midazolam is 400-fold larger during treatment with itraconazole than with rifampicin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:53–8.PubMedCrossRef Backman JT, Kivisto KT, Olkkola KT, et al. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve for oral midazolam is 400-fold larger during treatment with itraconazole than with rifampicin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:53–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hsu A, Granneman GR, Bertz RJ. Ritonavir. Clinical pharmacokinetics and interactions with other anti-HIV agents. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;35:275–91.PubMedCrossRef Hsu A, Granneman GR, Bertz RJ. Ritonavir. Clinical pharmacokinetics and interactions with other anti-HIV agents. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;35:275–91.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Niemi M, Backman JT, Fromm MF, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin: clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:819–50.PubMedCrossRef Niemi M, Backman JT, Fromm MF, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin: clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:819–50.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Galteau MM, Shamsa F. Urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol: a validated test for evaluating drug induction or drug inhibition mediated through CYP3A in humans and in animals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59:713–33.PubMedCrossRef Galteau MM, Shamsa F. Urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol: a validated test for evaluating drug induction or drug inhibition mediated through CYP3A in humans and in animals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59:713–33.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tran JQ, Kovacs SJ, McIntosh TS, et al. Morning spot and 24-hour urinary 6 beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol ratios: intraindividual variability and correlation under basal conditions and conditions of CYP 3A4 induction. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;39:487–94.PubMed Tran JQ, Kovacs SJ, McIntosh TS, et al. Morning spot and 24-hour urinary 6 beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol ratios: intraindividual variability and correlation under basal conditions and conditions of CYP 3A4 induction. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;39:487–94.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Härtter S, Sennewald R, Nehmiz G, et al. Oral bioavailability of dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®) after co-medication with verapamil in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:1053–62.PubMedCrossRef Härtter S, Sennewald R, Nehmiz G, et al. Oral bioavailability of dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®) after co-medication with verapamil in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:1053–62.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini KM, Huang SM, et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9:215–36. International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini KM, Huang SM, et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9:215–36.
25.
go back to reference Gupta A, Zhang Y, Unadkat JD, et al. HIV protease inhibitors are inhibitors but not substrates of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310:334–41.PubMedCrossRef Gupta A, Zhang Y, Unadkat JD, et al. HIV protease inhibitors are inhibitors but not substrates of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310:334–41.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tachibana T, Kato M, Watanabe T, et al. Method for predicting the risk of drug–drug interactions involving inhibition of intestinal CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. Xenobiotica. 2009;39:430–43.PubMedCrossRef Tachibana T, Kato M, Watanabe T, et al. Method for predicting the risk of drug–drug interactions involving inhibition of intestinal CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. Xenobiotica. 2009;39:430–43.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yasuda SU, Zhang L, Huang SM. The role of ethnicity in variability in response to drugs: focus on clinical pharmacology studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:417–23.PubMedCrossRef Yasuda SU, Zhang L, Huang SM. The role of ethnicity in variability in response to drugs: focus on clinical pharmacology studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:417–23.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Afatinib with Rifampicin and Ritonavir
Authors
Sven Wind
Thomas Giessmann
Arvid Jungnik
Tobias Brand
Kristell Marzin
Julia Bertulis
Julia Hocke
Dietmar Gansser
Peter Stopfer
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-013-0161-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Clinical Drug Investigation 3/2014 Go to the issue