Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Research Article

Sustaining Gains in Health Programs: Technical Efficiency and its Determinants in Malaria Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author: Esso-Hanam Atake

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since the year 2000, Africa has made significant progress in the fight against malaria. Between 2000 and 2015, the incidence and death from malaria fell by 42 and 66%, respectively. However, the African region still accounts for most global cases of malaria. In 2015, the region was home to 89% of malaria cases and 91% of malaria death.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate efficiency of policies against malaria in 30 malaria-endemic Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, from the perspective of sustaining gains.

Methods

The data came from World Malaria Report 2013. Data were analyzed using the double bootstrap method. We first estimated bootstrapped efficiency scores. Then, bootstrapped truncated regression was used to determine factors associated with malaria program efficiency.

Results

This study showed that most malaria programs in SSA are technically inefficient. We also found that aid from international institutions and public expenditures on malaria programs do not significantly affect the efficiency of malaria programs. However, in an enhanced governance context, international aid and public expenditure impact positively on the efficiency of malaria programs. Moreover, intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women is associated with a positive effect on the efficiency. Surprisingly, the free care policies—artemisinin-based combinations for under five-year-old children in the public facilities, rapid diagnostic tests, and distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets and long-lasting insecticide-impregnated nets—does not significantly affect the efficiency of malaria programs.

Conclusion

Financing alone does not ensure efficiency of malaria programs. Good governance and the targeting of the most vulnerable segments of the population are necessary to reduce malaria deaths and improve efficiency of malaria programs in SSA.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Aigner D, Lovell CK, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom. 1977;6:21–37.CrossRef
15.
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2:429–44.CrossRef
16.
Farrell MJ. The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc. 1957;120:253–90.
17.
Meeusen W, Van den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev. 1977;18:435–44.CrossRef
18.
Besstremyannaya G. The impact of Japanese hospital financing reform on hospital efficiency: a difference-in-difference approach. Jpn Econ Rev. 2013;64:337–62.CrossRef
19.
20.
Fizel JL, Nunnikhoven TS. Technical efficiency of for-profit and non-profit nursing homes. Manag Decis Econ. 1992;13:429–39.CrossRef
21.
Hollingsworth B. The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Econ. 2008;17:1107–28.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kooreman P. Nursing home care in The Netherlands: a nonparametric efficiency analysis. J Health Econ. 1994;13:301–16.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Simar L, Wilson PW. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci. 1998;44:49–61.CrossRef
24.
Simar L, Wilson PW. A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J Appl Stat. 2000;27:779–802.CrossRef
25.
Grosskopf S. Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: a selective survey. J Prod Anal. 1996;7:161–76.CrossRef
26.
Simar L, Wilson PW. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econometrics. 2007;136:31–64.CrossRef
27.
28.
Coelli T. A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models. Oper Res Lett. 1998;23:143–9.CrossRef
29.
30.
Alexander WRJ, Haug AA, Jaforullah M. A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. J Prod Anal. 2010;34:99–110.CrossRef
31.
Lépine A, Vassall A, Chandrashekar S. The determinants of technical efficiency of a large-scale HIV prevention project: application of the DEA double bootstrap using panel data from the Indian Avahan. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015;13:1.CrossRef
32.
Chavasse D, Lo-Phan L, Lavigne M. Insecticide-treated net projects: a handbook for managers. Malaria Consortium; 1999.
33.
Zandu A, Malengreau M, Wery M. Methods and expenses for protection against mosquitoes in households in Kinshasa, Zaire. Ann Soc Belg Med Tr. 1991;71:259–66.
34.
35.
Andrews KG, Lynch M, Eckert E, Gutman J. Missed opportunities to deliver intermittent preventive treatment for malaria to pregnant women 2003–2013: a systematic analysis of 58 household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J. 2015;14:1.CrossRef
36.
37.
38.
Bruxvoort K, Kalolella A, Nchimbi H, et al. Getting antimalarials on target: impact of national roll-out of malaria rapid diagnostic tests on health facility treatment in three regions of Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18:1269–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Hanson K. Public and private roles in malaria control: the contributions of economic analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:168–73.PubMed
40.
41.
42.
43.
Lewin AY, Morey RC, Cook TJ. Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts. Omega. 1982;10:401–11.CrossRef
44.
Eisele TP, Larsen D, Anglewicz A, et al. Malaria prevention in pregnancy, birthweight, and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of 32 national cross-sectional datasets in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:942–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
47.
Mancuso P, Valdmanis VG. Care appropriateness and health productivity evolution: a non-parametric analysis of the italian regional health systems. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14:595–607.CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
Adler N, Liebert V, Yazhemsky E. Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective. Omega. 2013;41:442–58.CrossRef
50.
Gitto S, Mancuso P. Bootstrapping the Malmquist indexes for Italian airports. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;135:403–11.CrossRef
51.
Bulajić M, Jeremić V, Knežević S, Žarkić-Joksimović N. Statistički Pristup Merenju Efikasnosti Banaka. Ekonomska istraživanja. 2013;26:95–104.
52.
53.
Msellem M, Mårtensson A, Rotllant G, et al. Influence of rapid malaria diagnostic tests on treatment and health outcome in fever patients, zanzibar—a crossover validation study. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Asiimwe C, Kyabayinze DJ, Kyalisiima Z, et al. Early experiences on the feasibility, acceptability, and use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests at peripheral health centres in Uganda-insights into some barriers and facilitators. Implement Sci. 2012;7:1.CrossRef
55.
Chandler CI, Jones C, Boniface G, et al. Guidelines and mindlines: why do clinical staff over-diagnose malaria in Tanzania? A qualitative study. Malar J. 2008;7:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Chandler CI, Whitty CJ, Ansah EK. How can malaria rapid diagnostic tests achieve their potential? A qualitative study of a trial at health facilities in Ghana. Malar J. 2010;9:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Ezeoke OP, Ezumah NN, Chandler CC, et al. Exploring health providers’ and community perceptions and experiences with malaria tests in South-East Nigeria: a critical step towards appropriate treatment. Malar J. 2012;11:1–10.CrossRef
58.
Ruizendaal E, Dierickx S, Grietens KP, et al. Success or failure of critical steps in community case management of malaria with rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Malar J. 2014;13:229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Van Eijk AM, Hill J, Larsen DA, et al. Coverage of intermittent preventive treatment and insecticide-treated nets for the control of malaria during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis and meta-analysis of national survey data, 2009–11. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:1029–42.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Berkessa T, Oljira D, Tesfa B. Insecticide treated nets use and its determinants among settlers of Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1.
61.
Stevens ER, Aldridge A, Degbey Y, et al. Evaluation of the 2011 long-lasting, insecticide-treated net distribution for universal coverage in Togo. Malar J. 2013;12:1.CrossRef
62.
Welch K, Fuster M. Barriers in access to insecticide-treated bednets for malaria prevention: an analysis of Cambodian DHS data. J Vector Borne Dis. 2012;49:1.PubMed
63.
Maslove DM, Mnyusiwalla A, Mills EJ, et al. Barriers to the effective treatment and prevention of malaria in Africa: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009;9:1–10.CrossRef
64.
Chatio S, Aborigo R, Adongo PB, et al. Adherence and uptake of artemisinin-based combination treatments for uncomplicated malaria: a qualitative study in northern Ghana. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116856.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. Governance matters III: governance indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002. World Bank Econ Rev. 2004;18:253–87.CrossRef
66.
67.
68.
Mills A, Lubell Y, Hanson K. Malaria eradication: the economic, financial and institutional challenge. Malar J. 2008;7:1.CrossRef
69.
70.
Metadata
Title
Sustaining Gains in Health Programs: Technical Efficiency and its Determinants in Malaria Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa
Author
Esso-Hanam Atake
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0294-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2/2017 Go to the issue

Original Research Article

Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden

Original Research Article

Financial Impact of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Medicaid: Budgetary Assessment Based on Number Needed to Treat

Systematic Review

Many Miles to Go: A Systematic Review of the State of Cost-Utility Analyses in Brazil

Review Article

Virtual Touch™ Quantification to Diagnose and Monitor Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

Original Research Article

Estimating Population Health Benefits Associated with Specialty and Traditional Drugs in the Year Following Product Approval

Original Research Article

Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Trastuzumab for the Treatment of Breast Cancer in Croatia