Published in:
Open Access
01-08-2014 | Original Research Article
Estimating the Costs of Opioid Abuse and Dependence from an Employer Perspective: a Retrospective Analysis Using Administrative Claims Data
Authors:
J. Bradford Rice, Noam Y. Kirson, Amie Shei, Alice Kate G. Cummings, Katharine Bodnar, Howard G. Birnbaum, Rami Ben-Joseph
Published in:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
|
Issue 4/2014
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Opioid abuse and dependence is problematic across many age groups, including the working-age population and their dependents. Little is known, however, about the economic costs of opioid abuse/dependence imposed on employers, who pay for a substantial portion of healthcare costs through their contributions to employer-sponsored health insurance and are also affected by indirect costs such as those due to disability and workplace absenteeism.
Objective
To provide a comprehensive, current estimate of the economic burden of prescription opioid abuse/dependence to employers.
Methods
Administrative claims from beneficiaries covered by large self-insured companies throughout the USA were used to identify patients, including employees and dependents, who were diagnosed with opioid abuse and/or dependence (‘abusers’) between 2006 and 2012. Healthcare and work-loss costs for abusers were assessed over a 12-month period and compared with those for patients not diagnosed with abuse (‘comparison patients’), using propensity score matching.
Results
7,658 matched pairs of abusers and comparison patients were analysed. Relative to comparison patients, abusers had significantly higher annual healthcare resource utilization, leading to US$10,627 in per-patient incremental annual healthcare costs. Additionally, abusers had US$1,244 in excess annual work-loss costs. Together, this implies an employer burden for diagnosed abuse of US$1.71 per member per month.
Conclusion
Opioid abuse/dependence impose a substantial economic burden on employers.