Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Current Opinion

Resource-Use Measurement Based on Patient Recall: Issues and Challenges for Economic Evaluation

Authors: Joanna C. Thorn, Joanna Coast, David Cohen, William Hollingworth, Martin Knapp, Sian M. Noble, Colin Ridyard, Sarah Wordsworth, Dyfrig Hughes

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Accurate resource-use measurement is challenging within an economic evaluation, but is a fundamental requirement for estimating efficiency. Considerable research effort has been concentrated on the appropriate measurement of outcomes and the policy implications of economic evaluation, while methods for resource-use measurement have been relatively neglected. Recently, the Database of Instruments for Resource Use Measurement (DIRUM) was set up at http://​www.​dirum.​org to provide a repository where researchers can share resource-use measures and methods. A workshop to discuss the issues was held at the University of Birmingham in October 2011. Based on material presented at the workshop, this article highlights the state of the art of UK instruments for resource-use data collection based on patient recall. We consider methodological issues in the design and analysis of resource-use instruments, and the challenges associated with designing new questionnaires. We suggest a method of developing a good practice guideline, and identify some areas for future research. Consensus amongst health economists has yet to be reached on many aspects of resource-use measurement. We argue that researchers should now afford costing methodologies the same attention as outcome measurement, and we hope that this Current Opinion article will stimulate a debate on methods of resource-use data collection and establish a research agenda to improve the precision and accuracy of resource-use estimates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnston K, Buxton MJ, Jones DR, et al. Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment. 1999;3(6):1–76.PubMed Johnston K, Buxton MJ, Jones DR, et al. Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment. 1999;3(6):1–76.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ridyard CH, Hughes DA. DIRUM team. Development of a database of instruments for resource use measurement: purpose, feasibility and design. Value in Health. 2012;15:650–5.PubMedCrossRef Ridyard CH, Hughes DA. DIRUM team. Development of a database of instruments for resource use measurement: purpose, feasibility and design. Value in Health. 2012;15:650–5.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Morris S, Devlin N, Parkin D. Economic analysis in health care. New York: Wiley; 2007. Morris S, Devlin N, Parkin D. Economic analysis in health care. New York: Wiley; 2007.
4.
go back to reference Noble SM, Hollingworth W, Tilling K. Missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: The current state of play. Health economics. 2012;21(2):187–200.PubMedCrossRef Noble SM, Hollingworth W, Tilling K. Missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: The current state of play. Health economics. 2012;21(2):187–200.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3): MR000008. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3): MR000008.
6.
go back to reference Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A. Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health. 2011;14(8):1101–8.PubMedCrossRef Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A. Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health. 2011;14(8):1101–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marques E, Johnson E, Gooberman-Hill RJS, et al. Using resource use logs to reduce the amount of missing data in economic evaluations alongside trials. Value Health. 2013;16(1):195–201. Marques E, Johnson E, Gooberman-Hill RJS, et al. Using resource use logs to reduce the amount of missing data in economic evaluations alongside trials. Value Health. 2013;16(1):195–201.
8.
go back to reference Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, Brewin C, Wing J, editors. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 1992. p. 179–90. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, Brewin C, Wing J, editors. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 1992. p. 179–90.
9.
go back to reference Simpson S, Corney R, Fitzgerald P, et al. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of counselling patients with chronic depression. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 2000; 4(36): 1–83. Simpson S, Corney R, Fitzgerald P, et al. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of counselling patients with chronic depression. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 2000; 4(36): 1–83.
10.
go back to reference Patel A, Rendu A, Moran P, et al. A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care. Fam Pract. 2005;22(3):323.PubMedCrossRef Patel A, Rendu A, Moran P, et al. A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care. Fam Pract. 2005;22(3):323.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Byford S, Leese M, Knapp M, et al. Comparison of alternative methods of collection of service use data for the economic evaluation of health care interventions. Health Econ. 2007;16(5):531–6.PubMedCrossRef Byford S, Leese M, Knapp M, et al. Comparison of alternative methods of collection of service use data for the economic evaluation of health care interventions. Health Econ. 2007;16(5):531–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mirandola M, Bisoffi G, Bonizzato P, et al. Collecting psychiatric resources utilisation data to calculate costs of care: a comparison between a service receipt interview and a case register. Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34(10):541–7.CrossRef Mirandola M, Bisoffi G, Bonizzato P, et al. Collecting psychiatric resources utilisation data to calculate costs of care: a comparison between a service receipt interview and a case register. Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34(10):541–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thompson S, Wordsworth S. An annotated cost questionnaire for completion by patients. HERU Discussion Paper 03/01; 2001. Thompson S, Wordsworth S. An annotated cost questionnaire for completion by patients. HERU Discussion Paper 03/01; 2001.
14.
go back to reference Wordsworth S. Improving the transferability of costing results in economic evaluation: an application to dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease. UK: University of Aberdeen; 2004. Wordsworth S. Improving the transferability of costing results in economic evaluation: an application to dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease. UK: University of Aberdeen; 2004.
15.
go back to reference Tarride JE, Burke N, Bischof M, et al. A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tarride JE, Burke N, Bischof M, et al. A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hounsome N, Orrell M, Tudor Edwards R. Eq-5d as a quality of life measure in people with dementia and their carers: evidence and key issues. Value Health. 2011;14(2):390–9.PubMedCrossRef Hounsome N, Orrell M, Tudor Edwards R. Eq-5d as a quality of life measure in people with dementia and their carers: evidence and key issues. Value Health. 2011;14(2):390–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference van Asselt AD, van Mastrigt GA, Dirksen CD, et al. How to deal with cost differences at baseline. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(6):519–28.PubMedCrossRef van Asselt AD, van Mastrigt GA, Dirksen CD, et al. How to deal with cost differences at baseline. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(6):519–28.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ridyard CH, Hughes DA. Methods for the collection of resource use data within clinical trials: a systematic review of studies funded by the UK health technology assessment program. Value Health. 2010;13(8):867–72.PubMedCrossRef Ridyard CH, Hughes DA. Methods for the collection of resource use data within clinical trials: a systematic review of studies funded by the UK health technology assessment program. Value Health. 2010;13(8):867–72.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tourangeau R. Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In: Jabine TB, Straf ML, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R, editors. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines. Washington: National Academic Press; 1984. p. 73–100. Tourangeau R. Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In: Jabine TB, Straf ML, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R, editors. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines. Washington: National Academic Press; 1984. p. 73–100.
20.
go back to reference Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005.
21.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Resource-Use Measurement Based on Patient Recall: Issues and Challenges for Economic Evaluation
Authors
Joanna C. Thorn
Joanna Coast
David Cohen
William Hollingworth
Martin Knapp
Sian M. Noble
Colin Ridyard
Sarah Wordsworth
Dyfrig Hughes
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2013 Go to the issue