Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2/2020

Open Access 01-04-2020 | Melanoma | Original Research Article

Malignant Melanoma of the Vulva and Vagina: A US Population-Based Study of 1863 Patients

Authors: Christoph Wohlmuth, Iris Wohlmuth-Wieser, Taymaa May, Danielle Vicus, Lilian T. Gien, Stéphane Laframboise

Published in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Vulvar melanoma (VuM) and vaginal melanoma (VaM) represent a unique subgroup of malignant melanomas with important differences in biology and treatment.

Objective

The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology and prognosis of VuM and VaM in a large representative cohort.

Methods

Women with invasive VuM or VaM were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-18 population representing 27.8% of the US population. Data on age, ethnicity, stage, location, histopathology, primary surgery, and lymphadenectomy were collected. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze disease-specific and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to identify factors with a significant association with disease-specific survival.

Results

A total of 1400 VuM and 463 VaM were included for further analysis; 78.6% and 49.7% of women with VuM and VaM underwent surgery, but only 52.9% of women with non-metastatic VuM and 42.9% of women with non-metastatic VaM undergoing surgery had lymph node assessment; one third of these had positive nodes. Superficial spreading was the most common subtype in VuM, and nodular melanoma in VaM (p < 0.001). The median disease-specific survival was 99 months (95% confidence interval 60–138) and 19 months (95% confidence interval 16–22), respectively. Survival was significantly associated with age at diagnosis, ethnicity, stage, surgery, lymph node metastases, histologic subtype, ulceration, mitotic count, and tumor thickness in VuM, and stage, surgery, and lymph node involvement in VaM. In the Cox model, lymph node status and number of mitoses remained independent predictors of outcome in VuM; in VaM, only lymph node status remained significant.

Conclusions

The overall prognosis of VuM and VaM remains poor. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is applicable and should be used for VuM; however, lymph node status and mitotic rate are the most important predictors of survival. Lymph node status should be assessed and patients with positive nodes may be candidates for adjuvant treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Koh W-J, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, et al. Vulvar cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15:92–120.CrossRef Koh W-J, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, et al. Vulvar cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15:92–120.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Coit DG, Thompson JA, Algazi A, Andtbacka R, Bichakjian CK, Carson WE, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: melanoma, version 3.2016. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14:945–58.CrossRef Coit DG, Thompson JA, Algazi A, Andtbacka R, Bichakjian CK, Carson WE, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: melanoma, version 3.2016. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14:945–58.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wong SL, Faries MB, Kennedy EB, Agarwala SS, Akhurst TJ, Ariyan C, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:399–413.CrossRef Wong SL, Faries MB, Kennedy EB, Agarwala SS, Akhurst TJ, Ariyan C, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:399–413.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dummer R, Hauschild A, Lindenblatt N, Pentheroudakis G, Keilholz U. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:v126–32.CrossRef Dummer R, Hauschild A, Lindenblatt N, Pentheroudakis G, Keilholz U. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:v126–32.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hou JY, Baptiste C, Hombalegowda RB, Tergas AI, Feldman R, Jones NL, et al. Vulvar and vaginal melanoma: a unique subclass of mucosal melanoma based on a comprehensive molecular analysis of 51 cases compared with 2253 cases of nongynecologic melanoma. Cancer. 2017;123:1333–44.CrossRef Hou JY, Baptiste C, Hombalegowda RB, Tergas AI, Feldman R, Jones NL, et al. Vulvar and vaginal melanoma: a unique subclass of mucosal melanoma based on a comprehensive molecular analysis of 51 cases compared with 2253 cases of nongynecologic melanoma. Cancer. 2017;123:1333–44.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Saglam O, Messina J, Naqvi SMH, Teer JK, Lee J, Zhang Y, et al. Female genitourinary tract melanoma: mutation analysis with clinicopathologic correlation; a single-institution experience. Melanoma Res. 2018;28:586–91.CrossRef Saglam O, Messina J, Naqvi SMH, Teer JK, Lee J, Zhang Y, et al. Female genitourinary tract melanoma: mutation analysis with clinicopathologic correlation; a single-institution experience. Melanoma Res. 2018;28:586–91.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rouzbahman M, Kamel-Reid S, Al Habeeb A, Butler M, Dodge J, Laframboise S, et al. Malignant melanoma of vulva and vagina. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015;19:350–3.CrossRef Rouzbahman M, Kamel-Reid S, Al Habeeb A, Butler M, Dodge J, Laframboise S, et al. Malignant melanoma of vulva and vagina. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015;19:350–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Phillips GL, Bundy BN, Okagaki T, Kucera PR, Stehman FB. Malignant melanoma of the vulva treated by radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the gynecologic oncology group. Cancer. 1994;73:2626–32.CrossRef Phillips GL, Bundy BN, Okagaki T, Kucera PR, Stehman FB. Malignant melanoma of the vulva treated by radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the gynecologic oncology group. Cancer. 1994;73:2626–32.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Trimble EL, Lewis JL, Williams LL, Curtin JP, Chapman D, Woodruff JM, et al. Management of vulvar melanoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;45:254–8.CrossRef Trimble EL, Lewis JL, Williams LL, Curtin JP, Chapman D, Woodruff JM, et al. Management of vulvar melanoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;45:254–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Verschraegen CF, Benjapibal M, Supakarapongkul W, Levy LB, Ross M, Atkinson EN, et al. Vulvar melanoma at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: 25 years later. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:359–64.CrossRef Verschraegen CF, Benjapibal M, Supakarapongkul W, Levy LB, Ross M, Atkinson EN, et al. Vulvar melanoma at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: 25 years later. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:359–64.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Räber G, Mempel V, Jackisch C, Hundeiker M, Heinecke A, Kürzl R, et al. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: report of 89 patients. Cancer. 1996;78:2353–8.CrossRef Räber G, Mempel V, Jackisch C, Hundeiker M, Heinecke A, Kürzl R, et al. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: report of 89 patients. Cancer. 1996;78:2353–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pleunis N, Schuurman MS, Van Rossum MM, Bulten J, Massuger LF, De Hullu JA, et al. Rare vulvar malignancies; incidence, treatment and survival in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142:440–5.CrossRef Pleunis N, Schuurman MS, Van Rossum MM, Bulten J, Massuger LF, De Hullu JA, et al. Rare vulvar malignancies; incidence, treatment and survival in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142:440–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sinasac SE, Petrella TM, Rouzbahman M, Sade S, Ghazarian D, Vicus D. Melanoma of the vulva and vagina: surgical management and outcomes based on a clinicopathologic review of 68 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:762–71.CrossRef Sinasac SE, Petrella TM, Rouzbahman M, Sade S, Ghazarian D, Vicus D. Melanoma of the vulva and vagina: surgical management and outcomes based on a clinicopathologic review of 68 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:762–71.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gershenwald JE, Hess KR, Thompson JF, Long GV, Ross MI, Lazar AJ, et al. Melanoma of the skin. In: AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th ed. American Joint Committee on Cancer; 2017. p. 563–88. Gershenwald JE, Hess KR, Thompson JF, Long GV, Ross MI, Lazar AJ, et al. Melanoma of the skin. In: AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th ed. American Joint Committee on Cancer; 2017. p. 563–88.
16.
go back to reference Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.CrossRef Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob J-J, Cowey CL, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–56.CrossRef Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob J-J, Cowey CL, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–56.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Robert C, Grange F, Mortier L, Karaszewska B, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:30–9.CrossRef Robert C, Grange F, Mortier L, Karaszewska B, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:30–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, Levchenko E, De Braud F, Larkin J, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:444–51.CrossRef Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, Levchenko E, De Braud F, Larkin J, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:444–51.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRef Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, Lebbé C, Brady B, Neyns B, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:226–35.CrossRef D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, Lebbé C, Brady B, Neyns B, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:226–35.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hamid O, Robert C, Ribas A, Hodi FS, Walpole E, Daud A, et al. Antitumour activity of pembrolizumab in advanced mucosal melanoma: a post-hoc analysis of KEYNOTE-001, 002, 006. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:670–4.CrossRef Hamid O, Robert C, Ribas A, Hodi FS, Walpole E, Daud A, et al. Antitumour activity of pembrolizumab in advanced mucosal melanoma: a post-hoc analysis of KEYNOTE-001, 002, 006. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:670–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 18 Regs research data + Hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana cases, Nov 2018 sub (1975–2016 varying)—linked to county attributes—total. https://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed 28 Jul 2019. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 18 Regs research data + Hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana cases, Nov 2018 sub (1975–2016 varying)—linked to county attributes—total. https://​seer.​cancer.​gov. Accessed 28 Jul 2019.
24.
go back to reference Nagarajan P, Curry JL, Ning J, Piao J, Torres-Cabala CA, Aung PP, et al. Tumor thickness and mitotic rate robustly predict melanoma-specific survival in patients with primary vulvar melanoma: a retrospective review of 100 cases. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:2093–104.CrossRef Nagarajan P, Curry JL, Ning J, Piao J, Torres-Cabala CA, Aung PP, et al. Tumor thickness and mitotic rate robustly predict melanoma-specific survival in patients with primary vulvar melanoma: a retrospective review of 100 cases. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:2093–104.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lattanzi M, Lee Y, Simpson D, Moran U, Darvishian F, Kim RH, et al. Primary melanoma histologic subtype: impact on survival and response to therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:186–8.CrossRef Lattanzi M, Lee Y, Simpson D, Moran U, Darvishian F, Kim RH, et al. Primary melanoma histologic subtype: impact on survival and response to therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:186–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference de Vries E, Houterman S, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Nijsten T, van de Schans SAM, Eggermont AMM, et al. Up-to-date survival estimates and historical trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the south-east of The Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1110–6.CrossRef de Vries E, Houterman S, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Nijsten T, van de Schans SAM, Eggermont AMM, et al. Up-to-date survival estimates and historical trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the south-east of The Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1110–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Eggermont AMM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob J-J, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, et al. Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1845–55.CrossRef Eggermont AMM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob J-J, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, et al. Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1845–55.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1824–35.CrossRef Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1824–35.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1789–801.CrossRef Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1789–801.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Andtbacka RH, Mozzillo N, Zager JS, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2211–22.CrossRef Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Andtbacka RH, Mozzillo N, Zager JS, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2211–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Malignant Melanoma of the Vulva and Vagina: A US Population-Based Study of 1863 Patients
Authors
Christoph Wohlmuth
Iris Wohlmuth-Wieser
Taymaa May
Danielle Vicus
Lilian T. Gien
Stéphane Laframboise
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keywords
Melanoma
Melanoma
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1175-0561
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1888
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-019-00487-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2/2020 Go to the issue