Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Short Communication

Insurance Coverage of Biologics for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective, Observational 5-Year Chart Review

Authors: Mai Abdelnabi, Aakash Patel, Monica Rengifo-Pardo, Alison Ehrlich

Published in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the variability in health insurance coverage for psoriasis systemic therapies, recent changes in coverage for biologics have yet to be evaluated.

Purpose

To determine changes in insurance coverage of biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis between 2009 and 2014, with a focus on insurance policies as stated in prior authorization (PA) forms, coverage denials, and time course of approval process.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD], Ninth Edition, code ICD 696.1) seen at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014. Exclusion criteria included <9 % body surface area, loss to follow-up, lack of biologic treatment, biologic treatment via a clinical trial, and lack of health insurance. For all other patients, metrics collected included age, sex, body surface area, health insurance plan, prior therapies, prescribed biologic, PA necessity, time in days between PA submission and coverage decision, and denial justifications.

Results

Eight hundred and sixty-four patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis within the time period were identified, 114 of who met the inclusion criteria. PA requirement increased from 16 % of patients prescribed a biologic in 2009 to 75 % of patients prescribed a biologic in 2014. The mean duration in days between PA submission and coverage decision from the insurance company increased from 3.7 days in 2009 to 6.7 days in 2014. PA denial rates increased from 0 % in 2009 to 19 % in 2014. The most common reason for coverage denial was failure to attempt alternative therapies prior to requesting biologics.

Conclusion

Insurance coverage of biologics for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis has become increasingly regulated between 2009 and 2014. Given both the cost burden and potential benefits of these therapies, further examination of healthcare coverage and treatment accessibility is warranted for optimal patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yentzer BA, Yelverton CB, Simpson GL, Simpson JF, Hwang W, Balkrishnan R, et al. Paradoxical effects of cost reduction measures in managed care systems for treatment of severe psoriasis. Dermatol Online J. 2009;15(4):1.PubMed Yentzer BA, Yelverton CB, Simpson GL, Simpson JF, Hwang W, Balkrishnan R, et al. Paradoxical effects of cost reduction measures in managed care systems for treatment of severe psoriasis. Dermatol Online J. 2009;15(4):1.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Robinson JC. Insurer strategies for managing use of and cost of biopharmaceuticals. Health Aff. 2006;25:1205–17.CrossRef Robinson JC. Insurer strategies for managing use of and cost of biopharmaceuticals. Health Aff. 2006;25:1205–17.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mullins CD, Lavallee DC, Pradel FG, DeVries AR, Caputo N. Health plans’ strategies for managing outpatient specialty pharmaceuticals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(5):1332–9.CrossRef Mullins CD, Lavallee DC, Pradel FG, DeVries AR, Caputo N. Health plans’ strategies for managing outpatient specialty pharmaceuticals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(5):1332–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goff CV, Hoffman JC, Vogenberg R. Biologic therapy management: the need for value-based health benefits models. A peer-reviewed white paper by the Biologic Finance and Access Council. Manage Care. 2008;17(3):14–27. Goff CV, Hoffman JC, Vogenberg R. Biologic therapy management: the need for value-based health benefits models. A peer-reviewed white paper by the Biologic Finance and Access Council. Manage Care. 2008;17(3):14–27.
6.
go back to reference Bowman J, Rousseau A, Silk D, Harrison C. Access to cancer drugs in Medicare Part D: formulary placement and beneficiary cost sharing in 2006. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(5):1240–8.CrossRef Bowman J, Rousseau A, Silk D, Harrison C. Access to cancer drugs in Medicare Part D: formulary placement and beneficiary cost sharing in 2006. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(5):1240–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Huskamp HA, Stevenson DG, Donohue JM, Newhouse JP, Keating NL. Coverage and prior authorization of psychotropic drugs under Medicare Part D. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(3):308–10.CrossRefPubMed Huskamp HA, Stevenson DG, Donohue JM, Newhouse JP, Keating NL. Coverage and prior authorization of psychotropic drugs under Medicare Part D. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(3):308–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cheng J, Feldman SR. The cost of biologics for psoriasis is increasing. Drugs Context. 2014;3:212–66.CrossRef Cheng J, Feldman SR. The cost of biologics for psoriasis is increasing. Drugs Context. 2014;3:212–66.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Insurance Coverage of Biologics for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective, Observational 5-Year Chart Review
Authors
Mai Abdelnabi
Aakash Patel
Monica Rengifo-Pardo
Alison Ehrlich
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1175-0561
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1888
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-016-0194-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 4/2016 Go to the issue