Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 5/2021

Open Access 01-10-2021 | Original Article

Intersections of power: videoconferenced debriefing of a rural interprofessional simulation team by an urban interprofessional debriefing team

Authors: Kathleen Dalinghaus, Glenn Regehr, Laura Nimmon

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Simulation as an educational tool is known to have benefits. Moreover, the use of simulation in continuing interprofessional development is vital in rural and remote communities with limited case volumes and resources. This study explored power dynamics between rural simulation participants and urban expert co-debriefers during a simulated operating room crisis and debriefing. The aim is to gain a rich understanding of rural/urban relational dynamics embedded within the constraints and affordances of videoconferencing technology.

Methods

In situ observations of a videoconference-enabled simulation and debriefing were conducted, followed by seven semi-structured interviews, in this qualitative case study. A sociomateriality lens with additional sensitizing concepts of power from critical theory was employed to explore human and nonhuman interactions between rural learners, urban co-debriefers, and videoconferencing technology.

Results

The interviews exposed subtle expressions of power dynamics at play that were curiously not observable in the enactment of the exercise. Rural learners appreciated the objectivity of the urban debriefers as well as the nurse/physician dyad. However, rural participants appeared to quietly dismiss feedback when it was incongruent with their context. Videoconference technology added both benefits and constraints to these relational dynamics.

Discussion

Awareness of power relationships, and insights into affordances and constraints of videoconferencing may enhance operationalization of interprofessional simulation-based education (SBE) in rural and remote contexts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78:783–8.CrossRef Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78:783–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:308–20.CrossRef Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:308–20.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35:e867–98.CrossRef Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35:e867–98.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khanduja PK, Bould MD, Naik VN, Hladkowicz E, Boet S. The role of simulation in continuing medical education for acute care physicians: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:186–93.CrossRef Khanduja PK, Bould MD, Naik VN, Hladkowicz E, Boet S. The role of simulation in continuing medical education for acute care physicians: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:186–93.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:279–85.CrossRef Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:279–85.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fanning RM, Gaba D. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:115–25.CrossRef Fanning RM, Gaba D. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:115–25.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014;48:657–66.CrossRef Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014;48:657–66.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Boet S, Bould MD, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN. Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1377–81.CrossRef Boet S, Bould MD, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN. Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1377–81.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brydges R, Dubrowski A, Regehr G. A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 Suppl):S49–55. Brydges R, Dubrowski A, Regehr G. A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 Suppl):S49–55.
10.
go back to reference Cheng A, Palaganas J, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Robinson T, Grant V. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: a primer for facilitators. Simul Healthc. 2015;10:69–75.CrossRef Cheng A, Palaganas J, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Robinson T, Grant V. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: a primer for facilitators. Simul Healthc. 2015;10:69–75.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference van Schaik SM, O’Sullivan PS, Eva KW, Irby DM, Regehr G. Does source matter? Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions of interprofessional feedback. Med Educ. 2016;50:181–8.CrossRef van Schaik SM, O’Sullivan PS, Eva KW, Irby DM, Regehr G. Does source matter? Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions of interprofessional feedback. Med Educ. 2016;50:181–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ikeyama T, Shimizu N, Ohta K. Low-cost and ready-to-go remote-facilitated simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:35–9.CrossRef Ikeyama T, Shimizu N, Ohta K. Low-cost and ready-to-go remote-facilitated simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:35–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ahmed RA, Atkinson SS, Gable B, Yee J, Gardner AK. Coaching from the sidelines: examining the impact of teledebriefing in simulation-based training. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:334–9.CrossRef Ahmed RA, Atkinson SS, Gable B, Yee J, Gardner AK. Coaching from the sidelines: examining the impact of teledebriefing in simulation-based training. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:334–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, Telesimulation YLM. an innovative tool for health professions education. AEM. Educ Train. 2017;1:132–6.CrossRef McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, Telesimulation YLM. an innovative tool for health professions education. AEM. Educ Train. 2017;1:132–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Renouf T, Alani S, Whalen D, et al. City mouse, country mouse: a mixed-methods evaluation of perceived communication barriers between rural family physicians and urban consultants in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Bmj Open. 2016;6:e10153.CrossRef Renouf T, Alani S, Whalen D, et al. City mouse, country mouse: a mixed-methods evaluation of perceived communication barriers between rural family physicians and urban consultants in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Bmj Open. 2016;6:e10153.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Simpson C, McDonald F. Chapter 2, The deficit perspective. Rethinking rural health ethics. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, Vol. 72. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 31–44. Simpson C, McDonald F. Chapter 2, The deficit perspective. Rethinking rural health ethics. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, Vol. 72. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 31–44.
17.
go back to reference Fenwick T. Re-thinking the ‘thing’: sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. J Workplace Learn. 2010;22:104–16.CrossRef Fenwick T. Re-thinking the ‘thing’: sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. J Workplace Learn. 2010;22:104–16.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Müller M. Assemblages and actor-networks: rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geogr Compass. 2015;9:27–41.CrossRef Müller M. Assemblages and actor-networks: rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geogr Compass. 2015;9:27–41.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Paradis E, Nimmon L, Wondimagegn D, Whitehead C. Critical theory: broadening our thinking to explore the structural factors at play in health professions education. Acad Med. 2020;95:842–5.CrossRef Paradis E, Nimmon L, Wondimagegn D, Whitehead C. Critical theory: broadening our thinking to explore the structural factors at play in health professions education. Acad Med. 2020;95:842–5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13:544–59. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13:544–59.
21.
go back to reference McMurtry A, Rohse S, Kilgour KN. Socio-material perspectives on interprofessional team and collaborative learning. Med Educ. 2016;50:169–80.CrossRef McMurtry A, Rohse S, Kilgour KN. Socio-material perspectives on interprofessional team and collaborative learning. Med Educ. 2016;50:169–80.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fenwick T, Abrandt Dahlgren M. Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory. Med Educ. 2015;49:359–67.CrossRef Fenwick T, Abrandt Dahlgren M. Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory. Med Educ. 2015;49:359–67.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dey I. Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. London: Academic Press; 1999. Dey I. Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. London: Academic Press; 1999.
24.
go back to reference Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qual Inq. 2004;10:261–80.CrossRef Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qual Inq. 2004;10:261–80.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Whitehead C. The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate? Med Educ. 2007;41:1010–6.CrossRef Whitehead C. The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate? Med Educ. 2007;41:1010–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Martimianakis MA, Reeves S. Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2010;25:98–104.CrossRef Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Martimianakis MA, Reeves S. Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2010;25:98–104.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference McGaghie WC. Evaluation apprehension and impression management in clinical medical education. Acad Med. 2018;93:685–6.CrossRef McGaghie WC. Evaluation apprehension and impression management in clinical medical education. Acad Med. 2018;93:685–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 2016;50:933–42.CrossRef Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 2016;50:933–42.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. From ‘problem-describing’ to ‘problem-solving’: challenging the ‘deficit’ view of remote and rural health. Aust J Rural Health. 2010;18:205–9.CrossRef Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. From ‘problem-describing’ to ‘problem-solving’: challenging the ‘deficit’ view of remote and rural health. Aust J Rural Health. 2010;18:205–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O’Brien BC, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51:40–50.CrossRef Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O’Brien BC, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51:40–50.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bleakley A. The proof is in the pudding: putting actor-network-theory to work in medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34:462–7.CrossRef Bleakley A. The proof is in the pudding: putting actor-network-theory to work in medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34:462–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intersections of power: videoconferenced debriefing of a rural interprofessional simulation team by an urban interprofessional debriefing team
Authors
Kathleen Dalinghaus
Glenn Regehr
Laura Nimmon
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00669-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Perspectives on Medical Education 5/2021 Go to the issue