Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 4/2021

Open Access 01-08-2021 | Show and Tell

Teaching next-generation sequencing to medical students with a portable sequencing device

Authors: Jorge Cervantes, Cynthia Perry, Min Chih Wang

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There continues to be a disjoint between the emergence of new diagnostic technologies and venues to train new physicians on how to apply them. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a very important tool for a wide range of clinical applications. Technical complexity and cost have been the major obstacles in incorporating these technologies into the classroom.

Goal for innovation

We opted to use the MinION, which is a new portable DNA sequencer that can produce data in real-time at a relatively low cost, for a NGS hands-on workshop with medical students.

Steps taken

We conducted a pilot NGS hands-on practical module in order to expose an interested group of medical students to this new portable sequencer device. A pre- and post-survey, using a Likert-type scale survey items and open-ended questions, evaluated participant resistance to new diagnostic tools, familiarity with NGS, and likelihood to use a portable sequencer in clinical practice.

Outcomes

Prior to participating in our learning workshop, students did not understand how to incorporate NGS into clinical practice, and expressed that cost and prior training/knowledge were among the limiting factors in their likelihood to use NGS as a diagnostic tool. After participating in the module, students’ responses demonstrated a shift in their understanding of the scientific principles and applications of NGS (pre- and post-survey scores p < 0.05).

Reflection

The hands-on experience not only helped students become closer to and more comfortable with NGS, but also served as a venue to discuss the science and application of this technology in medicine. Such discussion helped to provide participants with current “genetic literacy” that is often incompletely covered in the typical undergraduate medical education curriculum.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saeb ATM. Current Bioinformatics resources in combating infectious diseases. Bioinformation. 2018;14:31–5.CrossRef Saeb ATM. Current Bioinformatics resources in combating infectious diseases. Bioinformation. 2018;14:31–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Singh RR, Luthra R, Routbort M, Patel K, Medeiros L. Implementation of Next Generation Sequencing in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories: advantages, challenges and potential. Exper Rev Prec Med Drug Devel. 2016;11:109–20.CrossRef Singh RR, Luthra R, Routbort M, Patel K, Medeiros L. Implementation of Next Generation Sequencing in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories: advantages, challenges and potential. Exper Rev Prec Med Drug Devel. 2016;11:109–20.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Alekseyev YO, Fazeli R, Yang S, et al. A next-generation sequencing primer-how does it work and what can it do? Acad Pathol. 2018;5:2374289518766521.CrossRef Alekseyev YO, Fazeli R, Yang S, et al. A next-generation sequencing primer-how does it work and what can it do? Acad Pathol. 2018;5:2374289518766521.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Burris HA, Saltz LB, Yu PP. Assessing the value of next-generation sequencing tests in a dynamic environment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:139–46.CrossRef Burris HA, Saltz LB, Yu PP. Assessing the value of next-generation sequencing tests in a dynamic environment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:139–46.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Linderman MD, Bashir A, Diaz GA, et al. Preparing the next generation of genomicists: a laboratory-style course in medical genomics. BMC Med Genomics. 2015;8:47.CrossRef Linderman MD, Bashir A, Diaz GA, et al. Preparing the next generation of genomicists: a laboratory-style course in medical genomics. BMC Med Genomics. 2015;8:47.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bowling B, Zimmer E, Pyatt RE. Bringing next-generation sequencing into the classroom through a comparison of molecular biology techniques. Am Biol Teach. 2014;76:396–401.CrossRef Bowling B, Zimmer E, Pyatt RE. Bringing next-generation sequencing into the classroom through a comparison of molecular biology techniques. Am Biol Teach. 2014;76:396–401.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Labster. Labster virutal lab: next generation simulation. 2019. Labster. Labster virutal lab: next generation simulation. 2019.
10.
go back to reference Laver T, Harrison J, O’Neill PA, et al. Assessing the performance of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2015;3:1–8.CrossRef Laver T, Harrison J, O’Neill PA, et al. Assessing the performance of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2015;3:1–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mikheyev AS, Tin MM. A first look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14:1097–102.CrossRef Mikheyev AS, Tin MM. A first look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14:1097–102.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Krishnakumar R, Sinha A, Bird SW, et al. Systematic and stochastic influences on the performance of the MinION nanopore sequencer across a range of nucleotide bias. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3159.CrossRef Krishnakumar R, Sinha A, Bird SW, et al. Systematic and stochastic influences on the performance of the MinION nanopore sequencer across a range of nucleotide bias. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3159.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tyler AD, Mataseje L, Urfano CJ, et al. Evaluation of oxford Nanopore’s minION sequencing device for microbial whole genome sequencing applications. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10931.CrossRef Tyler AD, Mataseje L, Urfano CJ, et al. Evaluation of oxford Nanopore’s minION sequencing device for microbial whole genome sequencing applications. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10931.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Winand R, Bogaerts B, Hoffman S, et al. Targeting the 16s Rrna gene for bacterial identification in complex mixed samples: comparative evaluation of second (Illumina) and third (oxford nanopore technologies) generation sequencing technologies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;21(1):298.CrossRef Winand R, Bogaerts B, Hoffman S, et al. Targeting the 16s Rrna gene for bacterial identification in complex mixed samples: comparative evaluation of second (Illumina) and third (oxford nanopore technologies) generation sequencing technologies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;21(1):298.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Citizen Sequencers. Taking oxford nanopore’s MinION to the classroom and beyond. BioIT World. 2015. Citizen Sequencers. Taking oxford nanopore’s MinION to the classroom and beyond. BioIT World. 2015.
16.
go back to reference Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:541–2.CrossRef Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:541–2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Teaching next-generation sequencing to medical students with a portable sequencing device
Authors
Jorge Cervantes
Cynthia Perry
Min Chih Wang
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00568-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Perspectives on Medical Education 4/2021 Go to the issue