Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 1/2019

Open Access 01-02-2019 | Show and Tell

Development and validation of a health profession education-focused scholarly mentorship assessment tool

Authors: Christina St-Onge, Meredith Young, Lara Varpio

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Problem

PhD-trained researchers working in health professions education (HPE) regularly engage in one-on-one, or one-on-few, scholarly mentorship activities. While this work is often a formal expectation of these scientists’ roles, rarely is there formal institutional acknowledgement of this mentorship. In fact, there are few official means through which a research scientist can document the frequency or quality of the scholarly mentorship they provide.

Approach

Outcomes

The STHPE assessment tool has appropriate psychometric properties and evidence supporting acceptability. It can be used to document areas of strength and areas for improvement for research scientists engaged in HPE-related scholarly mentorship.

Next steps

At present, the STHPE assessment tool is the only formally developed tool for which there is evidence of validity for use by PhD-trained researchers working in HPE to collect feedback on their scholarly mentorship skills. The STPHE has been used in promotion and tenure packages to document effectiveness and quality of scholarly mentorship.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van der Vleuten CPM. Medical education research: a vibrant community of research and education practice. Med Educ. 2014;48:761–7.CrossRef van der Vleuten CPM. Medical education research: a vibrant community of research and education practice. Med Educ. 2014;48:761–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Varpio L, Gruppen L, Hu W, et al. Working definitions of the roles and an organizational structure in health professions education scholarship: initiating an international conversation. Acad Med. 2017;92:205–8.CrossRef Varpio L, Gruppen L, Hu W, et al. Working definitions of the roles and an organizational structure in health professions education scholarship: initiating an international conversation. Acad Med. 2017;92:205–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, Lovett M, O’Sullivan P. Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Med Educ Online. 2010;15:5063.CrossRef Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, Lovett M, O’Sullivan P. Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Med Educ Online. 2010;15:5063.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lovell B. What do we know about coaching in medical education? A literature review. Med Educ. 2018;52:376–90.CrossRef Lovell B. What do we know about coaching in medical education? A literature review. Med Educ. 2018;52:376–90.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Varpio L, St-Onge C, Young M. Academic promotion packages: crafting connotative frames. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:354–7.CrossRef Varpio L, St-Onge C, Young M. Academic promotion packages: crafting connotative frames. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:354–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2017. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2017.
7.
go back to reference Messick S. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan; 1989. pp. 13–103. Messick S. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan; 1989. pp. 13–103.
8.
go back to reference Messick S. Meaning and values in test validation: the science and ethics of assessment. Educ Res. 1989;18:5–11.CrossRef Messick S. Meaning and values in test validation: the science and ethics of assessment. Educ Res. 1989;18:5–11.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;1:41–67.CrossRef van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;1:41–67.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237–46.CrossRef Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237–46.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216.CrossRef Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning; 2006. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning; 2006.
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of a health profession education-focused scholarly mentorship assessment tool
Authors
Christina St-Onge
Meredith Young
Lara Varpio
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0491-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Perspectives on Medical Education 1/2019 Go to the issue