Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Perspectives on Medical Education
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | A Qualitative Space

Eliciting tacit knowledge: The potential of a reflective approach to video-stimulated interviewing

Authors: Marije van Braak, Esther de Groot, Mario Veen, Lisanne Welink, Esther Giroldi

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

A Qualitative Space highlights research approaches that push readers and scholars deeper into qualitative methods and methodologies. Contributors to A Qualitative Space may: advance new ideas about qualitative methodologies, methods, and/or techniques; debate current and historical trends in qualitative research; craft and share nuanced reflections on how data collection methods should be revised or modified; reflect on the epistemological bases of qualitative research; or argue that some qualitative practices should end. Share your thoughts on Twitter using the hashtag: #aqualspace …
Literature
1.
Kumagai AK. From competencies to human interests: ways of knowing and understanding in medical education. Acad Med. 2014;89:978–83.CrossRef
2.
Sternberg RJ, Wagner RK, Williams WM, Horvath JA. Testing common sense. Am Psychol. 1995;50:912–27.CrossRef
3.
Troff B. Tacit knowledge in teaching: folk pedagogy and teacher education. In: Tacit knowledge in professional practice. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1999. pp. 195–214.
4.
Eraut M. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br J Educ Psychol. 2000;70:113–36.CrossRef
5.
Shulman LS. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev. 1987;57:1–21.CrossRef
6.
Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45:60–8.CrossRef
7.
Barton KC. Elicitation techniques: getting people to talk about ideas they don’t usually talk about. Theory Res Soc Educ. 2015;43:179–205.CrossRef
8.
Eraut M, Alderton J, Cole G, Senker P. Development of knowledge and skills in employment. Research Report No. 5. Brighton: University of Sussex Institute of Education; 1998.
9.
Vesterinen O, Toom A, Patrikainen S. The stimulated recall method and ICTs in research on the reasoning of teachers. Int J Res Method Educ. 2010;33:183–97.CrossRef
10.
Van Tartwijk J, den Brok P, Veldman I, Wubbels T. Teachers’ practical knowledge about classroom management in multicultural classrooms. Teach Teach Educ. 2009;25:453–60.CrossRef
11.
Henry SG, Fetters MD. Video elicitation interviews: a qualitative research method for investigating physician-patient interactions. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10:118–25.CrossRef
12.
13.
Bloom BS. Thought-processes in lectures and discussions. J Gen Educ. 1953;7:160–9.
14.
Kagan N, Krathwohl DR, Miller R. Stimulated recall in therapy using video tape: a case study. J Couns Psychol. 1963;10:237.CrossRef
15.
Yinger RJ. Examining thought in action: a theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching. Teach Teach Educ. 1986;2:263–82.CrossRef
16.
Lyle J. Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. Br Educ Res J. 2003;29:861–78.CrossRef
17.
Paskins Z, McHugh G, Hassell AB. Getting under the skin of the primary care consultation using video stimulated recall: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:101.CrossRef
18.
Keith MJ. Stimulated recall and teachers’ thought processes: a critical review of the methodology and an alternative perspective. Paper presented at: Annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association; 9.–11.Nov; Louisville. 1988.
19.
Calderhead J. Stimulated recall: a method for research on teaching. Br J Educ Psychol. 1981;51:211–7.CrossRef
20.
Paskins Z, Sanders T, Croft PR, Hassell AB. Exploring the added value of video-stimulated recall in researching the primary care doctor-patient consultation: a process evaluation. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–11.CrossRef
21.
Rowe VC. Using video-stimulated recall as a basis for interviews: some experiences from the field. Music Educ Res. 2009;11:425–37.CrossRef
22.
Gass SM, Mackey A. Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000.
23.
Gass SM. Innovations in second language research methods. Annu Rev Appl Linguist. 2001;21:221–32.CrossRef
24.
Pomerantz A. Using participants’ video stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In: Conversation and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 93–113.CrossRef
25.
Sherin MG, Han SY. Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teach Teach Educ. 2004;20:163–83.CrossRef
26.
Liimatainen L, Poskiparta M, Karhila P, Sjögren A. The development of reflective learning in the context of health counselling and health promotion during nurse education. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34:648–58.CrossRef
27.
Hewson MGA. Reflection in clinical teaching: an analysis of reflection-on-action and its implications for staffing residents. Med Teach. 1991;13:227–31.CrossRef
28.
Hazen ACM, de Groot E, de Bont AA, et al. Learning through boundary crossing: professional identity formation of clinical pharmacists transitioning to general practice in the Netherlands. Acad Med. 2018;93:1531–8.CrossRef
29.
Hoffman RR, Lintern G. Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In: Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 203–22.CrossRef
30.
Van Dulmen S, Van Bijnen E. What makes them (not) talk about proper medication use with their patients? An analysis of the determinants of GP communication using reflective practice. Int J Pers Cent Med. 2011;1:27–34.CrossRef
31.
Giroldi E, Veldhuijzen W, Leijten C, et al. ‘No need to worry’: an exploration of general practitioners’ reassuring strategies. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:133.CrossRef
32.
Clarke D. The learner’s perspective study: Exploiting the potential for complementary analyses. Paper presented at: The Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association; 2.–5.April; New Orleans. 2002.
33.
Veldhuijzen W, Mogendorff K, Ram P, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G, van der Vleuten C. How doctors move from generic goals to specific communicative behavior in real practice consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90:170–6.CrossRef
34.
Giroldi E, Veldhuijzen W, Mannaerts A, van der Weijden T, Bareman F, van der Vleuten C. ‘Doctor, please tell me it’s nothing serious’: an exploration of patients’ worrying and reassuring cognitions using stimulated recall interviews. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:73.CrossRef
35.
Crasborn F, Hennissen P, Brouwer N, Korthagen F, Bergen T. Capturing mentor teachers’ reflective moments during mentoring dialogues. Teach Teach. 2010;16:7–29.CrossRef
36.
Ruto-Korir R, Beer L‑D. The potential for using visual elicitation in understanding preschool teachers’ beliefs of appropriate educational practices. S Afr J Educ. 2012;32:393–405.CrossRef
37.
Dempsey NP. Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qual Sociol. 2010;33:349–67.CrossRef
38.
Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. The active interview. In: Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: SAGE; 2004. pp. 140–61.
39.
Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1967.
40.
Coleman T, Murphy E, Cheater F. Factors influencing discussion of smoking between general practitioners and patients who smoke: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:207–10.
41.
O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Charles C, et al. Women’s perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:431–6.CrossRef
42.
Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1986.
Metadata
Title
Eliciting tacit knowledge: The potential of a reflective approach to video-stimulated interviewing
Authors
Marije van Braak
Esther de Groot
Mario Veen
Lisanne Welink
Esther Giroldi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0487-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2018 Go to the issue

Editorial

Advice for authors from the editors of Perspectives on Medical Education

Original Article

Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level

Original Article

Reflecting on what? The difficulty of noticing formative experiences in the moment

Commentary

Aiming for agency and authenticity in assessment

Commentary

Assuring the quality of programmatic assessment: Moving beyond psychometrics

Show and Tell

East meets West: Shadow coaching to support online reflective practice