Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Original Article

Exploring the effects of medical trainee naming: a randomized experiment

Authors: Alexander Chaitoff, Joshua Niforatos, José Vega

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is no rigorous exploration of how the different titles used by medical trainees in medical school affect patients’ perceptions of trainees. This study has two aims: (1) to understand the effects of medical trainee title on subjects’ perceptions, and (2) to understand the effects of informing subjects about the medical education system on comfort with trainees.

Methods

A survey was distributed utilizing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (n = 432). To explore aim 1 and 2, the survey included one randomized experimental treatment asking participants to imagine they were partaking in a hypothetical clinical encounter with a medical trainee using one of three titles. To explore aim 2, the survey instrument included an educational section and assessed changes in subjects’ comfort with trainees.

Results

There was no association between trainee title and subjects’ perceptions of trainee responsibility, education level, or comfort with being examined. However, 41.4 % (n = 179) of subjects were not aware of the medical trainees’ training level, and education resulted in significant increases in comfort with being interviewed and examined by a trainee (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

While trainee naming was not directly associated with subjects’ perceptions, educating patients about the medical education system may increase comfort level when they are with medical trainees.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nathanson L, Backer K, Long L. A first-year medical school pilot program for early clinical exposure. J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 1987;2:107–11.CrossRef Nathanson L, Backer K, Long L. A first-year medical school pilot program for early clinical exposure. J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 1987;2:107–11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cade J. An evaluation of early patient contact for medical students. Med Educ. 1993;27:205–10.CrossRef Cade J. An evaluation of early patient contact for medical students. Med Educ. 1993;27:205–10.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Medical student involvement in patient care. J Clin Ethics. 2001;12:111–5. The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Medical student involvement in patient care. J Clin Ethics. 2001;12:111–5.
4.
go back to reference Hickerton BC, Fitzgerald DJ, Perry E, De Bolla AR. The interpretability of doctor identification badges in UK hospitals: a survey of nurses and patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:543–7.CrossRef Hickerton BC, Fitzgerald DJ, Perry E, De Bolla AR. The interpretability of doctor identification badges in UK hospitals: a survey of nurses and patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:543–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Arora VM, Schaninger C, D’Arcy M, et al. Improving inpatients’ identification of their doctors: use of FACETM cards. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35:613. Arora VM, Schaninger C, D’Arcy M, et al. Improving inpatients’ identification of their doctors: use of FACETM cards. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35:613.
6.
go back to reference Santen SA, Hemphill RR, Prough EE, Perlowski AA. Do patients understand their physician’s level of training? a survey of emergency department patients. Acad Med. 2004;79:139–43.CrossRef Santen SA, Hemphill RR, Prough EE, Perlowski AA. Do patients understand their physician’s level of training? a survey of emergency department patients. Acad Med. 2004;79:139–43.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marracino RK, Orr RD. Entitling the student doctor. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:266–70.CrossRef Marracino RK, Orr RD. Entitling the student doctor. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:266–70.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Silver-Isenstadt A, Ubel PA. Erosion in medical students’ attitudes about telling patients they are students. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:481–7.CrossRef Silver-Isenstadt A, Ubel PA. Erosion in medical students’ attitudes about telling patients they are students. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:481–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Howell JD. Why medical students are ‘Medical Students’. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:718–9.CrossRef Howell JD. Why medical students are ‘Medical Students’. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:718–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Silver-Isenstadt A, Ubel PA. Medical student name tags. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:669–71.CrossRef Silver-Isenstadt A, Ubel PA. Medical student name tags. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:669–71.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference National Association of School Psychologist. Principles for Professional Ethics. 2010. http://www.nasponline.org/standards/2010standards/1_ethical principles.pdf. National Association of School Psychologist. Principles for Professional Ethics. 2010. http://​www.​nasponline.​org/​standards/​2010standards/​1_​ethical principles.pdf.
12.
go back to reference Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s mechanical turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:3–5.CrossRef Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s mechanical turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:3–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk. Polit Anal. 2012;20:351–68.CrossRef Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk. Polit Anal. 2012;20:351–68.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Crump MJC, McDonnell JV, Gureckis TM. Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57410.CrossRef Crump MJC, McDonnell JV, Gureckis TM. Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57410.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Behrend TS, Sharek DJ, Meade AW, Wiebe EN. The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43:800–13.CrossRef Behrend TS, Sharek DJ, Meade AW, Wiebe EN. The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43:800–13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hartz MB, Beal JR. Patients’ attitudes and comfort levels regarding medical studentsʼ involvement in obstetrics—gynecology outpatient clinics. Acad Med. 2000;75:1010–4.CrossRef Hartz MB, Beal JR. Patients’ attitudes and comfort levels regarding medical studentsʼ involvement in obstetrics—gynecology outpatient clinics. Acad Med. 2000;75:1010–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff. 2013;32:276–84.CrossRef Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff. 2013;32:276–84.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Goffman E. The Self as Ritual Object. In: Lemert C, Branaman A, editors. The Goffman Reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 1997. pp. 27–34. Goffman E. The Self as Ritual Object. In: Lemert C, Branaman A, editors. The Goffman Reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 1997. pp. 27–34.
19.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:100–3.CrossRef Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:100–3.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Niforatos J. The decent care movement: subsidiarity, pragmatic solidarity, and cross-cultural resonance. J Relig Health. 2016;55:206–16.CrossRef Niforatos J. The decent care movement: subsidiarity, pragmatic solidarity, and cross-cultural resonance. J Relig Health. 2016;55:206–16.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martinez W. Trust me, I’m a Doctor. Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4). doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.conl1-0504 Martinez W. Trust me, I’m a Doctor. Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4). doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.conl1-0504
22.
go back to reference Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi A. Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Med J. 2014;29:3–7.CrossRef Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi A. Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Med J. 2014;29:3–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Isaacson JH, Neides D, Mayer M, Nottingham K. Patient perceptions of having 1st-and 2nd-year medical students involved in their care. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26:164–7.CrossRef Isaacson JH, Neides D, Mayer M, Nottingham K. Patient perceptions of having 1st-and 2nd-year medical students involved in their care. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26:164–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference O’Hara B, Caswell K. Health status, health insurance, and medical services utilization: 2010. Curr Pop Rep. 2012;2012:70–133. O’Hara B, Caswell K. Health status, health insurance, and medical services utilization: 2010. Curr Pop Rep. 2012;2012:70–133.
25.
go back to reference Alemayehu B, Warner KE. The lifetime distribution of healthcare costs. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:627–42.CrossRef Alemayehu B, Warner KE. The lifetime distribution of healthcare costs. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:627–42.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Laveist TA, Nuru-Jeter A Is doctor-patient race concordance associated with greater satisfaction with care? J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43:296–306.CrossRef Laveist TA, Nuru-Jeter A Is doctor-patient race concordance associated with greater satisfaction with care? J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43:296–306.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Laveist T, Nuru-Jeter A, Jones K. The association of doctor-patient concordance with health services utilization. J Public Health Policy. 2003;24:312–23.CrossRef Laveist T, Nuru-Jeter A, Jones K. The association of doctor-patient concordance with health services utilization. J Public Health Policy. 2003;24:312–23.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gupta N, Carr NT. Understanding the patient-physician interaction: potential for reducing health disparities. J Appl Soc Sci. 2008;2:54–65. Gupta N, Carr NT. Understanding the patient-physician interaction: potential for reducing health disparities. J Appl Soc Sci. 2008;2:54–65.
29.
go back to reference Littlewood S, Ypinazar V, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Dornan T. Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review. BMJ. 2005;331:387–91.CrossRef Littlewood S, Ypinazar V, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Dornan T. Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review. BMJ. 2005;331:387–91.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Godefrooij MB, Diemers AD, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ perceptions about the transition to the clinical phase of a medical curriculum with preclinical patient contacts; a focus group study. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:28.CrossRef Godefrooij MB, Diemers AD, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ perceptions about the transition to the clinical phase of a medical curriculum with preclinical patient contacts; a focus group study. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:28.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Prince KJAH, Boshuizen HPA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Med Educ. 2005;29:704–12.CrossRef Prince KJAH, Boshuizen HPA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Med Educ. 2005;29:704–12.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dornan T, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Ypinazar V. How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2006;28:3–18.CrossRef Dornan T, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Ypinazar V. How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2006;28:3–18.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Diemers AD, Dolmans DHJM, Verwijnen MGM, Heineman E, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ opinions about the effects of preclinical patient contacts on their learning. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2008;13:633–47.CrossRef Diemers AD, Dolmans DHJM, Verwijnen MGM, Heineman E, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ opinions about the effects of preclinical patient contacts on their learning. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2008;13:633–47.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wenrich MD, Jackson MB, Wolfhagen I, Ramsey PG, Scherpbier AJJ. What are the benefits of early patient contact?–a comparison of three preclinical patient contact settings. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:80.CrossRef Wenrich MD, Jackson MB, Wolfhagen I, Ramsey PG, Scherpbier AJJ. What are the benefits of early patient contact?–a comparison of three preclinical patient contact settings. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring the effects of medical trainee naming: a randomized experiment
Authors
Alexander Chaitoff
Joshua Niforatos
José Vega
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0260-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2016 Go to the issue