Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Commentary

Trust your struggle

Author: Pim W. Teunissen

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Transitions in medical education are challenging for students, postgraduate trainees, their preceptors, and everyone else in the workplace [1]. This issue of Perspectives on Medical Education features a paper by Atherley and colleagues that clearly illustrates these challenges for undergraduate medical students [2]. They focused their transition study on the shift of context that students experience within rotation-based clerkships when moving from one rotation to the next. Some interesting findings emerged. For instance, students recognized the need to start a new rotation with a positive attitude and to try and develop a good relationship with staff. Paradoxically, both intentions could require students to ignore reputations of a rotation and its people. If not ignored, anticipation could stand in the way of taking full advantage of the learning opportunities of a rotation [2]. Fortunately, many students reported that the struggle of working through a transition added to their professional identity development and led to increased confidence. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Teunissen PW, Westerman M. Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45:51–9.CrossRef Teunissen PW, Westerman M. Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45:51–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Atherley A, Hambleton I, Unwin N, George C, Lashley P, Taylor C. Exploring the transition of undergraduate medical students into a clinical clerkship using organisational socialisation theory. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0241-5. Atherley A, Hambleton I, Unwin N, George C, Lashley P, Taylor C. Exploring the transition of undergraduate medical students into a clinical clerkship using organisational socialisation theory. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0241-5.
3.
go back to reference Bauer T, Erdogan B. Organizational socialisation: the effective onboarding of new employees. In: Zedeck S, editor. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization: APA handbooks in psychology. 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011. pp. 51–64.CrossRef Bauer T, Erdogan B. Organizational socialisation: the effective onboarding of new employees. In: Zedeck S, editor. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization: APA handbooks in psychology. 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011. pp. 51–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bergman EM, Bruin ABH de, Vorstenbosch MATM, et al. Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:133.CrossRef Bergman EM, Bruin ABH de, Vorstenbosch MATM, et al. Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:133.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Whitehead C, Selleger V, Kreeke J van de, Hodges B. The ‘missing person’ in roles-based competency models: a historical, cross-national, contrastive case study. Med Educ. 2014;48:785–95.CrossRef Whitehead C, Selleger V, Kreeke J van de, Hodges B. The ‘missing person’ in roles-based competency models: a historical, cross-national, contrastive case study. Med Educ. 2014;48:785–95.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43:312–9.CrossRef Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43:312–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Prideaux D, Spencer J. On theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2000;34:888–9.CrossRef Prideaux D, Spencer J. On theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2000;34:888–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41:737–45.CrossRef Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41:737–45.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Theory in medical education research: how do we get there? Med Educ. 2010;44:334–9.CrossRef Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Theory in medical education research: how do we get there? Med Educ. 2010;44:334–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Teunissen PW. On the transfer of theory to the practice of research and education. Med Educ. 2010;44:534–5.CrossRef Teunissen PW. On the transfer of theory to the practice of research and education. Med Educ. 2010;44:534–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Norman G. Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19:1–5.CrossRef Norman G. Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19:1–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trust your struggle
Author
Pim W. Teunissen
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0259-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2016 Go to the issue