Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Dermatology Reports
Published in: Current Dermatology Reports 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Laser Therapy (J Jagdeo, Section Editor)

A Combination Approach with Lasers, Light, and Energy-Based Devices for Ultimate Rejuvenation of the Aging Face

Authors: Kimberly Jerdan, Sabrina Guillen Fabi

Published in: Current Dermatology Reports | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

To optimally rejuvenate the aging face, a combination approach is often required to address the various facets of the dynamic aging process. When combining laser, light and energy-based devices, and injectables, not only is there a possible synergistic effect that can lead to better results but also patients get their desired result more quickly, which can translate into greater patient satisfaction and retention. Since the concerns patients present with are classically a result of a multiple-tissue issue, a single modality can rarely effectively provide patients with the results they desire in a single treatment session. By choosing the appropriate combination of ablative lasers, nonablative lasers, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency, and microfocused ultrasound, physicians can tailor the treatment to satisfy specific patient concerns more effectively and efficiently.
Literature
1.
Thomas JR, Dixon TK, Bhattacharyya TK. Effects of topicals on the aging skin process. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(1):55–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Visscher MO, Pan BS. Update on techniques for the quantitation of facial skin characteristics. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(1):7–19.PubMedCrossRef
3.•
Hart DR et al. Current concepts in the use of PLLA: clinical synergy noted with combined use of microfocused ultrasound and poly-l-lactic acid on the face, neck, and decolletage. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2015;136(5):180S–7. This article proved the efficacy, safety, and synergy of MFUS and PLLA (injectable) same-day treatment on the face.
4.•
Casabona G, Michalany N. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization and fillers for increased neocollagenesis: clinical and histological evaluation. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40 Suppl 12:S194–8. This article showed the possibility of combining MFUS and injectables on a same-day procedure tested on the thigh, with histological evidence for synergy when combined.
5.
Visscher MO, Pan BS, Kitzmiller WJ. Photodamage: treatments and topicals for facial skin. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(1):61–75.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):753–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Buckingham ED. Poly-L-lactic acid facial rejuvenation: an alternative to autologous fat? Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(2):271–84.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Fabi SG, Goldman MP. The safety and efficacy of combining poly-L-lactic acid with intense pulsed light in facial rejuvenation: a retrospective study of 90 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(7 Pt 2):1208–16.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.••
Friedmann DP, Fabi SG, Goldman MP. Combination of intense pulsed light, Sculptra, and Ultherapy for treatment of the aging face. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(2):109–18. This paper demonstrated evidence of safety, efficacy, and synergism of three modalities for same-day treatment of the face.
11.
Chan CS et al. Combined treatment for facial rejuvenation using an optimized pulsed light source followed by a fractional non-ablative laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(7):405–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Ruiz A, Rivero M. Clinical evaluation of intense pulsed light vs. combined treatment of intense pulsed light and NDYAG laser for facial rejuvenation in Latin American women. Pigmentary Disorders. 2014;1(6):142.
13.
Lupton JR, Williams CM, Alster TS. Nonablative laser skin resurfacing using a 1540 nm erbium glass laser: a clinical and histologic analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(9):833–5.PubMed
14.
Wanner M, Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Fractional photothermolysis: treatment of facial and nonfacial cutaneous photodamage with a 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(1):23–8.PubMed
15.
Lapidoth M, Yagima Odo ME, Odo LM. Novel use of erbium:YAG (2,940-nm) laser for fractional ablative photothermolysis in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin: a pilot study. Dermatologic Surgery. 2008;34:1–6.CrossRef
16.
17.
Zaitsev NV, Lebediantsev VV, Shul’ga IA. The gender- and age-specific differences in the structure of the styloid processes of the temporal bone. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2014;5(5):23–5.PubMed
18.
Rehman DE, Qureshi S, Abdul Haq A. Early detection of osteoporosis from incisure depth of human mandible in an orthopantomogram. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(7):766–9.PubMed
19.
Lillie EM et al. Evaluation of skull cortical thickness changes with age and sex from computed tomography scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(2):299–307.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Crockett JC, Rogers M, Coxon FP, Hocking LJ, Helfrich MH. Bone remodelling at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 7):991–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Gallagher JC et al. The effect of age on serum immunoreactive parathyroid hormone in normal and osteoporotic women. J Lab Clin Med. 1980;95(3):373–85.PubMed
22.
Marcus R, Madvig P, Young G. Age-related changes in parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone action in normal humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;58(2):223–30.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling. Emerging insights into the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(5):305–11.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
Mendelson BC et al. Age-related changes of the orbit and midcheek and the implications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(5):419–23.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Chon SH, Pappas A. Differentiation and characterization of human facial subcutaneous adipocytes. Adipocyte. 2015;4(1):13–21.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Gierloff M et al. Aging changes of the midfacial fat compartments: a computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(1):263–73.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Gosain AK et al. A volumetric analysis of soft-tissue changes in the aging midface using high-resolution MRI: implications for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(4):1143–52. discussion 1153-5.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Thomas MK et al. Anatomic and mechanical considerations in restoring volume of the face with use of hyaluronic acid fillers with a novel layered technique. Indian J Plast Surg. 2014;47(1):43–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Palm MD, Woodhall KE, Butterwick KJ, Goldman MP. Cosmetic use of poly-l-lactic acid: a retrospective study of 130 patients. Dermatologic Surgery. 2010;36(2):161–70.PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
35.
Quan T et al. Elevated matrix metalloproteinases and collagen fragmentation in photodamaged human skin: impact of altered extracellular matrix microenvironment on dermal fibroblast function. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(5):1362–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Yaar M, Gilchrest BA. Photoageing: mechanism, prevention and therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(5):874–87.PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
Cao Y et al. Effects of intense pulsed light on the biological properties and ultrastructure of skin dermal fibroblasts: potential roles in photoaging. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29(5):327–32.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Fabi SG, Goldman MP. Hand rejuvenation: a review and our experience. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(7 Pt 2):1112–27.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Goldman MP, Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Intense pulsed light as a nonablative approach to photoaging. Dermatologic Surgery. 2005;31(9 Pt 2):1179–87.PubMed
41.
Peterson JD, Goldman MP. Rejuvenation of the aging chest: a review and our experience. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(5):555–71.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Bitter PH. Noninvasive rejuvenation of photodamaged skin using serial, full-face intense pulsed light treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(9):835–42. discussion 843.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Fink B, Grammer K, Matts P. Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2006;27(6):433–42.CrossRef
44.
Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;25(1):24–30.CrossRef
45.
Sasaki GH et al. Surgical facial rejuvenation in younger patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(2):191–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Wu DC et al. Comparison of intense pulsed light with 1,927-nm fractionated thulium fiber laser for the rejuvenation of the chest. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(2):129–33.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Woodward J, F. S., Alster T, Combining MFU-V and fractionated CO2 for optimal skin tightening and lifting. Dermatologic Surgery, 2014. 40 Suppl:S190-S193.
48.
Woodward JA et al. Safety and efficacy of combining microfocused ultrasound with fractional CO2 laser resurfacing for lifting and tightening the face and neck. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40 Suppl 12:S190–3.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Tao L et al. Intense pulsed light, near infrared pulsed light, and fractional laser combination therapy for skin rejuvenation in Asian subjects: a prospective multi-center study in China. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(7):1977–83.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Kearney C, Brew D. Single-session combination treatment with intense pulsed light and nonablative fractional photothermolysis: a split-face study. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(7 Pt 1):1002–9.PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
53.
Surgery, A.S.f.A.P., Survey data 2008. 2008.
54.
Surgeons, A.S.o.P.: 2009 quick facts cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery trends. 2010.
55.
Mittelman H, Furr M, Lay PC. Combined fractionated CO2 and low-power erbium:YAG laser treatments. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2012;20(2):135–43, v.PubMedCrossRef
56.
57.
Weiss RA et al. Characterization of an optimized light source and comparison to pulsed dye laser for superficial and deep vessel clearance. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43(2):92–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Combination Approach with Lasers, Light, and Energy-Based Devices for Ultimate Rejuvenation of the Aging Face
Authors
Kimberly Jerdan
Sabrina Guillen Fabi
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Dermatology Reports / Issue 3/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2162-4933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-016-0150-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Current Dermatology Reports 3/2016 Go to the issue

Medical Surgery (M Alam, Section Editor)

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Skin Cancer Margins: How it Works

Laser Therapy (J Jagdeo, Section Editor)

An Update on Combination Treatments with Fractional Resurfacing Lasers

Laser Therapy (J Jagdeo, Section Editor)

The Evolution and Current Best Treatments for Traumatic, Surgical, and Burn Scars

Medical Surgery (M Alam, Section Editor)

Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Extramammary Paget’s Disease

Laser Therapy (J Jagdeo, Section Editor)

Accelerating Ablative Fractional Resurfacing Wound Healing Recovery by Photobiomodulation

Medical Surgery (M Alam, Section Editor)

Staged Excision: Tips and Pitfalls