Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Dermatology Reports 4/2014

01-12-2014 | Pediatrics (R Sidbury, Section Editor)

The Third Chair in the Examination Room: Practical Ethics of Decision-Making for the Pediatric Dermatologist

Authors: Annie R. Wang, Lionel Bercovitch

Published in: Current Dermatology Reports | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Decision-making in pediatric dermatology follows a model common to pediatric care. The parent or legal guardian provides informed permission for interventions with the child’s assent, where possible, acting in the best interests of the child. In most cases, this model works smoothly, but if the parent’s wishes and/or parenting style or the physician’s recommendations conflict with the wishes of the child, the minor patient may demand care that conflicts with the better judgment of the physician or parent, or the parent may not always act in what the physician believes to be the child’s best interests. Practical strategies for dealing with the ethical challenges of shared decision-making are presented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. Feb 1995;95(2):314-317. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. Feb 1995;95(2):314-317.
2.
go back to reference De Lourdes LM, Larcher V, Kurz R. Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Pediatrics. Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162(9):629–33.CrossRef De Lourdes LM, Larcher V, Kurz R. Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Pediatrics. Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162(9):629–33.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kopelman LM. The best interests standard for incompetent or incapacitated persons of all ages. J Law Med Ethics. 2007;35(1):187–96.PubMedCrossRef Kopelman LM. The best interests standard for incompetent or incapacitated persons of all ages. J Law Med Ethics. 2007;35(1):187–96.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference English A. State minor consent laws: a summary. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Adolescent Health and the Law; 2010. English A. State minor consent laws: a summary. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Adolescent Health and the Law; 2010.
5.•
go back to reference Bloom K, Bercovitch L. Who speaks for the child? Consent, assent and confidentiality in pediatric dermatology. In: Bercovitch L, Perlis C, editors. Dermatoethics. London: Springer; 2012. Discussion of ethical and legal principles of parent-child-physician triad. Bloom K, Bercovitch L. Who speaks for the child? Consent, assent and confidentiality in pediatric dermatology. In: Bercovitch L, Perlis C, editors. Dermatoethics. London: Springer; 2012. Discussion of ethical and legal principles of parent-child-physician triad.
6.
go back to reference Alderson P. Competent children? Minors' consent to health care treatment and research. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(11):2272–83.PubMedCrossRef Alderson P. Competent children? Minors' consent to health care treatment and research. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(11):2272–83.PubMedCrossRef
7.••
go back to reference Coleman DL, Rosoff PM. The legal authority of mature minors to consent to general medical treatment. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):786–93. Discussion and table of state-specific exemptions to minors making medical decisions.PubMedCrossRef Coleman DL, Rosoff PM. The legal authority of mature minors to consent to general medical treatment. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):786–93. Discussion and table of state-specific exemptions to minors making medical decisions.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beauchamp T, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, vol. 99. New York: Oxford University; 2009. Beauchamp T, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, vol. 99. New York: Oxford University; 2009.
9.
go back to reference Cummings C, Mercurio MR. Ethics for the pediatrician: autonomy, beneficence and rights. Pediatr Rev. 2010;31(6):252–5.PubMedCrossRef Cummings C, Mercurio MR. Ethics for the pediatrician: autonomy, beneficence and rights. Pediatr Rev. 2010;31(6):252–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jeffery K. Supportive holding or restraint: terminology and practice. Paediatr Nurs. 2010;22(6):24–8.PubMedCrossRef Jeffery K. Supportive holding or restraint: terminology and practice. Paediatr Nurs. 2010;22(6):24–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Grodin M, Alpert KK. Informed consent and pediatric care. New York: Plenum; 1983. Grodin M, Alpert KK. Informed consent and pediatric care. New York: Plenum; 1983.
12.
go back to reference Weithorn LA, Schere DG. Children's involvement in research participation decisions: psychological consideration. In: Grodin MG, Glantz LH, editors. Children as research subjects: science, ethics and law. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. Weithorn LA, Schere DG. Children's involvement in research participation decisions: psychological consideration. In: Grodin MG, Glantz LH, editors. Children as research subjects: science, ethics and law. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
13.
go back to reference La Greca A, Prinstein MJ. Peer group. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 1999. La Greca A, Prinstein MJ. Peer group. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 1999.
14.•
go back to reference Lipstein EA, Brinkman WB, Britto MT. What is known about parents' treatment decisions? A narrative review of pediatric decision making. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(2):246–58. Summary of several prior studies on factors influencing parental decision making.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lipstein EA, Brinkman WB, Britto MT. What is known about parents' treatment decisions? A narrative review of pediatric decision making. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(2):246–58. Summary of several prior studies on factors influencing parental decision making.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chan R, Shum D, Toulopoulou T, Chen EYH. Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23:201–16.PubMedCrossRef Chan R, Shum D, Toulopoulou T, Chen EYH. Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23:201–16.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cherry M. Parental authority and pediatric bioethical decision making. J Med Philos. 2010;35:553–72. Adolescents may be able to perceive and assess risk but may be more apt to make a risky decision due to poor judgement of how risks apply to oneself.PubMedCrossRef Cherry M. Parental authority and pediatric bioethical decision making. J Med Philos. 2010;35:553–72. Adolescents may be able to perceive and assess risk but may be more apt to make a risky decision due to poor judgement of how risks apply to oneself.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baumrind D. Rearing competent children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1989. Baumrind D. Rearing competent children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1989.
19.
go back to reference Steinberg L, Elmen DJ, Mounts NS. Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity and academic success among adolescents. Child Dev. 1989;60:1424–36.PubMedCrossRef Steinberg L, Elmen DJ, Mounts NS. Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity and academic success among adolescents. Child Dev. 1989;60:1424–36.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Steinberg L, Mounts NS, Lamborn SD, Dornbusch SM. Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across varied ecological niches. J Adolesc Res. 1991;1:19–36. Steinberg L, Mounts NS, Lamborn SD, Dornbusch SM. Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across varied ecological niches. J Adolesc Res. 1991;1:19–36.
21.
go back to reference Dornbusch S, Ritter P, Liederman P, Roberts D, Fraleigh M. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Dev. 1987;58:1244–57.PubMedCrossRef Dornbusch S, Ritter P, Liederman P, Roberts D, Fraleigh M. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Dev. 1987;58:1244–57.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Steinberg L, Lamborn SD, Dornbusch SM. Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Dev. 1992;63:1266–81.PubMedCrossRef Steinberg L, Lamborn SD, Dornbusch SM. Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Dev. 1992;63:1266–81.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Partridge B. Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles, and pediatric decision making. J Med Philos. 2010;35:518–25.PubMedCrossRef Partridge B. Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles, and pediatric decision making. J Med Philos. 2010;35:518–25.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Third Chair in the Examination Room: Practical Ethics of Decision-Making for the Pediatric Dermatologist
Authors
Annie R. Wang
Lionel Bercovitch
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Dermatology Reports / Issue 4/2014
Electronic ISSN: 2162-4933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-014-0090-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Current Dermatology Reports 4/2014 Go to the issue

Pediatrics (R Sidbury, Section Editor)

What’s New in Pediatric Dermatology