Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2/2016

01-06-2016 | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (M Weinstein, Section Editor)

Current Trends in Management of Defecatory Dysfunction, Posterior Compartment Prolapse, and Fecal Incontinence

Authors: Heidi Brown, Cara Grimes

Published in: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

While it would be our hope to report that there have been significant gains in the understanding of the correlation between the posterior vaginal compartment and defecatory dysfunction in the last year, this is not the case. Instead, we review the highlights of management of posterior vaginal compartment and defecatory dysfunction including (1) defining and understanding the patient’s symptoms; (2) considering systemic disorders, motility dysfunction, and mechanical causes that may be contributing; (3) encouraging conservative management as first-line therapy; and (4) recognizing which surgical options are likely to improve specific symptoms. This review is then followed by an update on treatment options for fecal incontinence, which we now prefer to refer to as accidental bowel leakage. We are able to report on five exciting and innovative treatment approaches for accidental bowel leakage. As the scientific community increases focus on patient-centered outcomes, we are likely on the verge of a greater understanding of how treatment options for posterior compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction can improve patient symptoms. This year, we can report that strong evidence-based recommendations simply do not exist, and this area is ripe for future investigation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grimes CL, Lukacz ES. Posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction: are they related? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):537–51.CrossRefPubMed Grimes CL, Lukacz ES. Posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction: are they related? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):537–51.CrossRefPubMed
2.•
go back to reference Hale DS, Fenner D. Consistently inconsistent, the posterior vaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):314–20. This review article highlights the lack of a consistent correlation between anatomy and function in the posterior vaginal compartment. Using a case as an example, the authors explore symptom presentation, evaluation, imaging, and surgical approach, despite the lack of evidence-based guidelines. Hale DS, Fenner D. Consistently inconsistent, the posterior vaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):314–20. This review article highlights the lack of a consistent correlation between anatomy and function in the posterior vaginal compartment. Using a case as an example, the authors explore symptom presentation, evaluation, imaging, and surgical approach, despite the lack of evidence-based guidelines.
3.
go back to reference Drossman DA et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(9):1569–80.CrossRefPubMed Drossman DA et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(9):1569–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mellgren A. Diagnosis and treatment of constipation. Eur J Surg. 1995;161(9):623–34.PubMed Mellgren A. Diagnosis and treatment of constipation. Eur J Surg. 1995;161(9):623–34.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Brandt LJ et al. Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100 Suppl 1:S5–21.CrossRefPubMed Brandt LJ et al. Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100 Suppl 1:S5–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ternent CA et al. Practice parameters for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2013–22.CrossRefPubMed Ternent CA et al. Practice parameters for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2013–22.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Haylen BT et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.PubMed Haylen BT et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Simon MA, Bueno AM. Behavioural treatment of the dyssynergic defecation in chronically constipated elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009;34(4):273–7.CrossRefPubMed Simon MA, Bueno AM. Behavioural treatment of the dyssynergic defecation in chronically constipated elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009;34(4):273–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rao SS et al. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):890–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rao SS et al. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):890–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Chiarioni G et al. Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(3):657–64.CrossRefPubMed Chiarioni G et al. Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(3):657–64.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Heymen S et al. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(4):428–41.CrossRefPubMed Heymen S et al. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(4):428–41.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rao SS et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(3):331–8.CrossRefPubMed Rao SS et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(3):331–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Johansson C et al. Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(5):503–9.CrossRefPubMed Johansson C et al. Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(5):503–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cundiff GW et al. An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 Pt 1):1451–6. discussion 1456–7.CrossRefPubMed Cundiff GW et al. An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 Pt 1):1451–6. discussion 1456–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Glavind K, Madsen H. A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(2):145–7.CrossRefPubMed Glavind K, Madsen H. A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(2):145–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1360–3. discussion 1363–4.CrossRefPubMed Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1360–3. discussion 1363–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maher CF et al. Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):685–9.CrossRefPubMed Maher CF et al. Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):685–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Porter WE et al. The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1353–8. discussion 1358–9.CrossRefPubMed Porter WE et al. The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1353–8. discussion 1358–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Abramov Y et al. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):314–8.CrossRefPubMed Abramov Y et al. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):314–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Paraiso MF et al. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1762–71.CrossRefPubMed Paraiso MF et al. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1762–71.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Erekson EA et al. The association between stage II or greater posterior prolapse and bothersome obstructive bowel symptoms. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):59–64.CrossRefPubMed Erekson EA et al. The association between stage II or greater posterior prolapse and bothersome obstructive bowel symptoms. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):59–64.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Saks EK et al. Clinical significance of obstructive defecatory symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(3):237–40.CrossRefPubMed Saks EK et al. Clinical significance of obstructive defecatory symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(3):237–40.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tan JS et al. Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(3):203–9. discussion 209.CrossRefPubMed Tan JS et al. Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(3):203–9. discussion 209.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fialkow MF et al. Posterior vaginal wall defects and their relation to measures of pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1443–8. discussion 1448–9.CrossRefPubMed Fialkow MF et al. Posterior vaginal wall defects and their relation to measures of pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1443–8. discussion 1448–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ellerkmann RM et al. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1332–7. discussion 1337–8.CrossRefPubMed Ellerkmann RM et al. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1332–7. discussion 1337–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Korda A. Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45(6):505–8.CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Korda A. Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45(6):505–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Burrows LJ et al. Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5 Pt 1):982–8.CrossRefPubMed Burrows LJ et al. Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5 Pt 1):982–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kahn MA et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST) and bowel symptoms: straining at stool is associated with perineal and anterior vaginal descent in a general gynecologic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1516–22.CrossRefPubMed Kahn MA et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST) and bowel symptoms: straining at stool is associated with perineal and anterior vaginal descent in a general gynecologic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1516–22.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Slieker-ten Hove MC et al. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Slieker-ten Hove MC et al. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Hai-Ying C et al. Digitation associated with defecation: what does it mean in urogynaecological patients? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):229–32.CrossRefPubMed Hai-Ying C et al. Digitation associated with defecation: what does it mean in urogynaecological patients? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):229–32.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Morgan DM et al. Symptoms of anal incontinence and difficult defecation among women with prolapse and a matched control cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(5):509. e1-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morgan DM et al. Symptoms of anal incontinence and difficult defecation among women with prolapse and a matched control cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(5):509. e1-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Nieminen K et al. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1636–42.CrossRefPubMed Nieminen K et al. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1636–42.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Farid M et al. Randomized controlled trial between perineal and anal repairs of rectocele in obstructed defecation. World J Surg. 2010;34(4):822–9.CrossRefPubMed Farid M et al. Randomized controlled trial between perineal and anal repairs of rectocele in obstructed defecation. World J Surg. 2010;34(4):822–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Van Geluwe B et al. Relief of obstructed defecation syndrome after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2014;114(3):189–97.PubMed Van Geluwe B et al. Relief of obstructed defecation syndrome after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2014;114(3):189–97.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12(1):7–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12(1):7–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Grimes CL et al. What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? Evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(5):261–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grimes CL et al. What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? Evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(5):261–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
40.
go back to reference Gustilo-Ashby AM et al. Bowel symptoms 1 year after surgery for prolapse: further analysis of a randomized trial of rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):76. e1-5.CrossRefPubMed Gustilo-Ashby AM et al. Bowel symptoms 1 year after surgery for prolapse: further analysis of a randomized trial of rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):76. e1-5.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Brown HW et al. Accidental bowel leakage in the mature women’s health study: prevalence and predictors. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(11):1101–8.CrossRefPubMed Brown HW et al. Accidental bowel leakage in the mature women’s health study: prevalence and predictors. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(11):1101–8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES. Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):66–71.CrossRefPubMed Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES. Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):66–71.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Lukacz ES, Segall MM, Wexner SD. Evaluation of an anal insert device for the conservative management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(9):892–8.CrossRefPubMed Lukacz ES, Segall MM, Wexner SD. Evaluation of an anal insert device for the conservative management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(9):892–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.•
go back to reference Richter HE et al. A vaginal bowel-control system for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):540–7. This prospective multicenter study provides the first effectiveness and safety data for a vaginal bowel-control device and pump system for the treatment of fecal incontinence. The article contains helpful illustrations to demonstrate where the device sits and how it works, and provides information not just on treatment outcomes but also on fitting success and quality of life impact at one and three months of use. Richter HE et al. A vaginal bowel-control system for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):540–7. This prospective multicenter study provides the first effectiveness and safety data for a vaginal bowel-control device and pump system for the treatment of fecal incontinence. The article contains helpful illustrations to demonstrate where the device sits and how it works, and provides information not just on treatment outcomes but also on fitting success and quality of life impact at one and three months of use.
45.
go back to reference Varma MG et al. Impact of a novel vaginal bowel control system on bowel function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(2):127–31.CrossRefPubMed Varma MG et al. Impact of a novel vaginal bowel control system on bowel function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(2):127–31.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ et al. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(5):494–502.CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ et al. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(5):494–502.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Brouwer R, Duthie G. Sacral nerve neuromodulation is effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the presence of a sphincter defect, pudendal neuropathy, or previous sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(3):273–8.CrossRefPubMed Brouwer R, Duthie G. Sacral nerve neuromodulation is effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the presence of a sphincter defect, pudendal neuropathy, or previous sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(3):273–8.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Graf W et al. Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):997–1003.CrossRefPubMed Graf W et al. Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):997–1003.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Mellgren A et al. Long-term efficacy of NASHA Dx injection therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(8):1087–94. Mellgren A et al. Long-term efficacy of NASHA Dx injection therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(8):1087–94.
50.•
go back to reference Mellgren A et al. A posterior anal sling for fecal incontinence: results of a 152-patient prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):349.e1–8. This prospective multicenter study provides effectiveness and safety data for the TOPAS system, a minimally invasive, self-fixating, polypropylene mesh anal sling to treat fecal incontinence. In addition to examining impact on symptoms and quality of life one year after implantation, the article also describes procedure time, estimated blood loss, and device-related adverse events. Mellgren A et al. A posterior anal sling for fecal incontinence: results of a 152-patient prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):349.e1–8. This prospective multicenter study provides effectiveness and safety data for the TOPAS system, a minimally invasive, self-fixating, polypropylene mesh anal sling to treat fecal incontinence. In addition to examining impact on symptoms and quality of life one year after implantation, the article also describes procedure time, estimated blood loss, and device-related adverse events.
Metadata
Title
Current Trends in Management of Defecatory Dysfunction, Posterior Compartment Prolapse, and Fecal Incontinence
Authors
Heidi Brown
Cara Grimes
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports / Issue 2/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2161-3303
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-016-0148-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2/2016 Go to the issue

Uterine Fibroids (N Narvekar, Section Editor)

Management of Urinary Symptoms Associated with Fibroids

Uterine Fibroids (N Narvekar, Section Editor)

Office Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (M Weinstein, Section Editor)

Quality Measures for Prolapse Management

Uterine Fibroids (N Narvekar, Section Editor)

Fibroids and Infertility