Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Radiation Oncology 2/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Research

Timely delivery of primary chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: are we meeting this quality measure?

Authors: Kristin Bixel, Leah Marsh, Nathan Denlinger, John L Hays, Allison Quick, Ritu Salani

Published in: Journal of Radiation Oncology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Treatment time has been used as a benchmark of quality care for women receiving primary concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. We assessed adherence to this quality measure and the impact of delays in therapy on clinical outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective review included patients treated with CCRT for cervical cancer between January 2000 and June 2014. Primary outcome was adherence to the quality measure of completion of therapy ≤56 days. Secondary outcomes include treatment times, response, recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of the 201 patients included, 90 (44.8%) completed therapy ≤56 days. There were no differences in baseline characteristics for patients completing therapy in ≤56 days versus >56 days. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at a local/non-academic facility, prolonged time to complete EBRT, and longer time to initiation of brachytherapy (BT) were associated with total treatment time prolongation. No significant differences in response, recurrence, PFS, DSS, or OS were observed with respect to total treatment time; however, protracted time to complete EBRT was associated with decreased PFS and DSS.

Conclusions

More than 50% of patients treated with primary CCRT for locally advanced cervical cancer fail to meet the quality benchmark for timely completion of therapy. Location of treatment, time to completion of EBRT, and delay in initiation of BT was associated with treatment prolongation. Though total treatment time failed to correlate with disease-specific outcomes, treatment delays during EBRT were detrimental to PFS and DSS.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Corn BW et al (1994) Technically accurate intracavitary insertions improve pelvic control and survival among patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 53(3):294–300CrossRefPubMed Corn BW et al (1994) Technically accurate intracavitary insertions improve pelvic control and survival among patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 53(3):294–300CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hanks GE, Herring DF, Kramer S (1983) Patterns of care outcome studies. Results of the national practice in cancer of the cervix. Cancer 51(5):959–967CrossRefPubMed Hanks GE, Herring DF, Kramer S (1983) Patterns of care outcome studies. Results of the national practice in cancer of the cervix. Cancer 51(5):959–967CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lanciano RM et al (1991) Tumor and treatment factors improving outcome in stage III-B cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20(1):95–100CrossRefPubMed Lanciano RM et al (1991) Tumor and treatment factors improving outcome in stage III-B cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20(1):95–100CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Keys HM et al (1999) Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 340(15):1154–1161CrossRefPubMed Keys HM et al (1999) Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 340(15):1154–1161CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Morris M et al (1999) Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1137–1143CrossRefPubMed Morris M et al (1999) Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1137–1143CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rose PG et al (1999) Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1144–1153CrossRefPubMed Rose PG et al (1999) Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1144–1153CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Smith GL et al (2015) Trends in the quality of treatment for patients with intact cervical cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92(2):260–267CrossRefPubMed Smith GL et al (2015) Trends in the quality of treatment for patients with intact cervical cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92(2):260–267CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Viswanathan AN et al (2012) American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 11(1):47–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Viswanathan AN et al (2012) American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 11(1):47–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Viswanathan AN et al (2012) American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles. Brachytherapy 11(1):33–46CrossRefPubMed Viswanathan AN et al (2012) American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles. Brachytherapy 11(1):33–46CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chen SW et al (2003) The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical cancer by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 67(1):69–76CrossRefPubMed Chen SW et al (2003) The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical cancer by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 67(1):69–76CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fyles A et al (1992) The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 25(4):273–279CrossRefPubMed Fyles A et al (1992) The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 25(4):273–279CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Girinsky T et al (1993) Overall treatment time in advanced cervical carcinomas: a critical parameter in treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27(5):1051–1056CrossRefPubMed Girinsky T et al (1993) Overall treatment time in advanced cervical carcinomas: a critical parameter in treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27(5):1051–1056CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Perez CA et al (1995) Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(5):1275–1288CrossRefPubMed Perez CA et al (1995) Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(5):1275–1288CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Petereit DG et al (1995) The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(5):1301–1307CrossRefPubMed Petereit DG et al (1995) The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(5):1301–1307CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Withers HR, Taylor JM, Maciejewski B (1988) The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 27(2):131–146CrossRefPubMed Withers HR, Taylor JM, Maciejewski B (1988) The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 27(2):131–146CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Song S et al (2013) The effect of treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Cancer 119(2):325–331CrossRefPubMed Song S et al (2013) The effect of treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Cancer 119(2):325–331CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shaverdian N et al (2013) Effects of treatment duration during concomitant chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86(3):562–568CrossRefPubMed Shaverdian N et al (2013) Effects of treatment duration during concomitant chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86(3):562–568CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tergas AI et al (2016) Radiation duration in women with cervical cancer treated with primary chemoradiation: a population-based analysis. Cancer Investig 34(3):137–147CrossRef Tergas AI et al (2016) Radiation duration in women with cervical cancer treated with primary chemoradiation: a population-based analysis. Cancer Investig 34(3):137–147CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eifel PJ, Thames HD (1995) Has the influence of treatment duration on local control of carcinoma of the cervix been defined? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(5):1527–1529CrossRefPubMed Eifel PJ, Thames HD (1995) Has the influence of treatment duration on local control of carcinoma of the cervix been defined? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(5):1527–1529CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lin JF et al (2014) Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 132(2):416–422CrossRefPubMed Lin JF et al (2014) Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 132(2):416–422CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Robin, T.P., et al., Disparities in standard of care treatment and associated survival decrement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2016. Robin, T.P., et al., Disparities in standard of care treatment and associated survival decrement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2016.
25.
go back to reference Wright JD et al (2015) Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 139(3):506–512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright JD et al (2015) Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 139(3):506–512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Timely delivery of primary chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: are we meeting this quality measure?
Authors
Kristin Bixel
Leah Marsh
Nathan Denlinger
John L Hays
Allison Quick
Ritu Salani
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Radiation Oncology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1948-7894
Electronic ISSN: 1948-7908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-017-0311-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of Radiation Oncology 2/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine